@misc{BondueScheithauer2014, author = {Bond{\"u}, Rebecca and Scheithauer, Herbert}, title = {Leaking and death-threats by students}, series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe}, journal = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe}, number = {388}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-404121}, pages = {17}, year = {2014}, abstract = {Leaking comprises observable behavior or statements that signal intentions of committing a violent offense and is considered an important warning sign for school shootings. School staff who are confronted with leaking have to assess its seriousness and react appropriately - a difficult task, because knowledge about leaking is sparse. The present study, therefore, examined how frequently leaking occurs in schools and how teachers identify leaking and respond to it. To achieve this aim, we informed teachers from eight schools in Germany about the definition of leaking and other warning signs and risk factors for school shootings in a one-hour information session. Teachers were then asked to report cases of leaking over a six- to nine-month period and to answer a questionnaire on leaking and its treatment after the information session and six to nine months later. Our results suggest that leaking is a relevant problem in German schools. Teachers mostly rated the information session positively and benefited in several aspects (e.g. reported more perceived courses of action or improved knowledge about leaking), but also expressed a constant need for support. Our findings highlight teachers' needs for further support and training and may be used in the planning of prevention measures for school shootings.}, language = {en} } @article{BondueScheithauer2014, author = {Bond{\"u}, Rebecca and Scheithauer, Herbert}, title = {Leaking and death-threats by students: A study in German schools}, series = {School psychology international}, volume = {35}, journal = {School psychology international}, number = {6}, publisher = {Sage Publ.}, address = {London}, issn = {0143-0343}, doi = {10.1177/0143034314552346}, pages = {592 -- 608}, year = {2014}, abstract = {Leaking comprises observable behavior or statements that signal intentions of committing a violent offense and is considered an important warning sign for school shootings. School staff who are confronted with leaking have to assess its seriousness and react appropriately - a difficult task, because knowledge about leaking is sparse. The present study, therefore, examined how frequently leaking occurs in schools and how teachers identify leaking and respond to it. To achieve this aim, we informed teachers from eight schools in Germany about the definition of leaking and other warning signs and risk factors for school shootings in a one-hour information session. Teachers were then asked to report cases of leaking over a six- to nine-month period and to answer a questionnaire on leaking and its treatment after the information session and six to nine months later. Our results suggest that leaking is a relevant problem in German schools. Teachers mostly rated the information session positively and benefited in several aspects (e.g. reported more perceived courses of action or improved knowledge about leaking), but also expressed a constant need for support. Our findings highlight teachers' needs for further support and training and may be used in the planning of prevention measures for school shootings.}, language = {en} } @article{NiproschkeOertelSchubarthetal.2016, author = {Niproschke, Saskia and Oertel, Lars and Schubarth, Wilfried and Ulbricht, Juliane and Bilz, Ludwig}, title = {More or Less Violence in Schools? A Replication Study from 1996-2014 in Saxon Schools}, series = {Zeitschrift f{\~A}¼r Soziologie der Erziehung und Sozialisation}, volume = {36}, journal = {Zeitschrift f{\~A}¼r Soziologie der Erziehung und Sozialisation}, publisher = {Juventa-Verl.}, address = {Weinheim}, issn = {1436-1957}, doi = {10.3262/ZSE1601078}, pages = {78 -- 96}, year = {2016}, abstract = {Der verbreiteten Annahme einer st{\"a}ndigen Gewaltzunahme an Schulen stehen bisher nur wenige Studien im Zeitvergleich gegen{\"u}ber. Der vorliegende Beitrag will diese L{\"u}cke schließen, indem er Ergebnisse einer aktuellen Replikationsstudie vorstellt und damit die Frage beantwortet, ob die Gewalt an Schulen im Vergleich zur Mitte der 1990er Jahre zu- oder abgenommen hat. Anhand einer repr{\"a}sentativen s{\"a}chsischen Stichprobe zeigt sich, dass im Jahr 2014 im Vergleich zu 1996 {\"u}ber weniger Gewalt an Schulen berichtet wird. Dies betrifft die Gewalt unter Sch{\"u} ler(inne)n und die Gewalt gegen Lehrkr{\"a}fte. Parallel hat die Interventionsbereitschaft unter der Lehrer- und Sch{\"u}lerschaft zugenommen. Zugleich macht die Studie auf differente Entwicklungstrends zwischen den Sch{\"u}lergruppen aufmerksam. Trotz eines insgesamt niedrigen Gewaltniveaus im Vergleich zur Mitte der 1990er Jahre legen die Befunde den Schluss nahe, bei den Pr{\"a}ventionsbem{\"u}hungen nicht nachzulassen. Veryfew studies have investigated the widely held assumption that violence in schools has constantly increased in recent years. The current study aims to fill this gap by presenting results of a recent replication study in Germany, as well as answering the question as to whether violence in schools increased or decreased in comparison with the mid-1990s. Based on a representative sample of Saxon students, this study shows that less violence was reported in schools in 2014 compared to 1996. This relates to both violence among students and their violent actions against teachers. Moreover, the willingness of teachers and students to intervene has increased. At the same time, this study draws attention to developmental trends between groups of students. Despite a general low level of violence in schools compared to the mid-1990s, the findings suggest that prevention efforts must be continued.}, language = {de} }