@article{MientusWulffNowaketal.2023,
  author    = {Mientus, Lukas and Wulff, Peter and Nowak, Anna and Borowski, Andreas},
  title     = {Algorithmen als Dozierende?},
  series = {PSI-Potsdam: Ergebnisbericht zu den Aktivit{\"a}ten im Rahmen der Qualit{\"a}tsoffensive Lehrerbildung (2019-2023) (Potsdamer Beitr{\"a}ge zur Lehrerbildung und Bildungsforschung ; 3)},
  journal   = {PSI-Potsdam: Ergebnisbericht zu den Aktivit{\"a}ten im Rahmen der Qualit{\"a}tsoffensive Lehrerbildung (2019-2023) (Potsdamer Beitr{\"a}ge zur Lehrerbildung und Bildungsforschung ; 3)},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {978-3-86956-568-2},
  issn      = {2626-3556},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-61640},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-616407},
  pages     = {117 -- 129},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Auf maschinellem Lernen basierende Tools haben schon l{\"a}ngst Einzug in unseren Alltag gefunden und so konnten auch in der Lehrkr{\"a}ftebildung erste Anwendungen entwickelt, erprobt und evaluiert werden. Im Teilprojekt Physikdidaktik des Schwerpunktes 2 „Schulpraktische Studien" wurden auf Basis eines Rahmenmodells f{\"u}r Reflexion (Nowak et al., 2019) automatisierte Analysemethoden (Wulff et al., 2020) entwickelt und fanden Einzug in universit{\"a}re fachdidaktische Lehre (Mientus et al., 2021a). Mit dem Projekt konnten Potenziale KI-basierter Unterst{\"u}tzung aufgezeigt und verstetigt sowie spezifische Herausforderungen identifiziert werden. Dieser Beitrag skizziert ausgew{\"a}hlte Anwendungsm{\"o}glichkeiten und weiterf{\"u}hrende Forschungen unter dem Gesichtspunkt der Akzeptanz computerunterst{\"u}tzter Lehre.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{WeckJungaKliegletal.2021,
  author    = {Weck, Florian and Junga, Yvonne Marie and Kliegl, Reinhold and Hahn, Daniela and Brucker, Katharina and Witth{\"o}ft, Michael},
  title     = {Effects of competence feedback on therapist competence and patient outcome},
  series = {Journal of consulting and clinical psychology},
  volume    = {89},
  journal   = {Journal of consulting and clinical psychology},
  number    = {11},
  publisher = {American Psychological Association},
  address   = {Washington},
  issn      = {0022-006X},
  doi       = {10.1037/ccp0000686},
  pages     = {885 -- 897},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Objective: Therapist competence is considered essential for the success of psychotherapy. Feedback is an intervention which has the potential to improve therapist competence. The present study investigated whether competence feedback leads to an improvement of therapist competence and patient outcome. Method: Sixty-seven master-level clinical trainees were randomly assigned to either a competence feedback group (CFG) or a control group (CG). Patients with a diagnosis of major depression (N = 114) were randomly assigned to CFG or CG. Treatment included 20 individual sessions of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). In CFG, therapists received, parallel to the treatment, five competence feedbacks, based on videotaped therapy sessions. Independent raters assessed therapist competence with the Cognitive Therapy Scale (CTS) and provided the competence feedback. Patient outcome was evaluated with the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) and therapeutic alliance (Helping Alliance Questionnaire [HAQ]) from both therapist's (HAQ-T) and patient's (HAQ-P) perspective were evaluated after each of the 20 sessions. Results: (a) Therapist competence (CTS) increased significantly more for CFG than CG. (b) Depression (BDI-II) decreased significantly across sessions for both groups, but without evidence for a group-differential benefit for the CFG. (c) Therapeutic alliance (HAQ-T/P) increased significantly across sessions for both groups from both perspectives, but without group differences. (d) There is a positive effect of BDI-II on CTS at the beginning and a negative effect of CTS on BDI-II at the end of therapy. Conclusion: Competence feedback improves therapists' independently rated competence, but there is no evidence that competence feedback in CBT leads to better outcome. What is the public health significance of this article? This study suggests the substantial value of systematic competence feedback for improving therapist competence in the psychotherapy of depression. No significant effect of competence feedback on the reduction of reported depressive symptoms was found.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{MaassKuehnePoltzetal.2022,
  author    = {Maaß, Ulrike and K{\"u}hne, Franziska and Poltz, Nadine and Lorenz, Anna and Ay-Bryson, Destina Sevde and Weck, Florian},
  title     = {Live supervision in psychotherapy training},
  series = {Training and education in professional psychology},
  volume    = {16},
  journal   = {Training and education in professional psychology},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {American Psychological Association},
  address   = {Washington},
  issn      = {1931-3918},
  doi       = {10.1037/tep0000390},
  pages     = {130 -- 142},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {There is increasing interest in improving psychotherapy training using evidence-based supervision. One approach is live supervision (LS), in which the supervisor offers immediate feedback to the trainee (e.g., via microphone, text messages) during the session. This review summarizes the research on LS and its main results. The databases Web of Science Core Collection, PsycArticles, PsycBooks, PsycInfo, PSYNDEX, Psychology and Behavioral Sciences Collection, and PubMed were searched from inception to January 23, 2020 (including a backward search) and updated November 15, 2020. The inclusion criteria (i.e., main focus on LS, immediate feedback from a present supervisor, psychological setting) were met by k = 138 publications, including k = 8 randomized controlled trials (RCTs; N = 339). Two reviewers independently evaluated the RCTs' risk of bias using the revised Cochrane Risk-of-Bias Tool. Most publications had a family therapy background (59\%), were categorized as nonempirical (55\%), aimed primarily at describing or comparing specific LS methods (35\%), and displayed positive views on LS (87\%). Based on the RCTs, LS was superior to no-supervision in 78\% of all comparisons, but only in 13\% of the cases compared to a delayed supervision (DS) condition (i.e., regarding trainee skills, patient outcomes, or other variables). These results somewhat contradict the overall favorable views in the literature. However, the generalizability is limited due to a lack of high-quality studies and substantial heterogeneity in terms of LS methods, concepts, outcomes, and measurements. Ideas for more systematic research on LS regarding objectives and methods are proposed. <br /> Public Significance Statement This review summarizes research on live supervision (LS). LS is a form of supervision in psychotherapy training in which the supervisor observes the trainee's therapy session and provides immediate feedback. The review concludes that LS is probably as effective as delayed supervision (DS), although more high-quality research is needed.},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{Apelojg2019,
  author    = {Apelojg, Benjamin},
  title     = {What´s going on?! Needs and emotions during classes},
  series = {9th International Conference on Society and Information Technologies (ICSIT 2018)},
  booktitle = {9th International Conference on Society and Information Technologies (ICSIT 2018)},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Curran Associates},
  address   = {Red Hook},
  isbn      = {978-1-5108-9702-1},
  pages     = {85 -- 88},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {The "output-orientation" is omnipresent in teacher education. In order to evaluate teachers' and students' performances, a wide range of different quantitative questionnaires exist worldwide. One important goal of teaching evaluation is to increase the quality of teaching and learning. The author argues, that standard evaluations which are typically made at the end of the semester are problematic due to two reasons. The first one is that some of the questions are too general and don`t offer concrete ideas as to what kind of actions can be taken to make the courses better. The second problem is that the evaluation is mostly made when the course is already over. Because of this criticism, Apelojg invented the Felix-App which offers the possibility to give feedback in real-time by asking for the emotions and needs that occur during different learning situations. The idea is very simple: positive emotions and satisfied needs are helpful for the learning process. Negative emotions and unsatisfied needs have negative effects on the learning process. First descriptive results show, that "managing emotions" during classes can have positive effects on both motivation and emotions.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KaufmannMaiwaldSchindleretal.2017,
  author    = {Kaufmann, Yvonne Marie and Maiwald, Lisa Marie and Schindler, Svenja and Weck, Florian},
  title     = {Wie wirkt sich mehrmaliges Kompetenz-Feedback auf psychotherapeutische Behandlungen aus?},
  series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie : Forschung und Praxis},
  volume    = {46},
  journal   = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie : Forschung und Praxis},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Hogrefe},
  address   = {G{\"o}ttingen},
  issn      = {1616-3443},
  doi       = {10.1026/1616-3443/a000412},
  pages     = {96 -- 106},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {Theoretischer Hintergrund: Einfl{\"u}sse von therapeutenorientiertem Kompetenz-Feedback in der Psychotherapieausbildung wurden bislang wenig untersucht. Fragestellung: Wie gehen Ausbildungstherapeuten mit Feedback um? Welchen Einfluss hat ein regelm{\"a}ßiges Kompetenz-Feedback auf die Qualit{\"a}t psychotherapeutischer Behandlungen (insbesondere Therapiesitzungen, therapeutische Beziehung, Person des Therapeuten, Supervision)? Methode: Elf Therapeuten wurden mithilfe eines halbstrukturierten Interviewleitfadens befragt. Die Auswertung erfolgte mittels qualitativer Inhaltsanalyse nach Mayring (2015). Ergebnisse: Das auf Basis der Interviews erstellte Kategoriensystem umfasste die Kategorien „Erwartungen an das Feedback", „Wahrnehmung des Feedbacks", „Verarbeitung von und Umgang mit Feedback", „Folgen, Auswirkungen und Ver{\"a}nderungen durch Feedback" sowie „Verbesserungsw{\"u}nsche". Schlussfolgerungen: Therapeuten streben eine Umsetzung des Feedbacks an, welches sich auf die Behandlung, die Supervision, die eigene Person und die therapeutische Beziehung auswirkt.},
  language  = {de}
}
@masterthesis{Dahl2021,
  type      = {Bachelor Thesis},
  author    = {Dahl, Dorothee Sophie},
  title     = {Let's have FUN! Gamification im Mathematikunterricht},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-51593},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-515937},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {78},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Spiele und spieltypische Elemente wie das Sammeln von Treuepunkten sind aus dem Alltag kaum wegzudenken. Zudem werden sie zunehmend in Unternehmen oder in Lernumgebungen eingesetzt. Allerdings ist die Methode Gamification bisher f{\"u}r den p{\"a}dagogischen Kontext wenig klassifiziert und f{\"u}r Lehrende kaum zug{\"a}nglich gemacht worden. Daher zielt diese Bachelorarbeit darauf ab, eine systematische Strukturierung und Aufarbeitung von Gamification sowie innovative Ans{\"a}tze f{\"u}r die Verwendung spieltypischer Elemente im Unterricht, konkret dem Mathematikunterricht, zu pr{\"a}sentieren. Dies kann eine Grundlage f{\"u}r andere Fachgebiete, aber auch andere Lehrformen bieten und so die Umsetzbarkeit von Gamification in eigenen Lehrveranstaltungen aufzeigen. In der Arbeit wird begr{\"u}ndet, weshalb und mithilfe welcher Elemente Gamification die Motivation und Leistungsbereitschaft der Lernenden langfristig erh{\"o}hen, die Sozial- und Personalkompetenzen f{\"o}rdern sowie die Lernenden zu mehr Aktivit{\"a}t anregen kann. Zudem wird Gamification explizit mit grundlegenden mathematikdidaktischen Prinzipien in Verbindung gesetzt und somit die Relevanz f{\"u}r den Mathematikunterricht hervorgehoben. Anschließend werden die einzelnen Elemente von Gamification wie Punkte, Level, Abzeichen, Charaktere und Rahmengeschichte entlang einer eigens f{\"u}r den p{\"a}dagogischen Kontext entwickelten Klassifikation „FUN" (Feedback - User specific elements - Neutral elements) schematisch beschrieben, ihre Funktionen und Wirkung dargestellt sowie Einsatzm{\"o}glichkeiten im Unterricht aufgezeigt. Dies beinhaltet Ideen zu lernf{\"o}rderlichem Feedback, Differenzierungsm{\"o}glichkeiten und Unterrichtsrahmengestaltung, die in Lehrveranstaltungen aller Art umsetzbar sein k{\"o}nnen. Die Bachelorarbeit umfasst zudem ein spezifisches Beispiel, einen Unterrichtsentwurf einer gamifizierten Mathematikstunde inklusive des zugeh{\"o}rigen Arbeitsmaterials, anhand dessen die Verwendung von Gamification deutlich wird. Gamification offeriert oftmals Vorteile gegen{\"u}ber dem traditionellen Unterricht, muss jedoch wie jede Methode an den Inhalt und die Zielgruppe angepasst werden. Weiterf{\"u}hrende Forschung k{\"o}nnte sich mit konkreten motivationalen Strukturen, personenspezifischen Unterschieden sowie mit mathematischen Inhalten wie dem Probleml{\"o}sen oder dem Wechsel zwischen verschiedenen Darstellungen hinsichtlich gamifizierter Lehrformen besch{\"a}ftigen.},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{KaufmannMaiwaldSchindleretal.2017,
  author    = {Kaufmann, Yvonne M. and Maiwald, Lisa and Schindler, Svenja and Weck, Florian},
  title     = {Wie wirkt sich mehrmaliges Kompetenz-Feedback auf psychotherapeutische Behandlungen aus?},
  series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  journal   = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  number    = {614},
  issn      = {1866-8364},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-43406},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-434066},
  pages     = {96 -- 106},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {Theoretischer Hintergrund: Einfl{\"u}sse von therapeutenorientiertem Kompetenz-Feedback in der Psychotherapieausbildung wurden bislang wenig untersucht. Fragestellung: Wie gehen Ausbildungstherapeuten mit Feedback um? Welchen Einfluss hat ein regelm{\"a}ßiges Kompetenz-Feedback auf die Qualit{\"a}t psychotherapeutischer Behandlungen (insbesondere Therapiesitzungen, therapeutische Beziehung, Person des Therapeuten, Supervision)? Methode: Elf Therapeuten wurden mithilfe eines halbstrukturierten Interviewleitfadens befragt. Die Auswertung erfolgte mittels qualitativer Inhaltsanalyse nach Mayring (2015). Ergebnisse: Das auf Basis der Interviews erstellte Kategoriensystem umfasste die Kategorien „Erwartungen an das Feedback", „Wahrnehmung des Feedbacks", „Verarbeitung von und Umgang mit Feedback", „Folgen, Auswirkungen und Ver{\"a}nderungen durch Feedback" sowie „Verbesserungsw{\"u}nsche". Schlussfolgerungen: Therapeuten streben eine Umsetzung des Feedbacks an, welches sich auf die Behandlung, die Supervision, die eigene Person und die therapeutische Beziehung auswirkt.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{BoschWilbert2020,
  author    = {Bosch, Jannis and Wilbert, J{\"u}rgen},
  title     = {Contrast and Assimilation Effects on Self-Evaluation of Performance and Task Interest in a Sample of Elementary School Children},
  series = {Frontiers in Education},
  volume    = {4},
  journal   = {Frontiers in Education},
  number    = {165},
  publisher = {Frontiers Media},
  address   = {Lausanne},
  issn      = {2504-284X},
  doi       = {10.3389/feduc.2019.00165},
  pages     = {11},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Social comparison processes and the social position within a school class already play a major role in performance evaluation as early as in elementary school. The influence of contrast and assimilation effects on self-evaluation of performance as well as task interest has been widely researched in observational studies under the labels big-fish-little-pond and basking-in-reflected-glory effect. This study examined the influence of similar contrast and assimilation effects in an experimental paradigm. Fifth and sixth grade students (n = 230) completed a computer-based learning task during which they received social comparative feedback based on 2 × 2 experimentally manipulated feedback conditions: social position (high vs. low) and peer performance (high vs. low). Results show a more positive development of task interest and self-evaluation of performance in both the high social position and the high peer performance condition. When applied to the school setting, results of this study suggest that students who already perform well in comparison to their peer group are also the ones who profit most from social comparative feedback, given that they are the ones who usually receive the corresponding positive performance feedback.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{BoschWilbert2020,
  author    = {Bosch, Jannis and Wilbert, J{\"u}rgen},
  title     = {Contrast and Assimilation Effects on Self-Evaluation of Performance and Task Interest in a Sample of Elementary School Children},
  series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  journal   = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  number    = {600},
  issn      = {1866-8364},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-44481},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-444819},
  pages     = {13},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Social comparison processes and the social position within a school class already play a major role in performance evaluation as early as in elementary school. The influence of contrast and assimilation effects on self-evaluation of performance as well as task interest has been widely researched in observational studies under the labels big-fish-little-pond and basking-in-reflected-glory effect. This study examined the influence of similar contrast and assimilation effects in an experimental paradigm. Fifth and sixth grade students (n = 230) completed a computer-based learning task during which they received social comparative feedback based on 2 × 2 experimentally manipulated feedback conditions: social position (high vs. low) and peer performance (high vs. low). Results show a more positive development of task interest and self-evaluation of performance in both the high social position and the high peer performance condition. When applied to the school setting, results of this study suggest that students who already perform well in comparison to their peer group are also the ones who profit most from social comparative feedback, given that they are the ones who usually receive the corresponding positive performance feedback.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{MuellervanSchaikBlumeetal.2014,
  author    = {M{\"u}ller, Eva Nora and van Schaik, Loes and Blume, Theresa and Bronstert, Axel and Carus, Jana and Fleckenstein, Jan H. and Fohrer, Nicola and Geissler, Katja and Gerke, Horst H. and Gr{\"a}ff, Thomas and Hesse, Cornelia and Hildebrandt, Anke and H{\"o}lker, Franz and Hunke, Philip and K{\"o}rner, Katrin and Lewandowski, J{\"o}rg and Lohmann, Dirk and Meinikmann, Karin and Schibalski, Anett and Schmalz, Britta and Schr{\"o}der-Esselbach, Boris and Tietjen, Britta},
  title     = {Scales, key aspects, feedbacks and challenges of ecohydrological research in Germany},
  series = {Hydrologie und Wasserbewirtschaftung},
  volume    = {58},
  journal   = {Hydrologie und Wasserbewirtschaftung},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {Bundesanst. f{\"u}r Gew{\"a}sserkunde},
  address   = {Koblenz},
  issn      = {1439-1783},
  doi       = {10.5675/HyWa_2014,4_2},
  pages     = {221 -- 240},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {Ecohydrology analyses the interactions of biotic and abiotic aspects of our ecosystems and landscapes. It is a highly diverse discipline in terms of its thematic and methodical research foci. This article gives an overview of current German ecohydrological research approaches within plant-animal-soil-systems, meso-scale catchments and their river networks, lake systems, coastal areas and tidal rivers. It discusses their relevant spatial and temporal process scales and different types of interactions and feedback dynamics between hydrological and biotic processes and patterns. The following topics are considered key challenges: innovative analysis of the interdisciplinary scale continuum, development of dynamically coupled model systems, integrated monitoring of coupled processes at the interface and transition from basic to applied ecohydrological science to develop sustainable water and land resource management strategies under regional and global change.},
  language  = {de}
}
@book{Oppermann2015,
  author    = {Oppermann, Antje},
  title     = {Selbstevaluation - Der Informationsfluss beim Lehren und Lernen},
  issn      = {2364-3927},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-74706},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {17},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Gespr{\"a}che mit Lehrenden unterschiedlicher Hochschulen eigten einen enormen Mehrwert f{\"u}r die Gestaltung der Lehre mittels der Selbstreflexion und dem gemeinsamen Austausch {\"u}ber effektive Evaluationsmethoden. Regelm{\"a}ßiges Training ist der Schl{\"u}ssel f{\"u}r eine dialogorientierte Qualit{\"a}tskultur in der eigenen Lehre. So wird die zielgerichtete Selbstreflexion zum festen Bestandteil des eigenen Habitus, des eigenen Lehrhandelns. Nachfolgende Ausf{\"u}hrungen richten sich an Dozierende in der Erwachsenenbildung. Sie zeigen einen Einblick in die Vielfalt der M{\"o}glichkeiten, mit Hilfe der Selbstevaluation und insbesondere des Feedbacks, die eigene Lehre immer wieder lebendig zu gestalten. Selbstevaluation bietet die M{\"o}glichkeit, Informationen und Eindr{\"u}cke zur Wirksamkeit der eigenen Lehre auf der Basis empirischen Datenmaterials zu gewinnen und abzusichern.},
  language  = {de}
}