@misc{DoetterlBerheNadeuetal.2016, author = {Doetterl, Sebastian and Berhe, Asmeret Asefaw and Nadeu, Elisabet and Wang, Zhengang and Sommer, Michael and Fiener, Peter}, title = {Erosion, deposition and soil carbon: A review of process-level controls, experimental tools and models to address C cycling in dynamic landscapes}, series = {Earth science reviews : the international geological journal bridging the gap between research articles and textbooks}, volume = {154}, journal = {Earth science reviews : the international geological journal bridging the gap between research articles and textbooks}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {Amsterdam}, issn = {0012-8252}, doi = {10.1016/j.earscirev.2015.12.005}, pages = {102 -- 122}, year = {2016}, abstract = {The role of soil erosion in terrestrial carbon (C) sequestration and release remains one of the most important uncertainties in our attempts to determine the potential of soils to mediate climate change. Despite its widely recognized importance for terrestrial C sequestration, to date, no Earth System Model (ESM) implements soil erosion effects on carbon cycling in sufficient detail. So far, available studies have mostly investigated the magnitude of erosional C transport and in-situ measurements of vertical C fluxes on the catchment or regional scale. Recognizing the need to adequately represent C erosion processes and controls in ESMs, we provide a comprehensive cross-disciplinary review on lateral C redistribution in the landscape and discuss the implications for bio-geochemical cycling of carbon. We present current knowledge on the role of erosional C distribution in controlling the stabilization and release of C in soils, taking into consideration the important geomorphic, ecological, hydrologic, pedologic and micro-climatic processes and controls that affect soil organic carbon (SOC) stock, fluxes, and persistence in dynamic landscapes. Further, we provide an overview on latest experimental and modelling approaches that are being used to investigate the role of erosion in the carbon cycle. Finally, to advance our understanding of the role of soil redistribution in biogeochemical cycles of essential elements, we discuss the most promising topics for future research in this field. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.}, language = {en} } @article{WilkenBaurSommeretal.2018, author = {Wilken, Florian and Baur, Martin and Sommer, Michael and Deumlich, Detlef and Bens, Oliver and Fiener, Peter}, title = {Uncertainties in rainfall kinetic energy-intensity relations for soil erosion modelling}, series = {Catena : an interdisciplinary journal of soil science, hydrology, geomorphology focusing on geoecology and landscape evolution}, volume = {171}, journal = {Catena : an interdisciplinary journal of soil science, hydrology, geomorphology focusing on geoecology and landscape evolution}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {Amsterdam}, issn = {0341-8162}, doi = {10.1016/j.catena.2018.07.002}, pages = {234 -- 244}, year = {2018}, abstract = {For bare soil conditions, the most important process driving and initiating splash and interrill erosion is the detachment of soil particles via raindrop impact. The kinetic energy of a rainfall event is controlled by the drop size and fall velocity distribution, which is often directly or indirectly implemented in erosion models. Therefore, numerous theoretical functions have been developed for the estimation of rainfall kinetic energy from available rainfall intensity measurements. The aim of this study is to assess differences inherent in a wide number of kinetic energy-rainfall intensity (KE-I) relations and their role in soil erosion modelling. Therefore, 32 KE-I relations are compared against measured rainfall energies based on optical distrometer measurements carried out at five stations of two substantially different rainfall regimes. These allow for continuous high-resolution (1-min) direct measurements of rainfall kinetic energies from a detailed spectrum of measured drop sizes and corresponding fall velocities. To quantify the effect of different KE-I relations on sediment delivery, we apply the erosion model WATEM/SEDEM in an experimental setup to four catchments of NE-Germany. The distrometer data shows substantial differences between measured and theoretical models of drop size and fall velocity distributions. For low intensities the number of small drops is overestimated by the Marshall and Palmer (1948; MP) drop size distribution, while for high intensities the proportion of large drops is overestimated by the MP distribution. The distrometer measurements show a considerable proportion of large drops falling at slower velocities than predicted by the Gunn and Kinzer (1949) terminal velocity model. For almost all rainfall events at all stations, the KE-I relations predicted higher cumulative kinetic energy sums compared to the direct measurements of the optical distrometers. The different KE-I relations show individual characteristics over the course of rainfall intensity levels. Our results indicate a high sensitivity (up to a range from 10 to 27 t ha(-1)) of the simulated sediment delivery related to different KE-I relations. Hence, the uncertainty associated with KE-I relations for soil erosion modelling is of critical importance.}, language = {en} } @article{HeinrichBalanzateguiBensetal.2018, author = {Heinrich, Ingo and Balanzategui, Daniel and Bens, Oliver and Blasch, Gerald and Blume, Theresa and Boettcher, Falk and Borg, Erik and Brademann, Brian and Brauer, Achim and Conrad, Christopher and Dietze, Elisabeth and Dr{\"a}ger, Nadine and Fiener, Peter and Gerke, Horst H. and G{\"u}ntner, Andreas and Heine, Iris and Helle, Gerhard and Herbrich, Marcus and Harfenmeister, Katharina and Heussner, Karl-Uwe and Hohmann, Christian and Itzerott, Sibylle and Jurasinski, Gerald and Kaiser, Knut and Kappler, Christoph and Koebsch, Franziska and Liebner, Susanne and Lischeid, Gunnar and Merz, Bruno and Missling, Klaus Dieter and Morgner, Markus and Pinkerneil, Sylvia and Plessen, Birgit and Raab, Thomas and Ruhtz, Thomas and Sachs, Torsten and Sommer, Michael and Spengler, Daniel and Stender, Vivien and St{\"u}ve, Peter and Wilken, Florian}, title = {Interdisciplinary Geo-ecological Research across Time Scales in the Northeast German Lowland Observatory (TERENO-NE)}, series = {Vadose zone journal}, volume = {17}, journal = {Vadose zone journal}, number = {1}, publisher = {Soil Science Society of America}, address = {Madison}, issn = {1539-1663}, doi = {10.2136/vzj2018.06.0116}, pages = {25}, year = {2018}, abstract = {The Northeast German Lowland Observatory (TERENO-NE) was established to investigate the regional impact of climate and land use change. TERENO-NE focuses on the Northeast German lowlands, for which a high vulnerability has been determined due to increasing temperatures and decreasing amounts of precipitation projected for the coming decades. To facilitate in-depth evaluations of the effects of climate and land use changes and to separate the effects of natural and anthropogenic drivers in the region, six sites were chosen for comprehensive monitoring. In addition, at selected sites, geoarchives were used to substantially extend the instrumental records back in time. It is this combination of diverse disciplines working across different time scales that makes the observatory TERENO-NE a unique observation platform. We provide information about the general characteristics of the observatory and its six monitoring sites and present examples of interdisciplinary research activities at some of these sites. We also illustrate how monitoring improves process understanding, how remote sensing techniques are fine-tuned by the most comprehensive ground-truthing site DEMMIN, how soil erosion dynamics have evolved, how greenhouse gas monitoring of rewetted peatlands can reveal unexpected mechanisms, and how proxy data provides a long-term perspective of current ongoing changes.}, language = {en} }