@article{ReibisVoeller2020,
  author    = {Reibis, Rona K. and V{\"o}ller, Heinz},
  title     = {Non pharmacological secondary prevention and rehabilitation},
  series = {Aktuelle Kardiologie},
  volume    = {9},
  journal   = {Aktuelle Kardiologie},
  number    = {03},
  publisher = {Thieme},
  address   = {Stuttgart},
  issn      = {2193-5203},
  doi       = {10.1055/a-1185-8460},
  pages     = {297 -- 302},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Die Sekund{\"a}rpr{\"a}vention der koronaren Herzkrankheit umfasst einerseits eine pharmakologische, andererseits eine lebensstilbasierte S{\"a}ule, die idealerweise interagieren und sich potenzieren. Neben der medikament{\"o}sen Blutdruck- und Lipideinstellung auf leitlinienorientierte Zielwerte erm{\"o}glichen moderne Antidiabetika eine Optimierung des glukometabolischen Kontinuums und eine Prognosebesserung. Die Lebensstiloptimierung setzt sich aus koronarprotektiver Ern{\"a}hrung, einer individualisierten Trainingstherapie, einer konsequenten Nikotinkarenz und stressreduzierenden Maßnahmen zusammen. Die kardiologische Rehabilitation (Phase II) schließt sich idealerweise unmittelbar einem station{\"a}ren Aufenthalt wegen eines akuten Koronarereignisses an, kann aber auch im Rahmen einer stabilen Koronarsituation im Rahmen eines allgemeinen Antragsverfahrens durchgef{\"u}hrt werden. Randomisierte und prospektiv angelegte Interventionsstudien belegen die prognostische Wertigkeit der kardiologischen Rehabilitation auch im Zeitalter akuter Revaskularisationstherapie mit 24-h-PCI und moderner Pharmakotherapie.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{SalzwedelJensenRauchetal.2020,
  author    = {Salzwedel, Annett and Jensen, Katrin and Rauch, Bernhard and Doherty, Patrick and Metzendorf, Maria-Inti and Hackbusch, Matthes and V{\"o}ller, Heinz and Schmid, Jean-Paul and Davos, Constantinos H.},
  title     = {Effectiveness of comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation in coronary artery disease patients treated according to contemporary evidence based medicine},
  series = {European journal of preventive cardiology : the official ESC journal for primary \& secondary cardiovascular prevention, rehabilitation and sports cardiology},
  volume    = {27},
  journal   = {European journal of preventive cardiology : the official ESC journal for primary \& secondary cardiovascular prevention, rehabilitation and sports cardiology},
  number    = {16},
  publisher = {Oxford Univ. Press},
  address   = {Oxford},
  organization    = {Univ Heidelberg Heinrich Heine Univ},
  issn      = {2047-4873},
  doi       = {10.1177/2047487320905719},
  pages     = {1756 -- 1774},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Background Despite numerous studies and meta-analyses the prognostic effect of cardiac rehabilitation is still under debate. This update of the Cardiac Rehabilitation Outcome Study (CROS II) provides a contemporary and practice focused approach including only cardiac rehabilitation interventions based on published standards and core components to evaluate cardiac rehabilitation delivery and effectiveness in improving patient prognosis. Design A systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods Randomised controlled trials and retrospective and prospective controlled cohort studies evaluating patients after acute coronary syndrome, coronary artery bypass grafting or mixed populations with coronary artery disease published until September 2018 were included. Resulte Based on CROS inclusion criteria out of 7096 abstracts six additional studies including 8671 patients were identified (two randomised controlled trials, two retrospective controlled cohort studies, two prospective controlled cohort studies). In total, 31 studies including 228,337 patients were available for this meta-analysis (three randomised controlled trials, nine prospective controlled cohort studies, 19 retrospective controlled cohort studies; 50,653 patients after acute coronary syndrome 14,583, after coronary artery bypass grafting 163,101, mixed coronary artery disease populations; follow-up periods ranging from 9 months to 14 years). Heterogeneity in design, cardiac rehabilitation delivery, biometrical assessment and potential confounders was considerable. Controlled cohort studies showed a significantly reduced total mortality (primary endpoint) after cardiac rehabilitation participation in patients after acute coronary syndrome (prospective controlled cohort studies: hazard ratio (HR) 0.37, 95\% confidence interval (CI) 0.20-0.69; retrospective controlled cohort studies HR 0.64, 95\% CI 0.53-0.76; prospective controlled cohort studies odds ratio 0.20, 95\% CI 0.08-0.48), but the single randomised controlled trial fulfilling the CROS inclusion criteria showed neutral results. Cardiac rehabilitation participation was also associated with reduced total mortality in patients after coronary artery bypass grafting (retrospective controlled cohort studies HR 0.62, 95\% CI 0.54-0.70, one single randomised controlled trial without fatal events), and in mixed coronary artery disease populations (retrospective controlled cohort studies HR 0.52, 95\% CI 0.36-0.77; two out of 10 controlled cohort studies with neutral results). Conclusion CROS II confirms the effectiveness of cardiac rehabilitation participation after acute coronary syndrome and after coronary artery bypass grafting in actual clinical practice by reducing total mortality under the conditions of current evidence-based coronary artery disease treatment. The data of CROS II, however, underscore the urgent need to define internationally accepted minimal standards for cardiac rehabilitation delivery as well as for scientific evaluation.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SchulzBehrendtSalzwedelRabeetal.2017,
  author    = {Schulz-Behrendt, Claudia and Salzwedel, Annett and Rabe, Sophie and Ortmann, K. and V{\"o}ller, Heinz},
  title     = {Aspekte beruflicher und sozialer Wiedereingliederung aus Sicht kardiovaskul{\"a}r erkrankter Rehabilitanden in besonderen beruflichen Problemlagen},
  series = {Die Rehabilitation : Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Praxis und Forschung in der Rehabilitation},
  volume    = {56},
  journal   = {Die Rehabilitation : Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Praxis und Forschung in der Rehabilitation},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {Thieme},
  address   = {Stuttgart},
  issn      = {0034-3536},
  doi       = {10.1055/s-0042-121379},
  pages     = {181 -- 188},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {Ziel: Untersucht wurden subjektive bio-psycho-soziale Auswirkungen chronischer Herz- und Gef{\"a}ßerkrankungen, Bew{\"a}ltigungsstrategien und Formen sozialer Unterst{\"u}tzung bei Rehabilitanden in besonderen beruflichen Problemlagen (BBPL). Methodik: F{\"u}r die qualitative Untersuchung wurden 17 Patienten (48,9±7,0 Jahre, 13 m{\"a}nnl.) mit BBPL (SIMBO-C>30) in leitfadengest{\"u}tzten Interviews befragt. Die Auswertung erfolgte softwaregest{\"u}tzt nach dem inhaltsanalytischen Ansatz von Mayring. Ergebnisse: Im Rahmen der Krankheitsauswirkungen benannten die Patienten soziale, einschließlich beruflicher Aspekte mit 62\% der Aussagen deutlich h{\"a}ufiger als physische oder psychische Faktoren (9 bzw. 29\%). Angewandte Bew{\"a}ltigungsstrategien und erfahrene Unterst{\"u}tzungsleistungen richteten sich jedoch {\"u}berwiegend auf k{\"o}rperliche Einschr{\"a}nkungen (70 bzw. 45\%). Schlussfolgerung: Obgleich soziale Krankheitsauswirkungen f{\"u}r die befragten Rehabilitanden subjektiv bedeutsam waren, gelang die Entwicklung geeigneter Bew{\"a}ltigungsstrategien nur unzureichen},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{SalzwedelHeidlerMengetal.2020,
  author    = {Salzwedel, Annett and Heidler, Maria-Dorothea and Meng, Karin and Schikora, Martin and Wegscheider, Karl and Reibis, Rona Katharina and V{\"o}ller, Heinz},
  title     = {Impact of cognitive performance on disease-related knowledge six months after multi-component rehabilitation in patients after an acute cardiac event},
  series = {European journal of preventive cardiology : the official ESC journal for primary \& secondary cardiovascular prevention, rehabilitation and sports cardiology},
  volume    = {26},
  journal   = {European journal of preventive cardiology : the official ESC journal for primary \& secondary cardiovascular prevention, rehabilitation and sports cardiology},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Sage Publ.},
  address   = {London},
  issn      = {2047-4873},
  doi       = {10.1177/2047487318791609},
  pages     = {46 -- 55},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Background Although associations between cardiovascular diseases and cognitive impairment are well known, the impact of cognitive performance on the success of patient education as a core component of cardiac rehabilitation remains insufficiently investigated so far. Design Prospective observational study in two inpatient cardiac rehabilitation centres between September 2014 and August 2015 with a follow-up six months after cardiac rehabilitation. Method At admission to and discharge from cardiac rehabilitation, the cognitive performance of 401 patients (54.5 ± 6.3 years, 80\% men) following an acute coronary syndrome and/or coronary artery bypass graft was tested using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment. Patients' disease-related knowledge was determined using a quiz (22 items for medical knowledge and 12 items for healthy lifestyle and behaviour) at both times and at follow-up. The change in knowledge after cardiac rehabilitation was analysed in multivariable regression models. Potentially influencing parameters (e.g. level of education, medication, cardiovascular risk factors, coronary artery bypass graft, comorbidities, exercise capacity) were considered. Results During cardiac rehabilitation, disease-related knowledge was significantly enhanced in both scales. At follow-up, the average level of medical knowledge was significantly reduced, while lifestyle knowledge remained at a stable level. The maintenance of knowledge after cardiac rehabilitation was predominantly predicted by prior knowledge, cognitive performance at discharge from cardiac rehabilitation and, in the case of medical knowledge, by coronary artery bypass graft. Conclusion Patient education in cardiac rehabilitation led to enhanced disease-related knowledge, but the maintenance of this essentially depended on patients' cognitive performance, especially after coronary artery bypass graft. Therefore, patient education concepts in cardiac rehabilitation should be reconsidered and adjusted as needed.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SalzwedelHauboldBarnacketal.2018,
  author    = {Salzwedel, Annett and Haubold, Kathrin and Barnack, Beate and Reibis, Rona Katharina and V{\"o}ller, Heinz},
  title     = {Indikatoren der Ergebnisqualit{\"a}t kardiologischer Rehabilitation Ergebnisse einer Delphi-Befragung von Mitgliedern der Deutschen Gesellschaft f{\"u}r Pr{\"a}vention und Rehabilitation von Herz- und Kreislauferkrankungen e. V. (DGPR)},
  series = {Die Rehabilitation : Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Praxis und Forschung in der Rehabilitation},
  volume    = {58},
  journal   = {Die Rehabilitation : Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Praxis und Forschung in der Rehabilitation},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Thieme},
  address   = {Stuttgart},
  issn      = {0034-3536},
  doi       = {10.1055/s-0044-101048},
  pages     = {31 -- 38},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Ziel der Studie Die vorliegende Untersuchung beinhaltete die explorative Erfassung potenzieller Indikatoren der Ergebnisqualit{\"a}t der kardiologischen Rehabilitation (CR) f{\"u}r Patienten unter 65 Jahren. Methoden In einer 4-stufigen webbasierten Delphi-Befragung (04-07/2016) von in der CR t{\"a}tigen {\"A}rzten[2] , Psychologen und Sport-/Physiotherapeuten wurden Parameter der k{\"o}rperlichen Leistungsf{\"a}higkeit, der Sozialmedizin, der subjektiven Gesundheit und kardiovaskul{\"a}re Risikofaktoren hinsichtlich ihrer Eignung als Qualit{\"a}tsindikator bewertet. Ergebnisse Von 44 vorgegebenen wie auch von den Teilnehmern vorgeschlagenen Parametern wurden 21 Parameter (48\%), die H{\"a}lfte davon psychosoziale Faktoren, als potenzielle Qualit{\"a}tsindikatoren ausgew{\"a}hlt, wobei lediglich f{\"u}r das Rauchverhalten, den Blutdruck, das LDL-Cholesterin und die max. Belastbarkeit im Belastungs-EKG ein Konsens (Zustimmung>75\% der Befragten) erzielt wurde. Schlussfolgerung Die Wahl der Qualit{\"a}tsindikatoren durch die Experten erfolgte mehrheitlich mit nur geringer Einigkeit. Eine klinische und wissenschaftliche Evaluierung der gew{\"a}hlten Parameter ist daher zwingend erforderlich.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{VigoritoAbreuAmbrosettietal.2017,
  author    = {Vigorito, Carlo and Abreu, Ana and Ambrosetti, Marco and Belardinelli, Romualdo and Corra, Ugo and Cupples, Margaret and Davos, Constantinos H. and Hoefer, Stefan and Iliou, Marie-Christine and Schmid, Jean-Paul and V{\"o}ller, Heinz and Doherty, Patrick},
  title     = {Frailty and cardiac rehabilitation: A call to action from the EAPC Cardiac Rehabilitation Section},
  series = {European journal of preventive cardiology : the official ESC journal for primary \& secondary cardiovascular prevention, rehabilitation and sports cardiology},
  volume    = {24},
  journal   = {European journal of preventive cardiology : the official ESC journal for primary \& secondary cardiovascular prevention, rehabilitation and sports cardiology},
  publisher = {Sage Publ.},
  address   = {London},
  issn      = {2047-4873},
  doi       = {10.1177/2047487316682579},
  pages     = {577 -- 590},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {Frailty is a geriatric syndrome characterised by a vulnerability status associated with declining function of multiple physiological systems and loss of physiological reserves. Two main models of frailty have been advanced: the phenotypic model (primary frailty) or deficits accumulation model (secondary frailty), and different instruments have been proposed and validated to measure frailty. However measured, frailty correlates to medical outcomes in the elderly, and has been shown to have prognostic value for patients in different clinical settings, such as in patients with coronary artery disease, after cardiac surgery or transvalvular aortic valve replacement, in patients with chronic heart failure or after left ventricular assist device implantation. The prevalence, clinical and prognostic relevance of frailty in a cardiac rehabilitation setting has not yet been well characterised, despite the increasing frequency of elderly patients in cardiac rehabilitation, where frailty is likely to influence the onset, type and intensity of the exercise training programme and the design of tailored rehabilitative interventions for these patients. Therefore, we need to start looking for frailty in elderly patients entering cardiac rehabilitation programmes and become more familiar with some of the tools to recognise and evaluate the severity of this condition. Furthermore, we need to better understand whether exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation may change the course and the prognosis of frailty in cardiovascular patients.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{MarxPhilipsBassengeetal.2016,
  author    = {Marx, R. and Philips, H. and Bassenge, D. and Nosper, M. and Roehrig, B. and Linck-Eleftheriadis, S. and Strandt, G. and Salzwedel, Annett and Pabst, F.},
  title     = {Progress of Rehabilitation for Cardiac Patients Depending on the Degree of Self-Sufficiency at Admission},
  series = {Die Rehabilitation : Zeitschrift f{\~A}¼r Praxis und Forschung in der Rehabilitation},
  volume    = {55},
  journal   = {Die Rehabilitation : Zeitschrift f{\~A}¼r Praxis und Forschung in der Rehabilitation},
  publisher = {Thieme},
  address   = {Stuttgart},
  issn      = {0034-3536},
  doi       = {10.1055/s-0041-111524},
  pages     = {34 -- 39},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Zusammenfassung Ziel der Studie: Es existieren kaum Publikationen uber das Rehabilitationsergebnis kardiologischer Patienten unter Berucksichtigung eines erhohten medizinischen, pflegerischen und therapeutischen Versorgungsaufwands (Barthel-Index70). Es war Ziel der Studie, die in einem Zeitraum von 2 Jahren aufgenommen Rehabilitanden (n=387) einer gesetzlichen Krankenkasse, aufgeteilt in jeweils eine Gruppe selbstversorgender und versorgungsaufwandiger Patienten, bezuglich ihrer Unterschiede in dem Rehabilitationsergebnis zu uberprufen. Methodik: In Abhangigkeit des Versorgungsaufwandes wurde das Rehabilitationsergebnis sowie Unterschiede im Verlauf hinsichtlich der korperlichen Leistungsfahigkeit, des emotionalen Status und der Aktivitaten des taglichen Lebens, gemessen an Barthelindex, FIM-Index, HADS-Werten, Komplikationen, Funktionsuntersuchungen, Belastungstests, Rehabilitationsdauer und Entlassungsform, gepruft. Ergebnisse: Die in Hinblick auf medizinischen, pflegerischen und therapeutischen Aufwand versorgungsaufwandigen Patienten waren alter, langer im Krankenhaus und in der Rehabilitation, sie hatten mehr Komplikationen und deutlich mehr Begleiterkrankungen. Sie wurden haufiger ins Akutkrankenhaus verlegt. Sie hatten eine hohere Steigerungsrate der Selbstversorgungsindices und eine relevante Steigerung bei den Belastungstests. Schlussfolgerung: Ein hoher Versorgungsaufwand multimorbider kardiologischer Patienten ist keine Kontraindikation gegen eine Rehabilitation, da auch bei dieser Patientengruppe die tragerspezifischen Rehabilitationsziele erreicht wurden. Abstract Introduction: There are hardly any publications about the outcome of cardiac rehabilitation considering patients with an increased need for medical, nursing and therapeutic care. The aim of this study, which consecutively included n=387 statutory health insurance inpatients over a period of 2 years, was to find out differences in outcome in self-care patients (Barthel index>70) as compared to patients with a need for complex care (Barthel index70). Methods: Rehabilitation outcomes concerning physical capacity, emotional status and activities of daily living as measured by Barthel index, FIM index, HADS, clinical complications, exercise test, duration of rehabilitation and form of dismission were analyzed and compared between both groups. Results: The inpatients with a Barthel index 70 at admission were older, had a longer stay in hospital and in rehabilitation, developed more complications and more often suffered from concomitant diseases. They were readmitted to hospital more often. They showed a comparatively higher increase in indices of self-care and a significant increase in physical performance tests. Conclusion: Higher medical care expenses of multimorbid cardiac inpatients are no contraindication against rehabilitation, because even in this group the specific rehabilitation aims of the healthcare payers can be reached.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{SalzwedelReibisHadzicetal.2019,
  author    = {Salzwedel, Annett and Reibis, Rona Katharina and Hadzic, Miralem and Buhlert, Hermann and V{\"o}ller, Heinz},
  title     = {Patients' expectations of returning to work, co-morbid disorders and work capacity at discharge from cardiac rehabilitation},
  series = {Vascular Health and Risk Management},
  volume    = {15},
  journal   = {Vascular Health and Risk Management},
  publisher = {Dove Medical Press},
  address   = {Albany, Auckland},
  issn      = {1176-6344},
  doi       = {10.2147/VHRM.S216039},
  pages     = {301 -- 308},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Objective: We aimed to characterize patients after an acute cardiac event regarding their negative expectations around returning to work and the impact on work capacity upon discharge from cardiac rehabilitation (CR). Methods: We analyzed routine data of 884 patients (52±7 years, 76\% men) who attended 3 weeks of inpatient CR after an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or cardiac surgery between October 2013 and March 2015. The primary outcome was their status determining their capacity to work (fit vs unfit) at discharge from CR. Further, sociodemographic data (eg, age, sex, and education level), diagnoses, functional data (eg, exercise stress test and 6-min walking test [6MWT]), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and self-assessment of the occupational prognosis (negative expectations and/or unemployment, W{\"u}rzburger screening) at admission to CR were considered. Results: A negative occupational prognosis was detected in 384 patients (43\%). Out of these, 368 (96\%) expected not to return to work after CR and/or were unemployed before CR at 29\% (n=113). Affected patients showed a reduced exercise capacity (bicycle stress test: 100 W vs 118 W, P<0.01; 6MWT: 380 m vs 421 m, P<0.01) and were more likely to receive a depression diagnosis (12\% vs 3\%, P<0.01), as well as higher levels on the HADS. At discharge from CR, 21\% of this group (n=81) were fit for work (vs 35\% of patients with a normal occupational prognosis (n=175, P<0.01)). Sick leave before the cardiac event (OR 0.4, 95\% CI 0.2-0.6, P<0.01), negative occupational expectations (OR 0.4, 95\% CI 0.3-0.7, P<0.01) and depression (OR 0.3, 95\% CI 0.1-0.8, P=0.01) reduced the likelihood of achieving work capacity upon discharge. In contrast, higher exercise capacity was positively associated. Conclusion: Patients with a negative occupational prognosis often revealed a reduced physical performance and suffered from a high psychosocial burden. In addition, patients' occupational expectations were a predictor of work capacity at discharge from CR. Affected patients should be identified at admission to allow for targeted psychosocial care.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{RoehrigSalzwedelLinckEleftheriadisetal.2015,
  author    = {R{\"o}hrig, Bernd and Salzwedel, Annett and Linck-Eleftheriadis, Sigrid and V{\"o}ller, Heinz and Nosper, Manfred},
  title     = {Outcome Based Center Comparisons in Inpatient Cardiac Rehabilitation Results from the EVA-Reha (R) Cardiology Project},
  series = {Die Rehabilitation : Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Praxis und Forschung in der Rehabilitation},
  volume    = {54},
  journal   = {Die Rehabilitation : Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Praxis und Forschung in der Rehabilitation},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Thieme},
  address   = {Stuttgart},
  issn      = {0034-3536},
  doi       = {10.1055/s-0034-1395556},
  pages     = {45 -- 52},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Background: So far, for center comparisons in inpatient cardiac rehabilitation (CR), the objective outcome quality was neglected because of challenges in quantifying the overall success of CR. In this article, a multifactorial benchmark model measuring the individual rehabilitation success is presented. Methods: In 21 rehabilitation centers, 5 123 patients were consecutively enrolled between 01/2010 and 12/2012 in the prospective multicenter registry EVA-Reha (R) Cardiology. Changes in 13 indicators in the areas cardiovascular risk factors, physical performance and subjective health during rehabilitation were evaluated according to levels of severity. Changes were only rated for patients who needed a medical intervention. Additionally, the changes had to be clinically relevant. Therefore Minimal Important Differences (MID) were predefined. Ratings were combined to a single score, the multiple outcome criterion (MEK). Results: The MEK was determined for all patients (71.7 +/- 7.4 years, 76.9 \% men) and consisted of an average of 5.6 indicators. After risk adjustment for sociodemographic and clinical baseline parameters, MEK was used for center ranking. In addition, individual results of indicators were compared with means of all study sites. Conclusion: With the method presented here, the outcome quality can be quantified and outcome-based comparisons of providers can be made.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{RoehrigNosperLinckEleftheriadisetal.2014,
  author    = {Roehrig, B. and Nosper, M. and Linck-Eleftheriadis, S. and Strandt, G. and Salzwedel, Annett and V{\"o}ller, Heinz},
  title     = {Method of the assessment of patients Outcome in cardiac rehabilitation by means of quality indicators - a description of the method},
  series = {Die Rehabilitation : Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Praxis und Forschung in der Rehabilitation},
  volume    = {53},
  journal   = {Die Rehabilitation : Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Praxis und Forschung in der Rehabilitation},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Thieme},
  address   = {Stuttgart},
  issn      = {0034-3536},
  doi       = {10.1055/s-0033-1341457},
  pages     = {31 -- 37},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {Introduction: Cardiac rehabilitation is designed for patients suffering from cardiovascular diseases or functional disabilities. The aim of a cardiac rehabilitation is to improve overall physical health, psychological well-being, physical function, the ability to participate in social life and help patients to change their habits. Regarding the heterogeneity of these aims measuring of the effect of cardiac rehabilitation is still a challenge. This study recommends a concept to assess the effects of cardiac rehabilitation regarding the individual change of relevant quality indicators. Methods: With EVA-Reha; cardiac rehabilitation the Medical Advisory Service of Statutory Health Insurance Funds in Rhineland-Palatinate, Alzey (MDK Rheinland-Pfalz) developed a software to collect data set including sociodemographic and diagnostic data and also the results of specific assessments. The project was funded by the Techniker Krankenkasse, Hamburg, and supported by participating rehabilitation centers. From 01. July 2010 to 30. June 2011 1309 patients (age 71.5 years, 76.1\% men) from 13 rehabilitation centers were consecutively enrolled. 13 quality indicators in 3 scales were developed for evaluation of cardiac rehabilitation: 1) cardiovascular risk factors (blood pressure, LDL cholesterol, triglycerides), 2) exercise capacity (resting heart rate, maximal exercise capacity, maximal walking distance, heart failure [NYHA classification], and angina pectoris [CCS classification]) and 3) subjective health (IRES-24: pain, somatic health, psychological wellbeing and depression as well as anxiety on the HADS). The study was prospective; data of patients were assessed at entry and discharge of rehabilitation. To measure the success of rehabilitation each parameter was graded in severity classes at entry and discharge. For each of the 13 quality indicators changes of severity class were rated in a rating matrix. For indicators without a requirement for medical care neither at entry nor at discharge no rating was performed. Results: The grading into severity classes as well as the minimal important differences were given for the 13 quality indicators. The result of rehabilitation can be demonstrated in suitable form by means of rating of the 13 quality indicators according to a clinical population. The rating model differs well between clinically changed and unchanged patients for the quality indicators. Conclusion: The result of cardiac rehabilitation can be assessed with 13 quality indicators measured at entry and discharge of the rehabilitation program. If a change into a more favorable category at the end of rehabilitation could be achieved it was counted as a success. The 13 quality indicators can be used to assess the individual result as well as the result of a population - e.g. all patients of a clinic in a specific time period. In addition, the assessment and rating of relevant quality indicators can be used for comparisons of rehabilitation centers.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{SalzwedelHeidlerHauboldetal.2017,
  author    = {Salzwedel, Annett and Heidler, Maria-Dorothea and Haubold, Kathrin and Schikora, Martin and Reibis, Rona Katharina and Wegscheider, Karl and J{\"o}bgens, Michael and V{\"o}ller, Heinz},
  title     = {Prevalence of mild cognitive impairment in employable patients after acute coronary event in cardiac rehabilitation},
  series = {Vascular Health and Risk Management},
  volume    = {13},
  journal   = {Vascular Health and Risk Management},
  publisher = {Dove Medical Press Ltd},
  address   = {Albany, Auckland},
  issn      = {1176-6344},
  doi       = {10.2147/VHRM.S121086},
  pages     = {55 -- 60},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {Introduction: Adequate cognitive function in patients is a prerequisite for successful implementation of patient education and lifestyle coping in comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programs. Although the association between cardiovascular diseases and cognitive impairments (CIs) is well known, the prevalence particularly of mild CI in CR and the characteristics of affected patients have been insufficiently investigated so far. Methods: In this prospective observational study, 496 patients (54.5 ± 6.2 years, 79.8\% men) with coronary artery disease following an acute coronary event (ACE) were analyzed. Patients were enrolled within 14 days of discharge from the hospital in a 3-week inpatient CR program. Patients were tested for CI using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) upon admission to and discharge from CR. Additionally, sociodemographic, clinical, and physiological variables were documented. The data were analyzed descriptively and in a multivariate stepwise backward elimination regression model with respect to CI. Results: At admission to CR, the CI (MoCA score < 26) was determined in 182 patients (36.7\%). Significant differences between CI and no CI groups were identified, and CI group was associated with high prevalence of smoking (65.9 vs 56.7\%, P = 0.046), heavy (physically demanding) workloads (26.4 vs 17.8\%, P < 0.001), sick leave longer than 1 month prior to CR (28.6 vs 18.5\%, P = 0.026), reduced exercise capacity (102.5 vs 118.8 W, P = 0.006), and a shorter 6-min walking distance (401.7 vs 421.3 m, P = 0.021) compared to no CI group. The age- and education-adjusted model showed positive associations with CI only for sick leave more than 1 month prior to ACE (odds ratio [OR] 1.673, 95\% confidence interval 1.07-2.79; P = 0.03) and heavy workloads (OR 2.18, 95\% confidence interval 1.42-3.36; P < 0.01). Conclusion: The prevalence of CI in CR was considerably high, affecting more than one-third of cardiac patients. Besides age and education level, CI was associated with heavy workloads and a longer sick leave before ACE.},
  language  = {en}
}