@article{KochSprer2016,
  author    = {Koch, Helvi and Sprer, Nadine},
  title     = {Fostering reading comprehension in regular classrooms: Implementation and effectiveness of whole-class reciprocal teaching},
  series = {Zeitschrift f{\~A}¼r p{\~A}\idagogische Psychologie.},
  volume    = {30},
  journal   = {Zeitschrift f{\~A}¼r p{\~A}\idagogische Psychologie.},
  publisher = {Hogrefe},
  address   = {Bern},
  issn      = {1010-0652},
  doi       = {10.1024/1010-0652/a000176},
  pages     = {213 -- 225},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Zusammenfassung. Ziel war es, die Effektivit{\"a}t zweier Interventionen zur F{\"o}rderung der Lesekompetenz von F{\"u}nftkl{\"a}sslern zu untersuchen. Beide Treatments wurden von Regellehrkr{\"a}ften implementiert. Die eine Intervention war das reziproke Lehren, welches um Selbstregulationsprozeduren angereichert wurde (RT+SRL). Die zweite war eine von Lehrkr{\"a}ften konzipierte lesestrategiebasierte Unterrichtseinheit (Good Practice, GP). Zus{\"a}tzlich gab es eine No-Treatment-Kontrollgruppe (KG0). Insgesamt nahmen an der Studie N = 244 Sch{\"u}ler teil. Im Rahmen eines Pre-, Post-, Follow-Up-Test-Untersuchungsplans kamen standardisierte Leseverst{\"a}ndnisaufgaben, selbstkonstruierte Lesestrategieaufgaben und eine Selbstwirksamkeitsskala zum Einsatz. Kontrastierende Einzelvergleichsanalysen ergaben, dass sich die Sch{\"u}ler der Treatmentbedingung RT+SRL im Vergleich zu den Sch{\"u}lern der Kontrollgruppe zum Post-Test signifikant st{\"a}rker im Leseverst{\"a}ndnis, in der Lesestrategieanwendung und in der Selbstwirksamkeit verbesserten. Gleiches galt f{\"u}r die Lesestrategieanwendung zum Follow-Up-Test. Sch{\"u}ler der Bedingung GP konnten im Vergleich zu KG0-Sch{\"u}lern weder zum Post- noch zum Follow-Up-Test vorteilige Ergebnisse in den drei Kriteriumsmaßen erzielen. The aim of this longitudinal study was to examine the effects of two different teacher-led classroom reading literacy interventions in comparison to traditional literacy instruction (TLI). One of the interventions was reciprocal teaching combined with specifi c self-regulation procedures (RT + SRL). Another intervention was a good-practice program which was designed by a group of teachers (GP). Both treatments were strategy oriented programs to improve reading competence of fi fth graders. In total, there were N = 244 students taking part in this study. To evaluate the effects of the interventions in comparison to TLI we used standardized tests and experimenter-developed reading tasks, and a self-effi cacy scale. The study involved a pretest, posttest, and maintenance test design. Simple contrast analyses indicated that students in the intervention condition RT + SRL outperformed TLI students in reading comprehension and self-effi cacy at post-test and in strategy related task performance at post-and maintenance test. Students in the intervention condition GP, however, demonstrated no better results than students of TLI.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{DumontNeumannNagyetal.2013,
  author    = {Dumont, Hanna and Neumann, Marko and Nagy, Gabriel and Becker, Michael and Rose, Norman and Trautwein, Ulrich},
  title     = {Class composition Effects in non-academic lower secondary school tracks in the state of Baden-W{\"u}rttemberg},
  series = {Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht : Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Forschung und Praxis},
  volume    = {60},
  journal   = {Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht : Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Forschung und Praxis},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {Reinhardt},
  address   = {M{\"u}nchen},
  issn      = {0342-183X},
  doi       = {10.2378/peu2013.art16d},
  pages     = {198 -- 213},
  year      = {2013},
  abstract  = {The study investigates the effects of classroom composition (average ability, achievement, and socio-economic background, proportion of immigrant students) on the development in mathematics achievement, and reading literacy from grade 5 to 6. The study draws on a sample of N=1892 students in vocational track schools (Hauptschule) and intermediate track schools (Realschule) in Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany. After controlling for school type, and between-school differences in student intake characteristics, none of the compositional characteristics showed a statistically significant effect on achievement development. School track was associated with the development of reading literacy even after controlling for individual differences; however, this relationship lost its statistical significance after the composition of the student body was additionally taken into account.},
  language  = {de}
}