@article{Jelinek2019, author = {Jelinek, Elfriede}, title = {Der Einzige und wir, sein Eigentum : ein Nachruf auf Thomas Bernhard}, series = {Elfriede Jelinek und Thomas Bernhard : Intertextualit{\"a}t - Korrelationen - Korrespondenzen}, volume = {154}, journal = {Elfriede Jelinek und Thomas Bernhard : Intertextualit{\"a}t - Korrelationen - Korrespondenzen}, publisher = {De Gruyter}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-11-063267-5}, doi = {10.1515/9783110632675-002}, pages = {11 -- 14}, year = {2019}, language = {de} } @article{vonBloh2019, author = {von Bloh, Ute}, title = {Die artistische {\"U}berbietung einer brinnenden liebe Freundschaft und Liebe in J{\"o}rg Wickrams ›Gabriotto und Reinhart‹}, series = {Beitr{\"a}ge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur}, volume = {141}, journal = {Beitr{\"a}ge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur}, number = {3}, publisher = {De Gruyter}, address = {Berlin}, issn = {0005-8076}, doi = {10.1515/bgsl-2019-0024}, pages = {395 -- 424}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Isolated, yet at the same time, in an environment that is hostile to them, the four characters Jorg Wickram imagines in his novel > Gabriotto und Reinhart< are alone together, as the two doomed couples are all also bound to each other in friendship. The construction of paradoxes, calculated primarily for effect, appears to be one of the novels controlled narrative devices. Much like the narratological strategies of intensification, exaggeration and repetition, they are controlled artifices designed for impact, and well-thought-out gambits on the part of the author which he uses, above all, to continue and intensify the tradition of medieval storytelling, and less frequently to counterpose an alternative understanding. Time and again the author makes use of the potential of widespread literary concepts to demonstrate that the love described in the novel is unparalleled.}, language = {de} } @article{Goetze2019, author = {G{\"o}tze, Clemens}, title = {Dieses Interview hat mich v{\"o}llig dekonstruiert}, series = {Elfriede Jelinek und Thomas Bernhard Intertextualit{\"a}t - Korrelationen - Korrespondenzen}, volume = {154}, journal = {Elfriede Jelinek und Thomas Bernhard Intertextualit{\"a}t - Korrelationen - Korrespondenzen}, publisher = {De Gruyter}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-11-063267-5}, doi = {10.1515/9783110632675-010}, pages = {113 -- 129}, year = {2019}, language = {de} } @article{MeyerKalkus2019, author = {Meyer-Kalkus, Reinhart}, title = {Dramenvorlesen als Kunst - das Beispiel Ludwig Tiecks}, series = {Belebungsk{\"u}nste : Praktiken lebendiger Darstellung in Literatur, Kunst und Wissenschaft um 1800}, journal = {Belebungsk{\"u}nste : Praktiken lebendiger Darstellung in Literatur, Kunst und Wissenschaft um 1800}, publisher = {Fink}, address = {Paderborn}, isbn = {978-3-7705-6292-3}, doi = {10.30965/9783846762929_005}, pages = {61 -- 82}, year = {2019}, language = {de} } @article{OPUS4-50491, title = {Elfriede Jelinek und Thomas Bernhard}, series = {Untersuchungen zur deutschen Literaturgeschichte, 154}, journal = {Untersuchungen zur deutschen Literaturgeschichte, 154}, editor = {Reinert, Bastian and G{\"o}tze, Clemens}, publisher = {de Gruyter}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-11-063267-5}, doi = {10.1515/9783110632675}, pages = {274}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Trotz unz{\"a}hliger Forschungsbeitr{\"a}ge zur Literaturnobelpreistr{\"a}gerin Elfriede Jelinek und dem „Verweigerungsk{\"u}nstler" Thomas Bernhard wurde den Verbindungslinien beider Autoren noch nie vergleichend nachgegangen. Der Band erschließt zum 30. Todestag Bernhards (u. 15 Jahre Nobelpreis f{\"u}r Jelinek) anschaulich ein breit gef{\"a}chertes Spektrum an Themen, Perspektiven und Werken beider Schriftsteller im Vergleich. Mit einem Essay von Elfriede Jelinek.}, language = {de} } @article{Philipowski2019, author = {Philipowski, Katharina}, title = {Figur - Mittelalter / Character - Middle Ages}, series = {Handbuch Historische Narratologie}, journal = {Handbuch Historische Narratologie}, editor = {von Contzen, Eva and Kragl, Florian}, publisher = {J.B. Metzler}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-476-04713-7}, pages = {116 -- 128}, year = {2019}, language = {de} } @article{Stockhorst2019, author = {Stockhorst, Stefanie}, title = {Hippotheologie}, series = {Brockes-Lekt{\"u}re : {\"A}sthetik - Religion - Politik}, journal = {Brockes-Lekt{\"u}re : {\"A}sthetik - Religion - Politik}, editor = {Dehrmann, Mark-Georg and G{\"u}nther, Friederike Felicitas}, publisher = {Lang}, address = {Bern, Berlin, Bruxelles [u. a.]}, isbn = {978-3-0343-3923-0}, pages = {185 -- 210}, year = {2019}, language = {de} } @article{Stockhorst2019, author = {Stockhorst, Stefanie}, title = {Kriegerischer Patriotismus - akustische Nachahmung - g{\"o}ttliche Inspiration}, series = {Johann Klaj (um 1616-1656): Akteur - Werk - Umfeld}, journal = {Johann Klaj (um 1616-1656): Akteur - Werk - Umfeld}, editor = {Niefanger, Dirk and Schnabel, Werner Wilhelm}, publisher = {De Gruyter}, address = {Berlin, Boston}, isbn = {978-3-11-066798-1}, pages = {329 -- 351}, year = {2019}, language = {de} } @article{Philipowski2019, author = {Philipowski, Katharina}, title = {Minne und Sang in lyrischen und narrativen Texten: Minnes{\"a}ngerballaden, Neithart Fuchs und Wartburgkrieg}, series = {S{\"a}ngerliebe - S{\"a}ngerkrieg : lyrische Narrative im {\"a}sthetischen Ged{\"a}chtnis des Mittelalters und der Neuzeit}, journal = {S{\"a}ngerliebe - S{\"a}ngerkrieg : lyrische Narrative im {\"a}sthetischen Ged{\"a}chtnis des Mittelalters und der Neuzeit}, editor = {Kropik, Cordula and Immer, Nikolas}, publisher = {Lang}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-631-77211-9}, pages = {35 -- 64}, year = {2019}, language = {de} } @article{Philipowski2019, author = {Philipowski, Katharina}, title = {R{\"u}diger und die Gaben}, series = {13. und 14. P{\"o}chlarner Heldenliedgespr{\"a}ch : die Nibelungenklage : R{\"u}diger von Bechelaren}, journal = {13. und 14. P{\"o}chlarner Heldenliedgespr{\"a}ch : die Nibelungenklage : R{\"u}diger von Bechelaren}, editor = {Keller, Johannes and Kragl, Florian and M{\"u}ller, Stephan}, publisher = {Fassbaender}, address = {Wien}, isbn = {978-3-902575-83-8}, pages = {313 -- 346}, year = {2019}, language = {de} } @article{Philipowski2019, author = {Philipowski, Katharina}, title = {Wider die Bew{\"a}ltigungsthese}, series = {13. und 14. P{\"o}chlarner Heldenliedgespr{\"a}ch : die Nibelungenklage : R{\"u}diger von Bechelaren}, journal = {13. und 14. P{\"o}chlarner Heldenliedgespr{\"a}ch : die Nibelungenklage : R{\"u}diger von Bechelaren}, editor = {Keller, Johannes and Kragl, Florian and M{\"u}ller, Stephan}, publisher = {Fassbaender}, address = {Wien}, isbn = {978-3-902575-83-8}, pages = {113 -- 145}, year = {2019}, language = {de} } @article{Demske2019, author = {Demske, Ulrike}, title = {Zur Autonomie indirekter Redewiedergabe - eine diachrone Perspektive}, series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r germanistische Linguistik}, volume = {47}, journal = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r germanistische Linguistik}, number = {1}, editor = {{\´A}gel, Vilmos and Feilke, Helmuth and Linke, Angelika and L{\"u}deling, Anke and Tophinke, Doris}, publisher = {De Gruyter}, address = {Berlin, New York}, issn = {0301-3294 print}, doi = {10.1515/zgl-2019-0003}, pages = {70 -- 101}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Regarding verbal mood and complementation patterns of reporting verbs, the distinction between direct and indirect reported speech is well established in present-day German. This paper looks into the history of German: Common knowledge has it that both the use of verbal mood as well as the quality of clause linkage undergo considerable changes giving rise to the question how these changes affect the manifestations of indirect reported speech in earlier stages of German. The historical record of the 16th century (with an outlook on the 17th century) shows that the distinction between direct and indirect reported speech is not yet grammaticalized in historical sources at the time. In particular with respect to dependent (in)direct reported speech, both types prefer V2-complements with only verbal mood differentiating between the types. Although present and past subjunctive have a much wider distribution in earlier stages of German, the occurrence of free indirect speech likewise testifies to its increasing use as a marker of indirect reported speech. The growing conventionalization of patterns of indirect reported speech in the course of Early Modern German may be considered as an example for an increase of subjectification in its development.}, language = {de} } @article{Sorg2019, author = {Sorg, Bernhard}, title = {Zur Konstruktion eines transzendentalen {\"a}sthetischen Subjekts bei Bernhard und Jelinek}, series = {Elfriede Jelinek und Thomas Bernhard Intertextualit{\"a}t - Korrelationen - Korrespondenzen}, volume = {154}, journal = {Elfriede Jelinek und Thomas Bernhard Intertextualit{\"a}t - Korrelationen - Korrespondenzen}, publisher = {De Gruyter}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-11-063267-5}, doi = {10.1515/9783110632675-008}, pages = {89 -- 99}, year = {2019}, language = {de} }