@book{OPUS4-11818,
  title     = {Accessible Media : Pre-Proceedings of a Workshop Potsdam 8-9 May, 2006},
  series = {Preprint / Universit{\"a}t Potsdam, Institut f{\"u}r Informatik},
  volume    = {2006, 7},
  journal   = {Preprint / Universit{\"a}t Potsdam, Institut f{\"u}r Informatik},
  editor    = {J{\"u}rgensen, Helmut},
  publisher = {Univ.},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  issn      = {0946-7580},
  year      = {2006},
  language  = {en}
}
@book{OPUS4-1195,
  title     = {Interdisciplinary studies on information structure : ISIS ; Working papers of the SFB 632 - Vol. 5},
  editor    = {Ishihara, Shinichiro and Schmitz, Michaela and Schwarz, Anne},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  issn      = {1866-4725},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-13047},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {221},
  year      = {2006},
  abstract  = {In this paper we compare the behaviour of adverbs of frequency (de Swart 1993) like usually with the behaviour of adverbs of quantity like for the most part in sentences that contain plural definites. We show that sentences containing the former type of Q-adverb evidence that Quantificational Variability Effects (Berman 1991) come about as an indirect effect of quantification over situations: in order for quantificational variability readings to arise, these sentences have to obey two newly observed constraints that clearly set them apart from sentences containing corresponding quantificational DPs, and that can plausibly be explained under the assumption that quantification over (the atomic parts of) complex situations is involved. Concerning sentences with the latter type of Q-adverb, on the other hand, such evidence is lacking: with respect to the constraints just mentioned, they behave like sentences that contain corresponding quantificational DPs. We take this as evidence that Q-adverbs like for the most part do not quantify over the atomic parts of sum eventualities in the cases under discussion (as claimed by Nakanishi and Romero (2004)), but rather over the atomic parts of the respective sum individuals.},
  language  = {en}
}
@book{OPUS4-1107,
  title     = {Optimality theory and minimalism : a possible convergence?},
  editor    = {Broekhuis, Hans and Vogel, Ralf},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {978-3-939469-54-4},
  issn      = {1616-7392},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-11909},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {vii ; 231},
  year      = {2006},
  abstract  = {This issue of Linguistics in Potsdam contains a number of papers that grew out of the workshop Descriptive and Empirical Adequacy in Linguistics held in Berlin on December 17-19 December, 2005. One of the goals of this meeting was to bring together scholars working in various frameworks (with emphasis on the Minimalist Program and Optimality Theory) and to discuss matters concerning descriptive and empirical adequacy. Another explicit goal was to discuss the question whether Minimalism and Optimality Theory should be considered incompatible and, hence, competing theories, or whether the two frameworks should rather be considered complementary in certain respects (see http://let.uvt.nl/deal05/call.html for the call for papers). Five of the seven papers in this volume directly grew out of the oral presentations given at the workshop. Although Vieri Samek-Lodovici's paper was not part of the workshop, it can also be considered a result of the workshop since it pulls together some of his many comments during the discussion time. The paper by Eva Engels and Sten Vikner discusses a phenomenon that received much interest from both minimalist and optimality theoretic syntax in the recent years, Scandinavian object shift. The paper may serve as a practical example for a claim that is repeatedly made in this volume: minimalist and OT analyses, even where they might be competing, can fruitfully inform each other in a constructive manner, leading to a deeper understanding of syntactic phenomena.},
  language  = {en}
}
@book{OPUS4-3905,
  title     = {The Celtic Englishes IV : the interface between english and the celtic languages ; proceedings of the fourth International Colloquium on the "Celtic Englishes" held at the University of Potsdam in Golm (Germany) from 22 - 26 September 2004},
  editor    = {Tristram, Hildegard L. C.},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {978-3-939469-06-3},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-40904},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {350},
  year      = {2006},
  abstract  = {What is "Celtic"and what is universal in the "Celtic Englishes"? This was the central concern of the fourth and final Colloquium of studies on language contact between English and the Celtic languages at the University of Potsdam in September 2004. The contributions to this volume discuss the "Celtic" peculiarities of Standard English in England and in Ireland (North and South). They also examine the perceived "Celticity" of personal names in the "Celtic" countries (Ireland, Wales, Cornwall, Brittany). Moreover, they put emphasis on specific grammatical features such as the expression of perfectivity, relativity, intensification and the typological shift of verbal word formation from syntheticity to analycity as well as the emergence of universal contact trends shared by Celtic, African and Indian Englishes. Thus, the choice of contributors and the scope of their articles makes Celtic Englishes IV an invaluable handbook for scholarly work in the field of the English - Celtic relations.},
  language  = {en}
}
@book{OPUS4-12054,
  title     = {ArabAmericas : literary Entanglements of the American hemisphere and the Arab world},
  series = {Bibliotheca ibero-americana},
  volume    = {110},
  journal   = {Bibliotheca ibero-americana},
  editor    = {Ette, Ottmar and Pannewick, Friederike},
  publisher = {Iberoamericana; Vervuert},
  address   = {Madrid; Frankfurt am Main},
  isbn      = {3-86527-289-4},
  pages     = {288 S.},
  year      = {2006},
  language  = {en}
}
@inproceedings{OPUS4-964,
  title     = {brandial'06 : Proceedings of the 10th Workshop on the semantics and pragmatics of dialogue (SemDial-10)},
  editor    = {Schlangen, David and Fern{\´a}ndez, Raquel},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {978-3-939469-29-2},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-10484},
  pages     = {vii ; 201},
  year      = {2006},
  abstract  = {brandial06 was the tenth in a series of workshops that aims to bring together researchers working on the semantics and pragmatics of dialogues in fields such as artificial intelligence, formal semantics and pragmatics, computational linguistics, philosophy, and psychology. This volume collects all presented papers and posters and gives abstracts of the invited talks.},
  language  = {en}
}
@book{OPUS4-11789,
  title     = {Reports of the 2nd German-Russian PhD Seminar : from 10th to 13th of October 2005 in Potsdam},
  series = {Diskussionsbeitr{\"a}ge / Universit{\"a}t Potsdam, Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakult{\"a}t},
  journal   = {Diskussionsbeitr{\"a}ge / Universit{\"a}t Potsdam, Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Fakult{\"a}t},
  editor    = {Hummel, Detlev and Remde, J{\"o}rg and Fliege, Felix},
  publisher = {Univ.},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  issn      = {1433-1039},
  pages     = {105 S.},
  year      = {2006},
  language  = {en}
}
@book{OPUS4-34451,
  title     = {Prosody in Conversation : Interactional Studies},
  series = {Studies in international sociolinguistics},
  volume    = {12},
  journal   = {Studies in international sociolinguistics},
  editor    = {Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth and Selting, Margret},
  edition   = {1. publ., digitally printed 1. paperback version},
  publisher = {Cambridge Univ. Press},
  address   = {Cambridge},
  isbn      = {978-0-521-02410-5},
  pages     = {471 S.},
  year      = {2006},
  language  = {en}
}
@book{OPUS4-30624,
  title     = {Hesed and Tzedakah : from Bible to modernity},
  series = {Aus Religion und Recht},
  volume    = {6},
  journal   = {Aus Religion und Recht},
  editor    = {Jacob, Walter and Homolka, Walter},
  publisher = {Frank \& Timme},
  address   = {Berlin},
  isbn      = {978-3-86596-090-0},
  pages     = {107 S.},
  year      = {2006},
  abstract  = {From a Jewish perspective, divine action in this world revolves around two poles: Hesed and Tzedakah. There is one fundamental difference between them: Hesed describes those actions of God that arise not from obligation, but instead are spurred by pure love for humankind, by grace and mercy. Tzedakah by contrast touches on God's righteous interaction within his covenant, as well as justice observed by man seeking harmony with God's will. Each of the terms applies to both God and man. Hesed and Tzedakah emanate from God, and eventually should transform a person into a Hasid and a Tzaddik. The authors of this volume parse the subtlety of different meanings behind this pair of terms - from Bible to modernity.},
  language  = {en}
}
@book{OPUS4-11759,
  title     = {The Governance of services of general interest between state, market and society},
  editor    = {Reichard, Christoph and Mussari, Riccardo and Kupke, S{\"o}ren},
  publisher = {WVB Wiss.-Verl.},
  address   = {Berlin},
  isbn      = {3-86573-208-9},
  pages     = {252 S.},
  year      = {2006},
  language  = {en}
}