@phdthesis{Wagner2023,
  author    = {Wagner, Luisa},
  title     = {Diagnosekompetenz (angehender) Lehrkr{\"a}fte},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {104},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Bereits im vorschulischen Bereich, aber vor allem in der Grundschule entwickeln Kinder wichtige Kompetenzen f{\"u}r sp{\"a}tere Bildungsabschl{\"u}sse. Doch die Kompe-tenzunterschiede zwischen den Sch{\"u}ler:innen sind bereits zu Beginn der Grund-schulzeit betr{\"a}chtlich. Somit kommt den Lehrkr{\"a}ften die {\"u}beraus wichtige Aufga-be zu allen Kindern den f{\"u}r sie besten Bildungsweg zu erm{\"o}glichen. Um dieser Herausforderung zu begegnen, m{\"u}ssen Diagnostik und F{\"o}rderung im Unterricht Hand in Hand gehen. Deshalb wird die Diagnosekompetenz von Lehrkr{\"a}ften als wichtige Voraussetzung f{\"u}r gelingenden Unterricht angesehen. Diese Dissertation widmet sich nun eben dieser wichtigen Kompetenz. Dabei wird sie als mehrdimen-sionales Konstrukt angesehen, zu dem neben der Beurteilung von fachlichen Kompetenzen auch die Einsch{\"a}tzung des Leistungsstandes und die Schlussfolge-rung hinsichtlich notwendiger F{\"o}rderung im Unterricht geh{\"o}ren. Anhand dreier Artikel sowie erg{\"a}nzender theoretischer Betrachtungen wurde die Diagnosekompe-tenz hinsichtlich m{\"o}glicher Einflussfaktoren, der Bedeutung f{\"u}r den Unterricht sowie f{\"u}r die Lehrer:innenbildung untersucht.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{RieseVogelsangSchroederetal.2022,
  author    = {Riese, Josef and Vogelsang, Christoph and Schr{\"o}der, Jan and Borowski, Andreas and Kulgemeyer, Christoph and Reinhold, Peter and Schecker, Horst},
  title     = {The development of lesson planning skills in the subject of physics},
  series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Erziehungswissenschaft},
  journal   = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Erziehungswissenschaft},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {Springer VS/Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH},
  address   = {Wiesbaden},
  issn      = {1434-663X},
  doi       = {10.1007/s11618-022-01112-0},
  pages     = {843 -- 867},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {One main goal of university teacher education is the first acquisition of skills for theory-driven lesson planning. According to models of teachers' professional competence, it is assumed that the acquired professional knowledge represents an essential basis for the development of planning skills. Learning opportunities to apply this professional knowledge often occur in school internships, usually in advanced semesters of teacher education programs. It is also assumed that practical experience within lesson planning supports the formation of professional knowledge. However, the relationship between the extent of professional knowledge and the development of skills to plan a lesson lacks evidence. There is a particular challenge in measuring lesson planning skills both authentically and standardized. To evaluate the mentioned relationship, a longitudinal pre-post-study with prospective physics-teachers (N = 68 in the longitudinal section) was conducted at four German universities. Pre-service physics teachers' skills to plan a lesson were assessed with a standardized performance assessment at the beginning and at the end of a longterm-internship. This assessment consists of planning a physics lesson, conveying Newton's third Law, in a simulated and standardized way with limited time. In addition, content knowledge, pedagogical content knowledge and pedagogical knowledge has been assessed using standardized instruments. Furthermore, additional information about the internship and the amount of learning opportunities was collected at the end of the internship. During the internship, both lesson planning skills and all components of professional knowledge increased. Cross-Lagged-Panel-Analyses reveal that in particular pre-service teachers' pedagogical content knowledge as well as pedagogical knowledge at the beginning of the internship influences the development of lesson planning skills.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{KochSprer2016,
  author    = {Koch, Helvi and Sprer, Nadine},
  title     = {Fostering reading comprehension in regular classrooms: Implementation and effectiveness of whole-class reciprocal teaching},
  series = {Zeitschrift f{\~A}¼r p{\~A}\idagogische Psychologie.},
  volume    = {30},
  journal   = {Zeitschrift f{\~A}¼r p{\~A}\idagogische Psychologie.},
  publisher = {Hogrefe},
  address   = {Bern},
  issn      = {1010-0652},
  doi       = {10.1024/1010-0652/a000176},
  pages     = {213 -- 225},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Zusammenfassung. Ziel war es, die Effektivit{\"a}t zweier Interventionen zur F{\"o}rderung der Lesekompetenz von F{\"u}nftkl{\"a}sslern zu untersuchen. Beide Treatments wurden von Regellehrkr{\"a}ften implementiert. Die eine Intervention war das reziproke Lehren, welches um Selbstregulationsprozeduren angereichert wurde (RT+SRL). Die zweite war eine von Lehrkr{\"a}ften konzipierte lesestrategiebasierte Unterrichtseinheit (Good Practice, GP). Zus{\"a}tzlich gab es eine No-Treatment-Kontrollgruppe (KG0). Insgesamt nahmen an der Studie N = 244 Sch{\"u}ler teil. Im Rahmen eines Pre-, Post-, Follow-Up-Test-Untersuchungsplans kamen standardisierte Leseverst{\"a}ndnisaufgaben, selbstkonstruierte Lesestrategieaufgaben und eine Selbstwirksamkeitsskala zum Einsatz. Kontrastierende Einzelvergleichsanalysen ergaben, dass sich die Sch{\"u}ler der Treatmentbedingung RT+SRL im Vergleich zu den Sch{\"u}lern der Kontrollgruppe zum Post-Test signifikant st{\"a}rker im Leseverst{\"a}ndnis, in der Lesestrategieanwendung und in der Selbstwirksamkeit verbesserten. Gleiches galt f{\"u}r die Lesestrategieanwendung zum Follow-Up-Test. Sch{\"u}ler der Bedingung GP konnten im Vergleich zu KG0-Sch{\"u}lern weder zum Post- noch zum Follow-Up-Test vorteilige Ergebnisse in den drei Kriteriumsmaßen erzielen. The aim of this longitudinal study was to examine the effects of two different teacher-led classroom reading literacy interventions in comparison to traditional literacy instruction (TLI). One of the interventions was reciprocal teaching combined with specifi c self-regulation procedures (RT + SRL). Another intervention was a good-practice program which was designed by a group of teachers (GP). Both treatments were strategy oriented programs to improve reading competence of fi fth graders. In total, there were N = 244 students taking part in this study. To evaluate the effects of the interventions in comparison to TLI we used standardized tests and experimenter-developed reading tasks, and a self-effi cacy scale. The study involved a pretest, posttest, and maintenance test design. Simple contrast analyses indicated that students in the intervention condition RT + SRL outperformed TLI students in reading comprehension and self-effi cacy at post-test and in strategy related task performance at post-and maintenance test. Students in the intervention condition GP, however, demonstrated no better results than students of TLI.},
  language  = {de}
}