@article{FagesHanghojKhanetal.2019, author = {Fages, Antoine and Hanghoj, Kristian and Khan, Naveed and Gaunitz, Charleen and Seguin-Orlando, Andaine and Leonardi, Michela and Constantz, Christian McCrory and Gamba, Cristina and Al-Rasheid, Khaled A. S. and Albizuri, Silvia and Alfarhan, Ahmed H. and Allentoft, Morten and Alquraishi, Saleh and Anthony, David and Baimukhanov, Nurbol and Barrett, James H. and Bayarsaikhan, Jamsranjav and Benecke, Norbert and Bernaldez-Sanchez, Eloisa and Berrocal-Rangel, Luis and Biglari, Fereidoun and Boessenkool, Sanne and Boldgiv, Bazartseren and Brem, Gottfried and Brown, Dorcas and Burger, Joachim and Crubezy, Eric and Daugnora, Linas and Davoudi, Hossein and Damgaard, Peter de Barros and de Chorro y de Villa-Ceballos, Maria de los Angeles and Deschler-Erb, Sabine and Detry, Cleia and Dill, Nadine and Oom, Maria do Mar and Dohr, Anna and Ellingvag, Sturla and Erdenebaatar, Diimaajav and Fathi, Homa and Felkel, Sabine and Fernandez-Rodriguez, Carlos and Garcia-Vinas, Esteban and Germonpre, Mietje and Granado, Jose D. and Hallsson, Jon H. and Hemmer, Helmut and Hofreiter, Michael and Kasparov, Aleksei and Khasanov, Mutalib and Khazaeli, Roya and Kosintsev, Pavel and Kristiansen, Kristian and Kubatbek, Tabaldiev and Kuderna, Lukas and Kuznetsov, Pavel and Laleh, Haeedeh and Leonard, Jennifer A. and Lhuillier, Johanna and von Lettow-Vorbeck, Corina Liesau and Logvin, Andrey and Lougas, Lembi and Ludwig, Arne and Luis, Cristina and Arruda, Ana Margarida and Marques-Bonet, Tomas and Silva, Raquel Matoso and Merz, Victor and Mijiddorj, Enkhbayar and Miller, Bryan K. and Monchalov, Oleg and Mohaseb, Fatemeh A. and Morales, Arturo and Nieto-Espinet, Ariadna and Nistelberger, Heidi and Onar, Vedat and Palsdottir, Albina H. and Pitulko, Vladimir and Pitskhelauri, Konstantin and Pruvost, Melanie and Sikanjic, Petra Rajic and Papesa, Anita Rapan and Roslyakova, Natalia and Sardari, Alireza and Sauer, Eberhard and Schafberg, Renate and Scheu, Amelie and Schibler, Jorg and Schlumbaum, Angela and Serrand, Nathalie and Serres-Armero, Aitor and Shapiro, Beth and Seno, Shiva Sheikhi and Shevnina, Irina and Shidrang, Sonia and Southon, John and Star, Bastiaan and Sykes, Naomi and Taheri, Kamal and Taylor, William and Teegen, Wolf-Rudiger and Vukicevic, Tajana Trbojevic and Trixl, Simon and Tumen, Dashzeveg and Undrakhbold, Sainbileg and Usmanova, Emma and Vahdati, Ali and Valenzuela-Lamas, Silvia and Viegas, Catarina and Wallner, Barbara and Weinstock, Jaco and Zaibert, Victor and Clavel, Benoit and Lepetz, Sebastien and Mashkour, Marjan and Helgason, Agnar and Stefansson, Kari and Barrey, Eric and Willerslev, Eske and Outram, Alan K. and Librado, Pablo and Orlando, Ludovic}, title = {Tracking five millennia of horse management with extensive ancient genome time series}, series = {Cell}, volume = {177}, journal = {Cell}, number = {6}, publisher = {Cell Press}, address = {Cambridge}, issn = {0092-8674}, doi = {10.1016/j.cell.2019.03.049}, pages = {1419 -- 1435}, year = {2019}, abstract = {Horse domestication revolutionized warfare and accelerated travel, trade, and the geographic expansion of languages. Here, we present the largest DNA time series for a non-human organism to date, including genome-scale data from 149 ancient animals and 129 ancient genomes (>= 1-fold coverage), 87 of which are new. This extensive dataset allows us to assess the modem legacy of past equestrian civilisations. We find that two extinct horse lineages existed during early domestication, one at the far western (Iberia) and the other at the far eastern range (Siberia) of Eurasia. None of these contributed significantly to modern diversity. We show that the influence of Persian-related horse lineages increased following the Islamic conquests in Europe and Asia. Multiple alleles associated with elite-racing, including at the MSTN "speed gene," only rose in popularity within the last millennium. Finally, the development of modem breeding impacted genetic diversity more dramatically than the previous millennia of human management.}, language = {en} } @article{ElsnerHofreiterSchibleretal.2017, author = {Elsner, Julia and Hofreiter, Michael and Schibler, Joerg and Schlumbaum, Angela}, title = {Ancient mtDNA diversity reveals specific population development of wild horses in Switzerland after the Last Glacial Maximum}, series = {PLoS one}, volume = {12}, journal = {PLoS one}, publisher = {PLoS}, address = {San Fransisco}, issn = {1932-6203}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0177458}, pages = {17246 -- 17256}, year = {2017}, language = {en} } @article{ElsnerSchiblerHofreiteretal.2015, author = {Elsner, Julia and Schibler, Joerg and Hofreiter, Michael and Schlumbaum, Angela}, title = {Burial condition is the most important factor for mtDNA PCR amplification success in Palaeolithic equid remains from the Alpine foreland}, series = {Archaeological and anthropological sciences}, volume = {7}, journal = {Archaeological and anthropological sciences}, number = {4}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {Heidelberg}, issn = {1866-9557}, doi = {10.1007/s12520-014-0213-4}, pages = {505 -- 515}, year = {2015}, abstract = {Faunal remains from Palaeolithic sites are important genetic sources to study preglacial and postglacial populations and to investigate the effect of climate change and human impact. Post mortem decay, resulting in fragmented and chemically modified DNA, is a key obstacle in ancient DNA analyses. In the absence of reliable methods to determine the presence of endogenous DNA in sub-fossil samples, temporal and spatial surveys of DNA survival on a regional scale may help to estimate the potential of faunal remains from a given time period and region. We therefore investigated PCR amplification success, PCR performance and post mortem damage in c. 47,000 to c. 12,000-year-old horse remains from 14 Palaeolithic sites along the Swiss Jura Mountains in relation to depositional context, tissue type, storage time and age, potentially influencing DNA preservation. The targeted 75 base pair mitochondrial DNA fragment could be amplified solely from equid remains from caves and not from any of the open dry and (temporary) wetland sites. Whether teeth are better than bones cannot be ultimately decided; however, both storage time after excavation and age significantly affect PCR amplification and performance, albeit not in a linear way. This is best explained by the-inevitable-heterogeneity of the data set. The extent of post mortem damage is not related to any of the potential impact factors. The results encourage comprehensive investigations of Palaeolithic cave sites, even from temperate regions.}, language = {en} } @misc{ElsnerSchiblerHofreiteretal.2015, author = {Elsner, Julia and Schibler, J{\"o}rg and Hofreiter, Michael and Schlumbaum, Angela}, title = {Burial condition is the most important factor for mtDNA PCR amplification success in Palaeolithic equid remains from the Alpine foreland}, series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe}, journal = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe}, number = {727}, issn = {1866-8372}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-42976}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-429763}, pages = {505 -- 515}, year = {2015}, abstract = {Faunal remains from Palaeolithic sites are important genetic sources to study preglacial and postglacial populations and to investigate the effect of climate change and human impact. Post mortem decay, resulting in fragmented and chemically modified DNA, is a key obstacle in ancient DNA analyses. In the absence of reliable methods to determine the presence of endogenous DNA in sub-fossil samples, temporal and spatial surveys of DNA survival on a regional scale may help to estimate the potential of faunal remains from a given time period and region. We therefore investigated PCR amplification success, PCR performance and post mortem damage in c. 47,000 to c. 12,000-year-old horse remains from 14 Palaeolithic sites along the Swiss Jura Mountains in relation to depositional context, tissue type, storage time and age, potentially influencing DNA preservation. The targeted 75 base pair mitochondrial DNA fragment could be amplified solely from equid remains from caves and not from any of the open dry and (temporary) wetland sites. Whether teeth are better than bones cannot be ultimately decided; however, both storage time after excavation and age significantly affect PCR amplification and performance, albeit not in a linear way. This is best explained by the—inevitable—heterogeneity of the data set. The extent of post mortem damage is not related to any of the potential impact factors. The results encourage comprehensive investigations of Palaeolithic cave sites, even from temperate regions.}, language = {en} }