@article{WarschburgervonSchwerinBuchholzetal.2003,
  author    = {Warschburger, Petra and von Schwerin, A.-D. and Buchholz, H. T. and Petermann, Franz},
  title     = {An educational program for parents of asthmatic preschool children: Short and medium-Term Effects.},
  year      = {2003},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{WarschburgerLandgrafPetermannetal.2003,
  author    = {Warschburger, Petra and Landgraf, Jeanne M. and Petermann, Franz and Freidel, Klaus},
  title     = {Health-related quality of life in children assessed by their parents : evaluation of the psychometric properties of the CHQ-PF50 in two German clinical samples},
  year      = {2003},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SchwarzIschebeck2003,
  author    = {Schwarz, Wolfgang and Ischebeck, A.},
  title     = {On the relative speed account of number-size interference effects in comparative judgments of numerals},
  year      = {2003},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Schwarz2003,
  author    = {Schwarz, Wolfgang},
  title     = {Stovhastic cascade processes as a model of multi-stage concurrent information procesing},
  year      = {2003},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SchneiderEsserSommerfeld2003,
  author    = {Schneider, A. and Esser, G{\"u}nter and Sommerfeld, E.},
  title     = {EEG coherence analysis for examining an automatizational deficit in dyslexia : a pilot study},
  issn      = {1422-4917},
  year      = {2003},
  abstract  = {EEG coherence analysis for examining an automatizational deficit in dyslexia - a pilot study Objectives: Do dyslexic children exhibit a general automatizational deficit as well as a phonological deficit? Methods: In 1,6 children aged 9-11 years the reaction time, the number of mistakes and EEG (19 scalp electrodes) were measured in three experiments (verbal and nonverbal). The EEG data was baseline-corrected and after a fast fourier transformation, analyzed with the coherence tool of the Brainvision(C) Software. Results: The dyslexic group made more mistakes than the control group on all tasks but their reaction times were significantly longer only on the verbal tasks. There were no coherence differences on the nonverbal task. On the language-dependent tasks the dyslexics showed higher total-frontal and lower left-frontal coherences only in the theta-frequency range, while in the alpha and beta frequency ranges coherences did not differ. Conclusions: A language-dependent cognitive automatizational deficit in the dyslexic group is assumed that is depicted by the higher synchronization of total-frontal coherences (involvement of the central executive) and is based on the less established functional coupling of cortical subsystems for language processing},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Weidenfeld2003,
  author    = {Weidenfeld, Andrea},
  title     = {Interpretation of and reasoning with conditionals : probabilities, mental models, and causality},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-5207},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  year      = {2003},
  abstract  = {In everyday conversation \"if\" is one of the most frequently used conjunctions. This dissertation investigates what meaning an everyday conditional transmits and what inferences it licenses. It is suggested that the nature of the relation between the two propositions in a conditional might play a major role for both questions. Thus, in the experiments reported here conditional statements that describe a causal relationship (e.g., \"If you touch that wire, you will receive an electric shock\") were compared to arbitrary conditional statements in which there is no meaningful relation between the antecedent and the consequent proposition (e.g., \"If Napoleon is dead, then Bristol is in England\"). Initially, central assumptions from several approaches to the meaning and the reasoning from causal conditionals will be integrated into a common model. In the model the availability of exceptional situations that have the power to generate exceptions to the rule described in the conditional (e.g., the electricity is turned off), reduces the subjective conditional probability of the consequent, given the antecedent (e.g., the probability of receiving an electric shock when touching the wire). This conditional probability determines people's degree of belief in the conditional, which in turn affects their willingness to accept valid inferences (e.g., \"Peter touches the wire, therefore he receives an electric shock\") in a reasoning task. Additionally to this indirect pathway, the model contains a direct pathway: Cognitive availability of exceptional situations directly reduces the readiness to accept valid conclusions. The first experimental series tested the integrated model for conditional statements embedded in pseudo-natural cover stories that either established a causal relation between the antecedent and the consequent event (causal conditionals) or did not connect the propositions in a meaningful way (arbitrary conditionals). The model was supported for the causal, but not for the arbitrary conditional statements. Furthermore, participants assigned lower degrees of belief to arbitrary than to causal conditionals. Is this effect due to the presence versus absence of a semantic link between antecedent and consequent in the conditionals? This question was one of the starting points for the second experimental series. Here, the credibility of the conditionals was manipulated by adding explicit frequency information about possible combinations of presence or absence of antecedent and consequent events to the problems (i.e., frequencies of cases of 1. true antecedent with true consequent, 2. true antecedent with false consequent, 3. false antecedent with true consequent, 4. false antecedent with false consequent). This paradigm allows testing different approaches to the meaning of conditionals (Experiment 4) as well as theories of conditional reasoning against each other (Experiment 5). The results of Experiment 4 supported mainly the conditional probability approach to the meaning of conditionals (Edgington, 1995) according to which the degree of belief a listener has in a conditional statement equals the conditional probability that the consequent is true given the antecedent (e.g., the probability of receiving an electric shock when touching the wire). Participants again assigned lower degrees of belief to the arbitrary than the causal conditionals, although the conditional probability of the consequent given the antecedent was held constant within every condition of explicit frequency information. This supports the hypothesis that the mere presence of a causal link enhances the believability of a conditional statement. In Experiment 5 participants solved conditional reasoning tasks from problems that contained explicit frequency information about possible relevant cases. The data favored the probabilistic approach to conditional reasoning advanced by Oaksford, Chater, and Larkin (2000). The two experimental series reported in this dissertation provide strong support for recent probabilistic theories: for the conditional probability approach to the meaning of conditionals by Edgington (1995) and the probabilistic approach to conditional reasoning by Oaksford et al. (2000). In the domain of conditional reasoning, there was additionally support for the modified mental model approaches by Markovits and Barrouillet (2002) and Schroyens and Schaeken (2003). Probabilistic and mental model approaches could be reconciled within a dual-process-model as suggested by Verschueren, Schaeken, and d\&\#39;Ydewalle (2003).},
  subject      = {Konditional},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KraheScheinbergerOlwigBieneck2003,
  author    = {Krah{\´e}, Barbara and Scheinberger-Olwig, Renate and Bieneck, Steffen},
  title     = {Men's reports of nonconsensual sexual interactions with women},
  year      = {2003},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KraheWaizenhoeferMoeller2003,
  author    = {Krah{\´e}, Barbara and Waizenh{\"o}fer, Eva and M{\"o}ller, Ingrid},
  title     = {Women's sexual aggression against men : prevalence and predictors},
  year      = {2003},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{KlieglEngbert2003,
  author    = {Kliegl, Reinhold and Engbert, Ralf},
  title     = {How tight is the link between lexical processing and saccade programs?},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-56919},
  year      = {2003},
  abstract  = {We question the assumption of serial attention shifts and the assumption that saccade programs are initiated or canceled only after stage one of word identification. Evidence: (1) Fixation durations prior to skipped words are not consistently higher compared to those prior to nonskipped words. (2) Attentional modulation of microsaccade rate might occur after early visual processing. Saccades are probably triggered by attentional selection.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{EngbertKliegl2003,
  author    = {Engbert, Ralf and Kliegl, Reinhold},
  title     = {The game of word skipping: Who are the competitors?},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-56899},
  year      = {2003},
  abstract  = {Computational models such as E-Z Reader and SWIFT are ideal theoretical tools to test quantitatively our current understanding of eye-movement control in reading. Here we present a mathematical analysis of word skipping in the E-Z Reader model by semianalytic methods, to highlight the differences in current modeling approaches. In E-Z Reader, the word identification system must outperform the oculomotor system to induce word skipping. In SWIFT, there is competition among words to be selected as a saccade target. We conclude that it is the question of competitors in the "game" of word skipping that must be solved in eye movement research.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{MayrKliegl2003,
  author    = {Mayr, Ulrich and Kliegl, Reinhold},
  title     = {Differential effects of cue changes and task changes on task-set selection costs},
  issn      = {0278-7393},
  year      = {2003},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{EngbertKliegl2003,
  author    = {Engbert, Ralf and Kliegl, Reinhold},
  title     = {Binocular coordination in microsaccades},
  year      = {2003},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{OberauerWendlandKliegl2003,
  author    = {Oberauer, Klaus and Wendland, Mirko and Kliegl, Reinhold},
  title     = {Age differences in working memory : the roles of storage and selective access},
  year      = {2003},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{EngbertKliegl2003,
  author    = {Engbert, Ralf and Kliegl, Reinhold},
  title     = {Microsaccades uncover the orientation of covert attention},
  year      = {2003},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{EngbertKliegl2003,
  author    = {Engbert, Ralf and Kliegl, Reinhold},
  title     = {Noise-enhanced performance in reading},
  year      = {2003},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{EngbertKliegl2003,
  author    = {Engbert, Ralf and Kliegl, Reinhold},
  title     = {The game of word skipping : who are the competitors?},
  year      = {2003},
  abstract  = {Computational models such as E-Z Reader and SWIFT are ideal theoretical tools to test quantitatively our current understanding of eye-movement control in reading. Here we present a mathematical analysis of word skipping in the E-Z Reader model by semianalytic methods, to highlight the differences in current modeling approaches. In E-Z Reader, the word identification system must outperform the oculomotor system to induce word skipping. In SWIFT, there is competition among words to be selected as a saccade target. We conclude that it is the question of competitors in the "game" of word skipping that must be solved in eye movement research},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KlieglEngbert2003,
  author    = {Kliegl, Reinhold and Engbert, Ralf},
  title     = {How tight is the link between lexical processing and saccade programs?},
  year      = {2003},
  abstract  = {We question the assumption of serial attention shifts and the assumption that saccade programs are initiated or canceled only after stage one of word identification. Evidence: (1) Fixation durations prior to skipped words are not consistently higher compared to those prior to non-skipped words. (2) Attentional modulation of microsaccade rate might occur after early visual processing. Saccades are probably triggered by attentional selection},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KlieglKrampeMayr2003,
  author    = {Kliegl, Reinhold and Krampe, Ralf-Thomas and Mayr, Ulrich},
  title     = {Formal models of age differences in task complexity effects},
  year      = {2003},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KlieglEngbert2003,
  author    = {Kliegl, Reinhold and Engbert, Ralf},
  title     = {SWIFT explorations},
  year      = {2003},
  language  = {en}
}