@misc{EldridgeŁangowskiStaceyetal.2016,
  author    = {Eldridge, Tilly and Łangowski, Łukasz and Stacey, Nicola and Jantzen, Friederike and Moubayidin, Laila and Sicard, Adrien and Southam, Paul and Kennaway, Richard and Lenhard, Michael and Coen, Enrico S. and {\O}stergaard, Lars},
  title     = {Fruit shape diversity in the Brassicaceae is generated by varying patterns of anisotropy},
  series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  journal   = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  number    = {986},
  issn      = {1866-8372},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-43804},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-438041},
  pages     = {3394 -- 3406},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Fruits exhibit a vast array of different 3D shapes, from simple spheres and cylinders to more complex curved forms; however, the mechanism by which growth is oriented and coordinated to generate this diversity of forms is unclear. Here, we compare the growth patterns and orientations for two very different fruit shapes in the Brassicaceae: the heart-shaped Capsella rubella silicle and the near-cylindrical Arabidopsis thaliana silique. We show, through a combination of clonal and morphological analyses, that the different shapes involve different patterns of anisotropic growth during three phases. These experimental data can be accounted for by a tissue level model in which specified growth rates vary in space and time and are oriented by a proximodistal polarity field. The resulting tissue conflicts lead to deformation of the tissue as it grows. The model allows us to identify tissue-specific and temporally specific activities required to obtain the individual shapes. One such activity may be provided by the valve-identity gene FRUITFULL, which we show through comparative mutant analysis to modulate fruit shape during post-fertilisation growth of both species. Simple modulations of the model presented here can also broadly account for the variety of shapes in other Brassicaceae species, thus providing a simplified framework for fruit development and shape diversity.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{EldridgeLangowskiStaceyetal.2016,
  author    = {Eldridge, Tilly and Langowski, Lukasz and Stacey, Nicola and Jantzen, Friederike and Moubayidin, Laila and Sicard, Adrien and Southam, Paul and Kennaway, Richard and Lenhard, Michael and Coen, Enrico S. and Ostergaard, Lars},
  title     = {Fruit shape diversity in the Brassicaceae is generated by varying patterns of anisotropy},
  series = {Development : Company of Biologists},
  volume    = {143},
  journal   = {Development : Company of Biologists},
  publisher = {Company of Biologists Limited},
  address   = {Cambridge},
  issn      = {0950-1991},
  doi       = {10.1242/dev.135327},
  pages     = {3394 -- 3406},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Fruits exhibit a vast array of different 3D shapes, from simple spheres and cylinders to more complex curved forms; however, the mechanism by which growth is oriented and coordinated to generate this diversity of forms is unclear. Here, we compare the growth patterns and orientations for two very different fruit shapes in the Brassicaceae: the heart-shaped Capsella rubella silicle and the near-cylindrical Arabidopsis thaliana silique. We show, through a combination of clonal and morphological analyses, that the different shapes involve different patterns of anisotropic growth during three phases. These experimental data can be accounted for by a tissue level model in which specified growth rates vary in space and time and are oriented by a proximodistal polarity field. The resulting tissue conflicts lead to deformation of the tissue as it grows. The model allows us to identify tissue-specific and temporally specific activities required to obtain the individual shapes. One such activity may be provided by the valve-identity gene FRUITFULL, which we show through comparative mutant analysis to modulate fruit shape during post-fertilisation growth of both species. Simple modulations of the model presented here can also broadly account for the variety of shapes in other Brassicaceae species, thus providing a simplified framework for fruit development and shape diversity.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{BreuningerLenhard2017,
  author    = {Breuninger, Holger and Lenhard, Michael},
  title     = {Expression of the central growth regulator BIG BROTHER is regulated by multiple cis-elements},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-400971},
  pages     = {10},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {Background Much of the organismal variation we observe in nature is due to differences in organ size. The observation that even closely related species can show large, stably inherited differences in organ size indicates a strong genetic component to the control of organ size. Despite recent progress in identifying factors controlling organ growth in plants, our overall understanding of this process remains limited, partly because the individual factors have not yet been connected into larger regulatory pathways or networks. To begin addressing this aim, we have studied the upstream regulation of expression of BIG BROTHER (BB), a central growth-control gene in Arabidopsis thaliana that prevents overgrowth of organs. Final organ size and BB expression levels are tightly correlated, implying the need for precise control of its expression. BB expression mirrors proliferative activity, yet the gene functions to limit proliferation, suggesting that it acts in an incoherent feedforward loop downstream of growth activators to prevent over-proliferation. Results To investigate the upstream regulation of BB we combined a promoter deletion analysis with a phylogenetic footprinting approach. We were able to narrow down important, highly conserved, cis-regulatory elements within the BB promoter. Promoter sequences of other Brassicaceae species were able to partially complement the A. thaliana bb-1 mutant, suggesting that at least within the Brassicaceae family the regulatory pathways are conserved. Conclusions This work underlines the complexity involved in precise quantitative control of gene expression and lays the foundation for identifying important upstream regulators that determine BB expression levels and thus final organ size.},
  language  = {en}
}