@article{vonKalckreuth2019,
  author    = {von Kalckreuth, Moritz Alexander},
  title     = {Expansivit{\"a}t, Objektivit{\"a}t und Aktualit{\"a}t des Betroffenseins},
  series = {Horizon : studies in phenomenology : Studien zur Ph{\"a}nomenologie : fenomenologičeskie issledovanija : {\´e}tudes ph{\´e}nom{\´e}nologiques},
  volume    = {8},
  journal   = {Horizon : studies in phenomenology : Studien zur Ph{\"a}nomenologie : fenomenologičeskie issledovanija : {\´e}tudes ph{\´e}nom{\´e}nologiques},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {St. Petersburg University Press},
  address   = {St. Petersburg},
  issn      = {2226-5260},
  doi       = {10.21638/2226-5260-2019-8-1-211-229},
  pages     = {211 -- 229},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {The aim of this paper is to discuss Nicolai Hartmann's conception of personhood as developed in his philosophy of spiritual being. Many contemporary accounts of personhood are systematically focused on rational phenomena as self-consciousness or practical reasoning, which are understood as 'conditions of personhood'. Apart from having some technical problems, those accounts limit our self-under-standing as persons on distinct rational properties and often fail to consider the sociocultural aspects of the personal situation. Nicolai Hartmann — although respecting the role of reason — understands personhood particularly as participation in a shared spiritual sphere called Objektiver Geist (objective spirit), which includes various intersubjective phenomena as languages, religion, moral, arts, and the sciences. Being part of this sphere seems to be more fundamental than having distinct rational properties, which requests a spiritual frame to be exerted. Further it is shown that Hartmann's ontology of person also includes a notion of being affected by the existential weight of situations and other person's actions — an idea often maintained by phenomenological positions. By regarding rational, intersubjective and affective aspects, Hartmann's philosophy of person succeeds in offering a broad articulation of our self-understanding and may also be seen as providing a background to understand certain phenomena that are part of the personal situation.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{vonKalckreuth2019,
  author    = {von Kalckreuth, Moritz Alexander},
  title     = {Wie viel Religionsphilosophie braucht es f{\"u}r eine Philosophie der Person?},
  series = {Neue Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie},
  volume    = {61},
  journal   = {Neue Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {De Gruyter},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {0028-3517},
  doi       = {10.1515/nzsth-2019-0004},
  pages     = {67 -- 83},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Der vorliegende Beitrag er{\"o}rtert das Verh{\"a}ltnis einer Philo-sophie der Person zur Religionsphilosophie bzw. einer Philosophie religi{\"o}ser Ph{\"a}nomene. Dabei soll die These vertreten werden, dass der personale Lebenszusammenhang bestimmte Ph{\"a}nomene aufweist, die nur in einem religi{\"o}sen Kontext ad{\"a}quat verstanden werden k{\"o}nnen. Die Interpretation dieser Ph{\"a}nomene kann einen Zugang zu bestimmten Aspekten von Personalit{\"a}t erm{\"o}glichen, die von den meisten Persontheorien der Gegenwart kaum beachtet werden.},
  language  = {de}
}