@article{KoechyWilson2001,
  author    = {K{\"o}chy, Martin and Wilson, Scott D.},
  title     = {Nitrogen deposition and forest expansion in the northern Great Plains},
  year      = {2001},
  abstract  = {1 Atmospheric nitrogen (N) deposition has become one of the most important agents of vegetation change in densely populated regions, It may also contribute to forest expansion into grasslands at the northern edge of the North American Great Plains. 2 We measured N deposition and available soil N with ion-exchange resin over 2 years in six national parks in areas varying in population density and industrialization. N deposition was significantly higher in four parks in densely populated regions than in two remote parks. 3 Available soil N increased significantly with N deposition across all parks. 4 We measured N mass and N-15 abundance (delta N-15) in vegetation and soil in two parks: Elk Island, receiving 22 kg N ha(-1) year(-1), and Jasper, receiving 8 kg N ha(-1) year(-1). Differences between parks in tissue N concentrations were small, but forest expansion over five decades resulted in the mass of N in vegetation increasing by 74\% in Elk Island but by only 26\% in Jasper. delta N-15 in forest vegetation was significantly lower in Elk Island than in Jasper, suggesting that anthropogenic sources contribute significantly to the high rates of N entering that ecosystem. 5 We determined the rate of forest expansion within parks using six decades of aerial photographs, Parks in aspen parkland and boreal forest showed a strong positive relationship between forest expansion and N deposition. The relationships found between N deposition, available soil N and forest expansion suggest that even comparatively low rates of N deposition may accelerate the expansion of forest into temperate grasslands.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{PeltzerKoechy2001,
  author    = {Peltzer, Duane and K{\"o}chy, Martin},
  title     = {Competitive effects of grasses and woody plants in mixed-grass prairie},
  year      = {2001},
  abstract  = {Variation in the competitive ability of plant species is suggested to determine their persistence and abundance in communities. In this study, we examine competition between grasses and woody plants, a phenomenon that occurs word-wide in savannas and along the margins between grasslands and forests. Specifically, we quantified the per- gram competitive effects of grasses and woody plants in native mixed-grass prairie by manipulating the natural vegetation. We separated the competitive effects of grasses, shrubs, and intact vegetation using selective herbicides to create four competition treatments: no neighbours (NN), no shrubs (NS), no grasses (NG), and all neighbours (AN). Competition treatments were applied to 2m x 2m experimental plots located in either prairie- or shrub- dominated habitats. Herbicides were applied starting one year prior to the study to create the four competition treatments. The effects of grasses and shrubs on resource availability (light, water, nitrogen) and the growth of two transplant species, Bouteloua gracilis, a perennial tussock grass, and Elaeagnus commutata, a common shrub, were measured over two growing seasons. Resource availability (i.e. light, soil moisture, soil available nitrogen) was two- to tenfold higher in no neighbour (NN) plots than in vegetated plots (NS, NG, AN). Both grasses and shrubs reduced resource levels to about the same extent. Light penetration declined linearly with increasing grass or shrub biomass, to a minimum of about 30\% incident light at 500 g/m² neighbour shoot mass. Soil resources (i.e. water, nitrogen) did not decline with increasing neighbour shoot or root mass for either grasses or shrubs. Thus, for soil resources, the presence of neighbours was more important than their mass (i.e. abundance). Transplant growth did not decline with increasing neighbour biomass; the only exception to this pattern was a linear decline in Bouteloua growth with increasing neighbour shoot mass in plots containing only shrubs (NG). Competition was equally intense in prairie-dominated and shrub-dominated habitats for transplants of Bouteloua, but was less intense in shrub-dominated habitats for the shrub Elaeagnus. These results raise the interesting possibility that variation in the persistence and abundance of plants in communities is more strongly controlled by variation in competitive effects than by differences in competitive response ability.},
  language  = {en}
}