@incollection{Verwiebe2024,
  author    = {Verwiebe, Roland},
  title     = {Social institutions},
  series = {Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research},
  booktitle = {Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research},
  editor    = {Maggino, Filomena},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Cham},
  isbn      = {978-3-031-17298-4},
  doi       = {10.1007/978-3-031-17299-1_2768},
  pages     = {6598 -- 6600},
  year      = {2024},
  abstract  = {Social institutions are a system of behavioral and relationship patterns that are densely interwoven and enduring and function across an entire society. They order and structure the behavior of individuals in core areas of society and thus have a strong impact on the quality of life of individuals. Institutions regulate the following: (a) family and relationship networks carry out social reproduction and socialization; (b) institutions in the realm of education and training ensure the transmission and cultivation of knowledge, abilities, and specialized skills; (c) institutions in the labor market and economy provide for the production and distribution of goods and services; (d) institutions in the realm of law, governance, and politics provide for the maintenance of the social order; (e) while cultural, media, and religious institutions further the development of contexts of meaning, value orientations, and symbolic codes.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Mackert2024,
  author    = {Mackert, J{\"u}rgen},
  title     = {Citizenship},
  series = {Politische Soziologie: Handbuch f{\"u}r Wissenschaft und Studium},
  journal   = {Politische Soziologie: Handbuch f{\"u}r Wissenschaft und Studium},
  editor    = {Endreß, Martin and Rampp, Benjamin},
  publisher = {Nomos},
  address   = {Baden-Baden},
  isbn      = {978-3-8487-4836-5},
  year      = {2024},
  language  = {de}
}
@unpublished{HippLeumannSchober2024,
  author    = {Hipp, Lena and Leumann, Sandra and Schober, Pia S.},
  title     = {Partnership penalties for working in gender-atypical occupations?},
  doi       = {10.31235/osf.io/ydurp},
  pages     = {35},
  year      = {2024},
  abstract  = {Does working in a gender-atypical occupation reduce individuals' likelihood of finding a different-sex romantic partner, and do such occupational partnership penalties contribute to occupational gender segregation? To answer this question, we theorized partnership penalties for working in gender-atypical occupations by drawing on insights from evolutionary psychology, social constructivism, and rational choice theory and exploited the stability of occupational pathways in Germany. In Study 1, we analyzed observational data from a national probability sample (N= 1,634,944) to assess whether individuals in gender-atypical occupations were less likely to be partnered than individuals who worked in gender typical occupations. To assess whether the observed partnership gaps found in Study 1 were causally related to the gender typicality of men's and women's occupations, we conducted a field experiment on a dating app (N = 6,778). Because the findings from Study 2 suggested that young women and men indeed experienced penalties for working in a gender-atypical occupation (at least when they were not highly attractive), we employed a choice-experimental design in Study 3 (N = 1,250) to assess whether women and men were aware of occupational partnership penalties and showed that anticipating occupational partnership penalties may keep young and highly educated women from working in gender-atypical occupations. Our main conclusion therefore is that that observed penalties and their anticipation seem to be driven by unconscious rather than conscious processes.},
  language  = {en}
}