@article{FrodlJanowitzSchmaaletal.2017,
  author    = {Frodl, Thomas and Janowitz, Deborah and Schmaal, Lianne and Tozzi, Leonardo and Dobrowolny, Henrik and Stein, Dan J. and Veltman, Dick J. and Wittfeld, Katharina and van Erp, Theo G. M. and Jahanshad, Neda and Block, Andrea and Hegenscheid, Katrin and Voelzke, Henry and Lagopoulos, Jim and Hatton, Sean N. and Hickie, Ian B. and Frey, Eva Maria and Carballedo, Angela and Brooks, Samantha J. and Vuletic, Daniella and Uhlmann, Anne and Veer, Ilya M. and Walter, Henrik and Schnell, Knut and Grotegerd, Dominik and Arolt, Volker and Kugel, Harald and Schramm, Elisabeth and Konrad, Carsten and Zurowski, Bartosz and Baune, Bernhard T. and van der Wee, Nic J. A. and van Tol, Marie-Jose and Penninx, Brenda W. J. H. and Thompson, Paul M. and Hibar, Derrek P. and Dannlowski, Udo and Grabe, Hans J.},
  title     = {Childhood adversity impacts on brain subcortical structures relevant to depression},
  series = {Journal of psychiatric research},
  volume    = {86},
  journal   = {Journal of psychiatric research},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Oxford},
  issn      = {0022-3956},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.11.010},
  pages     = {58 -- 65},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {Childhood adversity plays an important role for development of major depressive disorder (MDD). There are differences in subcortical brain structures between patients with MDD and healthy controls, but the specific impact of childhood adversity on such structures in MDD remains unclear. Thus, aim of the present study was to investigate whether childhood adversity is associated with subcortical volumes and how it interacts with a diagnosis of MDD and sex. Within the ENIGMA-MDD network, nine university partner sites, which assessed childhood adversity and magnetic resonance imaging in patients with MDD and controls, took part in the current joint mega-analysis. In this largest effort world-wide to identify subcortical brain structure differences related to childhood adversity, 3036 participants were analyzed for subcortical brain volumes using FreeSurfer. A significant interaction was evident between childhood adversity, MDD diagnosis, sex, and region. Increased exposure to childhood adversity was associated with smaller caudate volumes in females independent of MDD. All subcategories of childhood adversity were negatively associated with caudate volumes in females - in particular emotional neglect and physical neglect (independently from age, ICV, imaging site and MDD diagnosis). There was no interaction effect between childhood adversity and MDD diagnosis on subcortical brain volumes. Childhood adversity is one of the contributors to brain structural abnormalities. It is associated with subcortical brain abnormalities that are relevant to psychiatric disorders such as depression. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{WiebkingLinWippert2022,
  author    = {Wiebking, Christine and Lin, Chiao-I and Wippert, Pia-Maria},
  title     = {Training intervention effects on cognitive performance and neuronal plasticity — A pilot study},
  series = {Frontiers in Neurology, section Neurorehabilitation},
  volume    = {13},
  journal   = {Frontiers in Neurology, section Neurorehabilitation},
  publisher = {Frontiers},
  address   = {Lausanne, Schweiz},
  issn      = {1664-2295},
  doi       = {10.3389/fneur.2022.773813},
  pages     = {11},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Studies suggest that people suffering from chronic pain may have altered brain plasticity, along with altered functional connectivity between pain-processing brain regions. These may be related to decreased mood and cognitive performance. There is some debate as to whether physical activity combined with behavioral therapy (e.g. cognitive distraction, body scan) may counteract these changes. However, underlying neuronal mechanisms are unclear. The aim of the current pilot study with a 3-armed randomized controlled trial design was to examine the effects of sensorimotor training for nonspecific chronic low back pain on (1) cognitive performance; (2) fMRI activity co-fluctuations (functional connectivity) between pain-related brain regions; and (3) the relationship between functional connectivity and subjective variables (pain and depression). Six hundred and sixty two volunteers with non-specific chronic low back pain were randomly allocated to a unimodal (sensorimotor training), multidisciplinary (sensorimotor training and behavioral therapy) intervention, or to a control group within a multicenter study. A subsample of patients (n = 21) from one study center participated in the pilot study presented here. Measurements were at baseline, during (3 weeks, M2) and after intervention (12 weeks, M4 and 24 weeks, M5). Cognitive performance was measured by the Trail Making Test and functional connectivity by MRI. Pain perception and depression were assessed by the Von Korff questionnaire and the Hospital and Anxiety. Group differences were calculated by univariate and repeated ANOVA measures and Bayesian statistics; correlations by Pearson's r. Change and correlation of functional connection were analyzed within a pooled intervention group (uni-, multidisciplinary group). Results revealed that participants with increased pain intensity at baseline showed higher functional connectivity between pain-related brain areas used as ROIs in this study. Though small sample sizes limit generalization, cognitive performance increased in the multimodal group. Increased functional connectivity was observed in participants with increased pain ratings. Pain ratings and connectivity in pain-related brain regions decreased after the intervention. The results provide preliminary indication that intervention effects can potentially be achieved on the cognitive and neuronal level. The intervention may be suitable for therapy and prevention of non-specific chronic low back pain.},
  language  = {en}
}