@book{Hole2008,
  author    = {Hole, Daniel},
  title     = {EVEN, ALSO and ONLY in Vietnamese},
  editor    = {Ishihara, Shinichiro and Petrova, Svetlana and Schwarz, Anne},
  issn      = {1866-4725},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-22171},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  year      = {2008},
  abstract  = {The article analyzes the system of focus-sensitive particles and, to a lesser extent, clefts in Vietnamese. EVEN/ALSO/ONLY foci are discussed across syntactic categories, and Vietnamese is found to organize its system of focus-sensitive particles along three dimensions of classification: (i) EVEN vs. ALSO vs. ONLY; (ii) particles c-commanding foci vs. particles c-commanding backgrounds; (iii) adverbial focus-sensitive particles vs. particles c-commanding argument foci only. Towards the end of the paper, free-choice constructions and additional sentence-final particles conveying ONLY and ALSO semantics are briefly discussed. The peculiar Vietnamese system reflects core properties of the analogous empirical domain in Chinese, a known source of borrowings into Vietnamese over the millennia.},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{GotznerWartenburgerSpalek2016,
  author    = {Gotzner, Nicole and Wartenburger, Isabell and Spalek, Katharina},
  title     = {The impact of focus particles on the recognition and rejection of contrastive alternatives},
  series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  journal   = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  number    = {517},
  issn      = {1866-8364},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-41342},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-413420},
  pages     = {37},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {The semantics of focus particles like only requires a set of alternatives (Rooth, 1992). In two experiments, we investigated the impact of such particles on the retrieval of alternatives that are mentioned in the prior context or unmentioned. The first experiment used a probe recognition task and showed that focus particles interfere with the recognition of mentioned alternatives and the rejection of unmentioned alternatives relative to a condition without a particle. A second lexical decision experiment demonstrated priming effects for mentioned and unmentioned alternatives (compared with an unrelated condition) while focus particles caused additional interference effects. Overall, our results indicate that focus particles trigger an active search for alternatives and lead to a competition between mentioned alternatives, unmentioned alternatives, and the focused element.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{GotznerWartenburgerSpalek2016,
  author    = {Gotzner, Nicole and Wartenburger, Isabell and Spalek, Katharina},
  title     = {The impact of focus particles on the recognition and rejection of contrastive alternatives},
  series = {Language and cognition : an interdisciplinary journal of language and cognitive science},
  volume    = {8},
  journal   = {Language and cognition : an interdisciplinary journal of language and cognitive science},
  publisher = {Cambridge Univ. Press},
  address   = {Cambridge},
  issn      = {1866-9808},
  doi       = {10.1017/langcog.2015.25},
  pages     = {59 -- 95},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {The semantics of focus particles like only requires a set of alternatives (Rooth, 1992). In two experiments, we investigated the impact of such particles on the retrieval of alternatives that are mentioned in the prior context or unmentioned. The first experiment used a probe recognition task and showed that focus particles interfere with the recognition of mentioned alternatives and the rejection of unmentioned alternatives relative to a condition without a particle. A second lexical decision experiment demonstrated priming effects for mentioned and unmentioned alternatives (compared with an unrelated condition) while focus particles caused additional interference effects. Overall, our results indicate that focus particles trigger an active search for alternatives and lead to a competition between mentioned alternatives, unmentioned alternatives, and the focused element.},
  language  = {en}
}