@misc{TiberiusRietzBouncken2020, author = {Tiberius, Victor and Rietz, Meike and Bouncken, Ricarda B.}, title = {Performance analysis and science mapping of institutional entrepreneurship research}, series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe}, journal = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe}, number = {3}, issn = {1867-5808}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-52509}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-525092}, pages = {23}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Institutional entrepreneurship comprises the activities of agents who disrupt existing social institutions or create new ones, often to enable diffusion, especially of radical innovations, in a market. The increased interest in institutional entrepreneurship has produced a large number of scholarly publications, especially in the last five years. As a consequence, the literature landscape is somewhat complex and scattered. We aim to compile a quantitative overview of the field within business and management research by conducting bibliometric performance analyses and science mappings. We identified the most productive and influential journals, authors, and articles with the highest impact. We found that institutional entrepreneurship has stronger ties to organization studies than to entrepreneurship research. Additionally, a large body of literature at the intersection of institutions and entrepreneurship does not refer to institutional entrepreneurship theory. The science mappings revealed a distinction between theoretical and conceptual research on one hand and applied and empirical research on the other hand. Research clusters reflect the structure-agency problem by focusing on the change agent's goals and interests, strategies, and specific implementation mechanisms, as well as the relevance of public agents for existing institutions, and a more abstract process rather than agency view.}, language = {en} } @article{TiberiusRietzBouncken2020, author = {Tiberius, Victor and Rietz, Meike and Bouncken, Ricarda B.}, title = {Performance analysis and science mapping of institutional entrepreneurship research}, series = {Administrative Sciences}, volume = {10}, journal = {Administrative Sciences}, number = {3}, publisher = {MDPI}, address = {Basel}, doi = {10.3390/admsci10030069}, pages = {21}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Institutional entrepreneurship comprises the activities of agents who disrupt existing social institutions or create new ones, often to enable diffusion, especially of radical innovations, in a market. The increased interest in institutional entrepreneurship has produced a large number of scholarly publications, especially in the last five years. As a consequence, the literature landscape is somewhat complex and scattered. We aim to compile a quantitative overview of the field within business and management research by conducting bibliometric performance analyses and science mappings. We identified the most productive and influential journals, authors, and articles with the highest impact. We found that institutional entrepreneurship has stronger ties to organization studies than to entrepreneurship research. Additionally, a large body of literature at the intersection of institutions and entrepreneurship does not refer to institutional entrepreneurship theory. The science mappings revealed a distinction between theoretical and conceptual research on one hand and applied and empirical research on the other hand. Research clusters reflect the structure-agency problem by focusing on the change agent's goals and interests, strategies, and specific implementation mechanisms, as well as the relevance of public agents for existing institutions, and a more abstract process rather than agency view.}, language = {en} } @article{TiberiusSiglowSendraGarcia2020, author = {Tiberius, Victor and Siglow, Caroline and Sendra-Garc{\´i}a, Javier}, title = {Scenarios in business and management}, series = {Journal of business research}, volume = {121}, journal = {Journal of business research}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {New York}, issn = {0148-2963}, doi = {10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.08.037}, pages = {235 -- 242}, year = {2020}, abstract = {The scenario technique is widely used to cope with uncertainties plan for alternate future situations. The extensive research led to a scattered literature landscape. To organize the field quantitatively, we conduct bibliometric performance analyses and a bibliographic coupling analysis. Results show an increased interest in scenario research since 2009 and clear distinctions between strategic and operational as well as methodological and applied research. Future research can be expected to further enhance the method towards robust decision making and to combine it with methods searching for most likely scenarios, such as prediction markets, crowdsourcing, and superforecasting. Additionally, cognitive and behavioral aspects of using the scenario technique might draw further attention. The scenario technique is expected to be applied across all industries and will probably play an increasing role in currently underrepresented business functions such as marketing and innovation.}, language = {en} } @article{KrausLiKangetal.2020, author = {Kraus, Sascha and Li, Hongbo and Kang, Qi and Westhead, Paul and Tiberius, Victor}, title = {The sharing economy}, series = {International journal of entrepreneurial behavior \& research}, volume = {26}, journal = {International journal of entrepreneurial behavior \& research}, number = {8}, publisher = {Emerald Group Publishing Limited}, address = {Bingley}, issn = {1355-2554}, doi = {10.1108/IJEBR-06-2020-0438}, pages = {1769 -- 1786}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Purpose Quantitative bibliometric approaches were used to statistically and objectively explore patterns in the sharing economy literature. Design/methodology/approach Journal (co-)citation analysis, author (co-)citation analysis, institution citation and co-operation analysis, keyword co-occurrence analysis, document (co-)citation analysis and burst detection analysis were conducted based on a bibliometric data set relating to sharing economy publications. Findings Sharing economy research is multi- and interdisciplinary. Journals focused upon products liability, organizing framework, profile characteristics, diverse economies, consumption system and everyday life themes. Authors focused upon profile characteristics, sharing economy organization, social connections, first principle and diverse economy themes. No institution dominated the research field. Keyword co-occurrence analysis identified organizing framework, tourism industry, consumer behavior, food waste, generous exchange and quality cue as research themes. Document co-citation analysis found research themes relating to the tourism industry, exploring public acceptability, agri-food system, commercial orientation, products liability and social connection. Most cited authors, institutions and documents are reported. Research limitations/implications The study did not exclusively focus on publications in top-tier journals. Future studies could run analyses relating to top-tier journals alone, and then run analyses relating to less renowned journals alone. To address the potential fuzzy results concern, reviews could focus on business and/or management research alone. Longitudinal reviews conducted over several points in time are warranted. Future reviews could combine qualitative and quantitative approaches. Originality/value We contribute by analyzing information relating to the population of all sharing economy articles. In addition, we contribute by employing several quantitative bibliometric approaches that enable the identification of trends relating to the themes and patterns in the growing literature.}, language = {en} } @article{SchroederTiberiusBounckenetal.2020, author = {Schr{\"o}der, Katharina and Tiberius, Victor and Bouncken, Ricarda B. and Kraus, Sascha}, title = {Strategic entrepreneurship}, series = {International journal of entrepreneurial behavior \& research}, volume = {27}, journal = {International journal of entrepreneurial behavior \& research}, number = {3}, publisher = {Emerald Group Publishing Limited}, address = {Bingley}, issn = {1355-2554}, doi = {10.1108/IJEBR-11-2020-0798}, pages = {753 -- 776}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Purpose: Strategic entrepreneurship (SE) depicts the nexus of strategic management and entrepreneurship, suggesting that firms can create superior wealth when simultaneously pursuing advantage-seeking and opportunity-seeking behavior. As the rapid growth in SE research led to a multidisciplinary, scattered and fragmented literature landscape, the authors aim to structure this research field. Design/methodology/approach: The authors employ a bibliographic coupling and literature review of the strategic entrepreneurship research field. Findings: The authors identify and describe five major research streams with 15 sub-themes in recent SE research. Based on our findings, the authors propose an integrated research framework and research gaps for future research. Originality/value: To the authors' knowledge, this is the first review on SE based on a bibliographic coupling.}, language = {en} } @article{FilserTiberiusKrausetal.2020, author = {Filser, Matthias and Tiberius, Victor and Kraus, Sascha and Zeitlhofer, Tanita and Kailer, Norbert and M{\"u}ller, Adrian}, title = {Opportunity recognition}, series = {Entrepreneurship research journal}, volume = {13}, journal = {Entrepreneurship research journal}, number = {1}, publisher = {De Gruyter}, address = {Berlin}, issn = {2194-6175}, doi = {10.1515/erj-2020-0124}, pages = {1 -- 30}, year = {2020}, abstract = {This paper provides an overview of the ever-increasing literature on opportunity recognition, with a focus on its antecedents and determinants. With a two-step research approach, a bibliometric analysis and a systematic literature review, we structure the current research in this field. By using bibliometric techniques, we analyzed 161 publications and, consequently, clustered the 30 most influential references. Apart from economic theories and the role of opportunity recognition in entrepreneurship, a strong research focus is on antecedents of opportunity recognition. Therefore, in our subsequent literature review, we focus on determinants which influence opportunity recognition. We find that the opportunity recognition process is influenced by various personal, organizational and environmental factors. We conclude with a research outlook for future research opportunities on opportunity recognition.}, language = {en} } @article{LutherTiberiusBrem2020, author = {Luther, Laura and Tiberius, Victor and Brem, Alexander}, title = {User experience (UX) in business, management, and psychology}, series = {Multimodal technologies and interaction : open access journal}, volume = {4}, journal = {Multimodal technologies and interaction : open access journal}, number = {2}, publisher = {MDPI}, address = {Basel}, issn = {2414-4088}, doi = {10.3390/mti4020018}, pages = {19}, year = {2020}, abstract = {User Experience (UX) describes the holistic experience of a user before, during, and after interaction with a platform, product, or service. UX adds value and attraction to their sole functionality and is therefore highly relevant for firms. The increased interest in UX has produced a vast amount of scholarly research since 1983. The research field is, therefore, complex and scattered. Conducting a bibliometric analysis, we aim at structuring the field quantitatively and rather abstractly. We employed citation analyses, co-citation analyses, and content analyses to evaluate productivity and impact of extant research. We suggest that future research should focus more on business and management related topics.}, language = {en} } @misc{KruggelTiberiusFabro2020, author = {Kruggel, Alexander and Tiberius, Victor and Fabro, Manuela}, title = {Corporate Citizenship}, series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe}, journal = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe}, number = {130}, issn = {1867-5808}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-47801}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-478018}, pages = {21}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Corporate citizenship, which is firms' societal engagement beyond customer and shareholder interests, is a prominent topic in management practice and has led to extensive research. This increased interest resulted in a complex and fragmented scholarly literature. In order to structure and map the field quantitatively, we conducted a temporal analysis of publications and citations, an analysis of the productivity of involved disciplines, an analysis of the productivity of publication forms including journal impact factors, an author productivity and citation analysis, a co-author analysis, an article citation analysis, an article co-citation analysis, and a keyword co-occurrence analysis. Results of these bibliometric analyses show that corporate citizenship research seems to have been in a phase of stagnation since 2014 and shows a rather low degree of interdisciplinarity. Papers are predominantly published in high impact journals. Authors show little collaboration with other researchers. Current research relates to other business ethics topics, addresses philosophical foundations, and starts to relate to human resource management and organization studies.}, language = {en} } @article{KruggelTiberiusFabro2020, author = {Kruggel, Alexander and Tiberius, Victor and Fabro, Manuela}, title = {Corporate Citizenship}, series = {Sustainability}, volume = {12}, journal = {Sustainability}, number = {13}, publisher = {MDPI}, address = {Basel}, issn = {2071-1050}, doi = {10.3390/su12135289}, pages = {19}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Corporate citizenship, which is firms' societal engagement beyond customer and shareholder interests, is a prominent topic in management practice and has led to extensive research. This increased interest resulted in a complex and fragmented scholarly literature. In order to structure and map the field quantitatively, we conducted a temporal analysis of publications and citations, an analysis of the productivity of involved disciplines, an analysis of the productivity of publication forms including journal impact factors, an author productivity and citation analysis, a co-author analysis, an article citation analysis, an article co-citation analysis, and a keyword co-occurrence analysis. Results of these bibliometric analyses show that corporate citizenship research seems to have been in a phase of stagnation since 2014 and shows a rather low degree of interdisciplinarity. Papers are predominantly published in high impact journals. Authors show little collaboration with other researchers. Current research relates to other business ethics topics, addresses philosophical foundations, and starts to relate to human resource management and organization studies.}, language = {en} } @misc{LutherTiberiusBrem2020, author = {Luther, Laura and Tiberius, Victor and Brem, Alexander}, title = {User experience (UX) in business, management, and psychology}, series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe}, journal = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe}, number = {136}, issn = {1867-5808}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-47253}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-472534}, pages = {21}, year = {2020}, abstract = {User Experience (UX) describes the holistic experience of a user before, during, and after interaction with a platform, product, or service. UX adds value and attraction to their sole functionality and is therefore highly relevant for firms. The increased interest in UX has produced a vast amount of scholarly research since 1983. The research field is, therefore, complex and scattered. Conducting a bibliometric analysis, we aim at structuring the field quantitatively and rather abstractly. We employed citation analyses, co-citation analyses, and content analyses to evaluate productivity and impact of extant research. We suggest that future research should focus more on business and management related topics.}, language = {en} }