@misc{JonasJaecksNiebuhrSiebertetal.2021,
  author    = {Jonas, Kristina and Jaecks, Petra and Niebuhr-Siebert, Sandra and Wahl, Michael and Leinweber, Juliane and Bilda, Kerstin and Pl{\"o}ßel, Laura and Heide, Judith and Netzebandt, Jonka and Br{\"u}sch, Julia and Diener, Antonia and Hubert, Cilly and Menze, Clara and Neitzel, Isabel and Tenhagen, Anne and Kauschke, Christina and Siegm{\"u}ller, Julia and Sachse, Steffi and D{\"o}rfler, Tobias and Machleb, Franziska and Seyboth, Margret and Eikerling, Maren and Vona, Francesco and Garzotto, Franca and Lorusso, Maria Luisa},
  title     = {Spektrum Patholinguistik Band 14. Schwerpunktthema: Klick f{\"u}r Klick: Schritte in der digitalen Sprachtherapie},
  number    = {14},
  editor    = {Fritzsche, Tom and Breitenstein, Sarah and Wunderlich, Hanna and Ferchland, Lisa},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {978-3-86956-507-1},
  issn      = {1866-9433},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-50016},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-500160},
  pages     = {vi, 147},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Das 14. Herbsttreffen Patholinguistik mit dem Schwerpunktthema »Klick f{\"u}r Klick: Schritte in der digitalen Sprachtherapie« fand am 14.11.2020 als Online-Veranstaltung statt. Das Herbsttreffen wird seit 2007 j{\"a}hrlich vom Verband f{\"u}r Patholinguistik e.V. (vpl) in Kooperation mit dem Deutschen Bundesverband f{\"u}r akademische Sprachtherapie und Logop{\"a}die (dbs) und der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam durchgef{\"u}hrt. Der vorliegende Tagungsband beinhaltet die Hauptvortr{\"a}ge zum Schwerpunktthema sowie die Posterpr{\"a}sentationen zu weiteren Themen aus der sprachtherapeutischen Forschung und Praxis.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{FischerSiegelProelleretal.2022,
  author    = {Fischer, Caroline and Siegel, John and Proeller, Isabella and Drathschmidt, Nicolas},
  title     = {Resilience through digitalisation},
  series = {Public management review},
  volume    = {25},
  journal   = {Public management review},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {Routledge, Taylor \& Francis},
  address   = {London},
  issn      = {1471-9037},
  doi       = {10.1080/14719037.2022.2037014},
  pages     = {808 -- 835},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {This article examines public service resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic and studies the switch to telework due to social distancing measures. We argue that the pandemic and related policies led to increasing demands on public organisations and their employees. Following the job demands-resources model, we argue that resilience only can arise in the presence of resources for buffering these demands. Survey data were collected from 1,189 German public employees, 380 participants were included for analysis. The results suggest that the public service was resilient against the crisis and that the shift to telework was not as demanding as expected.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{FischerSiegelProelleretal.2022,
  author    = {Fischer, Caroline and Siegel, John and Proeller, Isabella and Drathschmidt, Nicolas},
  title     = {Resilience through digitalisation},
  series = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  journal   = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  number    = {4},
  issn      = {1867-5808},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-60804},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-608040},
  pages     = {30},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {This article examines public service resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic and studies the switch to telework due to social distancing measures. We argue that the pandemic and related policies led to increasing demands on public organisations and their employees. Following the job demands-resources model, we argue that resilience only can arise in the presence of resources for buffering these demands. Survey data were collected from 1,189 German public employees, 380 participants were included for analysis. The results suggest that the public service was resilient against the crisis and that the shift to telework was not as demanding as expected.},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Santuber2023,
  author    = {Santuber, Joaquin},
  title     = {Designing for digital justice},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-60417},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-604178},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {xviii, 183},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {At the beginning of 2020, with COVID-19, courts of justice worldwide had to move online to continue providing judicial service. Digital technologies materialized the court practices in ways unthinkable shortly before the pandemic creating resonances with judicial and legal regulation, as well as frictions. A better understanding of the dynamics at play in the digitalization of courts is paramount for designing justice systems that serve their users better, ensure fair and timely dispute resolutions, and foster access to justice. Building on three major bodies of literature —e-justice, digitalization and organization studies, and design research— Designing for Digital Justice takes a nuanced approach to account for human and more-than-human agencies. Using a qualitative approach, I have studied in depth the digitalization of Chilean courts during the pandemic, specifically between April 2020 and September 2022. Leveraging a comprehensive source of primary and secondary data, I traced back the genealogy of the novel materializations of courts' practices structured by the possibilities offered by digital technologies. In five (5) cases studies, I show in detail how the courts got to 1) work remotely, 2) host hearings via videoconference, 3) engage with users via social media (i.e., Facebook and Chat Messenger), 4) broadcast a show with judges answering questions from users via Facebook Live, and 5) record, stream, and upload judicial hearings to YouTube to fulfil the publicity requirement of criminal hearings. The digitalization of courts during the pandemic is characterized by a suspended normativity, which makes innovation possible yet presents risks. While digital technologies enabled the judiciary to provide services continuously, they also created the risk of displacing traditional judicial and legal regulation. Contributing to liminal innovation and digitalization research, Designing for Digital Justice theorizes four phases: 1) the pre-digitalization phase resulting in the development of regulation, 2) the hotspot of digitalization resulting in the extension of regulation, 3) the digital innovation redeveloping regulation (moving to a new, preliminary phase), and 4) the permanence of temporal practices displacing regulation. Contributing to design research Designing for Digital Justice provides new possibilities for innovation in the courts, focusing at different levels to better address tensions generated by digitalization. Fellow researchers will find in these pages a sound theoretical advancement at the intersection of digitalization and justice with novel methodological references. Practitioners will benefit from the actionable governance framework Designing for Digital Justice Model, which provides three fields of possibilities for action to design better justice systems. Only by taking into account digital, legal, and social factors can we design better systems that promote access to justice, the rule of law, and, ultimately social peace.},
  language  = {en}
}