@article{StonesTurner2020,
  author    = {Stones, Rob and Turner, Bryan S.},
  title     = {Successful societies},
  series = {The British journal of sociology : BJS online},
  volume    = {71},
  journal   = {The British journal of sociology : BJS online},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Wiley},
  address   = {Hoboken},
  issn      = {0007-1315},
  doi       = {10.1111/1468-4446.12724},
  pages     = {183 -- 199},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Combining moral philosophy with sociological theory to build on themes introduced in Hall and Lamont's Successful Societies (2009), the paper outlines a distinctive perspective. It holds that a necessary condition of successful societies is that decision-makers base their decisions on a high level of attentiveness (concern and comprehension) towards subjectively valued and morally legitimate forms of life. Late modern societies consist of a plurality of forms of life, each providing grounds for what Alasdair MacIntyre has called internal goods—valued and morally valuable practices. The status of such goods is examined, and distinctions are drawn between their manifest and latent, and transposable and situationally specific, characteristics. We integrate this refined idea of internal goods into a developed conception of habitus that is both morally informed and situationally embedded. The sociological approach of strong structuration theory (SST) is employed to demonstrate how this conception of habitus can guide the critique of decision-making that damages internal goods. We identify the most pervasive and invidious forms of damaging decision-making in contemporary societies as those involving excessive forms of instrumental reasoning. We argue that our developed conception of habitus, anchored in the collectively valued practices of specific worlds, can be a powerful focus for resistance. Accounts of scholarship in higher education and of the white working class in America illustrate the specificities of singular, particular, social worlds and illuminate critical challenges raised by the perspective we advocate.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Rothermel2020,
  author    = {Rothermel, Ann-Kathrin},
  title     = {Global-local dynamics in anti-feminist discourses},
  series = {International affairs},
  volume    = {96},
  journal   = {International affairs},
  number    = {5},
  publisher = {Oxford University Press},
  address   = {Oxford},
  issn      = {0020-5850},
  doi       = {10.1093/ia/iiaa130},
  pages     = {1367 -- 1385},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Women's rights are a core part of a global consensus on human rights. However, we are currently experiencing an increasing popularity of anti-feminist and misogynist politics threatening to override feminist gains. In order to help explain this current revival and appeal, in this article I analyse how anti-feminist communities construct their collective identities at the intersection of local and global trends and affiliations. Through an in-depth analysis of representations in the collective identities of six popular online anti-feminist communities based in India, Russia and the United States, I shed light on how anti-feminists discursively construct their anti-feminist 'self' and the feminist 'other' between narratives of localized resistance to change and backlash against the results of broader societal developments associated with globalization. The results expose a complex set of global-local dynamics, which provide a nuanced understanding of the differences and commonalities of anti-feminist collective identity-building and mobilization processes across contexts. By explicitly focusing on the role of discursively produced locations for anti-feminist identity-building and providing new evidence on anti-feminist communities across three different continents, the article contributes to current discussions on transnational anti-feminist mobilizations in both social movement studies and feminist International Relations.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BobzienKalleitner2020,
  author    = {Bobzien, Licia and Kalleitner, Fabian},
  title     = {Attitudes towards European financial solidarity during the Covid-19 pandemic},
  series = {European societies},
  volume    = {23},
  journal   = {European societies},
  number    = {Sup. 1},
  publisher = {Routledge, Taylor \& Francis Group},
  address   = {Abingdon},
  issn      = {1461-6696},
  doi       = {10.1080/14616696.2020.1836669},
  pages     = {S791 -- S804},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Whilst the Covid-19 pandemic affects all European countries, the ways in which these countries are prepared for the health and subsequent economic crisis varies considerably. Financial solidarity within the European Union (EU) could mitigate some of these inequalities but depends upon the support of the citizens of individual member states for such policies. This paper studies attitudes of the Austrian population - a net-contributor to the European budget - towards financial solidarity using two waves of the Austrian Corona Panel Project collected in May and June 2020. We find that individuals (i) who are less likely to consider the Covid-19 pandemic as a national economic threat, (ii) who believe that Austria benefits from supporting other countries, and (iii) who prefer the crisis to be organized more centrally at EU-level show higher support for European financial solidarity. Using fixed effects models, we further show that perceiving economic threats and preferring central crisis management also explain attitude dynamics within individuals over time. We conclude that cost-benefit perceptions are important determinants for individual support of European financial solidarity during the Covid-19 pandemic.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{Fuhr2020,
  author    = {Fuhr, Harald},
  title     = {Rezension zu: Geopolitical economy of energy and anvironment : China and the European Union / Hrsg.: Amineh, Mehdi Parvizi ; Yang, Guang. - Leiden: Brill, 2017. - ISBN: 978-90-04-27310-8},
  series = {Comparative sociology},
  volume    = {19},
  journal   = {Comparative sociology},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Brill},
  address   = {Leiden},
  issn      = {1569-1322},
  doi       = {10.1163/15691330-12341522},
  pages     = {151 -- 153},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{LilliestamOllierLabordenaMiretal.2020,
  author    = {Lilliestam, Johan and Ollier, Lana and Labordena Mir, Merc{\`e} and Pfenninger, Stefan and Thonig, Richard},
  title     = {The near- to mid-term outlook for concentrating solar power},
  series = {Energy sources. B, Economics, planning and policy},
  volume    = {16},
  journal   = {Energy sources. B, Economics, planning and policy},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Taylor \& Francis},
  address   = {London [u.a.]},
  issn      = {1556-7249},
  doi       = {10.1080/15567249.2020.1773580},
  pages     = {23 -- 41},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {The history of concentrating solar power (CSP) is characterized by a boom-bust pattern caused by policy support changes. Following the 2014-2016 bust phase, the combination of Chinese support and several low-cost projects triggered a new boom phase. We investigate the near- to mid-term cost, industry, market and policy outlook for the global CSP sector and show that CSP costs have decreased strongly and approach cost-competitiveness with new conventional generation. Industry has been strengthened through the entry of numerous new companies. However, the project pipeline is thin: no project broke ground in 2019 and only four projects are under construction in 2020. The only remaining large support scheme, in China, has been canceled. Without additional support soon creating a new market, the value chain may collapse and recent cost and technological advances may be undone. If policy support is renewed, however, the global CSP sector is prepared for a bright future.},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Teichert2020,
  author    = {Teichert, Conrad},
  title     = {Bildungssteuerung im System der Fahranf{\"a}ngervorbereitung},
  publisher = {Degener},
  address   = {Hannover},
  isbn      = {978-3-936071-93-1},
  pages     = {254,XL},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Wallraf2020,
  author    = {Wallraf, Wolfram},
  title     = {Strategische Autonomie Europas},
  series = {WeltTrends das außenpolitische Journal},
  volume    = {28},
  journal   = {WeltTrends das außenpolitische Journal},
  number    = {159},
  publisher = {WeltTrends},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  issn      = {0944-8101},
  pages     = {50 -- 53},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {de}
}
@incollection{Tanneberg2020,
  author    = {Tanneberg, Dag},
  title     = {Conclusion},
  series = {Politics of repression under authoritarian rule},
  booktitle = {Politics of repression under authoritarian rule},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Cham},
  isbn      = {978-3-030-35477-0},
  doi       = {10.1007/978-3-030-35477-0_6},
  pages     = {163 -- 176},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Does political repression work for authoritarian rule? On the one hand, repression is a hallmark of authoritarian governance. It denotes any action governments take to increase the costs of collective action. Autocrats consciously apply repression to curb popular opposition within their territorial jurisdiction. They repress in order to protect their policies, personnel, or other interests against challenges from below. Repression is, thus, a means to the end of political survival in non-democratic contexts. A useful means lives up to its promises. Does repression do that? This project started on the suspicion that we do not yet know the answer. This concluding chapter recalls the key theoretical ideas developed along the way, highlights the main findings of the book, and concludes with opportunities for future research.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{RamakrishnanKalkuhlAhmadetal.2020,
  author    = {Ramakrishnan, Anjali and Kalkuhl, Matthias and Ahmad, Sohail and Creutzig, Felix},
  title     = {Keeping up with the Patels},
  series = {Energy research \& social science},
  volume    = {70},
  journal   = {Energy research \& social science},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Amsterdam},
  issn      = {2214-6296},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.erss.2020.101742},
  pages     = {12},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {End-users base their consumption decisions not only on available budget and direct use value, but also on their social environment. The underlying social dynamics are particularly important in the case of consumer goods that implicate high future energy demand and are, hence, also key for climate mitigation. This paper investigates the impact of social factors, with a focus on 'status perceptions', on car and appliance ownerships by urban India households. Using two rounds of the household-level data from the India Human Development Survey (IHDS, 2005 and 2012), we test for the impact of social factors in addition to economic, demographic, locational, and housing on ownership levels. Starting with factor analysis to categorise appliances by their latent characteristics, we then apply the bivariate ordered probit model to identify drivers of consumption among the urban households. We find that while income and household demographics are predominant drivers of car and appliance uptake, the household's perception of status, instrumented by a variable measuring expenditure on conspicuous consumption, emerges as a key social dimension influencing the uptake. The results indicate how households identify themselves in society influences their corresponding car and appliance consumption. A deeper understanding of status-based consumption is, therefore, essential to designing better demand-side solutions to low carbon consumption.},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{vondenDriesch2020,
  author    = {von den Driesch, Ellen},
  title     = {Unter Verschluss},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{TroendleLilliestamMarellietal.2020,
  author    = {Tr{\"o}ndle, Tim and Lilliestam, Johan and Marelli, Stefano and Pfenninger, Stefan},
  title     = {Trade-offs between geographic scale, cost, and infrastructure requirements for fully renewable electricity in Europe},
  series = {Joule},
  volume    = {4},
  journal   = {Joule},
  number    = {9},
  publisher = {Cell Press},
  address   = {Cambridge , Mass.},
  issn      = {2542-4351},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.joule.2020.07.018},
  pages     = {1929 -- 1948},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {The European potential for renewable electricity is sufficient to enable fully renewable supply on different scales, from self-sufficient, subnational regions to an interconnected continent. We not only show that a continental-scale system is the cheapest, but also that systems on the national scale and below are possible at cost penalties of 20\% or less. Transmission is key to low cost, but it is not necessary to vastly expand the transmission system. When electricity is transmitted only to balance fluctuations, the transmission grid size is comparable to today's, albeit with expanded cross-border capacities. The largest differences across scales concern land use and thus social acceptance: in the continental system, generation capacity is concentrated on the European periphery, where the best resources are. Regional systems, in contrast, have more dispersed generation. The key trade-off is therefore not between geographic scale and cost, but between scale and the spatial distribution of required generation and transmission infrastructure.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Kohler2020,
  author    = {Kohler, Ulrich},
  title     = {Survey Research Methods during the COVID-19 Crisis},
  series = {Survey research methods},
  volume    = {14},
  journal   = {Survey research methods},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {European Survey Research Association},
  address   = {Konstanz},
  issn      = {1864-3361},
  doi       = {10.18148/srm/2020.v14i2.7769},
  pages     = {93 -- 94},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SalenHoviSprinzetal.2020,
  author    = {S{\ae}len, H{\aa}kon and Hovi, Jon and Sprinz, Detlef F. and Underdal, Arild},
  title     = {How US withdrawal might influence cooperation under the Paris climate agreement},
  series = {Environmental science \& policy},
  volume    = {108},
  journal   = {Environmental science \& policy},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Oxford},
  issn      = {1462-9011},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.envsci.2020.03.011},
  pages     = {121 -- 132},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Using a novel agent-based model, we study how US withdrawal might influence the political process established by the Paris Agreement, and hence the prospects for reaching the collective goal to limit warming below 2 degrees C. Our model enables us to analyze to what extent reaching this goal despite US withdrawal would place more stringent requirements on other core elements of the Paris cooperation process. We find, first, that the effect of a US withdrawal depends critically on the extent to which member countries reciprocate others' promises and contributions. Second, while the 2 degrees C goal will likely be reached only under a very small set of conditions in any event, even temporary US withdrawal will further narrow this set significantly. Reaching this goal will then require other countries to step up their ambition at the first opportunity and to comply nearly 100\% with their pledges, while maintaining high confidence in the Paris Agreements institutions. Third, although a US withdrawal will first primarily affect the United States' own emissions, it will eventually prove even more detrimental to other countries' emissions.},
  language  = {en}
}
@incollection{LedererHoehneStehleetal.2020,
  author    = {Lederer, Markus and H{\"o}hne, Chris and Stehle, Fee and Hickmann, Thomas and Fuhr, Harald},
  title     = {Multilevel climate governance in Brazil and Indonesia},
  series = {Climate governance across the globe : Pioneers, leaders and followers},
  booktitle = {Climate governance across the globe : Pioneers, leaders and followers},
  editor    = {Wurzel, R{\"u}diger K. W. and Andersen, Mikael Skou and Tobin, Paul},
  publisher = {Routledge},
  address   = {Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY},
  isbn      = {978-1-003-01424-9},
  doi       = {10.4324/9781003014249},
  pages     = {101 -- 119},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Focusing on forest policy and urban climate politics in Brazil and Indonesia, the primary objective of this chapter is to identify domestic pioneers and leaders who, compared to other sectors, governmental levels or jurisdictions within the same nation-state, move 'ahead of the troops' (Liefferink and Wurzel, 2017: 2-3). The chapter focuses especially on the role of multilevel governance in bringing about pioneership and leadership and on the different types of that have emerged. It also explores whether and, if so, to what extent domestic pioneers and leaders attract followers and whether there are signs of sustained domestic leadership. The chapter identifies the actors that constitute pioneers and leaders and assesses the processes which lead to their emergence. The chapter authors take up Wurzel et al.'s (2019) call to open up the black box of the nation-state. But instead of stressing the role of non-state actors, the chapter authors focus on vertical interactions among different governmental levels within nation states. The main argument put forward is that international and transnational processes, incentives, and ideas often trigger the development of domestic pioneership and leadership. Such processes, however, cannot be understood properly if domestic politics and dynamics across governmental levels within the nation-state are not taken into account.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Juchler2020,
  author    = {Juchler, Ingo},
  title     = {„Aber gehn Sie ins Theater, ich rat es Ihnen!"},
  series = {Politisches Lernen},
  volume    = {38},
  journal   = {Politisches Lernen},
  number    = {1+2},
  publisher = {Barbara Budrich},
  address   = {Leverkusen-Opladen},
  issn      = {0937-2946},
  pages     = {32 -- 35},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {In der Ausgabe Politisches Lernen 1-2|2019 setzte sich Kurt P. Tudyka mit dem Verh{\"a}ltnis von Theater und Politik auseinander. Er gelangte zu dem ern{\"u}chternden Res{\"u}mee: „Der Anspruch, Theater sei die Schule der Nation, - soweit er {\"u}berhaupt noch besteht -, m{\"u}sste aufgegeben werden." (S. 32) In Tudykas Einf{\"u}hrung hieß es bereits: „Eine politisierende Wirkung auf das Publikum wird bestritten." (S. 30) Vor diesem Hintergrund k{\"o}nnte bei Lehrerinnen und Lehrern der Politischen Bildung der Eindruck entstehen, ein Besuch im Theater mit Sch{\"u}lerinnen und Sch{\"u}lern sei didaktisch nicht sinnvoll. Dagegen wird im folgenden Beitrag die Auffassung vertreten, dass ein Theaterbesuch mit den Lernenden durchaus mit Erkenntnisgewinnen, seien sie politisch oder {\"u}ber das Politische hinausweisend, verbunden sein kann. Der Beitrag stellt eine gek{\"u}rzte Fassung des Textes „Theater und politische Bildung" dar, der in Markus Gloe / Tonio Oeftering (Hrsg.): Politische Bildung meets Kulturelle Bildung, Baden-Baden (Nomos) 2020, erscheinen wird.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Juchler2020,
  author    = {Juchler, Ingo},
  title     = {1960er: Aufwind f{\"u}r die Politische Bildung},
  series = {Geschichte der politischen Bildung},
  journal   = {Geschichte der politischen Bildung},
  publisher = {Bundesausschuss Politische Bildung (bap) e.V.},
  address   = {Bonn},
  pages     = {7},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Zur Jahreswende 1959/60 sorgten Hakenkreuzschmierereien an j{\"u}dischen Einrichtungen in K{\"o}ln und anderswo f{\"u}r Entsetzen und Emp{\"o}rung. Diese Vorkommnisse machten bewusst, was im Verlauf der 1960er Jahre zu einem Politikum f{\"u}r die j{\"u}ngere Generation werden sollte: Die mangelnde Aufarbeitung der nationalsozialistischen Vergangenheit. Diese Thematik sowie der von den USA in Vietnam gef{\"u}hrte Krieg stellten mobilisierende Faktoren f{\"u}r die Herausbildung einer außerparlamentarischen Opposition (APO) in der Bundesrepublik dar, die sich in der zweiten H{\"a}lfte der 1960er Jahre verbreitert. Prof. Ingo Juchler beschreibt den Weg der Politischen Bildung durch die 60er Jahre und die Entwicklung hin zur sog. „didaktischen Wende".},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Juchler2020,
  author    = {Juchler, Ingo},
  title     = {Zur Mensch-Tier-Beziehung in der politischen Bildung},
  series = {Wie geht gute politische Bildung?},
  journal   = {Wie geht gute politische Bildung?},
  publisher = {Bundesausschuss Politische Bildung (bap) e.V.},
  address   = {Bonn},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Eigentlich leben wir heute im Holoz{\"a}n, dem Erdzeitalter, das mit dem Ende der letzten großen Eiszeit vor etwa 12.000 Jahren seinen Ausgang nahm. Doch seit geraumer Zeit ist in Wissenschaft und {\"O}ffentlichkeit die Rede vom Anthropoz{\"a}n als der vom Menschen bestimmten gegenw{\"a}rtigen Epoche. Mit der Begriffssch{\"o}pfung soll der gravierende Einfluss des Menschen auf die Umwelt zum Ausdruck gebracht werden, der sich nicht zuletzt in der Versauerung der Meere, im Artensterben und Klimawandel {\"a}ußert. Doch wie spiegelt sich diese Erkenntnis in der Politischen Bildung wider?},
  language  = {de}
}
@incollection{Juchler2020,
  author    = {Juchler, Ingo},
  title     = {Theater und politische Bildung},
  series = {Politische Bildung meets kulturelle Bildung},
  booktitle = {Politische Bildung meets kulturelle Bildung},
  editor    = {Gloe, Markus and Oeftering, Tonio},
  publisher = {Nomos},
  address   = {Baden-Baden},
  isbn      = {978-3-8487-5484-7},
  doi       = {10.5771/9783845296708-59},
  pages     = {59 -- 74},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Wie {\"a}sthetische Bildung, vom Theater ausgehend, zusammen mit politischer Bildung realisiert werden kann, wird in diesem Beitrag vorgestellt. Politiklehrer_innen bekommen einen Einblick in die didaktische Bedeutung und den Gewinn f{\"u}r Sch{\"u}ler_innen durch den außerschulischen Lernort des Theaters. Am Beispiel des antiken Schauspiels wird die Bedeutung des Theaters f{\"u}r politische, genauer demokratische Bildung aufgezeigt, indem dargelegt wird, wie sie die Handlungskompetenz, den Perspektivwechsel sowie die Urteilsf{\"a}higkeit einzelner positiv beeinflusst. Da diese Kompetenzen heute l{\"a}nder{\"u}bergreifend in den Curricula festgeschrieben sind, bietet es sich an, das Theater in den Unterricht miteinzubinden. Im letzten Absatz dieses Beitrags liefert der Autor ein Beispiel f{\"u}r den Unterricht anhand des Schauspiels „Der Volksfeind" von Henrik Ibsen, mithilfe dessen Politiklehrer_innen das Theater in ihren Unterricht integrieren k{\"o}nnen.},
  language  = {de}
}
@incollection{Juchler2020,
  author    = {Juchler, Ingo},
  title     = {Politische Urteilsbildung},
  series = {Hannah Arendt : Lekt{\"u}ren zur politischen Bildung},
  booktitle = {Hannah Arendt : Lekt{\"u}ren zur politischen Bildung},
  editor    = {Oeftering, Tonio and Meints-Stender, Waltraud and Lange, Dirk},
  publisher = {Springer VS},
  address   = {Wiesbaden},
  isbn      = {978-3-658-30675-5},
  doi       = {10.1007/978-3-658-30676-2_3},
  pages     = {41 -- 58},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Die F{\"a}higkeit zum politischen Urteilen gilt als das {\"u}bergeordnete Ziel politischer Bildungsbem{\"u}hungen. Epistemologisch nimmt das Theorem der politischen Urteilsbildung seinen Ausgang in der Epoche der Aufkl{\"a}rung. Immanuel Kants Ausf{\"u}hrungen {\"u}ber den Zusammenhang von Aufkl{\"a}rung und M{\"u}ndigkeit in seiner Schrift Beantwortung der Frage: Was ist Aufkl{\"a}rung? bietet eine programmatische Vorlage f{\"u}r die weitere Auseinandersetzung mit M{\"u}ndigkeit und politischer Urteilsbildung. Der K{\"o}nigsberger Philosoph erkl{\"a}rte hierin eingangs: „Aufkl{\"a}rung ist der Ausgang des Menschen aus seiner selbst verschuldeten Unm{\"u}ndigkeit. Unm{\"u}ndigkeit ist das Unverm{\"o}gen, sich seines Verstandes ohne Leitung eines anderen zu bedienen. Selbstverschuldet ist diese Unm{\"u}ndigkeit, wenn die Ursache derselben nicht am Mangel des Verstandes, sondern der Entschließung und des Mutes liegt, sich seiner ohne Leitung eines andern zu bedienen. Sapere aude! Habe Mut, dich deines eigenen Verstandes zu bedienen! ist also der Wahlspruch der Aufkl{\"a}rung."},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{LilliestamPattBersalli2020,
  author    = {Lilliestam, Johan and Patt, Anthony and Bersalli, German},
  title     = {The effect of carbon pricing on technological change for full energy decarbonization},
  series = {Wiley interdisciplinary reviews : Climate change},
  volume    = {12},
  journal   = {Wiley interdisciplinary reviews : Climate change},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Wiley},
  address   = {Hoboken},
  issn      = {1757-7780},
  doi       = {10.1002/wcc.681},
  pages     = {21},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {In order to achieve the temperature goals of the Paris Agreement, the world must reach net-zero carbon emissions around mid-century, which calls for an entirely new energy system. Carbon pricing, in the shape of taxes or emissions trading schemes, is often seen as the main, or only, necessary climate policy instrument, based on theoretical expectations that this would promote innovation and diffusion of the new technologies necessary for full decarbonization. Here, we review the empirical knowledge available in academic ex-post analyses of the effectiveness of existing, comparatively high-price carbon pricing schemes in the European Union, New Zealand, British Columbia, and the Nordic countries. Some articles find short-term operational effects, especially fuel switching in existing assets, but no article finds mentionable effects on technological change. Critically, all articles examining the effects on zero-carbon investment found that existing carbon pricing scheme have had no effect at all. We conclude that the effectiveness of carbon pricing in stimulating innovation and zero-carbon investment remains a theoretical argument. So far, there is no empirical evidence of its effectiveness in promoting the technological change necessary for full decarbonization. This article is categorized under: Climate Economics > Economics of Mitigation},
  language  = {en}
}
@book{BogumilJann2020,
  author    = {Bogumil, J{\"o}rg and Jann, Werner},
  title     = {Verwaltung und Verwaltungswissenschaft in Deutschland},
  series = {Grundwissen Politik},
  journal   = {Grundwissen Politik},
  edition   = {3., vollst{\"a}ndig {\"u}berarbeitete Aufl.},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Wiesbaden},
  isbn      = {978-3-658-28407-7},
  doi       = {10.1007/978-3-658-28408-4},
  pages     = {491},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Die Autoren haben mit diesem Buch den ersten politikwissenschaftlichen Lehrtext zum Thema Verwaltung und Verwaltungswissenschaften in Deutschland vorgelegt. Die spezifisch sozialwissenschaftlichen Perspektiven unterscheiden diese Studie vom bislang vorliegenden vor allem juristisch gepr{\"a}gten Lehrmaterial. Dargestellt werden die Entwicklung und Perspektiven der Verwaltungswissenschaften sowie der institutionelle Aufbau, die internen Strukturen und Prozesse sowie die Entwicklungsphasen der {\"o}ffentlichen Verwaltung in Deutschland.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Kleinwaechter2020,
  author    = {Kleinw{\"a}chter, Lutz},
  title     = {Militante Verantwortungslosigkeit},
  series = {WeltTrends das außenpolitische Journal},
  volume    = {28},
  journal   = {WeltTrends das außenpolitische Journal},
  number    = {159},
  publisher = {WeltTrends},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {978-3-947802-32-6},
  pages     = {68 -- 69},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{HippBuenningMunnesetal.2020,
  author    = {Hipp, Lena and B{\"u}nning, Mareike and Munnes, Stefan and Sauermann, Armin},
  title     = {Problems and pitfalls of retrospective survey questions in COVID-19 studies},
  series = {Survey research methods},
  volume    = {14},
  journal   = {Survey research methods},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {European Survey Research Association},
  address   = {Konstanz},
  issn      = {1864-3361},
  doi       = {10.18148/srm/2020.v14i2.7741},
  pages     = {109 -- 113},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {This paper examines and discusses the biases and pitfalls of retrospective survey questions that are currently being used in many medical, epidemiological, and sociological studies on the COVID-19 pandemic. By analyzing the consistency of answers to retrospective questions provided by respondents who participated in the first two waves of a survey on the social consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic, we illustrate the insights generated by a large body of survey research on the use of retrospective questions and recall accuracy.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{HippBuenningMunnesetal.2020,
  author    = {Hipp, Lena and B{\"u}nning, Mareike and Munnes, Stefan and Sauermann, Armin},
  title     = {Commentary zu: Schaurer, Ines; Weiß, Bernd: Investigating selection bias of online surveys on coronavirus-related behavioral outcomes},
  series = {Survey research methods},
  volume    = {14},
  journal   = {Survey research methods},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {European Survey Research Association},
  address   = {Duisburg},
  issn      = {1864-3361},
  doi       = {10.18148/srm/2020.v14i2.7751},
  pages     = {107 -- 108},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{LilliestamMelligerOllieretal.2020,
  author    = {Lilliestam, Johan and Melliger, Marc Andr{\´e} and Ollier, Lana and Schmidt, Tobias S. and Steffen, Bjarne},
  title     = {Understanding and accounting for the effect of exchange rate fluctuations on global learning rates},
  series = {Nature energy},
  volume    = {5},
  journal   = {Nature energy},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Nature Publishing Group},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {2058-7546},
  doi       = {10.1038/s41560-019-0531-y},
  pages     = {71 -- 78},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Learning rates are a central concept in energy system models and integrated assessment models, as they allow researchers to project the future costs of new technologies and to optimize energy system costs. Here we argue that exchange rate fluctuations are an important, but thus far overlooked, determinant of the learning-rate variance observed in the literature. We explore how empirically observed global learning rates depend on where technologies are installed and which currency is used to calculate the learning rate. Using global data of large-scale photovoltaic (>= 5 MW) plants, we show that the currency choice can result in learning-rate differences of up to 16 percentage points. We then introduce an adjustment factor to correct for the effect of exchange rate and market focus fluctuations and discuss the implications of our findings for innovation scholars, energy modellers and decision makers. <br /> Learning rates are a measure of reduction in costs of energy from technologies such as solar photovoltaics. These are often estimated internationally with all monetary figures converted to a single currency, often US dollars. Lilliestam et al. show that such conversions can significantly affect the learning rate estimates.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{OllierMelligerLilliestam2020,
  author    = {Ollier, Lana and Melliger, Marc Andr{\´e} and Lilliestam, Johan},
  title     = {Friends or foes?},
  series = {Energies : open-access journal of related scientific research, technology development and studies in policy and management},
  volume    = {13},
  journal   = {Energies : open-access journal of related scientific research, technology development and studies in policy and management},
  number    = {23},
  publisher = {MDPI},
  address   = {Basel},
  issn      = {1996-1073},
  doi       = {10.3390/en13236339},
  pages     = {23},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Energy efficiency measures and the deployment of renewable energy are commonly presented as two sides of the same coin-as necessary and synergistic measures to decarbonize energy systems and reach the temperature goals of the Paris Agreement. Here, we quantitatively investigate the policies and performances of the EU Member States to see whether renewables and energy efficiency policies are politically synergistic or if they rather compete for political attention and resources. We find that Member States, especially the ones perceived as climate leaders, tend to prioritize renewables over energy efficiency in target setting. Further, almost every country performs well in either renewable energy or energy efficiency, but rarely performs well in both. We find no support for the assertion that the policies are synergistic, but some evidence that they compete. However, multi-linear regression models for performance show that performance, especially in energy efficiency, is also strongly associated with general economic growth cycles, and not only efficiency policy as such. We conclude that renewable energy and energy efficiency are not synergistic policies, and that there is some competition between them.},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Muster2020,
  author    = {Muster, Judith},
  title     = {Grenzen des Organiesierbaren},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {144},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Interessiert man sich f{\"u}r den gesellschaftlichen Einfluss der Organisationssoziologie auf die Praxis des Organisierens, so muss der Befund ern{\"u}chtern. St{\"a}rker als auf organisationssoziologische Wissensbest{\"a}nde wird in Unternehmen oder Verwaltungen auf aktuelle Managementtrends rekurriert. Man k{\"o}nnte diesen Befund beklagen und als fehlerhafte Rezeption der Praxis beiseitelegen. Alternativ ließe sich aber auch diskutieren, welchen Beitrag die Disziplin selbst zu dieser Rezeption leistet. Mit einer solchen Diskussion begibt man sich fast unweigerlich auf einen schwierigen Pfad. Zum einen kann die Soziologie gerade dann, wenn sie ihren Blick auf die Erforschung von Unternehmen oder Verwaltungen richtet, nicht die von der Praxis erwarteten positiven Antworten liefern. Gerade die Organisationssoziologie begibt sich zum anderen jedoch in direkte Konkurrenz zu Nachbardisziplinen wie die Betriebswirtschaftslehre oder die Organisationspsychologie, die die Rezeptionsf{\"a}higkeit ihrer Wissensbest{\"a}nde im Praxisfeld in den letzten Jahren unter Beweis gestellt haben. Die Erwartungen an die Umsetzbarkeit wissenschaftlicher Erkenntnisse in der Praxis sind dadurch gestiegen. Eine Soziologie, die ihre Erkenntniskraft in der kritischen Distanz sieht, mag das skeptisch stimmen. Es gilt daher, die Frage zu beantworten, wie die Praxisrelevanz einer Wissenschaft des zweiten Blicks auf Organisationen konkret aussehen kann. Diesem Vorhaben widmet sich das vorgelegte Promotionsprojekt. Die in der kumulativen Dissertation versammelten Beitr{\"a}ge verstehen sich allesamt als Erkundungen und Erprobungen der Praxisrelevanz der Organisationssoziologie anhand aktueller Managementfragen in Unternehmen. Die These lautet dabei, dass sich diese Praxisrelevanz nur als Kritik entfalten kann. Eine solche Kritik kann dabei zwei grunds{\"a}tzliche Formen annehmen: Als Strukturkritik bezieht sie sich auf konkrete Organisationen, deren spezifische Eigenlogiken und strukturelle Verstrickungen. Sie beschreibt dabei f{\"u}r den Einzelfall Funktionen und Folgen von Erwartungsstrukturen, die sich dann z. B. fallvergleichend generalisieren oder typisieren lassen. Organisationssoziologische Strukturkritik kann sich damit sowohl als vergleichender, praxissensibler Forschungsansatz realisieren, als auch die Grundlage einer soziologisch orientierten Beratung bilden. Als Schematakritik richtet sie sich gegen verk{\"u}rzte Vorstellungen des Organisierens, die sich etwa in Managementmoden finden lassen. Dem Kumulus zugrunde liegen f{\"u}nf Beitr{\"a}ge, die konkrete Auspr{\"a}gungen beider Kritikformen ausloten. Der erste Beitrag „Datafizierung und Organisation" zeigt, wie Schematakritik an Nachbardisziplinen aussehen kann, indem er Organisation als blinden Fleck der Digitalisierungsforschung diskutiert und Anschlussstellen f{\"u}r interdisziplin{\"a}re Forschung ausweist. Daher liefert der Beitrag einen systematischen Zugang zu organisationalen Implikationen der Digitalisierung. Neben der Anreicherung der Digitalisierungsforschung kann die entwickelte Argumentation auch f{\"u}r die Praxis Erkenntniskraft haben, indem z. B. problematisiert wird, dass im Managementdiskurs um Digitalisierung {\"u}berzogene Rationalisierungserwartungen herrschen oder durch digitale Infrastrukturen entstehende Informalit{\"a}ten systematisch ausgeblendet werden Der zweite Beitrag „F{\"u}hrung als erfolgreiche Einflussnahme in kritischen Momenten" legt eine Umdeutung des popul{\"a}ren Managementbegriffs F{\"u}hrung durch Schematakritik vor. Damit tr{\"a}gt er in mehrfacher Hinsicht zu einer praxisrelevanten Neubestimmung von F{\"u}hrung bei. F{\"u}r F{\"u}hrungskr{\"a}fte erm{\"o}glicht er beispielsweise die Einsicht, dass sie ihre F{\"u}hrungsaufgaben auf kritische Momente konzentrieren k{\"o}nnen und postuliert die Abkehr vom heroischen Bild des dauerhaft F{\"u}hrenden. Diese Umdeutung kann auch f{\"u}r F{\"u}hrungskr{\"a}fte in Organisationen entlastend sein, weist sie doch auf den Zusammenhang zwischen der organisationalen Verfasstheit und F{\"u}hrungschancen hin und er{\"o}ffnet damit Gestaltungschancen jenseits der F{\"u}hrungskr{\"a}fte- und Personalentwicklung. F{\"u}r die Organisationsforschung liefert der Beitrag einen theoretisch integrierten F{\"u}hrungsbegriff, der F{\"u}hrung sowohl organisational als auch situativ bestimmt. Er steht somit exemplarisch f{\"u}r eine organisationssoziologische Schematakritik, die etablierte Managementbegriffe neu deutet. Der dritte Beitrag kritisiert mit dem Konzept der transformationalen F{\"u}hrung eine Managementmode und zeigt auf, wie das darin enthaltene F{\"u}hrungsmodell durch die Bildung moralischer Kategorien Organisationsprobleme auf Organisationsmitglieder (hier: F{\"u}hrungskr{\"a}fte) verschiebt. Es wird einerseits eine organisationssoziologische Kritik am popul{\"a}ren Managementkonzept der transformationalen F{\"u}hrung vorgelegt. Andererseits verdeutlicht der Beitrag anhand systemtheoretischer Konzepte wie elementarer Verhaltensweisen, Moral oder Rollentrennung exemplarisch, dass organisationssoziologisches Denken den Managementdiskurs bereichern kann, indem es Verk{\"u}rzungen und Simplifizierungen aufdeckt und alternative Analyse- und Gestaltungsans{\"a}tze bereitstellt. Daf{\"u}r l{\"a}sst sich auch im Praxisdiskurs Geh{\"o}r finden, weil man annehmen darf, dass mit den Heilsversprechen von Kompaktl{\"o}sungen auch Entt{\"a}uschungen einhergehen, f{\"u}r die die Organisationssoziologie Erkl{\"a}rungen liefern kann. Die M{\"o}glichkeiten und Grenzen von Strukturkritik werden in den letzten beiden Beitr{\"a}gen diskutiert. Das Potenzial von Strukturkritik f{\"u}r die soziologisch orientierte Beratung von Organisationen exploriert der Beitrag „Die schwierige Liaison von Organisationssoziologie und Praxisbezug am Beispiel der Beratung". Ausgehend vom Theorie-Praxis-Komplex wird eruiert, wie soziologischer Praxisbezug im Feld der Beratung aussehen kann. Daf{\"u}r systematisiert der Beitrag organisationssoziologische Ans{\"a}tze von Beratung und zeigt auf, wie ein genuin soziologischer Beratungsansatz aussehen k{\"o}nnte. Der letzte Beitrag stellt Grundz{\"u}ge einer Methodologie strukturkritischer Forschung vor und illustriert diese an einem durchgef{\"u}hrten Forschungsprojekt zu Managementmoden. Anhand der Forschung in einem Produktionsbetrieb wird gezeigt, wie strukturkritische Forschung konkret aussehen kann. Solch strukturkritische Forschung steht im Forschungsprozess vor drei Herausforderungen: dem qualitativ hochwertigen Feldzugang, der Entwicklung einer f{\"u}r Forschung und Praxis instruktiven Fragestellung und der R{\"u}ckspiegelung der Ergebnisse in das Feld. Der Beitrag stellt Grundz{\"u}ge einer Methodologie strukturkritischer Organisationsforschung vor, die sich sachlich, zeitlich und sozial entlang der drei beschriebenen Momente des Feldzugangs, der Ausgangsfragestellung und der R{\"u}ckspiegelung der Ergebnisse spezifizieren lassen.},
  language  = {de}
}
@incollection{Juchler2020,
  author    = {Juchler, Ingo},
  title     = {Demokratische Aufbr{\"u}che in Berlin},
  series = {Forschen.Lernen.Lehren an {\"o}ffentlichen Orten - The Wider View},
  booktitle = {Forschen.Lernen.Lehren an {\"o}ffentlichen Orten - The Wider View},
  editor    = {Jungwirth, Martin},
  publisher = {WTM-Verlag},
  address   = {M{\"u}nster},
  isbn      = {978-3-95987-136-5},
  doi       = {10.37626/GA9783959871365.0},
  pages     = {155 -- 160},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{Reiners2021,
  author    = {Reiners, Nina},
  title     = {Rezension zu: Milewicz, Karolina M.: Constitutionalizing world politics : the logic of democratic power and the unintended consequences of international treaty making. - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020. - 354 S. - ISBN: 978-1-108-83509-1},
  series = {Politische Vierteljahresschrift : PVS : German political science quarterly},
  volume    = {62},
  journal   = {Politische Vierteljahresschrift : PVS : German political science quarterly},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {0032-3470},
  doi       = {10.1007/s11615-021-00333-y},
  pages     = {575 -- 577},
  year      = {2021},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{FleischerReiners2021,
  author    = {Fleischer, Julia and Reiners, Nina},
  title     = {Connecting international relations and public administration},
  series = {International studies review},
  volume    = {23},
  journal   = {International studies review},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {Oxford Univ. Press},
  address   = {Oxford},
  issn      = {1521-9488},
  doi       = {10.1093/isr/viaa097},
  pages     = {1230 -- 1247},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {The recent debate on administrative bodies in international organizations has brought forward multiple theoretical perspectives, analytical frameworks, and methodological approaches. Despite these efforts to advance knowledge on these actors, the research program on international public administrations (IPAs) has missed out on two important opportunities: reflection on scholarship in international relations (IR) and public administration and synergies between these disciplinary perspectives. Against this backdrop, the essay is a discussion of the literature on IPAs in IR and public administration. We found influence, authority, and autonomy of international bureaucracies have been widely addressed and helped to better understand the agency of such non-state actors in global policy-making. Less attention has been given to the crucial macro-level context of politics for administrative bodies, despite the importance in IR and public administration scholarship. We propose a focus on agency and politics as future avenues for a comprehensive, joint research agenda for international bureaucracies.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Tjaden2021,
  author    = {Tjaden, Jasper},
  title     = {Measuring migration 2.0},
  series = {Comparative migration studies : CMS},
  volume    = {9},
  journal   = {Comparative migration studies : CMS},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {London},
  issn      = {2214-594X},
  doi       = {10.1186/s40878-021-00273-x},
  pages     = {20},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {The interest in human migration is at its all-time high, yet data to measure migration is notoriously limited. "Big data" or "digital trace data" have emerged as new sources of migration measurement complementing 'traditional' census, administrative and survey data. This paper reviews the strengths and weaknesses of eight novel, digital data sources along five domains: reliability, validity, scope, access and ethics. The review highlights the opportunities for migration scholars but also stresses the ethical and empirical challenges. This review intends to be of service to researchers and policy analysts alike and help them navigate this new and increasingly complex field.},
  language  = {en}
}
@incollection{Penning2021,
  author    = {Penning, Isabelle},
  title     = {Spannung mit dem Strom-Quiz},
  series = {Praxis Grundschule extra. Lernspiele. Ideen und Materialien f{\"u}r den Unterricht},
  booktitle = {Praxis Grundschule extra. Lernspiele. Ideen und Materialien f{\"u}r den Unterricht},
  publisher = {Westermann},
  address   = {Braunschweig},
  isbn      = {978-3-14-161058-1},
  pages     = {110 -- 119},
  year      = {2021},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{HeintzWobbe2021,
  author    = {Heintz, Bettina and Wobbe, Theresa},
  title     = {Vorwort},
  series = {K{\"o}lner Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie : KZfSS},
  volume    = {73},
  journal   = {K{\"o}lner Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie : KZfSS},
  number    = {Suppl. 1},
  publisher = {Springer VS},
  address   = {Wiesbaden},
  issn      = {0023-2653},
  doi       = {10.1007/s11577-021-00740-4},
  pages     = {1 -- 4},
  year      = {2021},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{EcksteinMuster2021,
  author    = {Eckstein, Bernd and Muster, Judith},
  title     = {Postb{\"u}rokratie und die agile Unsicherheitsabsorption in Interaktionen},
  series = {Gruppe, Interaktion, Organisation. Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Angewandte Organisationspsychologie : GIO},
  volume    = {52},
  journal   = {Gruppe, Interaktion, Organisation. Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Angewandte Organisationspsychologie : GIO},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Wiesbaden},
  issn      = {2366-6145},
  doi       = {10.1007/s11612-021-00599-1},
  pages     = {649 -- 657},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {This article for the GIO-Journal proposes a perspective rooted in functional equivalence for the analysis of post-bureaucratic reforms that partly shift the organizational absorption of uncertainty to formal interactions of their members. Postbureaucracy tries to conceptualize organizational and societal changes throughout the second half of the 20th century. Agile management frameworks that multiply interactions between members of an organization can be treated as a phenomenon of postbureaucratic organizing. Drawing on systems theory this paper examines how postbureaucratic reforms trigger new uncertainties and how they are tackled by agile concepts of management. We will illustrate this by analyzing the agile concepts Scrum and Holacracy and show how relocation triggers new needs for formalization. Doing this we will focus on how interdependencies of communication in systems of interaction are centered in different dimensions. This paper advocates for a perspective on postbureaucracy in terms of functional equivalence to grasp the connection between the renouncement of formalization and the emergence of new needs for formalization.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{HeckeFuhrWolfs2021,
  author    = {Hecke, Steven van and Fuhr, Harald and Wolfs, Wouter},
  title     = {The politics of crisis management by regional and international organizations in fighting against a global pandemic},
  series = {International review of administrative sciences : an international journal of comparative public administration},
  volume    = {87},
  journal   = {International review of administrative sciences : an international journal of comparative public administration},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {Sage},
  address   = {Los Angeles, Calif. [u.a.]},
  issn      = {0020-8523},
  doi       = {10.1177/0020852320984516},
  pages     = {672 -- 690},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Despite new challenges like climate change and digitalization, global and regional organizations recently went through turbulent times due to a lack of support from several of their member states. Next to this crisis of multilateralism, the COVID-19 pandemic now seems to question the added value of international organizations for addressing global governance issues more specifically. This article analyses this double challenge that several organizations are facing and compares their ways of managing the crisis by looking at their institutional and political context, their governance structure, and their behaviour during the pandemic until June 2020. More specifically, it will explain the different and fragmented responses of the World Health Organization, the European Union and the International Monetary Fund/World Bank. With the aim of understanding the old and new problems that these international organizations are trying to solve, this article argues that the level of autonomy vis-a-vis the member states is crucial for understanding the politics of crisis management. <br /> Points for practitioners <br /> As intergovernmental bodies, international organizations require authorization by their member states. Since they also need funding for their operations, different degrees of autonomy also matter for reacting to emerging challenges, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. The potential for international organizations is limited, though through proactive and bold initiatives, they can seize the opportunity of the crisis and partly overcome institutional and political constraints.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Wobbe2021,
  author    = {Wobbe, Theresa},
  title     = {Die Differenz Haushalt vs. Markt als latentes Beobachtungsschema},
  series = {K{\"o}lner Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie : KZfSS},
  volume    = {73},
  journal   = {K{\"o}lner Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie : KZfSS},
  number    = {Suppl. 1},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {0023-2653},
  doi       = {10.1007/s11577-021-00746-y},
  pages     = {195 -- 222},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Ausgehend von der Teilung in nichtaktive (Haushalt) und aktive Bev{\"o}lkerung (Markt) fragt der Beitrag nach der Rolle, die statistische Vergleichsverfahren bei dieser Grenzziehung in der Welt der Arbeit spielen. Dies geschieht vor dem Hintergrund der Verzweigung von zwei strukturellen Entwicklungen, n{\"a}mlich dem Wandel der (Arbeits‑)Welten und der statistischen Vergleichsverfahren. Der Beitrag geh{\"o}rt zu den ersten, der diese Nahtstelle systematisch und empirisch an der nationalen und internationalen (Besch{\"a}ftigungs‑)Statistik untersucht. In diesem Beitrag schlage ich vor, die beiden Beobachtungsebenen als ein Feld der inter/nationalen Statistik zu verstehen. Ihre {\"A}hnlichkeiten, Unterschiede und Verzweigungen werden soziologisch bislang noch nicht wahrgenommen. Im Unterschied dazu behandele ich sie aus einer wissensgeschichtlichen und wissenssoziologischen Perspektive gemeinsam hinsichtlich ihrer Selektionsleistungen, Beobachtungsinstrumente und Beschreibungsebenen. Die Ergebnisse zeigen die zunehmende Spezifizierung und Ausdehnung der {\"o}konomischen Dimension von Arbeitst{\"a}tigkeiten, die durch die Ordnungstechniken der inter/nationalen Statistik, verst{\"a}rkt nach 1945, forciert werden. Diese Verschiebungen, so das Argument, sind eng mit dem Aufstieg des technischen Wissens im „technical internationalism" verbunden, die nach 1945 das statistische und das Alltagsverst{\"a}ndnis von der wirtschaftlich nichtaktiven Haushaltsarbeit bekr{\"a}ftigen.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{TjadenDunsch2021,
  author    = {Tjaden, Jasper Dag and Dunsch, Felipe Alexander},
  title     = {The effect of peer-to-peer risk information on potential migrants},
  series = {World development : the multi-disciplinary international journal devoted to the study and promotion of world development},
  volume    = {145},
  journal   = {World development : the multi-disciplinary international journal devoted to the study and promotion of world development},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Amsterdam},
  issn      = {0305-750X},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105488},
  pages     = {13},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {In response to mounting evidence on the dangers of irregular migration from Africa to Europe, the number of information campaigns which aim to raise awareness about the potential risks has rapidly increased. Governments, international organizations and civil society organizations implement a variety of campaigns to counter the spread of misinformation accelerated by smuggling and trafficking networks. The evidence on the effects of such information interventions on potential migrants remains limited and largely anecdotal. More generally, the role of risk perceptions in the decision-making process of potential irregular migrants is rarely explicitly tested, despite the fact that the concept of risk pervades conventional migration models, particularly in the field of economics. We address this gap by assessing the effects of a peer-to-peer information intervention on the perceptions, knowledge and intentions of potential migrants in Dakar, Senegal, using a randomized controlled trial design. The results show that - three months after the intervention - peer-to-peer information events increase potential migrants' subjective information levels, raise risk awareness, and reduce intentions to migrate irregularly. We find no substantial effects on factual migration knowledge. We discuss how the effects may be driven by the trust and identification-enhancing nature of peer-to-peer communication. <br /> (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.},
  language  = {en}
}
@incollection{Juchler2021,
  author    = {Juchler, Ingo},
  title     = {Mundus vult decipi},
  series = {Demokratie im Stresstest},
  booktitle = {Demokratie im Stresstest},
  editor    = {Deichmann, Carl and Partetzke, Marc},
  publisher = {Springer VS},
  address   = {Wiesbaden},
  isbn      = {978-3-658-33076-7},
  doi       = {10.1007/978-3-658-33077-4_13},
  pages     = {229 -- 247},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Die Menschen glauben, was sie glauben wollen. Betonung auf wollen. (…) Nein, der Glaube der Menschen h{\"a}ngt nicht von Fakten ab, nicht von Beweisen. Schlimmer noch - und das ist fast so etwas wie der zweite Teil der Erleuchtung, eine Steigerung: Man kann ihnen Fakten liefern, man kann sie widerlegen, es hilft nichts. Im Gegenteil, wer etwas glauben will, findet einen Weg! Er wird sich durch den winzigen Spalt quetschen, den die Wahrheit im l{\"a}sst. Wird die Dinge so lange so drehen und wenden, bis sie wieder in seinen Glauben hineinpassen, und seine ganze Klugheit wird ihn nicht etwa daran hindern, sondern ihm noch dabei behilflich sein. Eugen Ruge, Metropol Toren sind, die alles loben und lieben, was im Nebel verdrehter Worte dunkel daherkommt; Toren, die f{\"u}r wahr halten, was ihnen eingef{\"a}rbt durch wohlt{\"o}nende Phrasen, reizvoll die Ohren kitzelt. Lukrez, {\"U}ber die Natur der Dinge},
  language  = {de}
}
@book{Juchler2021,
  author    = {Juchler, Ingo},
  title     = {Ein Volkskanzler},
  publisher = {bpb, Bundeszentrale f{\"u}r politische Bildung},
  address   = {Bonn},
  isbn      = {978-3-8389-7228-2},
  pages     = {20},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Wie Grundrechte unter den Augen aller ausgeh{\"o}hlt und umgebaut werden, wie kurz der Weg von der Demokratie zur Diktatur ist, zeigt Maximilian Steinbeis' Gedankenexperiment »Ein Volkskanzler« in sechs Schritten. Auf der Grundlage seines Essays hat er ein Theaterst{\"u}ck verfasst, das bereits auf vielen B{\"u}hnen gespielt und nun auch als Kammerspiel verfilmt wurde. Die didaktische Handreichung unterst{\"u}tzt Lehrerinnen und Lehrer bei der Einbettung des Theaterst{\"u}cks oder der Verfilmung von »Ein Volkskanzler« im Unterricht.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Juchler2021,
  author    = {Juchler, Ingo},
  title     = {Aporien des Rechts},
  series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Menschenrechte},
  volume    = {15},
  journal   = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Menschenrechte},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Wochenschau Verlag},
  address   = {Frankfurt am Main},
  isbn      = {978-3-7344-1405-3},
  issn      = {1864-6492},
  pages     = {196 -- 206},
  year      = {2021},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{Stehle2021,
  author    = {Stehle, Fee},
  title     = {Rezension zu: Jordan, Andrew; Huitema, Dave; Asselt Harro van; Foster, Johanna (eds.): Governing climate change: polycentricity in action? - Cambridge ; New York, NY ; Port Melbourne : Cambridge University Press, 2018. - xv, 389 S. - ISBN 978-1-108-41812-6},
  series = {Global environmental politics},
  volume    = {21},
  journal   = {Global environmental politics},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {MIT Press},
  address   = {Cambridge},
  issn      = {1536-0091},
  doi       = {10.1162/glep_r_00596},
  pages     = {157 -- 159},
  year      = {2021},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BonomiSavignonMeneguzzoKuhlmannetal.2021,
  author    = {Bonomi Savignon, Andrea and Meneguzzo, Marco and Kuhlmann, Sabine and Cepiku, Denita},
  title     = {Guest editorial: Interinstitutional performance management},
  series = {International journal of public sector management : IJPSM},
  volume    = {34},
  journal   = {International journal of public sector management : IJPSM},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {Emerald Group Publishing Limited},
  address   = {Bingley},
  issn      = {0951-3558},
  doi       = {10.1108/IJPSM-03-2021-0057},
  pages     = {241 -- 246},
  year      = {2021},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BuechnerDosdall2021,
  author    = {B{\"u}chner, Stefanie and Dosdall, Henrik},
  title     = {Organisation und Algorithmus},
  series = {K{\"o}lner Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie : KZfSS},
  volume    = {73},
  journal   = {K{\"o}lner Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie : KZfSS},
  number    = {Suppl. 1},
  publisher = {Springer VS},
  address   = {Wiesbaden},
  issn      = {0023-2653},
  doi       = {10.1007/s11577-021-00752-0},
  pages     = {333 -- 357},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {This article analyzes how organizations endow algorithms, which we understand as digital formats of observation, with agency, thus rendering them actionable. Our main argument is that the relevance of digital observation formats results from how organizations embed them in their decision architectures. We demonstrate this using the example of the Austrian Public Employment Service (AMS), which introduced an algorithm in 2018 to evaluate the chances of unemployed persons being reintegrated in the labor market. In this regard, the AMS algorithm serves as an exemplary case for the current trend among public organizations to harness algorithms for distributing limited resources in a purportedly more efficient way. To reconstruct how this is achieved, we delineate how the AMS algorithm categorizes, compares, and evaluates persons. Building on this, we demonstrate how the algorithmic model is integrated into the organizational decision architecture and thereby made actionable. In conclusion, algorithmic models like the AMS algorithm also pose a challenge for organizations because they mute chances for realizing organizational learning. We substantiate this argument with regard to the role of coproduction and the absence of clear causality in the field of (re)integrating unemployed persons in the labor market.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Reiners2021,
  author    = {Reiners, Nina},
  title     = {Despite or because of contestation?},
  series = {Human rights quarterly : a comparative and international journal of the social sciences, humanities, and law},
  volume    = {43},
  journal   = {Human rights quarterly : a comparative and international journal of the social sciences, humanities, and law},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Johns Hopkins Univ. Press},
  address   = {Baltimore},
  issn      = {0275-0392},
  doi       = {10.1353/hrq.2021.0021},
  pages     = {329 -- 343},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Almost twenty years after its recognition in international human rights law, the human right to water continues to spark discussions about its scope and meaning. This article revisits the evolution and contestation of the right's first international legal framework, General Comment No. 15 from the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. The analysis highlights the contestation of economic and social rights as a universal phenomenon at multiple levels, but argues that these meaning-making practices can support their validation and recognition.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{Juchler2021,
  author    = {Juchler, Ingo},
  title     = {Rezension zu: Pelluchon, Corine: Manifest f{\"u}r die Tiere. - M{\"u}nchen: C.H. Beck Verlag, 2020. - 125 S. - ISBN: 978-3-406-75709-9},
  series = {Forum Politikunterricht},
  journal   = {Forum Politikunterricht},
  number    = {1-2},
  publisher = {Deutsche Vereinigung f{\"u}r Politische Bildung, Landesverband Bayern},
  address   = {M{\"u}nchen},
  issn      = {0941-5874},
  pages     = {2},
  year      = {2021},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{Turner2021,
  author    = {Turner, Bryan S.},
  title     = {Book review: Populism in the civil sphere / edited: Jeffrey C. Alexander, Peter Kivisto, Giuseppe Sciortino. - Cambridge ; Medford : Polity, 2021. - ISBN 978-1-5095-4474-5 ; 978-1-5095-4473-8},
  series = {Journal of classical sociology : JCS},
  volume    = {21},
  journal   = {Journal of classical sociology : JCS},
  number    = {3-4},
  publisher = {Sage Publ.},
  address   = {London},
  issn      = {1468-795X},
  doi       = {10.1177/1468795X21996104},
  pages     = {357 -- 360},
  year      = {2021},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SteckerKachelPaasch2021,
  author    = {Stecker, Christian and Kachel, Jannis and Paasch, Jana},
  title     = {Muster der Landesgesetzgebung},
  series = {Politische Vierteljahresschrift : PVS : German political science quarterly / hrsg. vom Vorstand der Deutschen Vereinigung f{\"u}r Politikwissenschaft},
  volume    = {62},
  journal   = {Politische Vierteljahresschrift : PVS : German political science quarterly / hrsg. vom Vorstand der Deutschen Vereinigung f{\"u}r Politikwissenschaft},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Springer VS},
  address   = {Wiesbaden},
  issn      = {0032-3470},
  doi       = {10.1007/s11615-021-00307-0},
  pages     = {307 -- 324},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {This research note presents the first systematic documentation of the legislative process in the German state parliaments. The data set comprises 16,610 bills between 1990 and 2020. After a description of the data, we provide illustrative insights into the patterns of law-making. It is shown that these patterns are dominated by the new dualism between government and opposition. Furthermore, the incentives of issue competition are clearly present in the legislative initiatives. There is no evidence, however, for the expectation that intracoalitional policy distance prolongs the duration of legislative procedures. The published data provides scholars with the opportunity to investigate various additional research questions.},
  language  = {de}
}
@incollection{Juchler2021,
  author    = {Juchler, Ingo},
  title     = {Außerschulische Lernorte, Narrationen und Theater},
  series = {Deutsche Demokratiegeschichte II},
  booktitle = {Deutsche Demokratiegeschichte II},
  editor    = {L{\"u}dicke, Lars},
  publisher = {be.bra wissenschaft},
  address   = {Berlin},
  isbn      = {978-3-95410-282-2},
  pages     = {45 -- 55},
  year      = {2021},
  language  = {de}
}
@incollection{Juchler2021,
  author    = {Juchler, Ingo},
  title     = {Groteske und Satire im DDR-Roman als didaktische Momente in der politischen Bildung},
  series = {Politik in der Kunst - Kunst in der Politik},
  booktitle = {Politik in der Kunst - Kunst in der Politik},
  editor    = {Goll, Thomas and Friedrichs, Werner},
  publisher = {Springer VS},
  address   = {Wiesbaden},
  isbn      = {978-3-658-33763-6},
  issn      = {2570-2114},
  doi       = {10.1007/978-3-658-33763-6_3},
  pages     = {35 -- 49},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Ingo Juchler setzt sich am Beispiel des Romans „Am k{\"u}rzeren Ende der Sonnenallee" (1999) von Thomas Brussig mit „Groteske und Satire im DDR-Roman als didaktische Momente in der politischen Bildung" auseinander. Nach der Einf{\"u}hrung in den Roman er{\"o}rtert er dessen politischen Sinngehalt, den er in der Auseinandersetzung mit den literarischen Leitfiguren des Romans, Friedrich Schiller und Jean-Paul Sartre, im besonderen Wert der Freiheit findet. Den Toten der Berliner Mauer, die davon Zeugnis geben, setzt Juchler im abschließenden Kapitel ein Denkmal.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Schuppert2021,
  author    = {Schuppert, Fabian},
  title     = {Zur Auferlegung systemischer Finanzrisiken},
  series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r politische Theorie},
  volume    = {12},
  journal   = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r politische Theorie},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Barbara Budrich},
  address   = {Leverkusen-Opladen},
  issn      = {1869-3016},
  doi       = {10.3224/zpth.v12i1.05},
  pages     = {67 -- 83},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Obwohl seit der Finanzkrise 2008 systemische Finanzrisiken das Objekt zahlreicher wissenschaftlicher Studien waren, hat die Frage, unter welchen Bedingungen und Umst{\"a}nden die Auferlegung eines systemischen Finanzrisikos moralisch unzul{\"a}ssig ist, bisher kaum Beachtung gefunden. Ziel dieses Aufsatzes ist es, eine Reihe von normativen Kriterien f{\"u}r die Einsch{\"a}tzung der moralischen Unzul{\"a}ssigkeit von systemischen Risiken zu entwickeln. Dar{\"u}ber hinaus wird argumentiert, dass staatliche und andere relevante Institutionen zwei zentrale Pflichten hinsichtlich des Umgangs mit systemischen Finanzrisiken haben: eine Schutzpflicht gegen{\"u}ber allen B{\"u}rger*innen und eine Sorgfaltspflicht, um die diesen Institutionen obliegenden Kontroll- und Aufsichtsfunktionen verantwortungsvoll auszu{\"u}ben.},
  language  = {de}
}