@book{OttoPollakWerneretal.2015,
  author    = {Otto, Philipp and Pollak, Jaqueline and Werner, Daniel and Wolff, Felix and Steinert, Bastian and Thamsen, Lauritz and Taeumel, Marcel and Lincke, Jens and Krahn, Robert and Ingalls, Daniel H. H. and Hirschfeld, Robert},
  title     = {Exploratives Erstellen von interaktiven Inhalten in einer dynamischen Umgebung​},
  number    = {101},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {978-3-86956-346-6},
  issn      = {1613-5652},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-83806},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {vii, 115},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Bei der Erstellung von Visualisierungen gibt es im Wesentlichen zwei Ans{\"a}tze. Zum einen k{\"o}nnen mit geringem Aufwand schnell Standarddiagramme erstellt werden. Zum anderen gibt es die M{\"o}glichkeit, individuelle und interaktive Visualisierungen zu programmieren. Dies ist jedoch mit einem deutlich h{\"o}heren Aufwand verbunden. Flower erm{\"o}glicht eine schnelle Erstellung individueller und interaktiver Visualisierungen, indem es den Entwicklungssprozess stark vereinfacht und die Nutzer bei den einzelnen Aktivit{\"a}ten wie dem Import und der Aufbereitung von Daten, deren Abbildung auf visuelle Elemente sowie der Integration von Interaktivit{\"a}t direkt unterst{\"u}tzt.},
  language  = {de}
}
@book{SeitzLinckeReinetal.2021,
  author    = {Seitz, Klara and Lincke, Jens and Rein, Patrick and Hirschfeld, Robert},
  title     = {Language and tool support for 3D crochet patterns},
  number    = {137},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {978-3-86956-505-7},
  issn      = {1613-5652},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-49253},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-492530},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {vii, 94},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Crochet is a popular handcraft all over the world. While other techniques such as knitting or weaving have received technical support over the years through machines, crochet is still a purely manual craft. Not just the act of crochet itself is manual but also the process of creating instructions for new crochet patterns, which is barely supported by domain specific digital solutions. This leads to unstructured and often also ambiguous and erroneous pattern instructions. In this report, we propose a concept to digitally represent crochet patterns. This format incorporates crochet techniques which allows domain specific support for crochet pattern designers during the pattern creation and instruction writing process. As contributions, we present a thorough domain analysis, the concept of a graph structure used as domain specific language to specify crochet patterns and a prototype of a projectional editor using the graph as representation format of patterns and a diagramming system to visualize them in 2D and 3D. By analyzing the domain, we learned about crochet techniques and pain points of designers in their pattern creation workflow. These insights are the basis on which we defined the pattern representation. In order to evaluate our concept, we built a prototype by which the feasibility of the concept is shown and we tested the software with professional crochet designers who approved of the concept.},
  language  = {en}
}
@book{GerkenUebernickeldePaula2022,
  author    = {Gerken, Stefanie and Uebernickel, Falk and de Paula, Danielly},
  title     = {Design Thinking: a Global Study on Implementation Practices in Organizations},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {978-3-86956-525-5},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-53466},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-534668},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {230},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {These days design thinking is no longer a "new approach". Among practitioners, as well as academics, interest in the topic has gathered pace over the last two decades. However, opinions are divided over the longevity of the phenomenon: whether design thinking is merely "old wine in new bottles," a passing trend, or still evolving as it is being spread to an increasing number of organizations and industries. Despite its growing relevance and the diffusion of design thinking, knowledge on the actual status quo in organizations remains scarce. With a new study, the research team of Prof. Uebernickel and Stefanie Gerken investigates temporal developments and changes in design thinking practices in organizations over the past six years comparing the results of the 2015 "Parts without a whole" study with current practices and future developments. Companies of all sizes and from different parts of the world participated in the survey. The findings from qualitative interviews with experts, i.e., people who have years of knowledge with design thinking, were cross-checked with the results from an exploratory analysis of the survey data. This analysis uncovers significant variances and similarities in how design thinking is interpreted and applied in businesses.},
  language  = {en}
}