@article{KlopschBaldermannHanschenetal.2019,
  author    = {Klopsch, Rebecca and Baldermann, Susanne and Hanschen, Franziska S. and Voss, Alexander and Rohn, Sascha and Schreiner, Monika and Neugart, Susanne},
  title     = {Brassica-enriched wheat bread: Unraveling the impact of ontogeny and breadmaking on bioactive secondary plant metabolites of pak choi and kale},
  series = {Food chemistry},
  volume    = {295},
  journal   = {Food chemistry},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Oxford},
  issn      = {0308-8146},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.05.113},
  pages     = {412 -- 422},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Consumption of Brassica vegetables is linked to health benefits, as they contain high concentrations of the following secondary plant metabolites (SPMs): glucosinolate breakdown products, carotenoids, chlorophylls, and phenolic compounds. Especially Brassica vegetables are consumed as microgreens (developed cotyledons). It was investigated how different ontogenetic stages (microgreens or leaves) of pak choi (Brassica rapa subsp. chinensis) and kale (Brassica oleracea var. sabellica) differ in their SPM concentration. The impact of breadmaking on SPMs in microgreens (7 days) and leaves (14 days) in pak choi and kale as a supplement in mixed wheat bread was assessed. In leaves, carotenoids, chlorophylls, and phenolic compounds were higher compared to those of microgreens. Breadmaking caused a decrease of SPMs. Chlorophyll degradation was observed, leading to pheophytin and pyropheophytin formation. In kale, sinapoylgentiobiose, a hydroxycinnamic acid derivative, concentration increased. Thus, leaves of Brassica species are suitable as natural ingredients for enhancing bioactive SPM concentrations in bread.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{IslamSchweigert2015,
  author    = {Islam, Khan Md. Shaiful and Schweigert, Florian J.},
  title     = {Comparison of three spectrophotometric methods for analysis of egg yolk carotenoids},
  series = {Food chemistry},
  volume    = {172},
  journal   = {Food chemistry},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Oxford},
  issn      = {0308-8146},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.09.045},
  pages     = {233 -- 237},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {Carotenoids accumulated in the egg yolk are of importance for two reasons. Firstly they are important pigments influencing customer acceptance and secondly they are essential components with positive health effects either as antioxidants or as precursor of vitamin A. Different analytical methods are available to quantitatively identify carotenoids from egg yolk such as spectrophotometric methods described by AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists) and HPLC (High Performance Liquid Chromatography). Both methods have in common that they are time consuming, need a laboratory environment and well trained technical operators. Recently, a rapid lab-independent spectrophotometric method (iCheck, BioAnalyt GmbH, Germany) has been introduced that claims to be less time consuming and easy to operate. The aim of the current study was therefore to compare the novel method with the two standard methods. Yolks of 80 eggs were analysed as aliquots by the three methods in parallel. While both spectrometric methods are only able measure total carotenoids as total beta-carotene, HPLC enables the determination of individual carotenoids such lutein, zeaxanthin, canthaxanthin, beta-carotene and beta-apocarotenoic ester. In general, total carotenoids levels as obtained by AOAC were in average 27\% higher than those obtained by HPLC. Carotenoid values obtained by the reference methods AOAC and HPLC are highly correlated with the iCheck method with r(2) of 0.99 and 0.94 for iCheck vs. AOAC and iCheck vs. HPLC, respectively (both p < 0.001). Bland Altman analysis showed that the novel iCheck method is comparable to the reference methods. In conclusion, the novel rapid and portable iCheck method is a valid and effective tool to determine total carotenoid of egg yolk under laboratory-independent conditions with little trained personal. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.},
  language  = {en}
}