@article{RieseVogelsangSchroederetal.2022, author = {Riese, Josef and Vogelsang, Christoph and Schr{\"o}der, Jan and Borowski, Andreas and Kulgemeyer, Christoph and Reinhold, Peter and Schecker, Horst}, title = {The development of lesson planning skills in the subject of physics}, series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Erziehungswissenschaft}, journal = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Erziehungswissenschaft}, number = {4}, publisher = {Springer VS/Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH}, address = {Wiesbaden}, issn = {1434-663X}, doi = {10.1007/s11618-022-01112-0}, pages = {843 -- 867}, year = {2022}, abstract = {One main goal of university teacher education is the first acquisition of skills for theory-driven lesson planning. According to models of teachers' professional competence, it is assumed that the acquired professional knowledge represents an essential basis for the development of planning skills. Learning opportunities to apply this professional knowledge often occur in school internships, usually in advanced semesters of teacher education programs. It is also assumed that practical experience within lesson planning supports the formation of professional knowledge. However, the relationship between the extent of professional knowledge and the development of skills to plan a lesson lacks evidence. There is a particular challenge in measuring lesson planning skills both authentically and standardized. To evaluate the mentioned relationship, a longitudinal pre-post-study with prospective physics-teachers (N = 68 in the longitudinal section) was conducted at four German universities. Pre-service physics teachers' skills to plan a lesson were assessed with a standardized performance assessment at the beginning and at the end of a longterm-internship. This assessment consists of planning a physics lesson, conveying Newton's third Law, in a simulated and standardized way with limited time. In addition, content knowledge, pedagogical content knowledge and pedagogical knowledge has been assessed using standardized instruments. Furthermore, additional information about the internship and the amount of learning opportunities was collected at the end of the internship. During the internship, both lesson planning skills and all components of professional knowledge increased. Cross-Lagged-Panel-Analyses reveal that in particular pre-service teachers' pedagogical content knowledge as well as pedagogical knowledge at the beginning of the internship influences the development of lesson planning skills.}, language = {de} } @article{GlowinskiAutenrieth2023, author = {Glowinski, Ingrid and Autenrieth, Marijke}, title = {Eigene Forschung im Labor, um naturwissenschaftliche Erkenntnisgewinnung kompetent unterrichten zu k{\"o}nnen?}, series = {PSI-Potsdam: Ergebnisbericht zu den Aktivit{\"a}ten im Rahmen der Qualit{\"a}tsoffensive Lehrerbildung (2019-2023) (Potsdamer Beitr{\"a}ge zur Lehrerbildung und Bildungsforschung ; 3)}, journal = {PSI-Potsdam: Ergebnisbericht zu den Aktivit{\"a}ten im Rahmen der Qualit{\"a}tsoffensive Lehrerbildung (2019-2023) (Potsdamer Beitr{\"a}ge zur Lehrerbildung und Bildungsforschung ; 3)}, number = {3}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam}, address = {Potsdam}, isbn = {978-3-86956-568-2}, issn = {2626-3556}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-61792}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-617922}, pages = {273 -- 293}, year = {2023}, abstract = {Im Rahmen des PSI-Projekts wurde eine Lehrveranstaltung konzipiert, die Lehramtsstudierenden einen vertieften Einblick sowohl in den Ablauf von Forschung als auch eine Bearbeitung einer eigenen experimentellen Forschungsaufgabe erm{\"o}glichen soll. Anlass waren die Ber{\"u}cksichtigung eines „Wissens {\"u}ber Erkenntnisgewinnung in der Disziplin" im Modell des „Erweiterten Fachwissens f{\"u}r den schulischen Kontext" (PSI) sowie Erkenntnisse empirischer Studien, die die Relevanz eigener Forschungserfahrung f{\"u}r das Unterrichten naturwissenschaftlicher Erkenntnisgewinnungsprozesse zeigen. Hier stellen wir eine neue Lehrveranstaltung (4 SWS) vor, die den angehenden Lehrkr{\"a}ften Forschungserfahrung erm{\"o}glicht (Seminar und Praktikum). Die Lehrveranstaltung vermittelt Einblicke in Forschung und die „Natur der Naturwissenschaften", erm{\"o}glicht das Durchf{\"u}hren eigener wissenschaftlicher und schulrelevanter Experimente und bietet eine angemessene Reflexion {\"u}ber die verschiedenen Kurselemente. Die Evaluationsergebnisse sind {\"u}berwiegend positiv, zeigen aber auch, dass f{\"u}r die Studierenden die wahrgenommene Schulrelevanz und die fachdidaktischen Aspekte ein wichtiges Kriterium f{\"u}r die positive Bewertung sind.}, language = {de} } @article{KortenkampKuzleReitzKoncebovski2023, author = {Kortenkamp, Ulrich and Kuzle, Ana and Reitz-Koncebovski, Karen}, title = {Fachdidaktisches Wissen aus dem Fachwissen generieren}, series = {PSI-Potsdam: Ergebnisbericht zu den Aktivit{\"a}ten im Rahmen der Qualit{\"a}tsoffensive Lehrerbildung (2019-2023) (Potsdamer Beitr{\"a}ge zur Lehrerbildung und Bildungsforschung ; 3)}, journal = {PSI-Potsdam: Ergebnisbericht zu den Aktivit{\"a}ten im Rahmen der Qualit{\"a}tsoffensive Lehrerbildung (2019-2023) (Potsdamer Beitr{\"a}ge zur Lehrerbildung und Bildungsforschung ; 3)}, number = {3}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam}, address = {Potsdam}, isbn = {978-3-86956-568-2}, issn = {2626-3556}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-61760}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-617602}, pages = {171 -- 191}, year = {2023}, abstract = {Das Mathematik-Teilprojekt SPIES-M zielt auf eine st{\"a}rkere Professionsorientierung und die Verkn{\"u}pfung von Fachwissenschaft und Fachdidaktik in der universit{\"a}ren Lehrkr{\"a}ftebildung. Zu allen großen Inhaltsgebieten der Mathematik wurden neue Lehrveranstaltungen konzipiert und in den Studienordnungen s{\"a}mtlicher Lehr{\"a}mter Mathematik an der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam implementiert. F{\"u}r die Konzeption wurden theoriebasiert Gestaltungsprinzipien herausgearbeitet, die sowohl f{\"u}r das Design als auch f{\"u}r die Evaluation und Weiterentwicklung der Lehrveranstaltungen nach dem Design-Research-Ansatz genutzt werden k{\"o}nnen. Die Umsetzung der Gestaltungsprinzipien wird am Beispiel der Fundamentalen Idee der Proportionalit{\"a}t verdeutlicht und dabei aufgezeigt, wie Studierende dazu bef{\"a}higt werden k{\"o}nnen, fachdidaktisches Wissen aus fachmathematischen Inhalten zu generieren. Die Entwicklung des Professionswissens der Studierenden wird mithilfe unterschiedlicher Instrumente untersucht, um R{\"u}ckschl{\"u}sse auf die Wirksamkeit der neu konzipierten Lehrveranstaltungen zu ziehen. F{\"u}r die Untersuchungen im Mixed-Methods-Design werden neben Beobachtungen in Lehrveranstaltungen eigens konzipierte Wissenstests, Gruppeninterviews, Unterrichtsentw{\"u}rfe aus Praxisphasen und Lerntageb{\"u}cher genutzt. Die Studierendenperspektive wird durch Befragungen zur wahrgenommenen (Berufs-)Relevanz der Lehrveranstaltungen erhoben. Weiteres wesentliches Element der Begleitforschung ist die kollegiale Supervision durch sogenannte „Spies" (Spione), die die Veranstaltungen kriteriengeleitet beobachten und anschließend gemeinsam mit den Dozierenden reflektieren. Die bisherigen Ergebnisse werden hier pr{\"a}sentiert und hinsichtlich ihrer Implikationen diskutiert. Die im Projekt entwickelten Gestaltungsprinzipien als Werkzeug f{\"u}r Design und Evaluation sowie das Spies-Konzept der kollegialen Supervision werden f{\"u}r die Qualit{\"a}tsentwicklung von Lehrveranstaltungen zum Transfer vorgeschlagen.}, language = {de} } @article{KulgemeyerBorowskiBuschhueteretal.2020, author = {Kulgemeyer, Christoph and Borowski, Andreas and Buschh{\"u}ter, David and Enkrott, Patrick and Kempin, Maren and Reinhold, Peter and Riese, Josef and Schecker, Horst and Schr{\"o}der, Jan and Vogelsang, Christoph}, title = {Professional knowledge affects action-related skills}, series = {Journal of research in science teaching : the official journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching}, volume = {57}, journal = {Journal of research in science teaching : the official journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching}, number = {10}, publisher = {Wiley}, address = {Hoboken}, issn = {0022-4308}, doi = {10.1002/tea.21632}, pages = {1554 -- 1582}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Professional knowledge is an important source of science teachers' actions in the classroom (e.g., personal professional content knowledge [pedagogical content knowledge, PCK] is the source of enacted PCK in the refined consensus model [RCM] for PCK). However, the evidence for this claim is ambiguous at best. This study applied a cross-lagged panel design to examine the relationship between professional knowledge and actions in one particular instructional situation: explaining physics. Pre- and post a field experience (one semester), 47 preservice physics teachers from four different universities were tested for their content knowledge (CK), PCK, pedagogical knowledge (PK), and action-related skills in explaining physics. The study showed that joint professional knowledge (the weighted sum of CK, PCK, and PK scores) at the beginning of the field experience impacted the development of explaining skills during the field experience (beta = .38**). We interpret this as a particular relationship between professional knowledge and science teachers' action-related skills (enacted PCK): professional knowledge is necessary for the development of explaining skills. That is evidence that personal PCK affects enacted PCK. In addition, field experiences are often supposed to bridge the theory-practice gap by transforming professional knowledge into instructional practice. Our results suggest that for field experiences to be effective, preservice teachers should start with profound professional knowledge.}, language = {en} } @misc{LiepertzBorowski2018, author = {Liepertz, Sven and Borowski, Andreas}, title = {Testing the Consensus Model}, series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe}, journal = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe}, number = {482}, issn = {1866-8372}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-416857}, pages = {22}, year = {2018}, abstract = {The structure and definition of professional knowledge is a continuing focus of science education research. In 2012, a pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) summit was held and it suggested a model of professional knowledge and skill including PCK, which was later often called the Consensus Model (Gess-Newsome, 2015. A model of teacher professional knowledge and skill including PCK: Results of the thinking from the PCK summit. In A. Berry, P. J. Friedrichsen, \& J. Loughran (Eds.), Teaching and learning in science series. Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (1st ed., pp. 28-42). New York, NY: Routledge). The Consensus Model proposes a potential powerful framework for the relations among teachers' different professional knowledge bases, but to date it has neither been investigated empirically nor systematically. In this study, we investigated the relationships suggested by the Consensus Model among different aspects of teachers' knowledge and skill. A sample of 35 physics teachers and their classes participated in the investigation; both teachers and their students in these classes took paper-and-pencil tests. Furthermore, a lesson taught by each of the teachers was videotaped and analysed. The video analysis focused on the interconnectedness of the content structure of the lesson as representation of the in-class actions of the teachers. The interconnectedness is understood as a direct result of the application of professional knowledge of the teachers to their teaching. The teachers' knowledge showed no significant influence on the interconnectedness of the lesson content structure. However, the results confirmed the influence of interconnectedness and certain aspects of professional knowledge on students' outcomes. Therefore, interconnectedness of content structure could be verified as one indicator of teachers' instructional quality.}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{BorowskiGlowinskiFristeretal.2018, author = {Borowski, Andreas and Glowinski, Ingrid and Frister, Jonas and H{\"o}ttecke, Dietmar and Buth, Katrin and Koenen, Jenna and Masanek, Nicole and Reichwein, Wilko and Scholten, Nina and Sprenger, Sandra and Stender, Peter and W{\"o}hlke, Carina and Komorek, Michael and Freckmann, Janine and Hofmann, Josefine and Niesel, Verena and Richter, Chris and Mehlmann, Nelli and Bikner-Ahsbahs, Angelika and Unverricht, Katja and Schanze, Sascha and Bittorf, Robert Marten and Meier, Monique and Grospietsch, Finja and Mayer, J{\"u}rgen and Gimbel, Katharina and Ziepprecht, Kathrin and Hofmann, Judith and Kramer, Charlotte and M{\"u}ller, Britta-Kornelia and Rohde, Andreas and Z{\"u}hlsdorf, Felix and Winkler, Iris and Laging, Ralf and Peter, Carina and Schween, Michael and H{\"a}rle, Gerhard and Busse, Beatrix and Mahner, Sebastian and K{\"o}stler, Verena and Kufner, Sabrina and M{\"a}gdefrau, Jutta and M{\"u}ller, Christian and Beck, Christina and Kriehuber, Eva and Boch, Florian and Engl, Anna-Teresa and Helzel, Andreas and Pickert, Tina and Reiter, Christian and Blasini, Bettina and Nerdel, Claudia and Lewalter, Doris and Schiffhauer, Silke and Richter-Gebert, J{\"u}rgen and Bannert, Maria and Maahs, Mirjam and Reißner, Maria and Ungar, Patrizia and von Wachter, Jana-Kristin and Hellmann, Katharina and Zaki, Katja and Pohlenz, Philipp}, title = {Koh{\"a}renz in der universit{\"a}ren Lehrerbildung}, editor = {Glowinski, Ingrid and Borowski, Andreas and Gillen, Julia and Schanze, Sascha and von Meien, Joachim}, publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam}, address = {Potsdam}, isbn = {978-3-86956-438-8}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-414267}, year = {2018}, abstract = {One area that is supported by the project "Qualit{\"a}tsoffensive Lehrerbildung" (funded by BMBF) is the improvement of collaboration and coordination between studies in the discipline, studies in pedagogical content knowledge, and studies in pedagogical knowledge during teacher education at university. Aiming a better coordination among these three parts of teacher education at university, many of the supported projects have designed and realized university-specific approaches. This conference proceedings volume comprises contributions by 15 of these projects. Seven of those were introduced and discussed in workshops on the occasion of two cross-regional project-conferences in Hannover and Potsdam. Overall, the contributions give a theoretically funded as well as a practice-oriented overview of current approaches and concepts to achieve a better connection between study units concerning studies in content knowledge, pedagogical content knowledge and pedagogical knowledge in teacher education. The volume presents university projects, which take effect on different levels (at the level of curriculum and content, at a collegiate level, at the level of structural conditions of universities). The different approaches are described in a way that they can provide a basis for transfer to other subjects or further universities. The contributions are aimed at teacher educators as well as other actors working in the field of teaching- and quality development at universities. All of them can take transferable ideas and impulses from the described concepts and formats.}, language = {de} }