@article{Tischer2012, author = {Tischer, Ute}, title = {Servius und Rom : Lokalit{\"a}ten en passant}, isbn = {978-3-11-022213-5}, year = {2012}, language = {de} } @misc{Tischer2008, author = {Tischer, Ute}, title = {Pirovano, Luigi: Le Interpretationes Vergilianae di Tiberio Claudio Donato : problemi di retorica / [rezensiert von] Ute Tischer}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-42150}, year = {2008}, abstract = {Rezensiertes Werk: Pirovano, Luigi: Le Interpretationes Vergilianae di Tiberio Claudio Donato : problemi di retorica / Luigi Pirovano. - Roma : Herder, 2006. - 253 S. - (Studi e testi tardoantichi ; 5) Zugl.: Milano, Univ., Diss., 1998-1999 ISBN 978-88-89670-19-4}, language = {de} } @misc{Tischer2008, author = {Tischer, Ute}, title = {Pirovano, L., " Le interpretationes Vergilianae" di Tiberio Claudio Donato : problemi di retorica; Roma, Herder, 2006}, issn = {0017-1417}, year = {2008}, language = {de} } @misc{Tischer2008, author = {Tischer, Ute}, title = {Petrus Martyr d'Anghiera {\"u}ber die Freiheit der Indios : Epist. 806 und Dec. 7,4}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-42385}, year = {2008}, language = {de} } @article{Tischer2008, author = {Tischer, Ute}, title = {Petrus Martyr d'Anghiera {\"u}ber die Freiheit der Indios (Epist. 806 und Dec. 7,4)}, issn = {0044-3441}, year = {2008}, abstract = {Petrus Martyr d'Anghiera dealt twice with the ethical discussions concerning the Spanish colonization in America around 1524. A straight reading shows how this sensitive topic was presented with caution and literary skill, thereby mitigating the charge of opportunism that several authors have made.}, language = {de} } @article{Tischer2013, author = {Tischer, Ute}, title = {Manifestus error? Wrong Citation and literary Communication (on Gel. 15.6)}, series = {Mnemosyne : a journal of classical studies}, volume = {66}, journal = {Mnemosyne : a journal of classical studies}, number = {3}, publisher = {Brill}, address = {Leiden}, issn = {0026-7074}, pages = {411 -- 432}, year = {2013}, language = {de} } @article{Tischer2013, author = {Tischer, Ute}, title = {Manifestus error? Falsches zitieren und literarische Kommunikation (zu Gel. 15.6)}, year = {2013}, language = {de} } @article{Tischer2006, author = {Tischer, Ute}, title = {Interpretationspr{\"a}missen im Aeneiskommentar des Servius : zu Serv. Aen. 5,568 und 2,135}, issn = {0018-0777}, year = {2006}, language = {de} } @misc{Tischer2006, author = {Tischer, Ute}, title = {Interpretationspr{\"a}missen im Aeneiskommentar des Servius : zu Serv. Aen. 5,568 und 2,135}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-42375}, year = {2006}, language = {de} } @article{Tischer2011, author = {Tischer, Ute}, title = {Gute Zeiten, schlechte Zeiten (Gell. 1,9).}, isbn = {978-3-8253-5843-3}, year = {2011}, language = {de} } @misc{Tischer2007, author = {Tischer, Ute}, title = {Gellius, ein stoischer nebulo und das Zitat : zu Gell. 1,2}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-42366}, year = {2007}, abstract = {Chapter 1, 2 of the Noctes Atticae reports how the orator and politician Herodes Atticus silences a boastful young Stoic by citing a diatribe of Epictetus. The article shows that Gellius - unlike his own assertion - does not describe a real experience. Instead he dramatizes the text (Epict. diss. 2, 19), which is the origin of the citation. Comparing both texts one finds details of the scenery described, the characterizations of the protagonists as well as the themes discussed quite similar in both the non-cited parts of Epictetus and the text of Gellius. Particularly interesting in that respect is how Gellius takes up citing and its various aspects as it can be found in his model. Epictetus deals with this theme in a critical way, because in his opinion citations of authorities say nothing about the philosophical qualities of the person who uses them. While Gellius' praxis of citation is formally modelled very closely on Epictetus' speech, regarding the content he by no means rejects the use of philosophical citations as weapon to beat an opponent in discussion.}, language = {de} } @article{Tischer2007, author = {Tischer, Ute}, title = {Gellius : ein stoischer Nebulo und das Zitat ; zu Gell. 1,2}, issn = {0031-7985}, year = {2007}, abstract = {Chapter 1, 2 of the Noctes Atticae reports how the orator and politician Herodes Atticus silences a boastful young Stoic by citing a diatribe of Epictetus. The article shows that Gellius - unlike his own assertion - does not describe a real experience. Instead he dramatizes the text (Epict. diss. 2, 19), which is the origin of the citation. Comparing both texts one finds details of the scenery described, the characterizations of the protagonists as well as the themes discussed quite similar in both the non-cited parts of Epictetus and the text of Gellius. Particularly interesting in that respect is how Gellius takes up citing and its various aspects as it can be found in his model. Epictetus deals with this theme in a critical way, because in his opinion citations of authorities say nothing about the philosophical qualities of the person who uses them. While Gellius' praxis of citation is formally modelled very closely on Epictetus' speech, regarding the content he by no means rejects the use of philosophical citations as weapon to beat an opponent in discussion.}, language = {de} } @article{TischerForst2010, author = {Tischer, Ute and Forst, Alexandra}, title = {Einleitung : Fremde Rede - eigene Rede}, isbn = {978-3-631-60257-7}, year = {2010}, language = {de} } @phdthesis{Tischer2006, author = {Tischer, Ute}, title = {Die zeitgeschichtliche Anspielung in der antiken Literaturerkl{\"a}rung}, publisher = {Narr}, address = {T{\"u}bingen}, pages = {330 S.}, year = {2006}, abstract = {Die Arbeit besch{\"a}ftigt sich im weitesten Sinne mit dem Verh{\"a}ltnis zwischen einem Text, seinen Lesern und deren Kritikern. Ihr Gegenstand sind Anspielungen auf zeitgeschichtliche Ereignisse in antiken literarischen Texten und die Vermutungen, die die Verfasser antiker exegetischer Literatur dar{\"u}ber {\"a}ußern. Ziel ist dabei - anders als in den meisten einschl{\"a}gigen Untersuchungen - nicht die Pr{\"a}sentation neuer Interpretationen zu den klassischen Texten, sondern die Analyse der aus Antike und Sp{\"a}tantike {\"u}berlieferten Anspielungsdeutungen. An diese wird die Frage gestellt, welche Absichten, Ziele und Verfahren die Exegeten den von ihnen kommentierten Dichtern unterstellten und auf welchem Wege sie selbst zu ihrer Interpretation gelangten. Der Vergleich der einzelnen Interpretationen l{\"a}ßt typische Denkweisen und Interpretationsmuster hervortreten, erm{\"o}glicht einen Einblick in den geistigen Hintergrund der antiken Kommentatoren und schafft damit erst die Basis f{\"u}r die Beurteilung ihrer auch heute immer wieder diskutierten Vorschl{\"a}ge.}, language = {de} } @article{Tischer2016, author = {Tischer, Ute}, title = {Cicero meets Vergil. Allegory, Quotation and the Genesis of a biographical Note from the Life of Vergil}, series = {Materiali e discussioni per l'analisi dei testi classici}, journal = {Materiali e discussioni per l'analisi dei testi classici}, publisher = {Fabrizio Serra Editore}, address = {Pisa}, issn = {0392-6338}, doi = {10.1400/247097}, pages = {57 -- 99}, year = {2016}, language = {de} } @article{Tischer2010, author = {Tischer, Ute}, title = {Aspekte des Zitat : {\"U}berlegungen zur Anwendung eines modernen Konzepts auf antike lateinische Texte}, isbn = {978-3-631-60257-7}, year = {2010}, language = {de} }