@incollection{Franzke2023,
  author    = {Franzke, Jochen},
  title     = {Deutschland},
  series = {Politik zur lokalen Integration von Migranten},
  booktitle = {Politik zur lokalen Integration von Migranten},
  editor    = {Franzke, Jochen and Ruano de la Fuente, Jos{\´e} M.},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Cham},
  isbn      = {978-3-031-21372-4},
  doi       = {10.1007/978-3-031-21373-1_7},
  pages     = {113 -- 128},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Das Kapitel beginnt mit einem kurzen historischen {\"U}berblick {\"u}ber den {\"U}bergang Deutschlands im 20. und 21. Jahrhundert von einem Transit- und Auswanderungsland zu einem Einwanderungsland. Der n{\"a}chste Teil des Kapitels befasst sich mit den Herausforderungen und Problemen der deutschen Einwanderungspolitik in einem f{\"o}deralen Mehrebenensystem. Abschließend analysiert das Kapitel einige Trends in der deutschen Migrationspolitik seit der Fl{\"u}chtlingskrise 2015, wie etwa Ver{\"a}nderungen im Parteiensystem und in den Konzepten, die der Migrationspolitik zugrunde liegen, um die Zuwanderung nach Deutschland besser zu steuern, zu kontrollieren und zu begrenzen.},
  language  = {de}
}
@incollection{FranzkeRuanodelaFuente2023,
  author    = {Franzke, Jochen and Ruano de la Fuente, Jos{\´e} M.},
  title     = {Neue Herausforderungen f{\"u}r die lokale Politik zur Integration von Migranten in Europa},
  series = {Politik zur lokalen Integration von Migranten},
  booktitle = {Politik zur lokalen Integration von Migranten},
  editor    = {Franzke, Jochen and Ruano de la Fuente, Jos{\´e} M.},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Cham},
  isbn      = {978-3-031-21372-4},
  doi       = {10.1007/978-3-031-21373-1_1},
  pages     = {1 -- 11},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {In diesem einleitenden Kapitel beschreiben die Herausgeber die wichtigsten theoretischen Grundlagen der Analyse dieses Buches und den methodischen Ansatz. Der Kern des Buches besteht aus 14 l{\"a}nderspezifischen Kapiteln, die einen europ{\"a}ischen Vergleich erm{\"o}glichen und die zunehmende Varianz der migrationspolitischen Ans{\"a}tze innerhalb und zwischen den europ{\"a}ischen L{\"a}ndern aufzeigen. Der Grad der lokalen Autonomie, der Grad der Zentralisierung und die traditionellen Formen der Migrationspolitik sind Faktoren, die insbesondere die M{\"o}glichkeiten der lokalen Beh{\"o}rden beeinflussen, ihre eigene Integrationspolitik zu formulieren.},
  language  = {de}
}
@phdthesis{Wenzel2017,
  author    = {Wenzel, Bertolt},
  title     = {The organization of coordination in marine governance},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {Over the past decade, an increasing number of public organizations involved in fisheries and marine environmental management in Europe have changed their formal coordination structures. Similar reorganizations of formal coordination structures can be observed for organizations at different administrative levels of governance with different mandates across the policy cycle. Against the backdrop of this phenomenon, this PhD thesis is interested in exploring how these similar organizational reforms can be explained and why the formal coordination structures for fisheries and marine environmental management have been reorganized in the cases of the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES), the Directorate-General for Fisheries and Maritime Affairs of the European Commission (DG FISH), the Norwegian Institute of Marine Research (IMR) and the Swedish Agency for Marine and Water Management (SwAM). Accordingly, the objective is to shed light on how public organizations actually "behave" or "tick" in the face of increasingly complex coordination challenges in fisheries and marine environmental management. To address these questions, the thesis draws on different theoretical perspectives in organization theory, namely an instrumental and an institutional perspective. These theoretical perspectives provide different explanations for how organizations deal with issues of formal organizational structure and coordination. In order to evaluate the explanatory relevance of these theoretical perspectives in the cases of ICES, DG FISH, the IMR and the SwAM, a case study approach based on congruence analysis is applied. The case studies are based on document analysis, the analysis of organizational charts and their change over time, as well as expert interviews. The aim of the thesis is to contribute to the coordination debate in the marine policy and governance literature from a hitherto omitted public administration and organization theory perspective, as well as explaining coordination efforts at the organizational level with an organization theory approach. The findings indicate that the formal coordination structures of the organizations studied have not only changed to solve coordination problems in fisheries and marine environmental management efficiently and effectively, but also to follow modern management paradigms in marine governance and to ensure the legitimacy of these organizations. Moreover, it was found that in the cases of ICES, DG FISH, the IMR and the SwAM, the organizational changes were strongly influenced by external pressures and interactions with other organizations in the organizational field of fisheries and marine environmental management in Europe. Driven by forces of isomorphism, a gradual convergence of the formal horizontal coordination structures for fisheries and marine environmental management of the organizations studied can be observed. However, the findings also indicate that although the organizational changes observed may convey a reaction to changing environments, they do not necessarily reflect actual policy change and the implementation of new management concepts.},
  language  = {en}
}