@article{Haenel2021,
  author    = {H{\"a}nel, Hilkje Charlotte},
  title     = {\#MeToo and testimonial injustice},
  series = {Philosophy and Social Criticism},
  volume    = {48},
  journal   = {Philosophy and Social Criticism},
  number    = {6},
  publisher = {Sage Publ.},
  address   = {London},
  issn      = {0191-4537},
  doi       = {10.1177/01914537211017578},
  pages     = {833 -- 859},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Two decades ago, Tarana Burke started using the phrase 'me too' to release victims of sexual abuse and rape from their shame and to empower girls from minority communities. In 2017, actress Alyssa Milano made the hashtag \#MeToo go viral. This article's concern is with the role of testimonial practices in the context of sexual violence. While many feminists have claimed that the word of those who claim to being sexually violated by others (should) have political and/or epistemic priority, others have failed to recognize the harm and injury of instances of sexual violence that are not yet acknowledged as such and failed to listen to victims from marginalized social groups. In fact, some feminists have attacked \#MeToo for mingling accounts of 'proper' sexual violence and accounts that are not 'proper' experiences of sexual violence. My aim in this article is to show why this critique is problematic and find a philosophically fruitful way to understand the \#MeToo-movement as a movement that strives for moral and conceptual progress.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{SchlomannBuenningHippetal.2021,
  author    = {Schlomann, Anna and B{\"u}nning, Mareike and Hipp, Lena and Wahl, Hans-Werner},
  title     = {Aging during COVID-19 in Germany},
  series = {European journal of ageing : social, behavioural and health perspectives},
  volume    = {19},
  journal   = {European journal of ageing : social, behavioural and health perspectives},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {1613-9372},
  doi       = {10.1007/s10433-021-00655-1},
  pages     = {1077 -- 1086},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Existing theories of aging suggest that there may be similarities and differences in how COVID-19 impacts older people's psychosocial adaptation compared to younger age groups, particularly middle-aged individuals. To assess the degree to which these impacts vary, we analyzed data from 3098 participants between the ages of 40 and 79 from an online survey in Germany. Data were collected at three measurement occasions between the start of the nationwide lockdown in mid-March 2020 and the end of the lockdown in early August 2020. The survey focused on everyday experiences during the COVID-19 crisis and collected various satisfaction ratings (e.g., general life satisfaction, satisfaction with family life, satisfaction with social contacts). At baseline, participants also provided retrospective ratings of satisfaction for the period before the COVID-19 crisis. In our analyses, we compared satisfaction ratings of middle-aged (40-64 years) and older individuals (65-79 years) and found that both middle-aged and older participants experienced the greatest decreases in satisfaction with social contacts, with more pronounced decreases seen in middle-aged participants. A similar pattern was observed for general life satisfaction, but the overall decreases were less pronounced in both groups compared to the decreases in satisfaction with social contacts. We also observed a partial recovery effect in all measures at the last measurement occasion, and this effect was more pronounced in older adults. Findings were also confirmed using age as a continuous variable and checking for linear and nonlinear effects of outcomes across the age range. Although ageism arose during the pandemic in the sense that older adults were labeled as a "risk group," particularly at the start of the outbreak, we found consistently with other studies that middle-aged adults' satisfaction decreased to a greater extent than that of older adults.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KhalilNaumann2021,
  author    = {Khalil, Samir and Naumann, Elias},
  title     = {Does contact with foreigners reduce worries about immigration?},
  series = {European sociological review},
  volume    = {38},
  journal   = {European sociological review},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Oxford University Press},
  address   = {Oxford},
  issn      = {0266-7215},
  doi       = {10.1093/esr/jcab039},
  pages     = {189 -- 201},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {This article examines how contact with perceived foreigners affects natives' attitudes towards immigration. Using six waves of individual level panel data from Germany (2007-2017), we find that natives' reported mutual visits with foreigners reduce worries about immigration. However, the results do not imply an increase in this effect in the course of repeated contact. Our analyses also consider the possibility that the effect of out-group contact on attitudes is heterogeneous across social groups. Our results show that contact effects are not restricted to younger age groups but also hold for older age groups. Surprisingly, there are stronger reductions in worries among right-leaning compared to left-leaning individuals.},
  language  = {en}
}
@techreport{AdriaansGrieseAuspurgetal.2021,
  author    = {Adriaans, Jule and Griese, Florian and Auspurg, Katrin and Bledow, Nona and Bohmann, Sandra and Busemeyer, Marius R. and Delhey, Jan and Goebel, Jan and Groh-Samberg, Olaf and Heckhausen, Jutta and Hinz, Thomas and Kroh, Martin and Lengfeld, Holger and Lersch, Philipp M. and Liebig, Stefan and Richter, David and Sachweh, Patrick and Schupp, J{\"u}rgen and Schwerdt, Guido and Verwiebe, Roland},
  title     = {Dokumentation zum Entwicklungsprozess des Moduls Einstellungen zu sozialer Ungleichheit im SOEP (v38)},
  series = {SOEP survey papers, series B - survey reports (Methodenberichte)},
  volume    = {1071},
  journal   = {SOEP survey papers, series B - survey reports (Methodenberichte)},
  publisher = {Deutsches Institut f{\"u}r Wirtschaftsforschung (DIW)},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {2193-5580},
  pages     = {35},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Im Rahmen eines einj{\"a}hrigen Entwicklungsprozesses wurde das Fragebogenmodul "Einstellungen zu sozialer Ungleichheit" unter der Leitung der Infrastruktureinrichtung SOEP entwickelt und in der 38. Welle der Haupterhebung des Sozio-oekonomischen Panels erstmalig erhoben. Das finale Fragebogenmodul umfasst 43 Items zu den Themenbereichen Soziale Vergleiche, Soziale Mobilit{\"a}t, Sozialstaat und Nicht-materielle Ungleichheit. In der Tradition des SOEP als forschungsbasierte Infrastruktureinrichtung erfolgte die Fragebogenentwicklung in enger Zusammenarbeit mit externen Forschenden aus dem Bereich der Einstellungs- und Ungleichheitsforschung. Neben der etablierten Nutzung des SOEP Innovation Samples (SOEP-IS) f{\"u}r quantitative Pretests neu entwickelter Fragen kam erstmals ein kognitiver Pretest zum Einsatz. Der vorliegende Bericht dokumentiert den Entwicklungsprozess von der Konzeption bis zum finalen Fragebogen.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{GerhardsKohlerSawert2021,
  author    = {Gerhards, J{\"u}rgen and Kohler, Ulrich and Sawert, Tim},
  title     = {Educational expansion, social class, and choosing latin as a strategy of distinction},
  series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Soziologie},
  volume    = {50},
  journal   = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Soziologie},
  number    = {5},
  publisher = {de Gruyter},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {2366-0325},
  doi       = {10.1515/zfsoz-2021-0021},
  pages     = {306 -- 321},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {In times of educational expansion, privileged families are looking for new strategies of distinction. Referring to Pierre Bourdieu's theory of distinction, we argue that choosing Latin at school - a language that is no longer spoken and therefore has no direct value - is one of the strategies of privileged families to set themselves apart from less privileged families. Based on two surveys we conducted at German schools, the paper analyzes the relationship between parents' educational background and the probability that their child will learn Latin. Results indicate that historically academic families have the strongest tendency towards learning Latin, followed by new academic families, and leaving behind the non-academic families. We distinguish between four causal mechanisms that might help to explain these associations: cultural distinction, selecting a socially exclusive learning environment, beliefs in a secondary instrumental function of learning Latin, and spatial proximity between the location of humanist Gymnasiums and the residential areas of privileged families. The hypotheses are formalized by means of Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAG). Findings show that the decision to learn Latin is predominately an unintended consequence of the selection of a socially exclusive learning environment. In addition, there is evidence that especially children from historically academic families learn Latin as a strategy of cultural distinction.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{ApeltBinderKuster2021,
  author    = {Apelt, Maja and Binder, Beate and Kuster, Friederike},
  title     = {Einleitung},
  series = {Feministische Studien},
  volume    = {39},
  journal   = {Feministische Studien},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {De Gruyter Oldenbourg},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {0723-5186},
  doi       = {10.1515/fs-2021-0027},
  pages     = {197 -- 201},
  year      = {2021},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{BuenningHipp2021,
  author    = {B{\"u}nning, Mareike and Hipp, Lena},
  title     = {Geschlechterungleichheiten im Arbeitsleben und subjektiven Wohlbefinden von Erwerbst{\"a}tigen w{\"a}hrend der COVID-19-Pandemie},
  series = {Sozialer Fortschritt},
  volume    = {70},
  journal   = {Sozialer Fortschritt},
  number    = {5-6},
  publisher = {Duncker \& Humblot},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {0038-609X},
  doi       = {10.3790/sfo.70.5-6.293},
  pages     = {293 -- 315},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Wie hat sich die COVID-19 Pandemie auf geschlechtsspezifische Ungleichheiten im Arbeitsleben und dem subjektiven Wohlbefinden Erwerbst{\"a}tiger ausgewirkt? Zur Beantwortung dieser Frage analysiert dieser Beitrag drei Wellen einer nicht zufallsbasierten Onlinestichprobe f{\"u}r den Zeitraum Mitte M{\"a}rz bis Anfang August 2020 und umfassen damit den Zeitraum des ersten Lockdowns. Die Ergebnisse unserer multivariaten Analysen zeigen: Frauen, Eltern und insbesondere M{\"u}tter waren {\"u}berdurchschnittlich von Arbeitszeitreduzierungen betroffen. Bei der Wahrscheinlichkeit im Homeoffice zu arbeiten gab es nur geringf{\"u}gige Unterschiede nach Geschlecht und Familiensituation. Die Zufriedenheit mit der Arbeit, dem Familienleben und dem Leben insgesamt ging bei Frauen, Eltern und insbesondere M{\"u}ttern {\"u}berproportional stark zur{\"u}ck. Die beobachteten Unterschiede verringern sich gegen Ende des Lockdowns wieder, jedoch unterschiedlich stark f{\"u}r die einzelnen Ergebnisdimensionen.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Wolf2021,
  author    = {Wolf, Hannah},
  title     = {Introduction},
  series = {The condition of democracy : Volume 2: Contesting citizenship},
  journal   = {The condition of democracy : Volume 2: Contesting citizenship},
  publisher = {Routledge},
  address   = {London},
  isbn      = {978-0-367-74537-0},
  pages     = {1 -- 15},
  year      = {2021},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{BinderApelt2021,
  author    = {Binder, Beate and Apelt, Maja},
  title     = {Legal Gender Studies: Herausforderungen und Perspektiven feministischer Rechtskritik},
  series = {Feministische Studien},
  volume    = {39},
  journal   = {Feministische Studien},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {De Gruyter Oldenbourg},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {0723-5186},
  doi       = {10.1515/fs-2021-0034},
  pages     = {321 -- 340},
  year      = {2021},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Botsch2021,
  author    = {Botsch, Gideon},
  title     = {Rassenb{\"u}rgerkrieg},
  publisher = {Transcript},
  address   = {Bielefeld},
  isbn      = {978-3-8376-5863-7},
  pages     = {147 -- 159},
  year      = {2021},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{Mackert2021,
  author    = {Mackert, J{\"u}rgen},
  title     = {Social life as collective struggle},
  series = {sozialpolitik.ch},
  journal   = {sozialpolitik.ch},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}t},
  address   = {Freiburg},
  issn      = {2297-8224},
  doi       = {10.18753/2297-8224-174},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {In recent years, all over the globe we have seen intensifying economic exploitation, political disenfranchisement, social marginalization and cultural repression in all kinds of political regimes, from liberal democratic to authoritarian and dictatorial. Although the strategies vary with regard to regime and context, in all of them we observe that while a growing number of social groups are speaking out and rising against them, a presumably much higher number of groups do not. In this article, I argue that all these processes can be conceived as aspects of ongoing closure struggles in social life. However, in order to understand why some social groups are able to fight against closure strategies while others are not, closure theory in its current state of elaboration is not of any help. While it operates with the term solidarization, it does not offer any explanation of how such acting in solidarity may become possible in closure struggles. The article is a mainly theoretical contribution of how to solve this problem.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{CoeruetCoeruet2021,
  author    = {C{\"o}r{\"u}t, G{\"o}zde Yaz{\i}c{\i} and C{\"o}r{\"u}t, İlker},
  title     = {The neo-liberal conception of empowerment and its limits},
  series = {Central Asian survey},
  volume    = {41},
  journal   = {Central Asian survey},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Routledge, Taylor \& Francis Group},
  address   = {Abingdon},
  issn      = {0263-4937},
  doi       = {10.1080/02634937.2021.1969897},
  pages     = {118 -- 137},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Through qualitative research conducted in the bazaars of Bishkek, this paper examines the posited tripartite relationship between the free market, micro-finance and women's empowerment by focusing on how loans from micro-finance institutions in Bishkek influence the lives of female loanees. The neo-liberal conception of 'individual autonomy' and 'empowerment', it is argued, may not adequately serve as indicators of actual female empowerment/disempowerment in Bishkek and lead us to fail to recognize moments of self-exploitation and forms of claim-making. The research also underlines the disempowering effects of the affectional burden, that is, the constant sense of anxiety, that the loanees have to manage in order to survive in the neo-liberal business environment, which offers high interest rate loans and exposes the loanees to over-indebtedness. These effects can be followed through the analysis of the role the desire for stability and 'ontological security' plays in the formation of the identities/world views of the loanees.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Bose2021,
  author    = {Bose, K{\"a}the von},
  title     = {Umweltf{\"u}rsorge im Krankenhaus},
  series = {NTM : Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Geschichte der Wissenschaften, Technik und Medizin},
  volume    = {29},
  journal   = {NTM : Zeitschrift f{\"u}r Geschichte der Wissenschaften, Technik und Medizin},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Birkh{\"a}user},
  address   = {Basel ; Berlin},
  issn      = {0036-6978},
  doi       = {10.1007/s00048-020-00289-x},
  pages     = {113 -- 141},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Den Boden putzen, das Bett abziehen, einen Blumenstrauß arrangieren - Bem{\"u}hungen um Sauberkeit sowie eine angenehme Raumatmosph{\"a}re obliegen im Krankenhaus meist weiblichen* Pflegerinnen, Reinigungskr{\"a}ften und Hauswirtschafterinnen. Im Klinikalltag vermischen sich Anforderungen an hygienische Sauberkeit unter Prozessen der {\"O}konomisierung mit Logiken des Marketings sowie mit affektiv-emotionalen Bed{\"u}rfnissen der Akteur_innen dieser R{\"a}ume. Obwohl die Maßst{\"a}be klinischer Hygiene auf medizinischem Wissen basieren, sind die Arbeitsteilung sowie Anspr{\"u}che an Sauberkeit auf verschiedenen Hierarchieebenen zugleich von vergeschlechtlichten und teils rassifizierten Vorstellungen durchdrungen, die {\"u}ber den klinischen Kontext hinausweisen. Dies legt schon eine Besch{\"a}ftigung mit der Geschichte der Bakteriologie nahe: Die Logik und Sprache der Infektionsabwehr ist in Wissenschaft und Alltag auch verwoben mit sozialen Differenzmarkierungen. Unter R{\"u}ckgriff auf die Ergebnisse einer Ethnografie zu Sauberkeit und Reinigungsarbeiten im Krankenhaus, die wissensgeschichtlich fundiert werden, wird in dem Beitrag die Frage nach der (feminisierten) Sorge f{\"u}r die Umwelt mit der Frage nach der Atmosph{\"a}re klinischer R{\"a}ume verkn{\"u}pft. Auf welche Weise und mit welchen Effekten verschr{\"a}nken sich wissenschaftlich-medizinisches Hygienewissen mit einem allt{\"a}glichen, jedoch historisierbaren Wissen {\"u}ber sch{\"o}ne und angenehme Sauberkeit, das immer noch weiblich konnotiert ist?},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{AhnBrennerCuccaetal.2021,
  author    = {Ahn, Byeongsun and Brenner, Anna-Katharina and Cucca, Roberta and Friesenecker, Michael and Litschauer, Katharina and Mocca, Elisabetta and Riederer, Bernhard},
  title     = {Vienna},
  series = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  journal   = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  editor    = {Kazepov, Yuri Albert Kyrill and Verwiebe, Roland},
  isbn      = {978-0-367-68011-4},
  issn      = {1867-5808},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-53784},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-537843},
  pages     = {176},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {This book explores and debates the urban transformations that have taken place in Vienna over the past 30 years and their consequences in policy fields such as labour and housing, political and social participation and the environment. Historically, European cities have been characterised by a strong association between social cohesion, quality of life, economic ambition and a robust State. Vienna is an excellent example for that. In more recent years, however, cities were pressured to change policy principles and mechanisms in the context of demographic shifts, post-industrial transformations and welfare recalibration which have led to worsened social conditions in many cities. Each chapter in this volume discusses Vienna's responses to these pressures in key policy arenas, looking at outcomes from the context-specific local arrangements. Against a theoretical framework debating the European city as a model of inclusion and social justice, authors explore the local capacity to innovate urban policies and to address new social risks, while paying attention to potential trade-offs. The book questions and assesses the city's resilience using time series and an institutional analysis of four key dimensions that characterise the European city model within the context of post-industrial transition: redistribution, recognition, representation and sustainability. It offers a multiscalar perspective of urban governance through labour, housing, participatory and environmental policies, bringing together different levels and public policy types.},
  language  = {en}
}
@book{AhnBrennerCuccaetal.2021,
  author    = {Ahn, Byeongsun and Brenner, Anna-Katharina and Cucca, Roberta and Friesenecker, Michael and Litschauer, Katharina and Mocca, Elisabetta and Riederer, Bernhard},
  title     = {Vienna},
  series = {Built environment city studies},
  journal   = {Built environment city studies},
  editor    = {Kazepov, Yuri and Verwiebe, Roland},
  publisher = {Routledge},
  address   = {London},
  isbn      = {978-0-367-68011-4},
  doi       = {10.4324/9781003133827},
  pages     = {1 -- 155},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {This book explores and debates the urban transformations that have taken place in Vienna over the past 30 years and their consequences in policy fields such as labour and housing, political and social participation and the environment. Historically, European cities have been characterised by a strong association between social cohesion, quality of life, economic ambition and a robust State. Vienna is an excellent example for that. In more recent years, however, cities were pressured to change policy principles and mechanisms in the context of demographic shifts, post-industrial transformations and welfare recalibration which have led to worsened social conditions in many cities. Each chapter in this volume discusses Vienna's responses to these pressures in key policy arenas, looking at outcomes from the context-specific local arrangements. Against a theoretical framework debating the European city as a model of inclusion and social justice, authors explore the local capacity to innovate urban policies and to address new social risks, while paying attention to potential trade-offs. The book questions and assesses the city's resilience using time series and an institutional analysis of four key dimensions that characterise the European city model within the context of post-industrial transition: redistribution, recognition, representation and sustainability. It offers a multiscalar perspective of urban governance through labour, housing, participatory and environmental policies, bringing together different levels and public policy types.},
  language  = {en}
}
@book{Haenel2021,
  author    = {H{\"a}nel, Hilkje Charlotte},
  title     = {Wer hat Angst vorm Feminismus},
  publisher = {Beck},
  address   = {M{\"u}nchen},
  isbn      = {978-3-406-74181-4},
  doi       = {10.17104/9783406770784},
  pages     = {192},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Feminismus - das ist nicht nur f{\"u}r M{\"a}nner, sondern auch f{\"u}r einige Frauen immer noch ein bedrohliches Wort, selbst oder gerade in Zeiten von \#MeToo. Liegt das daran, dass viele gar nicht wissen, was Feminismus ist und worauf er hinarbeitet? Gibt es den einen Feminismus? Was hat Feminismus eigentlich mit Sexismus zu tun? Und was mit unseren Beziehungen? Offener Frauenhass ist in unserer Gesellschaft mittlerweile weitgehend ge{\"a}chtet. Aber auch nach {\"u}ber f{\"u}nfzehn Jahren mit einer Frau an der Regierungsspitze sind wir noch l{\"a}ngst nicht in der Gleichberechtigung angekommen. Im Gegenteil: Weiterhin strukturiert Sexismus geschlechtsspezifische Alltagserfahrungen, bis hinein in unsere Intimbeziehungen, wo die Grenzen zwischen Lust und sexueller Gewalt schnell verschwimmen. Die Philosophin und Schriftstellerin Hilkje H{\"a}nel deckt die Mechanismen sexueller Objektifizierung und m{\"a}nnlichen Anspruchsdenkens auf. Sie zeigt, wie Frauen oft in die sexistischen Alltagsstrukturen verstrickt sind, an denen auch viele M{\"a}nner leiden. Ihr zug{\"a}ngliches Buch ist das Pl{\"a}doyer f{\"u}r einen Feminismus, von dem alle etwas haben - und vor dem niemand Angst haben muss.},
  language  = {de}
}