@misc{Busch2005,
  author    = {Busch, Christoph},
  title     = {Rechtsradikale Vernetzung im Internet},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-9772},
  year      = {2005},
  abstract  = {This article asks how the internet has been contributing to the trans-national networking of the radical right and whether the radical right has the capacity to act as a trans-national movement. Taking into account language difficulties, the ideological background of ultra- nationalism and internal disputes, the analysis shows that the radical right-wing transnational networking has hardly developed. Additionally, its internet users' potential is too low to contribute to a stronger trans-national alignment. The obstacles remain despite improved technological possibilities. This is proven by empirical examples of virtual trans-national networks.},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{Buras2005,
  author    = {Buras, Piotr},
  title     = {1945 und die Polen},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-9747},
  year      = {2005},
  abstract  = {The current series of anniversaries concerning World War II raise the question of how Poland is coming to terms with its past. The article summarises the ongoing Polish debate about the Warsaw Uprising and the changing perspectives on Polish history in society and political circles. The discussion about Poland's view on its own past has great influence on recent foreign political relations, e.g. with Germany, the Ukraine, or Russia.},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{Muetzenich2005,
  author    = {M{\"u}tzenich, Rolf},
  title     = {Wandel und Kontinuit{\"a}ten deutscher Außenpolitik},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-9722},
  year      = {2005},
  abstract  = {In the spring 2004 issue of WeltTrends, Gunther Hellmann sparked a debate on Germany's foreign policy. He argued that Germany's international behaviour is dominated by a "realpolitik" policy, generally referred to as "normalization". For Hellmann, this transformation indicates one of the "deepest crisis of Germany's foreign policy" ever. The first three parts were published in the summer, fall and winter editions (no. 43, 44 and 45) of WeltTrends, which featured contributions of German International Relations scholars as well as experts from abroad. In this issue, foreign policy makers and a Polish expert join the debate.},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{Giessmann2004,
  author    = {Gießmann, Hans J.},
  title     = {Deutsche Außenpolitik sollte gescheite Friedenspolitik sein},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-9676},
  year      = {2004},
  abstract  = {In the spring issue of WeltTrends, Gunther Hellmann (Johann-Wolfgang-Goethe- Universit{\"a}t Frankfurt a. M.) sparked a debate on Germany's foreign policy. He argued that Germany's international behaviour is dominated by a Realpolitik policy generally referred to as "normalization". For Hellmann this transformation indicates "the deepest crisis of German foreign policy" ever. Hellmann proposes a rehabilitation of the tradition of the Bonner Republik and an active Idealpolitik. This summer issue of WeltTrends features eleven articles written in response to Hellmann by International Relations scholars. The debate focuses on analytical as well as normative aspects of current German foreign policy. The authors discuss the context of the European Common Foreign and Security Policy, the international system and the United Nations, historical aspects of German foreign policy and the German foreign policy discourse. While some contributors share Hellmann's idealist position, most challenge his plea from a more realist perspective. In the upcoming fall issue, this debate will be continued with contributions by German foreign policy makers. A final reply by Hellmann will complete the debate in the winter issue of WeltTrends. Contributions by: Franz Ansprenger, Stephan B{\"o}ckenf{\"o}rde, Wilfried von Bredow, Sabine Busse, Edwina S. Campbell, Hartmut Elsenhans, Hans J. Gießmann, Werner Link, Carlo Masala, Hanns W. Maull, and Siegfried Schwarz.},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{Schwarz2004,
  author    = {Schwarz, Siegfried},
  title     = {Dramatisierung deutscher Außenpolitik},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-9658},
  year      = {2004},
  abstract  = {In the spring issue of WeltTrends, Gunther Hellmann (Johann-Wolfgang-Goethe- Universit{\"a}t Frankfurt a. M.) sparked a debate on Germany's foreign policy. He argued that Germany's international behaviour is dominated by a Realpolitik policy generally referred to as "normalization". For Hellmann this transformation indicates "the deepest crisis of German foreign policy" ever. Hellmann proposes a rehabilitation of the tradition of the Bonner Republik and an active Idealpolitik. This summer issue of WeltTrends features eleven articles written in response to Hellmann by International Relations scholars. The debate focuses on analytical as well as normative aspects of current German foreign policy. The authors discuss the context of the European Common Foreign and Security Policy, the international system and the United Nations, historical aspects of German foreign policy and the German foreign policy discourse. While some contributors share Hellmann's idealist position, most challenge his plea from a more realist perspective. In the upcoming fall issue, this debate will be continued with contributions by German foreign policy makers. A final reply by Hellmann will complete the debate in the winter issue of WeltTrends. Contributions by: Franz Ansprenger, Stephan B{\"o}ckenf{\"o}rde, Wilfried von Bredow, Sabine Busse, Edwina S. Campbell, Hartmut Elsenhans, Hans J. Gießmann, Werner Link, Carlo Masala, Hanns W. Maull, and Siegfried Schwarz.},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{Risse2003,
  author    = {Risse, Thomas},
  title     = {Die unipolare Weltordnung - Ein soziales Konstrukt : ein Kommentar zu den Kommentaren},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-9631},
  year      = {2003},
  abstract  = {In this issue, we continue and complete the debate on the future of the transatlantic relationship and of world order after the Iraq war. The debate was initiated by an article by Thomas Risse (Freie Universit{\"a}t Berlin) in WeltTrends 39, which has provoked a remarkable reaction within the German academic community, as documented in WeltTrends 40. This issue features additional comments and the rebuttal by Thomas Risse. Most authors believe that the transatlantic partnership is in a serious crisis, but claim that it remains without an alternative for both sides of the Atlantic.},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{Koszel2003,
  author    = {Koszel, Bogdan},
  title     = {Polens Engagement in der euroatlantischen Zone nach dem Irak-Krieg},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-9625},
  year      = {2003},
  abstract  = {In this issue, we continue and complete the debate on the future of the transatlantic relationship and of world order after the Iraq war. The debate was initiated by an article by Thomas Risse (Freie Universit{\"a}t Berlin) in WeltTrends 39, which has provoked a remarkable reaction within the German academic community, as documented in WeltTrends 40. This issue features additional comments and the rebuttal by Thomas Risse. Most authors believe that the transatlantic partnership is in a serious crisis, but claim that it remains without an alternative for both sides of the Atlantic.},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{Grosse2003,
  author    = {Große, Ines},
  title     = {Ethnizit{\"a}t und Zuwanderung in Deutschland},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-9547},
  year      = {2003},
  abstract  = {The central focus of this essay is the "politicisation" of ethnicity in contemporary German immigration policy and its underlying ethnic ideology. Emphasis is put on the relevance of ethnicity and how it is viewed within the framework of German immigration policy. The author discusses German citizenship policy and its ideology, which creates ethnic boundaries in order to serve as a mechanism to defend limited access to German citizenship. The effects of the elevation of so-called ethnic groups through privileged immigration are explained with the example of ethnic German emigrants living in the former Soviet Union - the "Auslandsdeutschen" - and the process of their ethnic formation.},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{Schoeneburg2002,
  author    = {Sch{\"o}neburg, Volkmar},
  title     = {Der verlorene Charme des Rechtsstaates : oder: was brachten die Mauersch{\"u}tzenprozesse?},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-9451},
  year      = {2002},
  abstract  = {This article is a reply to a statement by Elke Schwinger in WeltTrends 31. The author tries to strike the balance between "coming to terms with the past" and the role of criminal law in this process in Germany. The principle of prohibition of retroactive laws, fixed in the 1990 German Unification Treaty and in the Constitution, had been broken in the trials against the "Mauersch{\"u}tzen" (border guards) in German criminal courts since 1990. There is an artificially constructed past which does not correspond to the reality of the border regime before 1989. The author underlines that today the criminal law is misused for political aims within the German unification process.},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{Franzke2005,
  author    = {Franzke, Jochen},
  title     = {Netzwerke f{\"u}r Demokratie statt Achsen mit Autokraten},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-8071},
  year      = {2005},
  abstract  = {The German Ostpolitik of the Red-Green government between 1998 and 2005 focused particularly on the autocratic Russia. It mostly ignored the other - democratic - states in Central and Eastern Europe. Since this policy failed to improve the stability in the region, a policy change is necessary. Regional stability can only be based on the equal cooperation of democratic states. Germany should therefore intensify her support for the democratic forces in the region and integrate her policy into a common Ostpolitik within the EU.},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{Hellmann2004,
  author    = {Hellmann, Gunther},
  title     = {Wider die machtpolitische Resozialisierung der deutschen Außenpolitik},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-8027},
  year      = {2004},
  abstract  = {German foreign policy is in the midst of a far-reaching transformation. Contrary to disciplinary expectations, this process is neither properly captured by descriptions in the liberal tradition („Europeanisation", „Civilian Power") nor by Realist expectations that Germany is doomed to „remilitarise" and/or „renationalise". However, the key term of foreign policy discourse, „normalisation", is an unmistakable code, signalling a rediscovery of traditional Realpolitik practices which fit Germany's current environment. The paper argues that rather than merely playing the role of an obedient disciple of Realpolitik socialisers, Germany ought to rehabilitate the foreign policy tradition of the Bonn Republic in support of an active Idealpolitik transformation of its environment. The article serves as a starting point for a debate on German foreign policy in the upcoming issues of WeltTrends.},
  language  = {de}
}