@article{VladovaUllrichSloaneetal.2023,
  author    = {Vladova, Gergana and Ullrich, Andr{\´e} and Sloane, Mona and Renz, Andr{\´e} and Tsui, Eric},
  title     = {Editorial: new teaching and learning worlds},
  series = {Frontiers in education},
  volume    = {8},
  journal   = {Frontiers in education},
  publisher = {Frontiers Media},
  address   = {Lausanne},
  issn      = {2504-284X},
  doi       = {10.3389/feduc.2023.1175498},
  pages     = {1 -- 3},
  year      = {2023},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{ThienenWeinsteinMeinel2023,
  author    = {Thienen, Julia von and Weinstein, Theresa Julia and Meinel, Christoph},
  title     = {Creative metacognition in design thinking},
  series = {Frontiers in psychology},
  volume    = {14},
  journal   = {Frontiers in psychology},
  publisher = {Frontiers Research Foundation},
  address   = {Lausanne},
  issn      = {1664-1078},
  doi       = {10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1157001},
  pages     = {20},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Design thinking is a well-established practical and educational approach to fostering high-level creativity and innovation, which has been refined since the 1950s with the participation of experts like Joy Paul Guilford and Abraham Maslow. Through real-world projects, trainees learn to optimize their creative outcomes by developing and practicing creative cognition and metacognition. This paper provides a holistic perspective on creativity, enabling the formulation of a comprehensive theoretical framework of creative metacognition. It focuses on the design thinking approach to creativity and explores the role of metacognition in four areas of creativity expertise: Products, Processes, People, and Places. The analysis includes task-outcome relationships (product metacognition), the monitoring of strategy effectiveness (process metacognition), an understanding of individual or group strengths and weaknesses (people metacognition), and an examination of the mutual impact between environments and creativity (place metacognition). It also reviews measures taken in design thinking education, including a distribution of cognition and metacognition, to support students in their development of creative mastery. On these grounds, we propose extended methods for measuring creative metacognition with the goal of enhancing comprehensive assessments of the phenomenon. Proposed methodological advancements include accuracy sub-scales, experimental tasks where examinees explore problem and solution spaces, combinations of naturalistic observations with capability testing, as well as physiological assessments as indirect measures of creative metacognition.},
  language  = {en}
}
@book{SchmiedgenRhinowKoeppenetal.2015,
  author    = {Schmiedgen, Jan and Rhinow, Holger and K{\"o}ppen, Eva and Meinel, Christoph},
  title     = {Parts without a whole?},
  number    = {97},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {978-3-86956-334-3},
  issn      = {1613-5652},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-79969},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {143},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {This explorative study gives a descriptive overview of what organizations do and experience when they say they practice design thinking. It looks at how the concept has been appropriated in organizations and also describes patterns of design thinking adoption. The authors use a mixed-method research design fed by two sources: questionnaire data and semi-structured personal expert interviews. The study proceeds in six parts: (1) design thinking¹s entry points into organizations; (2) understandings of the descriptor; (3) its fields of application and organizational localization; (4) its perceived impact; (5) reasons for its discontinuation or failure; and (6) attempts to measure its success. In conclusion the report challenges managers to be more conscious of their current design thinking practice. The authors suggest a co-evolution of the concept¹s introduction with innovation capability building and the respective changes in leadership approaches. It is argued that this might help in unfolding design thinking¹s hidden potentials as well as preventing unintended side-effects such as discontented teams or the dwindling authority of managers.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{RoeschTiberiusKraus2023,
  author    = {R{\"o}sch, Nicolas and Tiberius, Victor and Kraus, Sascha},
  title     = {Design thinking for innovation},
  series = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  journal   = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  number    = {7},
  issn      = {1460-1060},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-60834},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-608341},
  pages     = {19},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Purpose - Design thinking has become an omnipresent process to foster innovativeness in various fields. Due to its popularity in both practice and theory, the number of publications has been growing rapidly. The authors aim to develop a research framework that reflects the current state of research and allows for the identification of research gaps. Design/methodology/approach - The authors conduct a systematic literature review based on 164 scholarly articles on design thinking. Findings - This study proposes a framework, which identifies individual and organizational context factors, the stages of a typical design thinking process with its underlying principles and tools, and the individual as well as organizational outcomes of a design thinking project. Originality/value - Whereas previous reviews focused on particular aspects of design thinking, such as its characteristics, the organizational culture as a context factor or its role on new product development, the authors provide a holistic overview of the current state of research.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{RoeschTiberiusKraus2023,
  author    = {R{\"o}sch, Nicolas and Tiberius, Victor and Kraus, Sascha},
  title     = {Design thinking for innovation},
  series = {European journal of innovation management},
  volume    = {26},
  journal   = {European journal of innovation management},
  number    = {7},
  publisher = {Emerald},
  address   = {Bingley},
  issn      = {1460-1060},
  doi       = {10.1108/EJIM-03-2022-0164},
  pages     = {160 -- 176},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Purpose - Design thinking has become an omnipresent process to foster innovativeness in various fields. Due to its popularity in both practice and theory, the number of publications has been growing rapidly. The authors aim to develop a research framework that reflects the current state of research and allows for the identification of research gaps. Design/methodology/approach - The authors conduct a systematic literature review based on 164 scholarly articles on design thinking. Findings - This study proposes a framework, which identifies individual and organizational context factors, the stages of a typical design thinking process with its underlying principles and tools, and the individual as well as organizational outcomes of a design thinking project. Originality/value - Whereas previous reviews focused on particular aspects of design thinking, such as its characteristics, the organizational culture as a context factor or its role on new product development, the authors provide a holistic overview of the current state of research.},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Lindberg2013,
  author    = {Lindberg, Tilmann S{\"o}ren},
  title     = {Design-Thinking-Diskurse : Bestimmung, Themen, Entwicklungen},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-69704},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  year      = {2013},
  abstract  = {Der Untersuchungsgegenstand der vorliegenden Arbeit ist, die mit dem Begriff „Design Thinking" verbundenen Diskurse zu bestimmen und deren Themen, Konzepte und Bez{\"u}ge herauszuarbeiten. Diese Zielstellung ergibt sich aus den mehrfachen Widerspr{\"u}chen und Vieldeutigkeiten, die die gegenw{\"a}rtigen Verwendungen des Design-Thinking-Begriffs charakterisieren und den koh{\"a}renten Gebrauch in Wissenschaft und Wirtschaft erschweren. Diese Arbeit soll einen Beitrag dazu leisten, „Design Thinking" in den unterschiedlichen Diskurszusammenh{\"a}ngen grundlegend zu verstehen und f{\"u}r zuk{\"u}nftige Verwendungen des Design-Thinking-Begriffs eine solide Argumentationsbasis zu schaffen.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{HehnMendezUebernickeletal.2019,
  author    = {Hehn, Jennifer and Mendez, Daniel and Uebernickel, Falk and Brenner, Walter and Broy, Manfred},
  title     = {On integrating design thinking for human-centered requirements engineering},
  series = {IEEE software},
  volume    = {37},
  journal   = {IEEE software},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Inst. of Electr. and Electronics Engineers},
  address   = {Los Alamitos},
  issn      = {0740-7459},
  doi       = {10.1109/MS.2019.2957715},
  pages     = {25 -- 31},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {We elaborate on the possibilities and needs to integrate design thinking into requirements engineering, drawing from our research and project experiences. We suggest three approaches for tailoring and integrating design thinking and requirements engineering with complementary synergies and point at open challenges for research and practice.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{DragičevićVladovaUllrich2023,
  author    = {Dragičević, Nikolina and Vladova, Gergana and Ullrich, Andr{\´e}},
  title     = {Design thinking capabilities in the digital world},
  series = {Frontiers in Education},
  volume    = {7},
  journal   = {Frontiers in Education},
  publisher = {Frontiers},
  address   = {Lausanne, Schweiz},
  issn      = {2504-284X},
  doi       = {10.3389/feduc.2022.1012478},
  pages     = {18},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Recent research suggests that design thinking practices may foster the development of needed capabilities in new digitalised landscapes. However, existing publications represent individual contributions, and we lack a holistic understanding of the value of design thinking in a digital world. No review, to date, has offered a holistic retrospection of this research. In response, in this bibliometric review, we aim to shed light on the intellectual structure of multidisciplinary design thinking literature related to capabilities relevant to the digital world in higher education and business settings, highlight current trends and suggest further studies to advance theoretical and empirical underpinnings. Our study addresses this aim using bibliometric methods—bibliographic coupling and co-word analysis as they are particularly suitable for identifying current trends and future research priorities at the forefront of the research. Overall, bibliometric analyses of the publications dealing with the related topics published in the last 10 years (extracted from the Web of Science database) expose six trends and two possible future research developments highlighting the expanding scope of the design thinking scientific field related to capabilities required for the (more sustainable and human-centric) digital world. Relatedly, design thinking becomes a relevant approach to be included in higher education curricula and human resources training to prepare students and workers for the changing work demands. This paper is well-suited for education and business practitioners seeking to embed design thinking capabilities in their curricula and for design thinking and other scholars wanting to understand the field and possible directions for future research.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{DragičevićVladovaUllrich2023,
  author    = {Dragičević, Nikolina and Vladova, Gergana and Ullrich, Andr{\´e}},
  title     = {Design thinking capabilities in the digital world},
  series = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  journal   = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  number    = {158},
  issn      = {1867-5808},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-58846},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-588468},
  pages     = {18},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Recent research suggests that design thinking practices may foster the development of needed capabilities in new digitalised landscapes. However, existing publications represent individual contributions, and we lack a holistic understanding of the value of design thinking in a digital world. No review, to date, has offered a holistic retrospection of this research. In response, in this bibliometric review, we aim to shed light on the intellectual structure of multidisciplinary design thinking literature related to capabilities relevant to the digital world in higher education and business settings, highlight current trends and suggest further studies to advance theoretical and empirical underpinnings. Our study addresses this aim using bibliometric methods—bibliographic coupling and co-word analysis as they are particularly suitable for identifying current trends and future research priorities at the forefront of the research. Overall, bibliometric analyses of the publications dealing with the related topics published in the last 10 years (extracted from the Web of Science database) expose six trends and two possible future research developments highlighting the expanding scope of the design thinking scientific field related to capabilities required for the (more sustainable and human-centric) digital world. Relatedly, design thinking becomes a relevant approach to be included in higher education curricula and human resources training to prepare students and workers for the changing work demands. This paper is well-suited for education and business practitioners seeking to embed design thinking capabilities in their curricula and for design thinking and other scholars wanting to understand the field and possible directions for future research.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{dePaulaMarxWolfetal.2022,
  author    = {de Paula, Danielly and Marx, Carolin and Wolf, Ella and Dremel, Christian and Cormican, Kathryn and Uebernickel, Falk},
  title     = {A managerial mental model to drive innovation in the context of digital transformation},
  series = {Industry and innovation},
  journal   = {Industry and innovation},
  publisher = {Routledge, Taylor \& Francis Group},
  address   = {Abingdon},
  issn      = {1366-2716},
  doi       = {10.1080/13662716.2022.2072711},
  pages     = {24},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Industry 4.0 is transforming how businesses innovate and, as a result, companies are spearheading the movement towards 'Digital Transformation'. While some scholars advocate the use of design thinking to identify new innovative behaviours, cognition experts emphasise the importance of top managers in supporting employees to develop these behaviours. However, there is a dearth of research in this domain and companies are struggling to implement the required behaviours. To address this gap, this study aims to identify and prioritise behavioural strategies conducive to design thinking to inform the creation of a managerial mental model. We identify 20 behavioural strategies from 45 interviewees with practitioners and educators and combine them with the concepts of 'paradigm-mindset-mental model' from cognition theory. The paper contributes to the body of knowledge by identifying and prioritising specific behavioural strategies to form a novel set of survival conditions aligned to the new industrial paradigm of Industry 4.0.},
  language  = {en}
}