@article{Hassler2019,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Theory of signs and ideas on the relation between language and thought at the border between the 18th and 19th centuries},
  series = {Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta. Jazyk i literatura},
  volume    = {16},
  journal   = {Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta. Jazyk i literatura},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {St. Petersburg University Press},
  address   = {Sankt-Peterburg},
  issn      = {2541-9358},
  doi       = {10.21638/spbu09.2019.308},
  pages     = {463 -- 479},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {The name Ideologues refers to a group of philosophers, psychologists, grammarians, educational theorists and medical specialists who for a short period from 1795 to 1805 determined the intellectual climate in France and sought to develop a science of ideas (id{\´e}ologie). The Ideologues had a rather reserved attitude to Condillac's (1714-1780) ideas and his sensualist sign theory. They strove for the perfection of language for the needs of thought and of scientific knowledge. The connections with the Ideologues can also be discerned in Russia. In the educational theory, Jean-Baptiste Maudru (1740-1808) was close to the Ideologues and, despite his insufficient knowledge of the Russian language, made some interesting remarks on the connection between the language and the national character. According to Maudru and in agreement with the Ideologues, different typologies of word order are not just an indication of greater or lesser closeness to the natural order. Rather, they indicate differences in national character, which manifest themselves in the specific character of individual languages. Maudru taught at the military academy in Saint Petersburg and published the first Russian grammar in France (Maudru 1802). In his grammar, he sought to link mechanically the specific features of languages and of national characters with the climatic influences. His attempt to revive the theory of climatic influences was criticized by Karamzin. Karamzin also treated the discussion of the metaphoric extension of word meanings as an absurd undertaking, which had no place in grammar.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Hassler2020,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {The Functional-Communicative Approach to Language of the Potsdam School in the German Democratic Republic},
  series = {History of Humanities},
  volume    = {5},
  journal   = {History of Humanities},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {The University of Chicago Press Journals},
  address   = {Chicago},
  issn      = {2379-3163},
  pages     = {31 -- 49},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Hassler2007,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Texts of reference and serial texts in the constitution of a notional paradigm : the example of the French ideologues},
  isbn      = {978-90-272-4601-1},
  year      = {2007},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Hassler2003,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Scepticism and semantic theory from Locke to Du Marsais},
  isbn      = {1-4020-1377-9},
  year      = {2003},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{Hassler2004,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Rosenfeld, S., A Revolution in Language: the Problem of Signs in Late Eighteenth-Century France; Stanford, Stanford University Press, 2001},
  year      = {2004},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{Hassler2020,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Pr{\´e}sentation},
  series = {Collocations et traditions discursives Actes du Colloque du Coll{\`e}ge Doctoral Franco-allemand (CDFA) tenu {\`a} l'Universit{\´e} de Potsdam le 4 juillet 2018 (Linx : revue des linguistes de l'Universit{\´e} Paris Ouest Nanterre La D{\´e}fense)},
  volume    = {2020},
  journal   = {Collocations et traditions discursives Actes du Colloque du Coll{\`e}ge Doctoral Franco-allemand (CDFA) tenu {\`a} l'Universit{\´e} de Potsdam le 4 juillet 2018 (Linx : revue des linguistes de l'Universit{\´e} Paris Ouest Nanterre La D{\´e}fense)},
  number    = {13},
  editor    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  issn      = {2118-9692},
  doi       = {10.4000/linx.3842},
  year      = {2020},
  language  = {en}
}
@incollection{HasslerBoehmHennemann2017,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda and B{\"o}hm, Ver{\´o}nica Julia and Hennemann, Anja},
  title     = {On the evidential use of English adverbials and their equivalents in Romance languages and Russian},
  series = {Evidentiality revisited : Cognitive grammar, functional and discourse-pragmatic perspectives (Pragmatics \& Beyond New Series ; 271)},
  volume    = {271},
  booktitle = {Evidentiality revisited : Cognitive grammar, functional and discourse-pragmatic perspectives (Pragmatics \& Beyond New Series ; 271)},
  editor    = {Mar{\´i}n Arrese, Juana I. and Haßler, Gerda and Carretero, Marta},
  publisher = {John Benjamins},
  address   = {Amsterdam, Philadelphia},
  isbn      = {9789027256768},
  issn      = {0922-842X},
  doi       = {10.1075/pbns.271.04boh},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {87 -- 104},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {The present study investigates the use of equivalents of the English adverbials seemingly and apparently with a specific morphological structure in Romance languages and Russian, i.e. Spanish al parecer, Portuguese ao parecer and ao que parece, French avoir l'air de, Italian all'apparenza and in apparenza as well as Russian по-видимому. The underlying hypothesis is that the function and syntactic behaviour of these adverbial locutions are motivated by their morphological composition. It is to investigate whether the adverbials may be used sentence-initially, parenthetically, as an adverbial with broad or narrow scope or as a component of a modalised predication. The adverbial locutions are treated as means of expression where evidentiality and epistemic modality represent overlapping functional-semantic categories.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{Hassler1994,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Nerlich, B., Semantic theories in Europe 1830 - 1930; Amsterdam, Benjamins, 1992},
  year      = {1994},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{Hassler2006,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Nebrija, Elio Antonio de (1444?-1522)},
  isbn      = {0-08-044299-4},
  year      = {2006},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Hassler2022,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Meaning and Function},
  series = {Concordia discors vs. discordia concors : researches into comparative literature, contrastive linguistics, translation and cross-cultural strategies},
  volume    = {16},
  journal   = {Concordia discors vs. discordia concors : researches into comparative literature, contrastive linguistics, translation and cross-cultural strategies},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Ştefan cel Mare University Press},
  address   = {Suceava},
  issn      = {2065-4057},
  pages     = {17 -- 50},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {The use of the word functional in the most diverse theories and approaches has contributed in no small measure to the confusion in linguistics today. This article does not claim to give an overview of the different directions of functionalism in linguistics. Rather, the aim is to present what Coseriu's view characterised as functional in his time and to what extent his theory outlined a path that still makes sense in functional-cognitive linguistics today. This will involve an examination of Coseriu's difficult-to-identify concept of function. Furthermore, the article will also show that functional thinking is relevant for current grammatography.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Hassler2018,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Linguistic relativity and language as epiphenomenon: two contradictory positions},
  series = {Conflu{\^e}ncia. Revista do Instituto de l{\´i}ngua portuguesa},
  volume    = {2018},
  journal   = {Conflu{\^e}ncia. Revista do Instituto de l{\´i}ngua portuguesa},
  number    = {55},
  issn      = {2317-4153},
  doi       = {10.18364/rc.v0i55},
  pages     = {82 -- 98},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {The assumption of linguistics relativity and the definition of languages as epiphenomena are certainly known as two contradictory positions from the last century. But I will start my discussion of them in the period of their appearance and then use this as a basis to evaluate the heuristic value of these positions in present day linguistics. I will start with the definition of language as an epiphenomenon and then I will go on with the linguistic relativity. The notion of ʽepiphenomenon' is usually used to exclude certain aspects of a scientific object because they are considered to be deduced from others. In linguistics, restrictions of the research object were made, invoking the notion of ʽepiphenomenonʼ, which was partially done with a polemical attitude, and was always responded to polemically.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Hassler1999,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Lafaye's Dictionnaire des synonymes in the history of semantics},
  year      = {1999},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{Hassler2002,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Koerner, E. F. K., (Hrsg.), History of linguistics in Spain; Amsterdam, Benjamins, 2001},
  year      = {2002},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Hassler2006,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Klaus D. Dutz (1953-2006) y Peter Schmitter (1943-2006)},
  year      = {2006},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Hassler2012,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Introduction},
  isbn      = {978-3-89323-140-9},
  year      = {2012},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Hassler2008,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Introduction},
  isbn      = {978-90-272-4606-6},
  year      = {2008},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Hassler2008,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Indicative verb forms as means of expressing modality in romance languages},
  isbn      = {978-1-443-84059-0},
  year      = {2008},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{Hassler2006,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {History of Linguistics : Schools and Traditions ; Meaning: Pre-20th century theories},
  isbn      = {0-08-044299-4},
  year      = {2006},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{Hassler2006,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {History of Linguistics : Schools and Traditions 18th century Linguistic Thought},
  isbn      = {0-08-044299-4},
  year      = {2006},
  language  = {en}
}
@incollection{Hassler2018,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {History of european vernacular grammar writing},
  series = {Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics},
  booktitle = {Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics},
  editor    = {Aronoff, Mark and Abbi, Anvita},
  publisher = {Oxford University},
  address   = {New York},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {The grammatization of European vernacular languages began in the Late Middle Ages and Renaissance and continued up until the end of the 18th century. Through this process, grammars were written for the vernaculars and, as a result, the vernaculars were able to establish themselves in important areas of communication. Vernacular grammars largely followed the example of those written for Latin, using Latin descriptive categories without fully adapting them to the vernaculars. In accord with the Greco-Latin tradition, the grammars typically contain sections on orthography, prosody, morphology, and syntax, with the most space devoted to the treatment of word classes in the section on "etymology." The earliest grammars of vernaculars had two main goals: on the one hand, making the languages described accessible to non-native speakers, and on the other, supporting the learning of Latin grammar by teaching the grammar of speakers' native languages. Initially, it was considered unnecessary to engage with the grammar of native languages for their own sake, since they were thought to be acquired spontaneously. Only gradually did a need for normative grammars develop which sought to codify languages. This development relied on an awareness of the value of vernaculars that attributed a certain degree of perfection to them. Grammars of indigenous languages in colonized areas were based on those of European languages and today offer information about the early state of those languages, and are indeed sometimes the only sources for now extinct languages. Grammars of vernaculars came into being in the contrasting contexts of general grammar and the grammars of individual languages, between grammar as science and as art and between description and standardization. In the standardization of languages, the guiding principle could either be that of anomaly, which took a particular variety of a language as the basis of the description, or that of analogy, which permitted interventions into a language aimed at making it more uniform.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{Hassler2006,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Herv{\´a}s y Panduro, Lorenzo},
  isbn      = {0-08-044299-4},
  year      = {2006},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{Hassler1999,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Gambarara, D. (Hrsg.), Language philosophies and the language sciences, a historical perspective in honour of Lia Formigari; M{\"u}nster, Nodus-Publ., 1996},
  year      = {1999},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{Hassler2015,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Evidentiality and the expression of speaker's stance in Romance languages and German},
  series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Philosophische Reihe},
  journal   = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Philosophische Reihe},
  number    = {138},
  issn      = {1866-8380},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-404492},
  pages     = {28},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {In recent years, the category of evidentiality has also come into use for the description of Romance languages and of German. This has been contingent on a change in its interpretation from a typological category to a semantic-pragmatic category, which allows an application to languages lacking specialised morphemes for the expression of evidentiality. We consider evidentiality to be a structural dimension of grammar, the values of which are expressed by types of constructions that code the source of information which a speaker imparts. If we look at the situation in Romance languages and in German, drawing a boundary between epistemic modality and evidentiality presents problems that are difficult to solve. Adding markers of the source of the speaker's knowledge often limits the degree of responsibility of the speaker for the content of the utterance. Evidential adverbs are a frequently used means of marking the source of the speaker's knowledge. The evidential meaning is generalised to marking any source of knowledge, what can be regarded as a result of a process of pragmaticalisation. The use of certain means which also carry out evidential markings can even contribute to the blurring of the different kinds of evidentiality. German also has modal verbs which in conjunction with the perfect tense of the verb have a predominantly evidential use (sollen and wollen). But even here the evidential marking is not without influence on the modality of the utterance. The Romance languages, however, do not have such specialised verbs for expressing evidentiality in certain contexts. To do this, they mark evidentiality - often context bound - by verb forms such as the conditional and the imperfect tense. This article shall contrast the different architectures used in expressing evidentiality in German and in the Romance languages.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Hassler2014,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Evidentiality and the expression of speaker's stance in Romance languages and German},
  series = {Discourse Studies : an interdisciplinary journal for the study of text and talk},
  volume    = {17},
  journal   = {Discourse Studies : an interdisciplinary journal for the study of text and talk},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Sage Publications},
  address   = {London},
  issn      = {1461-4456},
  doi       = {10.1177/1461445614564522},
  pages     = {182 -- 209},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {In recent years, the category of evidentiality has also come into use for the description of Romance languages and of German. This has been contingent on a change in its interpretation from a typological category to a semantic-pragmatic category, which allows an application to languages lacking specialised morphemes for the expression of evidentiality. We consider evidentiality to be a structural dimension of grammar, the values of which are expressed by types of constructions that code the source of information which a speaker imparts. If we look at the situation in Romance languages and in German, drawing a boundary between epistemic modality and evidentiality presents problems that are difficult to solve. Adding markers of the source of the speaker's knowledge often limits the degree of responsibility of the speaker for the content of the utterance. Evidential adverbs are a frequently used means of marking the source of the speaker's knowledge. The evidential meaning is generalised to marking any source of knowledge, what can be regarded as a result of a process of pragmaticalisation. The use of certain means which also carry out evidential markings can even contribute to the blurring of the different kinds of evidentiality. German also has modal verbs which in conjunction with the perfect tense of the verb have a predominantly evidential use (sollen and wollen). But even here the evidential marking is not without influence on the modality of the utterance. The Romance languages, however, do not have such specialised verbs for expressing evidentiality in certain contexts. To do this, they mark evidentiality - often context bound - by verb forms such as the conditional and the imperfect tense. This article shall contrast the different architectures used in expressing evidentiality in German and in the Romance languages.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Hassler2015,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Evidentiality and the expression of speaker's stance in Romance languages and German},
  series = {Discourse studies : an interdisciplinary journal for the study of text and talk},
  volume    = {17},
  journal   = {Discourse studies : an interdisciplinary journal for the study of text and talk},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Sage Publ.},
  address   = {London},
  issn      = {1461-4456},
  doi       = {10.1177/1461445614564522},
  pages     = {182 -- 209},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {In recent years, the category of evidentiality has also come into use for the description of Romance languages and of German. This has been contingent on a change in its interpretation from a typological category to a semantic-pragmatic category, which allows an application to languages lacking specialised morphemes for the expression of evidentiality. We consider evidentiality to be a structural dimension of grammar, the values of which are expressed by types of constructions that code the source of information which a speaker imparts. If we look at the situation in Romance languages and in German, drawing a boundary between epistemic modality and evidentiality presents problems that are difficult to solve. Adding markers of the source of the speaker's knowledge often limits the degree of responsibility of the speaker for the content of the utterance. Evidential adverbs are a frequently used means of marking the source of the speaker's knowledge. The evidential meaning is generalised to marking any source of knowledge, what can be regarded as a result of a process of pragmaticalisation. The use of certain means which also carry out evidential markings can even contribute to the blurring of the different kinds of evidentiality. German also has modal verbs which in conjunction with the perfect tense of the verb have a predominantly evidential use (sollen and wollen). But even here the evidential marking is not without influence on the modality of the utterance. The Romance languages, however, do not have such specialised verbs for expressing evidentiality in certain contexts. To do this, they mark evidentiality - often context bound - by verb forms such as the conditional and the imperfect tense. This article shall contrast the different architectures used in expressing evidentiality in German and in the Romance languages.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Hassler2002,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Evidentiality and reported speech in Romance languages},
  year      = {2002},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Hassler2018,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Evidential and epistemic sentence adverbs in Romance languages},
  series = {Linguistik online},
  volume    = {92},
  journal   = {Linguistik online},
  number    = {5},
  issn      = {1615-3014},
  doi       = {10.13092/lo.92.4506},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-421822},
  pages     = {82 -- 98},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {In this paper evidential and modal adverbs will be studied, such as French apparemment, {\´e}videmment, visiblement, Italian apparentemente, evidentemente, ovviamente, and Spanish aparentemente, evidentemente and visiblemente. The development of their signification will be discussed, including German adverbs like offensichtlich. In these means of expression, the functional-semantic categories evidentiality and epistemic modality seem to overlap: on the one hand, they are used if the state of affairs talked about cannot be verified, that is, if there is still a moment of insecurity concerning the transmitted information. Then adverbials with a special structure (preposition + article + nominal form of a verb) will be analysed, and we will examine if they behave in the same way.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Hassler2003,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Epistemic modality revisited: evidential functions of lexical and grammatical forms in Romance languages},
  isbn      = {80-8673221-5},
  year      = {2003},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Hassler2010,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Epistemic modality and evidentiality and their determination on a deictic basis : the case of Romance languages},
  isbn      = {978-3-11-022396-5},
  year      = {2010},
  abstract  = {In recent years the category of evidentiality has come into use also for the description of Romance languages. This has been contingent on a change in its interpretation from a typological category to a semantic-pragmatic category, which allows an application to languages lacking specialised morphemes for the expression of evidentiality. In the following we will first describe the theoretical framework in which we use the category of evidentiality for the description of Romance languages. A key question to be elucidated here will be the determination of evidentiality as a deictic phenomenon. This will also be the basis for discussing the distinction between evidentiality and epistemic modality.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Hassler2010,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Epistemic modality and evidentiality and their determination on a deictic basis},
  isbn      = {978-3-11-023433-6},
  year      = {2010},
  abstract  = {It has often been pointed out that there is some overlap between epistemic modality and evidentiality (Chafe \& Nichols 1986, Cornillie 2007, De Haan 1999, Dendale \& Tasmowski 2001, Plungian 2001, Squartini 2004). In this paper I would like to offer several reflections about the necessity of drawing a boundary between modality and evidentiality. Starting from the typological category of evidentiality - extended here for use in pragmatic studies - I will then explore demarcation problems in Romance languages, which lack grammaticalized forms for expressing evidentiality. The underlying premise of this paper is that evidentiality as marker of the origin of the speaker's knowledge stands in relation to the speaker's pragmatic stance. Because the perspective of the speaker is thus incorporated into the utterance, it seems appropriate to analyse the applicability of the deictic category. Finally, under the aspect of deixis, I shall attempt a demarcation between evidentiality and modality.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Hassler1999,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Diversity of human languages and universals of thougth : an eigteenth-century debate in the Berlin Academy},
  isbn      = {90-272-4583-5},
  year      = {1999},
  language  = {en}
}
@incollection{Hassler2016,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Deg{\´e}rando's three prize essays and the shift in linguistic thought at the turn of the 19th century},
  series = {History of Linguistics 2014 : selected papers from the 13th International Conference on the History of the Language Sciences (ICHoLS XIII), Vila Real, Portugal, 25-29 August 2014 (Studies in the History of the Language Sciences ; 126)},
  booktitle = {History of Linguistics 2014 : selected papers from the 13th International Conference on the History of the Language Sciences (ICHoLS XIII), Vila Real, Portugal, 25-29 August 2014 (Studies in the History of the Language Sciences ; 126)},
  publisher = {John Benjamins Publishing Company},
  address   = {Amsterdam, Philadelphia},
  isbn      = {978-90-272-4617-2},
  issn      = {0304-0720},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {149 -- 160},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {Deg{\´e}rando started out from the views of the French ideologists on the relationship of language and thought, but increasingly distanced himself from them. This is already evident based on the choice of reference authors and also on the increasing emphasis on empirical research. His prize essays reflect the fundamental changes in linguistic thought during the late 18th century. He was successful in the competition of the Institut National (1797/1799) and with another essay at the Berlin Academy (1802). His main argument against Condillac and the ideologists is that empirical knowledge does not depend on signs. Therefore, the development of better languages will not improve this kind of human knowledge.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Hassler2001,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Crosslinguistic and diachronic remarks on the grammaticalization of aspect in Romance languages : location and motion verbs},
  year      = {2001},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{Hassler2002,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Butt, M. (Hrsg.), Time over matter: diachronic perspectives on morphosyntax; Stanford CSLI Publ., 2001},
  year      = {2002},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{Hassler2006,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Brosses, Charles de (1709-1777)},
  series = {Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics},
  journal   = {Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics},
  editor    = {Brown, Keith},
  edition   = {2nd ed.},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Burlington},
  isbn      = {0-08-044299-4},
  year      = {2006},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{Hassler2006,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Bello, Andr{\´e}s (1781-1865)},
  series = {Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics},
  journal   = {Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics},
  editor    = {Brown, Keith},
  edition   = {2nd ed.},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Burlington},
  isbn      = {0-08-044299-4},
  year      = {2006},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{Hassler2006,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Beauz{\´e}e, Nicolas (1717-1789)},
  isbn      = {0-08-044299-4},
  year      = {2006},
  language  = {en}
}
@incollection{Hassler2022,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Aspectual periphrases in Romance languages in contact with the English progressive form},
  series = {Linguistic Hybridity. Contact-induced and cognitively motivated grammaticalization and lexicalization processes in Romance Languages},
  booktitle = {Linguistic Hybridity. Contact-induced and cognitively motivated grammaticalization and lexicalization processes in Romance Languages},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Winter},
  address   = {Heidelberg},
  isbn      = {978-3-8253-4936-3},
  pages     = {215 -- 229},
  year      = {2022},
  language  = {en}
}
@incollection{Hassler2018,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Arbitrariness, Motivation and Value of the Linguistic Sign: Saussurean and Post-Saussurean Perspectives},
  series = {The Cours de Linguistique G{\´e}n{\´e}rale Revisited: 1916-2016. Saussure et le Cours de linguistique g{\´e}n{\´e}rale cent ans apr{\`e}s},
  booktitle = {The Cours de Linguistique G{\´e}n{\´e}rale Revisited: 1916-2016. Saussure et le Cours de linguistique g{\´e}n{\´e}rale cent ans apr{\`e}s},
  editor    = {Rico, Christophe and Kirtchuk, Pablo},
  publisher = {Polis Institute Press},
  address   = {Jerusalem},
  isbn      = {978-9-65769-811-2},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {61 -- 87},
  year      = {2018},
  abstract  = {In 1916, three years after the death of Ferdinand de Saussure, the Cours de linguistique g{\´e}n{\´e}rale (CLG) was published in Geneva. This foundational work marked the beginning of a discipline that has profoundly influenced the development of the humanities ever since. What sources influenced the CLG? Do the main concepts of this seminal work have the same validity today as they did in 1916? How has the recent development of language sciences influenced its reception? How does this text account for meaning and communication within the context of speech (parole)? In order to explore these questions, one hundred years after the publication of Ferdinand de Saussure's seminal work on General Linguistics, Polis--The Jerusalem Institute of Languages and Humanities held an interdisciplinary conference that gathered 14 international specialists from various disciplines: general linguistics, pragmatics, philology, dialectology, translation studies, terminology, and philosophy. The first section of this work reassesses the sources and further influence of the CLG on modern linguistics. The book's second part discusses some of the main concepts and dichotomies of the CLG (constitution of the linguistic method, arbitrariness of sign, main dichotomies), under the light of both the original manuscripts and recent linguistic developments (influence of dialectology or translation studies). The third and last part handles the pragmatic and semantic dimensions of language, suggesting new avenues of reflection that could not yet have been fully taken into account within the CLG itself. Uniting 14 scholarly articles, together with an introduction, an index locorum and a collective bibliography, this volume hopes to encourage readers with its reappraisal and reinterpretation of Saussure's ground-breaking work and thus contribute to the future development of linguistics and humanities.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Hassler2007,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Analogy : the history of a concept and a term from the 17th to the 19th century},
  isbn      = {978-90-272-4603-5},
  year      = {2007},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{Hassler2006,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Alarcos Llorach, Emilio (1922-1998)},
  isbn      = {0-08-044299-4},
  year      = {2006},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Hassler2021,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Adverbal expression of aspectuality and interaction with perfective and imperfective verbs},
  series = {Russian Grammar: System - Usus - Variation/Русская грамматика: Cистема - узус - варьирование},
  journal   = {Russian Grammar: System - Usus - Variation/Русская грамматика: Cистема - узус - варьирование},
  publisher = {Lang},
  address   = {Berlin},
  isbn      = {978-3-631-87748-7},
  pages     = {219 -- 234},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {This paper intends to explore the interaction between aspect and lexical means, in this case temporal adverbials, in the bounding of representations of situations. First, the theoretical basis is outlined, followed by the results of a corpus analysis of coccurrences with adverbs that limit situations. The term situation encompasses all representable processes, states, events, or actions. Finally, some theoretical conclusions are drawn concerning the cognitive category of bounding, using the example of aspectuality. The imperfective verb forms maintain their aspectuality in delimiting connections with adverbs, resulting in a complex, multi-dimensional aspectuality. In nongrammaticalized forms, such as lexical markers, the speaker is free to make a temporal localization or an aspectual perspective. Lexical expressions can make temporal and aspect markings even more precisely and clearly than tenses. They can also limit or extend situations and thus express aspect. Aspectuality thus presents itself as a compositional category, in which external bounding and the internal representation of a course of action or development can interact.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Hassler2011,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Acknowlegements},
  isbn      = {978-90-272-4606-6},
  year      = {2011},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Hassler2006,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {A Fala : normalizaci{\´o}n tard{\´i}a e identidad cultural},
  year      = {2006},
  language  = {en}
}