@article{SeyfriedAnsmannPohlenz2019,
  author    = {Seyfried, Markus and Ansmann, Moritz and Pohlenz, Philipp},
  title     = {Institutional isomorphism, entrepreneurship and effectiveness},
  series = {Tertiary Education and Management},
  volume    = {25},
  journal   = {Tertiary Education and Management},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Dordrecht},
  issn      = {1358-3883},
  doi       = {10.1007/s11233-019-09022-3},
  pages     = {115 -- 129},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {This paper presents empirical evidence on the adoption, implementation and the perceived effectiveness of quality management in teaching and learning in German higher education institutions. Theoretically, the article combines two new institutionalist approaches: institutional isomorphism and institutional entrepreneurship. Empirically, the study refers to qualitative interview data and quantitative survey data. The analysis reveals that isomorphism is a leading driver behind the adoption of quality management in German higher education institutions, whereas institutional entrepreneurship plays an important role in quality management implementation. While isomorphism can be regarded as a conclusive reason behind the absence of a perception of quality management's effectiveness, institutional entrepreneurship may function as a corrective towards the overall negative impact of isomorphic conformity by institutionalizing quality management in a sustainable manner.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{PohlenzNiedermeier2019,
  author    = {Pohlenz, Philipp and Niedermeier, Frank},
  title     = {The Bologna Process and the harmonisation of higher education systems in other world regions},
  series = {Innovation : the European journal of social sciences},
  volume    = {32},
  journal   = {Innovation : the European journal of social sciences},
  number    = {4},
  publisher = {Routledge, Taylor \& Francis Group},
  address   = {Abingdon},
  issn      = {1351-1610},
  doi       = {10.1080/13511610.2019.1637248},
  pages     = {481 -- 494},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {The Bologna Process has inspired harmonisation strategies for higher education systems in other parts of the world. However, developments in other contexts are not much under review in the European debate. The present article describes the case of Southeast Asia and the attempt to promote harmonisation of its higher education systems. It further compares the processes in ASEAN and the European Higher Education Area to then discuss open questions for future comparative research. To do so the authors re-contextualise data from a study in ASEAN against the background of future research needs in the field of higher education harmonisation.},
  language  = {en}
}