@phdthesis{Uensal2009,
  author    = {{\"U}nsal, Feyzan},
  title     = {Politische und religi{\"o}se Symbole im Betrieb : eine rechtsvergleichende Studie zum deutschen und t{\"u}rkischen Recht},
  series = {Europ{\"a}ische Hochschulschriften : Reihe 2, Rechtswissenschaft},
  volume    = {4926},
  journal   = {Europ{\"a}ische Hochschulschriften : Reihe 2, Rechtswissenschaft},
  publisher = {Lang},
  address   = {Frankfurt am Main},
  isbn      = {978-3-631-59241-0},
  pages     = {585 S.},
  year      = {2009},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{ZimmermannWeiss2020,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Weiß, Norman},
  title     = {V{\"o}lker- und verfassungsrechtliche Parameter eines deutschen Lieferkettengesetzes},
  series = {Archiv des V{\"o}lkerrechts},
  volume    = {58},
  journal   = {Archiv des V{\"o}lkerrechts},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {Mohr Siebeck},
  address   = {T{\"u}bingen},
  issn      = {0003-892X},
  doi       = {10.1628/avr-2020-0028},
  pages     = {424 -- 463},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Currently a political debate is ongoing in Germany as to whether Germany should, following the example of several other European countries such as France and the Netherlands, adopt a Supply Chain Act (Lieferkettengesetz). If adopted, the act in question would impose due diligence obligations on German corporations to prevent human rights violations taking place in their respective global supply chains. It is against this background that the article examines the preconditions that must be met in order for such act to be eventually compatible with both, German constitutional and international law. The authors further deal with the question whether Germany might even be obliged under international, as well as under German constitutional law, to enact such a supply chain law in order to protect the human rights of workers employed by companies forming part of the global supply chains of German companies. As far as German constitutional law is concerned the article notably deals with the question whether it is the Federal parliament that may adopt such a law also taking into account the competencies of the European Union in the field, and what are the requirements of legal specificity and proportionality in order for the draft law to stand constitutional scrutiny. The authors further offer detailed suggestions how corporate due diligence standards might be best provided for in the envisaged law and propose a risk analysis approach that varies not only according to specific countries and sector-specific characteristics, but that by the same token also takes into account the ability of the respective German company to exercise an appropriate due diligence standard when it comes to human rigths issues arising within the framewok of their supply chain. As far as the substantive human rights standards are concerned that should serve as benchmarks for the envisaged Supply Chain Act the authors propose to rely on, and refer to, those instruments such as the ICCPR and the CESCR, as well as the ILO treaties containing core labour standards, that enjoy almost universal acceptance and reflect customary international law.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{ZimmermannVonMangoldt2012,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Von Mangoldt, Hermann},
  title     = {Article 53},
  isbn      = {978-0-19-969299-6},
  year      = {2012},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{ZimmermannThienel2012,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Thienel, Tobias},
  title     = {Yugoslavia, cases and proceedings before the ICJ},
  isbn      = {978-0-19-929168-7},
  year      = {2012},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{ZimmermannThienel2012,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Thienel, Tobias},
  title     = {Article 60},
  isbn      = {978-0-19-969299-6},
  year      = {2012},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{ZimmermannSener2014,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Sener, Meltem},
  title     = {Chemical weapons and the international criminal court},
  series = {American journal of international law},
  volume    = {108},
  journal   = {American journal of international law},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {American Society of International Law},
  address   = {Washington},
  issn      = {0002-9300},
  doi       = {10.5305/amerjintelaw.108.3.0436},
  pages     = {436 -- 448},
  year      = {2014},
  language  = {en}
}
@book{ZimmermannSchuetteSener2013,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Sch{\"u}tte, Janine and Sener, Meltem},
  title     = {Deutsche zweiter Klasse? Eine verfassungs-, europa- und v{\"o}lkerrechtliche Analyse der Optionsregelung nach \S\S 29/40b Staatsangeh{\"o}rigkeitsgesetz},
  publisher = {Dt. Inst. f{\"u}r Menschenrechte},
  address   = {Berlin},
  isbn      = {978-3-942315-83-8},
  pages     = {63 S.},
  year      = {2013},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{ZimmermannSchabedoth2022,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Schabedoth, John Alexander},
  title     = {Domestic and international criminal justice},
  series = {KFG working paper series},
  journal   = {KFG working paper series},
  number    = {57},
  publisher = {Berlin Potsdam Research Group International Law - Rise or Decline?},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {2509-3762},
  doi       = {10.2139/ssrn.4087189},
  pages     = {22},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {This paper consists of two parts: In the first part, some of the challenges with which the Internationaal Criminal Court is currently confronted are being presented. First of all, the article will describe the current state of the International Criminal Court and the Rome Statue. Afterwards, the article analyses the Court's efforts to deal with cases against third-country nationals and the challenges it is facing in that regard. In addition, the Court's case law will be analyzed in order to determine an increasing 'emancipation' of the case law of the International Criminal Court from international humanitarian law. The second part of the paper will briefly discuss the role of domestic international criminal law and domestic courts in the further development and enforcement of international criminal law. As an example of the role that domestic courts may have in clarifying classic issues in international law, the judgment of the German Supreme Court of January 28, 2021 (3 StR 564/19), which deals with the status of costumary international law on functional immunity of State officials before domestic courts, shall be assessed.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{ZimmermannRoemer2013,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and R{\"o}mer, Lutz},
  title     = {Artikel 27 Dublin III-Verordnung : das Ende des Konzepts "normativer Vergewisserung"},
  isbn      = {978-3-8114-3914-6},
  year      = {2013},
  language  = {de}
}
@book{ZimmermannOellersFrahmTomuschatetal.2012,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Oellers-Frahm, Karin and Tomuschat, Christian and Tams, Christian J.},
  title     = {The statute of the international court of justice : a commentary},
  edition   = {2. ed.},
  publisher = {Oxford Univ. Press},
  address   = {Oxford},
  isbn      = {978-0-19-969299-6},
  pages     = {1745 S.},
  year      = {2012},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{ZimmermannLandefeld2014,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Landefeld, Sarina},
  title     = {Europ{\"a}ische Menschenrechtskonvention und Staatsangeh{\"o}rigkeitsrecht der Konventionsstaaten},
  series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Ausl{\"a}nderrecht und Ausl{\"a}nderpolitik : ZAR},
  volume    = {34},
  journal   = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Ausl{\"a}nderrecht und Ausl{\"a}nderpolitik : ZAR},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {Nomos},
  address   = {Baden-Baden},
  issn      = {0721-5746},
  pages     = {97 -- 136},
  year      = {2014},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{ZimmermannJauer2021,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Jauer, Nora},
  title     = {Legal shades of grey?},
  series = {Archiv des V{\"o}lkerrechts},
  volume    = {59},
  journal   = {Archiv des V{\"o}lkerrechts},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {Mohr Siebeck},
  address   = {T{\"u}bingen},
  issn      = {0003-892X},
  doi       = {10.1628/avr-2021-0016},
  pages     = {278 -- 299},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {As part of the current process of de-formalization in international law, States increasingly chose informal, non-legally binding agreements or 'Memoranda of Understanding' ('MOUs') to organize their international affairs. The increasing conclusion of such legally non-binding instruments in addition to their flexibility, however, also leads to uncertainties in international relations. Against this background, this article deals with possible indirect legal consequences produced by MOUs. It discusses the different legal mechanisms and avenues that may give rise to such secondary legal effects of MOUs through a process of interaction with, and interpretation in line with, other (formal) sources of international law. The article further considers various strategies how to avoid such eventual possible unintended or unexpected indirect legal effects of MOUs when drafting such instruments and when dealing with them subsequent to their respective 'adoption'.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{ZimmermannJauer2021,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Jauer, Nora},
  title     = {Possible indirect legal effects under international law of non-legally binding instruments},
  series = {KFG working paper series},
  volume    = {48},
  journal   = {KFG working paper series},
  publisher = {Berlin Potsdam Research Group International Law - Rise or Decline?},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {2509-3770},
  pages     = {24},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {As part of the current overall process of de-formalization in international law States increasingly chose informal, non-legally binding agreements or 'Memoranda of Understanding' ('MOUs') to organize their international affairs. The increasing conclusion of such legally non-binding instruments in addition to their flexibility, however, also leads to uncertainties in international relations. Against this background, this article deals with possible indirect legal consequences produced by MOUs. It discusses the different legal mechanisms and avenues that may give rise to secondary legal effects of MOUs through a process of interaction with and interpretation in line with other (formal) sources of international law. The article further considers various strategies how to avoid such eventual possible unintended or unexpected indirect legal effects of MOUs when drafting such instruments and when dealing with them subsequent to their respective 'adoption'.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{ZimmermannHerrmann2021,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Herrmann, Franziska},
  title     = {70 Jahre Genfer Fl{\"u}chtlingskonvention},
  series = {Informationsbrief Ausl{\"a}nderrecht},
  journal   = {Informationsbrief Ausl{\"a}nderrecht},
  number    = {6},
  publisher = {Luchterhand},
  address   = {K{\"o}ln ; Neuwied},
  issn      = {0174-2108},
  pages     = {221 -- 227},
  year      = {2021},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{ZimmermannHenn2013,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Henn, Elisabeth V.},
  title     = {Das Aggressionsverbrechen und das deutsche Strafrecht},
  year      = {2013},
  language  = {de}
}
@incollection{ZimmermannGeiss2017,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Geiß, Robin},
  title     = {The International Committee of the Red Cross: A Unique Actor in the Field of International Humanitarian Law Creation and Progressive Development},
  series = {Humanizing the Laws of War},
  booktitle = {Humanizing the Laws of War},
  publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
  address   = {Cambridge},
  isbn      = {978-1-107-17135-0},
  doi       = {10.1017/9781316759967.009},
  pages     = {215 -- 255},
  year      = {2017},
  language  = {en}
}
@incollection{ZimmermannGeiss2016,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Geiß, Robin},
  title     = {Article 8, VI, Article 8 para. 2 (f): scope of application of article 8 para. 2 (e)},
  series = {The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court},
  booktitle = {The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court},
  publisher = {Beck},
  address   = {M{\"u}nchen},
  isbn      = {978-3-406-64854-0},
  year      = {2016},
  language  = {en}
}
@incollection{ZimmermannGeiss2022,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Geiß, Robin},
  title     = {Article 8 Paras. 2(c)-(f) and 3: War crimes committed in an armed conflict not of an international character},
  series = {Rome statute of the International Criminal Court},
  booktitle = {Rome statute of the International Criminal Court},
  editor    = {Ambos, Kai},
  edition   = {4},
  publisher = {C.H. Beck},
  address   = {M{\"u}nchen},
  isbn      = {978-3-406-74384-9},
  pages     = {837 -- 1048},
  year      = {2022},
  language  = {en}
}
@incollection{ZimmermannGeiss2022,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Geiß, Robin},
  title     = {Article 8 Para. 2(b)(xvi): Pillage},
  series = {Rome statute of the International Criminal Court},
  booktitle = {Rome statute of the International Criminal Court},
  editor    = {Ambos, Kai},
  edition   = {Fourth edition},
  publisher = {C.H. Beck},
  address   = {M{\"u}nchen},
  isbn      = {978-3-406-74384-9},
  pages     = {539 -- 554},
  year      = {2022},
  language  = {en}
}
@incollection{ZimmermannGeiss2022,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Geiß, Robin},
  title     = {Article 8 Para. 2(b)(x): Prohibition of physical mutilation},
  series = {Rome statute of the International Criminal Court},
  booktitle = {Rome statute of the International Criminal Court},
  editor    = {Ambos, Kai},
  edition   = {4},
  publisher = {Beck},
  address   = {M{\"u}nchen},
  isbn      = {978-3-406-74384-9},
  pages     = {419 -- 436},
  year      = {2022},
  language  = {en}
}
@incollection{ZimmermannGeiss2022,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Geiß, Robin},
  title     = {Article 8 Para. 2(b)(xiii): Prohibited destruction},
  series = {Rome statute of the International Criminal Court},
  booktitle = {Rome statute of the International Criminal Court},
  editor    = {Ambos, Kai},
  edition   = {4},
  publisher = {Beck},
  address   = {M{\"u}nchen},
  isbn      = {978-3-406-74384-9},
  pages     = {474 -- 503},
  year      = {2022},
  language  = {en}
}
@incollection{ZimmermannFreiburgBraun2022,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Freiburg-Braun, Elisa},
  title     = {Article 15ter Exercise of jurisdiction over the crime of aggression (Security Council referral)},
  series = {Rome statute of the International Criminal Court},
  booktitle = {Rome statute of the International Criminal Court},
  editor    = {Ambos, Kai},
  edition   = {Fourth},
  publisher = {Beck},
  address   = {M{\"u}nchen},
  isbn      = {978-3-406-77926-8},
  doi       = {10.17104/9783406779268-927},
  pages     = {927 -- 932},
  year      = {2022},
  language  = {en}
}
@incollection{ZimmermannFreiburgBraun2022,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Freiburg-Braun, Elisa},
  title     = {Article 8bis Crime of aggression},
  series = {Rome statute of the International Criminal Court},
  booktitle = {Rome statute of the International Criminal Court},
  editor    = {Ambos, Kai},
  edition   = {Fourth},
  publisher = {Beck},
  address   = {M{\"u}nchen},
  isbn      = {978-3-406-77926-8},
  doi       = {10.17104/9783406779268-686},
  pages     = {686 -- 726},
  year      = {2022},
  language  = {en}
}
@incollection{ZimmermannFreiburg2016,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Freiburg, Elisa},
  title     = {Article 15bis: Exercise of jurisdiction over the crime of aggression (State referal, proprio motu)},
  series = {The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court ; a commentary},
  booktitle = {The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court ; a commentary},
  editor    = {Triffterer, Otto and Ambos, Kai},
  edition   = {3. Aufl},
  publisher = {Beck},
  address   = {M{\"u}nchen},
  isbn      = {978-3-406-64854-0},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {741 -- 764},
  year      = {2016},
  language  = {en}
}
@incollection{ZimmermannFreiburg2016,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Freiburg, Elisa},
  title     = {Article 8bis: Crime of aggression},
  series = {The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court ; a commentary},
  booktitle = {The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court ; a commentary},
  editor    = {Triffterer, Otto and Ambos, Kai},
  edition   = {3. Aufl.},
  publisher = {Beck},
  address   = {M{\"u}nchen},
  isbn      = {978-3-406-64854-0},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {580 -- 618},
  year      = {2016},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{ZimmermannElberling2013,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Elberling, Bj{\"o}rn},
  title     = {Kapitel 27 : Ausweisungsschutz},
  isbn      = {978-3-16-149397-3},
  year      = {2013},
  language  = {de}
}
@incollection{ZimmermannEiken2021,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Eiken, Jan},
  title     = {Volle Souver{\"a}nit{\"a}t?},
  series = {Zwei plus Vier : die internationale Gr{\"u}ndungsgeschichte der Berliner Republik},
  booktitle = {Zwei plus Vier : die internationale Gr{\"u}ndungsgeschichte der Berliner Republik},
  editor    = {Geiger, Tim and Lillteicher, J{\"u}rgen and Wentker, Hermann},
  publisher = {De Gruyter},
  address   = {Berlin},
  isbn      = {978-3-11-072801-9},
  doi       = {10.1515/9783110728019-007},
  pages     = {103 -- 122},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Nach Art. 7 Abs. 1 S. 1 des Vertrages zur abschließenden Regelung in Bezug aufDeutschland vom 12. September 1990 (Zwei-plus-Vier-Vertrag)1beendeten die Fran-z{\"o}sische Republik, die Union der Sozialistischen Sowjetrepubliken, das VereinigteK{\"o}nigreich Großbritannien und Nordirland und die Vereinigten Staaten von Ameri-ka„ihre Rechte und Verantwortlichkeiten in Bezug auf Berlin und Deutschland alsGanzes". Dies hatte, wie in dessen Art. 7 Abs. 1 S. 2 ausdr{\"u}cklich niedergelegt, zurFolge, dass„die entsprechenden, damit zusammenh{\"a}ngenden vierseitigen Verein-barungen, Beschl{\"u}sse und Praktiken beendet und alle entsprechenden Einrichtun-gen der vier M{\"a}chte aufgel{\"o}st"wurden.2Art. 7 Abs. 2 Zwei-plus-Vier-Vertrag stelltdemgem{\"a}ß fest, dass das vereinte Deutschland volle Souver{\"a}nit{\"a}t {\"u}ber seine inne-ren und {\"a}ußeren Angelegenheiten erhalten habe. Nach dem Wortlaut des Vertrageshaben die Alliierten damit jegliche Rechte in Bezug auf Deutschland abgegeben,rechtliche Auswirkungen der Besatzungsgeschichte Deutschlands noch bis in dieheutige Zeit scheinen danach zun{\"a}chst ausgeschlossen.In dem folgenden Beitrag soll diese aus heutiger Sicht selbstverst{\"a}ndlich er-scheinende Hypothese kritisch hinterfragt und der Frage nachgegangen werden, obund inwieweit die Besatzungsgeschichte Deutschlands noch immer rechtliche Fol-gen zeitigt. Hierbei soll insbesondere auf Fragen der Fortgeltung alliierten Rechts,Eigentumsfragen sowie auf Fragen der Nachfolge in v{\"o}lkerrechtlichen Vertr{\"a}geneingegangen werden.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{ZimmermannDorschner2011,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Dorschner, Jonas},
  title     = {Article 22},
  isbn      = {978-0-19-954251-2},
  year      = {2011},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{ZimmermannBaeumler2013,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and B{\"a}umler, Jelena},
  title     = {Navigating through narrow jurisdictional straits : the Philippines - PRC South China Sea Dispute and UNCLOS},
  year      = {2013},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{ZimmermannBaeumler2010,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and B{\"a}umler, Jelena},
  title     = {Der Afrikanische Gerichtshof f{\"u}r Menschen- und V{\"o}lkerrechte : aktuelle Herausforderungen},
  issn      = {0177-7521},
  year      = {2010},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{ZimmermannBoos2018,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Boos, Felix},
  title     = {Bringing States to Justice for Crimes against Humanity},
  series = {Journal of international criminal justice},
  volume    = {16},
  journal   = {Journal of international criminal justice},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {Oxford Univ. Press},
  address   = {Oxford},
  issn      = {1478-1387},
  doi       = {10.1093/jicj/mqy053},
  pages     = {835 -- 855},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {Draft Article 15 of the International Law Commission's project on crimes against humanity — dealing with the settlement of disputes arising from a proposed convention — attempts to strike a balance between state autonomy and robust judicial supervision. It largely follows Article 22 of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, which renders the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) conditional upon prior negotiations. Hence, the substance of the clause can be interpreted in light of the recent case law of the ICJ, especially in the case Georgia v. Russia. In addition, this contribution discusses several issues regarding the scope ratione temporis of the compromissory clause. It advances several proposals to improve the current draft, addressing its relationship with state responsibility — an explicit reference to which is currently missing — as well as the relationship between the ICJ and a possible treaty body. It also proposes to recalibrate the interplay of the requirement of prior negotiations with, respectively, the possibility of seizing a future treaty body and the indication of provisional measures by the ICJ.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{ZimmermannBerdefy2023,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Berdefy, Alina-Camille},
  title     = {Internationale Gerichtsbarkeit im Kontext des Krieges gegen die Ukraine},
  series = {Europ{\"a}ische Grundrechte-Zeitschrift},
  volume    = {50},
  journal   = {Europ{\"a}ische Grundrechte-Zeitschrift},
  number    = {1-8},
  publisher = {Engel},
  address   = {Kehl am Rhein},
  issn      = {0341-9800},
  pages     = {40 -- 48},
  year      = {2023},
  abstract  = {Angesichts der dramatischen Lage in der Ukraine untersucht der folgende Beitrag, auf welchem Wege, vor welchen v{\"o}lkerrechtlichen Gerichten, in welchem Umfang und mit welcher Aussicht auf Erfolg die Ukraine oder einzelne ukrainische Staatsangeh{\"o}rige Sicherheitsschutz vor der russischen Invasion und/oder den im Zusammenhang damit bereits begangenen oder noch bevorstehenden V{\"o}lkerrechtsverst{\"o}ßen Rechtsschutz erlangen k{\"o}nnen. Im Einzelnen handelt es sich hierbei um zwei anh{\"a}ngige Verfahren vor dem Internationalen Gerichtshof, mehrere Staaten- sowie eine große Vielzahl von Individualbeschwerden vor dem Europ{\"a}ischen Gerichtshof f{\"u}r Menschenrechte; ein Verfahren vor dem Internationalen Seegerichtshof; zahlreiche Investitionsverfahren vor internationalen Schiedsgerichten sowie schließlich zwei "Situationen" vor dem Internationalen Strafgerichtshof. Abschließend wird die Option der Schaffung eines ad-hoc-Tribunals f{\"u}r das Verbrechen der Aggression behandelt.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{ZimmermannBerdefy2023,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas and Berdefy, Alina-Camille},
  title     = {Strafverfolgung und Beendigung von Straflosigkeit angesichts des russischen Angriffskriegs gegen die Ukraine},
  series = {Ukraine-Krieg und Recht},
  volume    = {2},
  journal   = {Ukraine-Krieg und Recht},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {C.H. Beck},
  address   = {M{\"u}nchen},
  pages     = {164 -- 167},
  year      = {2023},
  language  = {de}
}
@incollection{Zimmermann2015,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas},
  title     = {Artikel 208 (Beitrag der Union; Ziel)},
  series = {Europ{\"a}isches Unionsrecht : Vertrag {\"u}ber die Europ{\"a}ische Union Vertrag {\"u}ber die Arbeitsweise der Europ{\"a}ischen Union, Charta der Grundrechte der Europ{\"a}ischen Union ; EUV, AEUV, GRC},
  volume    = {4},
  booktitle = {Europ{\"a}isches Unionsrecht : Vertrag {\"u}ber die Europ{\"a}ische Union Vertrag {\"u}ber die Arbeitsweise der Europ{\"a}ischen Union, Charta der Grundrechte der Europ{\"a}ischen Union ; EUV, AEUV, GRC},
  editor    = {von der Groeben, Hans and Schwarze, J{\"u}rgen and Hatje, Armin},
  edition   = {7. Aufl.},
  publisher = {Nomos},
  address   = {Baden-Baden},
  isbn      = {978-3-8329-6019-3},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {352 -- 376},
  year      = {2015},
  language  = {de}
}
@incollection{Zimmermann2015,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas},
  title     = {Artikel 210 (Koordinierung)},
  series = {Europ{\"a}isches Unionsrecht : Vertrag {\"u}ber die Europ{\"a}ische Union Vertrag {\"u}ber die Arbeitsweise der Europ{\"a}ischen Union, Charta der Grundrechte der Europ{\"a}ischen Union ; EUV, AEUV, GRC},
  volume    = {Bd. 4},
  booktitle = {Europ{\"a}isches Unionsrecht : Vertrag {\"u}ber die Europ{\"a}ische Union Vertrag {\"u}ber die Arbeitsweise der Europ{\"a}ischen Union, Charta der Grundrechte der Europ{\"a}ischen Union ; EUV, AEUV, GRC},
  editor    = {von der Groeben, Hans and Schwarze, J{\"u}rgen and Hatje, Armin},
  edition   = {7. Aufl.},
  publisher = {Nomos},
  address   = {Baden-Baden},
  isbn      = {978-3-8329-6019-3},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {396 -- 397},
  year      = {2015},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Zimmermann2017,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas},
  title     = {Humanitarian Assistance and the Security Council},
  series = {Israel Law Review},
  volume    = {50},
  journal   = {Israel Law Review},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
  address   = {Cambridge},
  isbn      = {0021-2237},
  doi       = {doi.org/10.1017/S0021223716000315},
  pages     = {3 -- 23},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {Over the years, the Security Council has on several occasions dealt with humanitarian assistance issues. However, it is Security Council Resolution 2165(2014), related to the situation in Syria, that has brought the role of the Security Council to the forefront of the debate. It is against this background that the article discusses the legal issues arising from Security Council action facilitating humanitarian assistance to be delivered in situations of non-international armed conflict. Following a brief survey of relevant practice of the Security Council related to humanitarian assistance, the article considers the relevance, if any, of Article 2(7) of the Charter of the United Nations (UN) to humanitarian assistance to be delivered in such situations. It then moves on to analyse whether a rejection by the territorial state of humanitarian aid to be delivered by third parties may amount to a situation under Article 39 of the UN Charter. It then considers in detail whether (at least implicitly) Resolution 2165 has been adopted under Chapter VII and, if this is not the case, whether it can be still considered to be legally binding. The article finally considers what impact the adoption of Security Council Resolution 2165 might have on the interpretation of otherwise applicable rules of international humanitarian law and, in particular, the right of third parties to provide humanitarian assistance in a situation of a non-international armed conflict in spite of the absence of consent by the territorial state, and the obligations that members of the Security Council, permanent and non-permanent, have under Common Article 1 of the Geneva Conventions when faced with a draft resolution providing for the delivery of humanitarian assistance, notwithstanding the absence of consent by the territorial state.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Zimmermann2016,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas},
  title     = {Art. 116 Abs. 2 GG - ein verfassungsrechtliches Auslaufmodell},
  series = {Die {\"O}ffentliche Verwaltung},
  volume    = {3},
  journal   = {Die {\"O}ffentliche Verwaltung},
  publisher = {Kohlhammer},
  address   = {Stuttgart},
  isbn      = {0029-859X},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Zur Wiedergutmachung nationalsozialistischen Unrechts garantiert Art. 116 Abs. 2 GG Abk{\"o}mmlingen von in diskriminierender Weise ausgeb{\"u}rgerten Deutschen die deutsche Staatsangeh{\"o}rigkeit. Dadurch soll der Zustand wiederhergestellt werden, der ohne die Ausb{\"u}rgerung bestehen w{\"u}rde. Daher wird insoweit regelm{\"a}ßig auf das geltende Staatsangeh{\"o}rigkeitsrecht abgestellt. \S 4 Abs. 4 StAG hat im Jahr 2000 eine Beschr{\"a}nkung der Weitergabe der deutschen Staatsangeh{\"o}rigkeit f{\"u}r im Ausland geborene Kinder deutscher Staatsangeh{\"o}riger eingef{\"u}hrt, die selbst bereits im Ausland geboren wurden. Dadurch wird m{\"o}glicherweise der Anwendungsbereich des Art. 116 Abs. 2 GG dauerhaft signifikant eingeschr{\"a}nkt; unter Umst{\"a}nden wird die Norm gar obsolet. Vor diesem Hintergrund wird das Spannungsverh{\"a}ltnis zwischen der uneingeschr{\"a}nkten Anwendung des \S 4 Abs. 4 StAG mit dem verfassungsrechtlich verb{\"u}rgerten Recht auf Wiedereinb{\"u}rgerung von Kindern zu Unrecht ausgeb{\"u}rgerter Deutscher er{\"o}rtert.},
  language  = {de}
}
@incollection{Zimmermann2015,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas},
  title     = {Artikel 198 (Ziele der Assoziierung)},
  series = {Europ{\"a}isches Unionsrecht},
  booktitle = {Europ{\"a}isches Unionsrecht},
  edition   = {7. Aufl.},
  publisher = {Nomos},
  address   = {Baden-Baden},
  isbn      = {978-3-8329-6019-3},
  pages     = {244 -- 247},
  year      = {2015},
  language  = {de}
}
@incollection{Zimmermann2016,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas},
  title     = {Kommentierung des Art. 116 GG},
  series = {Berliner Kommentar zum Grundgesetz},
  booktitle = {Berliner Kommentar zum Grundgesetz},
  publisher = {Erich Schmidt Verlag},
  address   = {Berlin},
  isbn      = {3-503-05911-3},
  year      = {2016},
  language  = {de}
}
@incollection{Zimmermann2015,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas},
  title     = {Article 8bis: Crime of Aggression},
  series = {The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court},
  booktitle = {The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court},
  edition   = {3. Aufl.},
  publisher = {Beck},
  address   = {M{\"u}nchen},
  pages     = {580 -- 618},
  year      = {2015},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Zimmermann2015,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas},
  title     = {The Palestinian-Israeli Conflict: Developing International Law Without Solving the Conflict},
  series = {Archiv des V{\"o}lkerrechts},
  volume    = {53},
  journal   = {Archiv des V{\"o}lkerrechts},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Mohr Siebeck},
  address   = {T{\"u}bingen},
  doi       = {10.1628/000389215X14412717564749},
  pages     = {149 -- 166},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {The article analyses whether the Palestinian-Israeli conflict has served as a catalyst for the development of international law, as well as whether international law has been instrumental in attempting to find solutions for the said conflict. In several ways, this conflict has made a significant contribution to understanding and interpreting the UN Charter. It also brought along important developments about the role of third parties, both under the Geneva Conventions and under the law of state responsibility, which provides for an obligation of not recognizing as legal, or not rendering aid or assistance to situations caused by serious violations of jus cogens. International judicial institutions (and also domestic ones) play a rather limited role in this respect, due both to a lack of courage to address fundamental questions, and/or a disregard of the outcome of the proceedings by at least one of the parties to the conflict. Other reasons are Israel's reluctance of accepting the jurisdiction of either the ICJ or the ICC, and its view on the non-applicability of human rights treaties outside of its territory, as well as Palestine's uncertain status in the international community limiting its access to international courts. However, the ICJ's 2004 (formally non-binding) advisory opinion on the Israeli Wall provided answers to some of the most fundamental questions related to the conflict, unfortunately without having any immediate impact on the situation on the ground. Given Palestine's accession to the Rome Statute in early 2015, time has yet to show which role in the process will be played by the ICC. Other issues arising from the conflict, and examined by this article, are that of (Palestinian) statehood, going beyond the traditional concept of statehood and including the consequences of the jus cogens-character of the right of self-determination, as well as questions of treaty succession and succession in matters of State responsibility with regard to acts committed by the PLO.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Zimmermann2012,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas},
  title     = {Amending the amendment provisions of the rome statute the kampala compromise on the crime of aggression and the law of treaties},
  series = {Journal of international criminal justice},
  volume    = {10},
  journal   = {Journal of international criminal justice},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Oxford Univ. Press},
  address   = {Oxford},
  issn      = {1478-1387},
  doi       = {10.1093/jicj/mqs002},
  pages     = {209 -- 227},
  year      = {2012},
  abstract  = {The adoption, in Kampala in June 2010, of amendments to the Rome Statute on the crime of aggression was hailed as a historic milestone in the development of the international Criminal Court (ICC). However, the manner in which these amendments are supposed to enter into force runs the risk of undermining the rules of the international law of treaties, as well as the legality and acceptability of the Kampala compromise itself The author examines the relevant amendment procedures provided for in the ICC Statute and the compatibility with them of the amendment procedure chosen in Kampala and ultimately warns of the legal consequences which may follow from the Review Conference's somewhat-Alexandrian solution.},
  language  = {en}
}
@incollection{Zimmermann2015,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas},
  title     = {Artikel 209 (Mehrjahres- und thematische Programme; Vertragsschlusskompetenz; Rolle der EIB)},
  series = {Europ{\"a}isches Unionsrecht : Europ{\"a}isches Unionsrecht : Vertrag {\"u}ber die Europ{\"a}ische Union Vertrag {\"u}ber die Arbeitsweise der Europ{\"a}ischen Union, Charta der Grundrechte der Europ{\"a}ischen Union ; EUV, AEUV, GRC},
  volume    = {Bd. 4},
  booktitle = {Europ{\"a}isches Unionsrecht : Europ{\"a}isches Unionsrecht : Vertrag {\"u}ber die Europ{\"a}ische Union Vertrag {\"u}ber die Arbeitsweise der Europ{\"a}ischen Union, Charta der Grundrechte der Europ{\"a}ischen Union ; EUV, AEUV, GRC},
  editor    = {von der Groeben, Hans and Schwarze, J{\"u}rgen and Hatje, Armin},
  edition   = {7. Aufl.},
  publisher = {Nomos},
  address   = {Baden-Baden},
  isbn      = {978-3-8329-6019-3},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {377 -- 395},
  year      = {2015},
  language  = {de}
}
@incollection{Zimmermann2015,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas},
  title     = {Artikel 202 (Regelung der Freiz{\"u}gigkeit der Arbeitskr{\"a}fte)},
  series = {Europ{\"a}isches Unionsrecht : Vertrag {\"u}ber die Europ{\"a}ische Union Vertrag {\"u}ber die Arbeitsweise der Europ{\"a}ischen Union, Charta der Grundrechte der Europ{\"a}ischen Union ; EUV, AEUV, GRC},
  volume    = {Bd. 4},
  booktitle = {Europ{\"a}isches Unionsrecht : Vertrag {\"u}ber die Europ{\"a}ische Union Vertrag {\"u}ber die Arbeitsweise der Europ{\"a}ischen Union, Charta der Grundrechte der Europ{\"a}ischen Union ; EUV, AEUV, GRC},
  editor    = {von der Groeben, Hans and Schwarze, J{\"u}rgen and Hatje, Armin},
  edition   = {7. Aufl.},
  publisher = {Nomos},
  address   = {Baden-Baden},
  isbn      = {978-3-8329-6019-3},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {255 -- 255},
  year      = {2015},
  language  = {de}
}
@incollection{Zimmermann2015,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas},
  title     = {Artikel 200 (Verbot von Z{\"o}llen/Ausnahmen)},
  series = {Europ{\"a}isches Unionsrecht : Vertrag {\"u}ber die Europ{\"a}ische Union Vertrag {\"u}ber die Arbeitsweise der Europ{\"a}ischen Union, Charta der Grundrechte der Europ{\"a}ischen Union ; EUV, AEUV, GRC},
  volume    = {Bd. 4},
  booktitle = {Europ{\"a}isches Unionsrecht : Vertrag {\"u}ber die Europ{\"a}ische Union Vertrag {\"u}ber die Arbeitsweise der Europ{\"a}ischen Union, Charta der Grundrechte der Europ{\"a}ischen Union ; EUV, AEUV, GRC},
  editor    = {von der Groeben, Hans and Schwarze, J{\"u}rgen and Hatje, Armin},
  edition   = {7. Aufl.},
  publisher = {Nomos},
  address   = {Baden-Baden},
  isbn      = {978-3-8329-6019-3},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {250 -- 253},
  year      = {2015},
  language  = {de}
}
@incollection{Zimmermann2015,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas},
  title     = {Artikel 211 (Internationale Zusammenarbeit)},
  series = {Europ{\"a}isches Unionsrecht : Vertrag {\"u}ber die Europ{\"a}ische Union Vertrag {\"u}ber die Arbeitsweise der Europ{\"a}ischen Union, Charta der Grundrechte der Europ{\"a}ischen Union ; EUV, AEUV, GRC},
  volume    = {Bd. 4},
  booktitle = {Europ{\"a}isches Unionsrecht : Vertrag {\"u}ber die Europ{\"a}ische Union Vertrag {\"u}ber die Arbeitsweise der Europ{\"a}ischen Union, Charta der Grundrechte der Europ{\"a}ischen Union ; EUV, AEUV, GRC},
  editor    = {von der Groeben, Hans and Schwarze, J{\"u}rgen and Hatje, Armin},
  edition   = {7. Aufl.},
  publisher = {Nomos},
  address   = {Baden-Baden},
  isbn      = {978-3-8329-6019-3},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {398 -- 399},
  year      = {2015},
  language  = {de}
}
@incollection{Zimmermann2015,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas},
  title     = {Artikel 203 (Durchf{\"u}hrungsgesetzgebung)},
  series = {Europ{\"a}isches Unionsrecht : Vertrag {\"u}ber die Europ{\"a}ische Union Vertrag {\"u}ber die Arbeitsweise der Europ{\"a}ischen Union, Charta der Grundrechte der Europ{\"a}ischen Union ; EUV, AEUV, GRC},
  volume    = {Bd. 4},
  booktitle = {Europ{\"a}isches Unionsrecht : Vertrag {\"u}ber die Europ{\"a}ische Union Vertrag {\"u}ber die Arbeitsweise der Europ{\"a}ischen Union, Charta der Grundrechte der Europ{\"a}ischen Union ; EUV, AEUV, GRC},
  editor    = {von der Groeben, Hans and Schwarze, J{\"u}rgen and Hatje, Armin},
  edition   = {7. Aufl.},
  publisher = {Nomos},
  address   = {Baden-Baden},
  isbn      = {978-3-8329-6019-3},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {256 -- 259},
  year      = {2015},
  language  = {de}
}
@incollection{Zimmermann2015,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas},
  title     = {Artikel 204 (Anwendung auf Gr{\"o}nland)},
  series = {Europ{\"a}isches Unionsrecht : Vertrag {\"u}ber die Europ{\"a}ische Union Vertrag {\"u}ber die Arbeitsweise der Europ{\"a}ischen Union, Charta der Grundrechte der Europ{\"a}ischen Union ; EUV, AEUV, GRC},
  volume    = {Bd. 4},
  booktitle = {Europ{\"a}isches Unionsrecht : Vertrag {\"u}ber die Europ{\"a}ische Union Vertrag {\"u}ber die Arbeitsweise der Europ{\"a}ischen Union, Charta der Grundrechte der Europ{\"a}ischen Union ; EUV, AEUV, GRC},
  editor    = {von der Groeben, Hans and Schwarze, J{\"u}rgen and Hatje, Armin},
  edition   = {7. Aufl.},
  publisher = {Nomos},
  address   = {Baden-Baden},
  isbn      = {978-3-8329-6019-3},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {260 -- 266},
  year      = {2015},
  language  = {de}
}
@incollection{Zimmermann2015,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas},
  title     = {Artikel 199 (Zwecke der Assoziierung)},
  series = {Europ{\"a}isches Unionsrecht : Vertrag {\"u}ber die Europ{\"a}ische Union Vertrag {\"u}ber die Arbeitsweise der Europ{\"a}ischen Union, Charta der Grundrechte der Europ{\"a}ischen Union ; EUV, AEUV, GRC},
  volume    = {Bd. 4},
  booktitle = {Europ{\"a}isches Unionsrecht : Vertrag {\"u}ber die Europ{\"a}ische Union Vertrag {\"u}ber die Arbeitsweise der Europ{\"a}ischen Union, Charta der Grundrechte der Europ{\"a}ischen Union ; EUV, AEUV, GRC},
  editor    = {von der Groeben, Hans and Schwarze, J{\"u}rgen and Hatje, Armin},
  edition   = {7. Aufl.},
  publisher = {Nomos},
  address   = {Baden-Baden},
  isbn      = {978-3-8329-6019-3},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {248 -- 249},
  year      = {2015},
  language  = {de}
}
@incollection{Zimmermann2015,
  author    = {Zimmermann, Andreas},
  title     = {Artikel 198 (Ziele der Assoziierung)},
  series = {Europ{\"a}isches Unionsrecht : Vertrag {\"u}ber die Europ{\"a}ische Union Vertrag {\"u}ber die Arbeitsweise der Europ{\"a}ischen Union, Charta der Grundrechte der Europ{\"a}ischen Union ; EUV, AEUV, GRC},
  volume    = {Bd. 4},
  booktitle = {Europ{\"a}isches Unionsrecht : Vertrag {\"u}ber die Europ{\"a}ische Union Vertrag {\"u}ber die Arbeitsweise der Europ{\"a}ischen Union, Charta der Grundrechte der Europ{\"a}ischen Union ; EUV, AEUV, GRC},
  editor    = {von der Groeben, Hans and Schwarze, J{\"u}rgen and Hatje, Armin},
  edition   = {7. Aufl.},
  publisher = {Nomos},
  address   = {Baden-Baden},
  isbn      = {978-3-8329-6019-3},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {244 -- 247},
  year      = {2015},
  language  = {de}
}