@phdthesis{Schwetlick2023,
  author    = {Schwetlick, Lisa},
  title     = {Data assimilation for neurocognitive models of eye movement},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-59828},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-598280},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {x, 209},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Visual perception is a complex and dynamic process that plays a crucial role in how we perceive and interact with the world. The eyes move in a sequence of saccades and fixations, actively modulating perception by moving different parts of the visual world into focus. Eye movement behavior can therefore offer rich insights into the underlying cognitive mechanisms and decision processes. Computational models in combination with a rigorous statistical framework are critical for advancing our understanding in this field, facilitating the testing of theory-driven predictions and accounting for observed data. In this thesis, I investigate eye movement behavior through the development of two mechanistic, generative, and theory-driven models. The first model is based on experimental research regarding the distribution of attention, particularly around the time of a saccade, and explains statistical characteristics of scan paths. The second model implements a self-avoiding random walk within a confining potential to represent the microscopic fixational drift, which is present even while the eye is at rest, and investigates the relationship to microsaccades. Both models are implemented in a likelihood-based framework, which supports the use of data assimilation methods to perform Bayesian parameter inference at the level of individual participants, analyses of the marginal posteriors of the interpretable parameters, model comparisons, and posterior predictive checks. The application of these methods enables a thorough investigation of individual variability in the space of parameters. Results show that dynamical modeling and the data assimilation framework are highly suitable for eye movement research and, more generally, for cognitive modeling.},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Rolfs2007,
  author    = {Rolfs, Martin},
  title     = {In-between fixation and movement : on the generation of microsaccades and what they convey about saccade generation},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-14581},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  year      = {2007},
  abstract  = {Microsaccades are an important component of the small eye movements that constitute fixation, the basis of visual perception. The specific function of microsaccades has been a long-standing research problem. Only recently, conclusive evidence emerged, showing that microsaccades aid both visual perception and oculomotor control. The main goal of this thesis was to improve our understanding of the implementation of microsaccade generation within the circuitry of saccade control, an unsolved issue in oculomotor research. We make a case for a model according to which microsaccades and saccades result from mutually dependent motor plans, competing for expression. The model consists of an activation field, coding for fixation at its center and for saccades at peripheral locations; saccade amplitude increases with eccentricity. Activity during fixation spreads to slightly peripheral locations in the field and, thus, may result in the generation of microsaccades. Inhibition of remote and excitation of neighbouring locations govern the dynamics of the field, resulting in a strong competition between fixation and saccade generation. We propose that this common-field model of microsaccade and saccade generation finds a neurophysiological counterpart in the motor map of the superior colliculus (SC), a key brainstem structure involved in the generation of saccades. In a series of five behavioral experiments, we tested implications of the model. Predictions were derived concerning (1) the behavior of microsaccades in a given task (microsaccade rate, amplitude, and direction), (2) the interactions of microsaccades and subsequent saccades, and (3) the relationship between microsaccadic behavior and neurophysiological processes at the level of the SC. The results yielded strong support for the model at all three levels of analysis, suggesting that microsaccade statistics are indicative of the state of the fixation-related part of the SC motor map.},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Risse2011,
  author    = {Risse, Sarah},
  title     = {Processing in the perceptual span : investigations with the n+2-boundary paradigm},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-60414},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  year      = {2011},
  abstract  = {Cognitive psychology is traditionally interested in the interaction of perception, cognition, and behavioral control. Investigating eye movements in reading constitutes a field of research in which the processes and interactions of these subsystems can be studied in a well-defined environment. Thereby, the following questions are pursued: How much information is visually perceived during a fixation, how is processing achieved and temporally coordinated from visual letter encoding to final sentence comprehension, and how do such processes reflect on behavior such as the control of the eyes' movements during reading. Various theoretical models have been proposed to account for the specific eye-movement behavior in reading (for a review see Reichle, Rayner, \& Pollatsek, 2003). Some models are based on the idea of shifting attention serially from one word to the next within the sentence whereas others propose distributed attention allocating processing resources to more than one word at a time. As attention is assumed to drive word recognition processes one major difference between these models is that word processing must either occur in strict serial order, or that word processing is achieved in parallel. In spite of this crucial difference in the time course of word processing, both model classes perform well on explaining many of the benchmark effects in reading. In fact, there seems to be not much empirical evidence that challenges the models to a point at which their basic assumptions could be falsified. One issue often perceived as being decisive in the debate on serial and parallel word processing is how not-yet-fixated words to the right of fixation affect eye movements. Specifically, evidence is discussed as to what spatial extent such parafoveal words are previewed and how this influences current and subsequent word processing. Four experiments investigated parafoveal processing close to the spatial limits of the perceptual span. The present work aims to go beyond mere existence proofs of previewing words at such spatial distances. Introducing a manipulation that dissociates the sources of long-range preview effects, benefits and costs of parafoveal processing can be investigated in a single analysis and the differing impact is tracked across a three-word target region. In addition, the same manipulation evaluates the role of oculomotor error as the cause of non-local distributed effects. In this respect, the results contribute to a better understanding of the time course of word processing inside the perceptual span and attention allocation during reading.},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Meinke2006,
  author    = {Meinke, Anja},
  title     = {Nikotineffekte auf r{\"a}umliche Aufmerksamkeitsprozesse bei Nichtrauchern},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-7659},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  year      = {2006},
  abstract  = {Nikotin in den unterschiedlichsten Darreichungsformen verringert bei verschiedenen Spezies im r{\"a}umlichen Hinweisreizparadigma die Kosten invalider Hinweisreize. Welcher Teilprozess genau durch Nikotin beeinflusst wird, ist bislang nicht untersucht worden. Die g{\"a}ngige Interpretation ist, daß Nikotin das Losl{\"o}sen von Aufmerksamkeit von einem bisher beachteten Ort erleichtert. In f{\"u}nf Studien, drei elektrophysiologischen und zwei behavioralen wurden drei m{\"o}gliche Mechanismen der Nikotinwirkung an Nichtrauchern untersucht. Experiment 1 und 2 gingen der Frage nach, ob Nikotin eine Modulation sensorischer gain Kontrolle bewirkt. Dazu wurden ereigniskorrelierte Potentiale (EKP) im Posner-Paradigma erhoben und die Wirkung von Nikotin auf die aufmerksamkeitsassoziierten Komponenten P1 und N1 betrachtet. Nikotin verringerte die Kosten invalider Hinweisreize bei Aufmerksamkeitslenkung durch endogene Hinweisreize, nicht aber bei exogenen Hinweisreizen. Die P1 und N1 Komponenten zeigten sich unbeeinflusst von Nikotin, damit findet also die Annahme einer Wirkung auf sensorische Suppression keine Unterst{\"u}tzung. In Experiment 3 und 4 wurde untersucht, ob Nikotin einen Effekt auf kostentr{\"a}chtige unwillk{\"u}rliche Aufmerksamkeitsverschiebungen, Distraktionen, hat. In Experiment 3 wurden in einem r{\"a}umlichen Daueraufmerksamkeitsparadigma Distraktionen durch deviante Stimulusmerkmale ausgel{\"o}st und die Wirkung von Nikotin auf eine distraktionsassoziierte Komponente des EKP, die P3a, betrachtet. In Experiment 4 wurde in einem Hinweisreizparadigma durch zus{\"a}tzliche Stimuli eine Distraktion ausgel{\"o}st und die Nikotinwirkung auf die Reaktionszeitkosten untersucht. Nikotin zeigte keinen Einfluss auf Distraktionskosten in beiden Studien und auch keine Wirkung auf die P3a Komponente in Experiment 3. In Experiment 4 wurde zus{\"a}tzlich die Wirkung von Nikotin auf das Losl{\"o}sen von Aufmerksamkeit untersucht, indem die Schwierigkeit des Losl{\"o}sens variiert wurde. Auch hier zeigte sich keine Nikotinwirkung. Allerdings konnte in beiden Studien weder die h{\"a}ufig berichtete generelle Reaktionszeitverk{\"u}rzung noch die Verringerung der Kosten invalider Hinweisreize repliziert werden, so dass zum Einen keine Aussage {\"u}ber die Wirkung von Nikotin auf Distraktionen oder den Aufmerksamkeitslosl{\"o}seprozess gemacht werden k{\"o}nnen, zum Anderen sich die Frage stellte, unter welchen Bedingungen Nikotin einen differentiellen Effekt {\"u}berhaupt zeigt. Im letzten Experiment wurde hierzu die H{\"a}ufigkeit der Reaktionsanforderung einerseits und die zeitlichen Aspekte der Aufmerksamkeitslenkung andererseits variiert und der Effekt des Nikotins auf den Validit{\"a}tseffekt, die Reaktionszeitdifferenz zwischen valide und invalide vorhergesagten Zielreizen, betrachtet. Nikotin verringerte bei Individuen, bei denen Aufmerksamkeitslenkung in allen Bedingungen evident war, in der Tendenz den Validit{\"a}tseffekt in der ereignis{\"a}rmsten Bedingung, wenn nur selten willentliche Aufmerksamkeitsausrichtung notwendig war. Dies k{\"o}nnte als Hinweis gedeutet werden, dass Nikotin unter Bedingungen, die große Anforderungen an die Vigilanz stellen, die top-down Zuweisung von Aufmerksamkeitsressourcen unterst{\"u}tzt.},
  subject      = {Nicotin},
  language  = {de}
}