@article{Hassler2021,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Adverbal expression of aspectuality and interaction with perfective and imperfective verbs},
  series = {Russian Grammar: System - Usus - Variation/Русская грамматика: Cистема - узус - варьирование},
  journal   = {Russian Grammar: System - Usus - Variation/Русская грамматика: Cистема - узус - варьирование},
  publisher = {Lang},
  address   = {Berlin},
  isbn      = {978-3-631-87748-7},
  pages     = {219 -- 234},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {This paper intends to explore the interaction between aspect and lexical means, in this case temporal adverbials, in the bounding of representations of situations. First, the theoretical basis is outlined, followed by the results of a corpus analysis of coccurrences with adverbs that limit situations. The term situation encompasses all representable processes, states, events, or actions. Finally, some theoretical conclusions are drawn concerning the cognitive category of bounding, using the example of aspectuality. The imperfective verb forms maintain their aspectuality in delimiting connections with adverbs, resulting in a complex, multi-dimensional aspectuality. In nongrammaticalized forms, such as lexical markers, the speaker is free to make a temporal localization or an aspectual perspective. Lexical expressions can make temporal and aspect markings even more precisely and clearly than tenses. They can also limit or extend situations and thus express aspect. Aspectuality thus presents itself as a compositional category, in which external bounding and the internal representation of a course of action or development can interact.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Hassler2022,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Meaning and Function},
  series = {Concordia discors vs. discordia concors : researches into comparative literature, contrastive linguistics, translation and cross-cultural strategies},
  volume    = {16},
  journal   = {Concordia discors vs. discordia concors : researches into comparative literature, contrastive linguistics, translation and cross-cultural strategies},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Ştefan cel Mare University Press},
  address   = {Suceava},
  issn      = {2065-4057},
  pages     = {17 -- 50},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {The use of the word functional in the most diverse theories and approaches has contributed in no small measure to the confusion in linguistics today. This article does not claim to give an overview of the different directions of functionalism in linguistics. Rather, the aim is to present what Coseriu's view characterised as functional in his time and to what extent his theory outlined a path that still makes sense in functional-cognitive linguistics today. This will involve an examination of Coseriu's difficult-to-identify concept of function. Furthermore, the article will also show that functional thinking is relevant for current grammatography.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Hassler2019,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Le tournant s{\´e}miotique du d{\´e}but du XX{\`e}me si{\`e}cle},
  series = {Historiographia Linguistica},
  volume    = {46},
  journal   = {Historiographia Linguistica},
  number    = {1-2},
  publisher = {John Benjamins Publishing Co.},
  address   = {Amsterdam},
  issn      = {0302-5160},
  doi       = {10.1075/hl.00039.has},
  pages     = {85 -- 100},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Le centenaire de la publication du Cours de linguistique g{\´e}n{\´e}rale (1916) de Ferdinand de Saussure nous a invit{\´e} {\`a} reconsid{\´e}rer l'importance de cet ouvrage et le r{\^o}le de son auteur pour la fondation d'une linguistique int{\´e}gr{\´e}e dans une s{\´e}miologie. Il n'y a aucun doute que cet auteur fut extr{\^e}mement important pour le d{\´e}veloppement de la linguistique structurale en Europe et qu'avec son concept du signe linguistique il a fait œuvre de pionnier pour le tournant s{\´e}miologique. Mais l'accueil favorable d'une th{\´e}orie dans le milieu scientifique ne s'explique pas seulement par sa qualit{\´e} int{\´e}rieure, mais par plusieurs conditions ext{\´e}rieures. Ces conditions seront analys{\´e}es sur trois plans: (1) l'arriv{\´e}e de la m{\´e}thode des n{\´e}ogrammairiens {\`a} ses limites qui incitait alors {\`a} l'{\´e}tude de l'unit{\´e} du signifiant et du signifi{\´e}; (2) la simplification et l'outrance de la pens{\´e}e structurale dans le Cours, publi{\´e} en 1916 par Charles Bally et Albert Sechehaye et (3) la pr{\´e}paration de la r{\´e}ception de la pens{\´e}e s{\´e}miologique par plusieurs travaux parall{\`e}les.},
  language  = {fr}
}
@article{Hassler2019,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Theory of signs and ideas on the relation between language and thought at the border between the 18th and 19th centuries},
  series = {Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta. Jazyk i literatura},
  volume    = {16},
  journal   = {Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta. Jazyk i literatura},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {St. Petersburg University Press},
  address   = {Sankt-Peterburg},
  issn      = {2541-9358},
  doi       = {10.21638/spbu09.2019.308},
  pages     = {463 -- 479},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {The name Ideologues refers to a group of philosophers, psychologists, grammarians, educational theorists and medical specialists who for a short period from 1795 to 1805 determined the intellectual climate in France and sought to develop a science of ideas (id{\´e}ologie). The Ideologues had a rather reserved attitude to Condillac's (1714-1780) ideas and his sensualist sign theory. They strove for the perfection of language for the needs of thought and of scientific knowledge. The connections with the Ideologues can also be discerned in Russia. In the educational theory, Jean-Baptiste Maudru (1740-1808) was close to the Ideologues and, despite his insufficient knowledge of the Russian language, made some interesting remarks on the connection between the language and the national character. According to Maudru and in agreement with the Ideologues, different typologies of word order are not just an indication of greater or lesser closeness to the natural order. Rather, they indicate differences in national character, which manifest themselves in the specific character of individual languages. Maudru taught at the military academy in Saint Petersburg and published the first Russian grammar in France (Maudru 1802). In his grammar, he sought to link mechanically the specific features of languages and of national characters with the climatic influences. His attempt to revive the theory of climatic influences was criticized by Karamzin. Karamzin also treated the discussion of the metaphoric extension of word meanings as an absurd undertaking, which had no place in grammar.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Hassler2020,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Humboldts Konzept einer sprachlichen Weltansicht und seine Stellung in der Geschichte des sprachlichen Relativismus},
  series = {Aesthetics and Politics in Wilhelm von Humboldt},
  volume    = {6},
  journal   = {Aesthetics and Politics in Wilhelm von Humboldt},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Universit{\`a} di Pisa},
  address   = {Pisa},
  issn      = {2465-1060},
  pages     = {21 -- 63},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {The idea of a linguistic worldview was clearly expressed in German national romantic thought of the early 19th century, where language was seen as the expression of the spirit of a nation. Wilhelm von Humboldt argued that every language shaped the world-view of its speakers, but he also saw a possibility to improve human knowledge in the co-action of languages. The idea of linguistic relativity can be found in John Locke's statement that words interpose themselves between our understandings and the truth which it would contemplate and apprehend. In the 18th century, we can find formulations that our language accustoms us to arrange our ideas in a specific way, that some languages are more suitable for certain kinds of thought, or that metaphors have significant influence on peoples' thought. In the 20thcentury the Neo-Humboldtian school revitalised the idea of an influence of language on thought in a reductionist way. At the end of the 20th century, some authors, for example John J. Gumperz and Stephen C. Levinson, tried to rethink linguistic relativity and to prove it by empirical results.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Hassler2020,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Le tournant dans l'enseignement des langues {\´e}trang{\`e}res chez Wilhelm Vi{\"e}tor dans le contexte linguistique de l'{\´e}poque},
  series = {Documents pour l'histoire du fran{\c{c}}ais langue {\´e}trang{\`e}re ou seconde : revue semestrielle},
  journal   = {Documents pour l'histoire du fran{\c{c}}ais langue {\´e}trang{\`e}re ou seconde : revue semestrielle},
  number    = {64-65},
  publisher = {SIHFLES},
  address   = {Paris},
  issn      = {0992-7654},
  pages     = {75 -- 94},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {fr}
}
@article{Hassler2020,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {The Functional-Communicative Approach to Language of the Potsdam School in the German Democratic Republic},
  series = {History of Humanities},
  volume    = {5},
  journal   = {History of Humanities},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {The University of Chicago Press Journals},
  address   = {Chicago},
  issn      = {2379-3163},
  pages     = {31 -- 49},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Hassler2020,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Pasigraf{\´i}a y antipasigraf{\´i}a a finales del siglo XVIII y a principios del siglo XIX},
  volume    = {41},
  editor    = {Calero Vaquerao, Mar{\´i}a Luisa},
  publisher = {Infoling},
  address   = {Barcelona},
  issn      = {1139-8736},
  pages     = {169 -- 192},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {In 1797 a rather short work appeared in Paris in two volumes, under the title Pasigraphie in both its French and German versions. The author, Joseph de Maimieux (1753-1820), is said to have coined the term pasigraphie. With the invention of pasigraphy, Maimieux pursued the goal of creating a conceptually based writing system that could be applied to all languages. In this way, a text written in this script could be read in all languages. The pasigraphic system is based on an a priori system of conceptual classification to which written characters are assigned. It is therefore initially an exclusively written language, on which Maimieux two years later also built a spoken language with the Pasilalie. The first arguments against the endeavour represented by the Pasigraphie were brought forward by Maimieux' immediate contemporaries, the ideologues. These objections were re-affirmed in particular by Johann Severin Vater. The decisive difference between Maimieux and his critics lies in the determination of the role of signs in the formation of concepts. While for Maimieux the signs only name the finished concepts, his critics argued that signs have a function in the constitution of the concepts. A universal language is therefore ultimately not possible, since there are no universal concepts and the individual languages lead to different conceptual structures.},
  language  = {es}
}
@article{Hassler2019,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Modalit{\´e} et polyphonie},
  series = {Quinze {\´e}tudes de cas sur les modalit{\´e}s linguistiques / Fifteen Case Studies on Types of Linguistic Modalities},
  volume    = {{\´E}pilogos},
  journal   = {Quinze {\´e}tudes de cas sur les modalit{\´e}s linguistiques / Fifteen Case Studies on Types of Linguistic Modalities},
  number    = {6},
  publisher = {Universit{\´e} de Rouen Normandie},
  address   = {Rouen},
  isbn      = {978-2-919501-07-6},
  pages     = {183 -- 200},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Dans cette {\´e}tude du grec ancien, nous souhaitons souligner deux particularit{\´e}s peu remarqu{\´e}es de l'adjectif verbal en -τέος, toutes deux li{\´e}es {\`a} la modalit{\´e} d{\´e}ontique. L'une concerne la possibilit{\´e} rare de trouver l'adjectif verbal d'obligation avec la n{\´e}gation non assertive μή, alors que la tr{\`e}s grande majorit{\´e} des occurrences n{\´e}gatives comporte la n{\´e}gation assertive οὐ. L'autre est li{\´e}e {\`a} l'emploi au potentiel de cet adjectif verbal d'obligation : dans ces {\´e}nonc{\´e}s, se pose la question de la combinaison entre la modalit{\´e} du potentiel et la modalit{\´e} d{\´e}ontique de l'adjectif verbal. Il nous semble que ces deux particularit{\´e}s peu fr{\´e}quentes sont r{\´e}v{\´e}latrices du fonctionnement de la modalit{\´e} d{\´e}ontique dans l'adjectif verbal d'obligation {\`a} l'{\´e}poque classique (X{\´e}nophon et Platon en font ainsi un usage abondant).},
  language  = {fr}
}
@article{Hassler2020,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Sprache als Epiph{\"a}nomen in der Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft},
  series = {Per la storia della linguistica. Saggi in onore di Giorgio Graffi per il suo 70esimo compleanno = Blityri. Studi di storia delle idee sui segni e le lingue VIII, 1-2 (2019)},
  volume    = {VIII /2019},
  journal   = {Per la storia della linguistica. Saggi in onore di Giorgio Graffi per il suo 70esimo compleanno = Blityri. Studi di storia delle idee sui segni e le lingue VIII, 1-2 (2019)},
  number    = {1-2},
  publisher = {Edizioni ETS},
  address   = {Pisa},
  isbn      = {88-467-5675-4},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-441580},
  pages     = {191 -- 206},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {The notion of 'epiphenomenon' is usually used to exclude certain aspects of a scientific object because they are considered to be deduced from others. In linguistics, restrictions of the research object were made, invoking the notion of 'epiphenomenon', which was partially done with a polemical attitude, and was always responded to polemically. The best-known definition of languages as an epiphenomenon is that proposed by Chomsky, who declared that the specific realisations of language do not warrant scientific attention, but there were early relegations of properties of individual languages to the domain of an epiphenomenon of grammar, to the domain of an art and not a science. These relegations from a certain point of abstraction did advance theories of language, even though they took a point of abstraction that did not correspond to the complexity of language.},
  language  = {de}
}