@misc{KuehneLesserPetrietal.2018, author = {K{\"u}hne, Franziska and Lesser, Hannah and Petri, Franziska and Weck, Florian}, title = {Do mental health patients learn what their cognitive-behaviour therapists think they do?}, series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe}, journal = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe}, number = {490}, issn = {1866-8364}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-420607}, pages = {7}, year = {2018}, abstract = {Purpose: The acquisition of skills is essential to the conceptualization of cognitive-behavioural therapy. Yet, what experiences are encountered and what skills actually learned during therapy, and whether patients and therapists have concurrent views hereof, remains poorly understood. Method: An explorative pilot study with semi-structured, corresponding interview guides was conducted. Pilot data from our outpatient unit were transcribed and content-analyzed following current guidelines. Results: The responses of 18 participants (patients and their psychotherapists) were assigned to six main categories. Educational and cognitive aspects were mentioned most frequently and consistently by both groups. Having learned Behavioural alternatives attained the second highest agreement between perspectives. Conclusions: Patients and therapists valued CBT as an opportunity to learn new skills, which is an important prerequisite also for the maintenance of therapeutic change. We discuss limitations to generalizability but also theoretical and therapy implications.}, language = {en} } @article{KuehneLesserPetrietal.2018, author = {K{\"u}hne, Franziska and Lesser, Hannah and Petri, Franziska and Weck, Florian}, title = {Do mental health patients learn what their cognitive-behaviour therapists think they do?}, series = {International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being}, volume = {13}, journal = {International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being}, number = {1}, publisher = {Taylor \& Francis Group}, address = {London}, issn = {1748-2631}, doi = {10.1080/17482631.2018.1527598}, pages = {6}, year = {2018}, abstract = {Purpose: The acquisition of skills is essential to the conceptualization of cognitive-behavioural therapy. Yet, what experiences are encountered and what skills actually learned during therapy, and whether patients and therapists have concurrent views hereof, remains poorly understood. Method: An explorative pilot study with semi-structured, corresponding interview guides was conducted. Pilot data from our outpatient unit were transcribed and content-analyzed following current guidelines. Results: The responses of 18 participants (patients and their psychotherapists) were assigned to six main categories. Educational and cognitive aspects were mentioned most frequently and consistently by both groups. Having learned Behavioural alternatives attained the second highest agreement between perspectives. Conclusions: Patients and therapists valued CBT as an opportunity to learn new skills, which is an important prerequisite also for the maintenance of therapeutic change. We discuss limitations to generalizability but also theoretical and therapy implications.}, language = {en} } @misc{GropalisBailerWecketal.2018, author = {Gropalis, Maria and Bailer, Josef and Weck, Florian and Witth{\"o}ft, Michael}, title = {Optimierung von Expositionstherapie bei pathologischen Krankheits{\"a}ngsten}, series = {Psychotherapeut}, volume = {63}, journal = {Psychotherapeut}, number = {3}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {New York}, issn = {0935-6185}, doi = {10.1007/s00278-018-0285-1}, pages = {188 -- 193}, year = {2018}, abstract = {Pathologische Krankheits{\"a}ngste wurden bislang nach ICD und DSM prim{\"a}r als somatoforme St{\"o}rung bzw. als somatische Belastungsst{\"o}rung klassifiziert. Theoretische Erw{\"a}gungen und empirische Befunde legen jedoch nahe, dass es sich bei pathologischen Krankheits{\"a}ngsten eigentlich um eine Angstst{\"o}rung handelt. Innerhalb des vorliegenden Beitrags wird daf{\"u}r argumentiert, dass Defizite in der aktuellen Behandlungspraxis und in der Wahrnehmung von Patienten mit Hypochondrie als „schwierige Patienten" teilweise auf Unklarheit in der Nosologie sowie bez{\"u}glich der entscheidenden Mechanismen der Entstehung und Aufrechterhaltung zur{\"u}ckzuf{\"u}hren sind. Ausgehend von innovativen theoretischen Ans{\"a}tzen zur Erkl{\"a}rung pathologischer Krankheits{\"a}ngste werden Vorschl{\"a}ge f{\"u}r eine verbesserte therapeutische Praxis skizziert. Der Fokus liegt hierbei auf einem verst{\"a}rken Einsatz expositionsbasierter Behandlungselemente, die sich am „Inhibitory-learning"-Ansatz orientieren und sich bei anderen Angstst{\"o}rungen bereits bew{\"a}hrt haben.}, language = {en} } @article{ProbstJakobKaufmannetal.2018, author = {Probst, Thomas and Jakob, Marion and Kaufmann, Yvonne Marie and M{\"u}ller-Neng, Julia M. B. and Bohus, Martin and Weck, Florian}, title = {Patients' and therapists' experiences of general change mechanisms during bug-in-the-eye and delayed video-based supervised cognitive-behavioral therapy}, series = {Journal of clinical psychology}, volume = {74}, journal = {Journal of clinical psychology}, number = {4}, publisher = {Wiley}, address = {Hoboken}, issn = {0021-9762}, doi = {10.1002/jclp.22519}, pages = {509 -- 522}, year = {2018}, abstract = {ObjectiveThis secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial investigated whether bug-in-the-eye (BITE) supervision (live computer-based supervision during a psychotherapy session) affects the manner in which patients and therapists experience general change mechanisms (GCMs) during cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT). MethodA total of 23 therapists were randomized either to the BITE condition or the control condition (delayed video-based [DVB] supervision). After each session, both patients (BITE: n=19; DVB: n=23) and therapists (BITE: n=11; DVB: n=12) completed the Helping Alliance Questionnaire (HAQ) and the Bernese Post Session Report (BPSR). The HAQ total score and the 3 secondary factors of the BPSR (interpersonal experiences, intrapersonal experiences, problem actuation) functioned as GCMs. Multilevel models were performed. ResultsFor patients, GCMs did not develop differently between BITE and DVB during CBT. Therapists rated the alliance as well as interpersonal and intrapersonal experiences not significantly different between BITE and DVB during CBT, but they perceived problem actuation to increase significantly more in BITE than in DVB (p<.05). ConclusionBITE supervision might be helpful in encouraging CBT therapists to apply interventions, which focus on the activation of relevant problems and related emotions.}, language = {en} } @misc{KuehneAyOtterbecketal.2018, author = {K{\"u}hne, Franziska and Ay, Destina Sevde and Otterbeck, Mara Jasmin and Weck, Florian}, title = {Standardized Patients in Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy}, series = {Academic psychiatry}, volume = {42}, journal = {Academic psychiatry}, number = {6}, publisher = {Springer}, address = {New York}, issn = {1042-9670}, doi = {10.1007/s40596-018-0886-6}, pages = {773 -- 781}, year = {2018}, abstract = {ObjectivesThe use of simulated and standardized patients (SP) is widely accepted in the medical field and, from there, is beginning to disseminate into clinical psychology and psychotherapy. The purpose of this study was therefore to systematically review barriers and facilitators that should be considered in the implementation of SP interventions specific to clinical psychology and psychotherapy.MethodsFollowing current guidelines, a scoping review was conducted. The literature search focused on the MEDLINE, PsycINFO and Web of Science databases, including Dissertation Abstracts International. After screening for titles and abstracts, full texts were screened independently and in duplicate according to our inclusion criteria. For data extraction, a pre-defined form was piloted and used. Units of meaning with respect to barriers and facilitators were extracted and categorized inductively using content-analysis techniques. From the results, a matrix of interconnections and a network graph were compiled.ResultsThe 41 included publications were mainly in the fields of psychiatry and mental health nursing, as well as in training and education. The detailed category system contrasts four supercategories, i.e., which organizational and economic aspects to consider, which persons to include as eligible SPs, how to develop adequate scenarios, and how to authentically and consistently portray mental health patients.ConclusionsPublications focused especially on the interrelation between authenticity and consistency of portrayals, on how to evoke empathy in learners, and on economic and training aspects. A variety of recommendations for implementing SP programs, from planning to training, monitoring, and debriefing, is provided, for example, ethical screening of and ongoing support for SPs.}, language = {en} } @misc{KuehneAyOtterbecketal.2018, author = {K{\"u}hne, Franziska and Ay, Destina Sevde Ay and Otterbeck, Mara Jasmin and Weck, Florian}, title = {Standardized Patients in Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy}, series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam: Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe}, journal = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam: Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe}, number = {541}, doi = {10.25932/publishup-42696}, url = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-426965}, pages = {9}, year = {2018}, abstract = {Objectives: The use of simulated and standardized patients (SP) is widely accepted in the medical field and, from there, is beginning to disseminate into clinical psychology and psychotherapy. The purpose of this study was therefore to systematically review barriers and facilitators that should be considered in the implementation of SP interventions specific to clinical psychology and psychotherapy. Methods: Following current guidelines, a scoping review was conducted. The literature search focused on the MEDLINE,PsycINFO and Web of Science databases, including Dissertation Abstracts International. After screening for titles and abstracts,full texts were screened independently and in duplicate according to our inclusion criteria. For data extraction, a pre-defined form was piloted and used. Units of meaning with respect to barriers and facilitators were extracted and categorized inductively using content-analysis techniques. From the results, a matrix of interconnections and a network graph were compiled. Results: The 41 included publications were mainly in the fields of psychiatry and mental health nursing, as well as in training and education. The detailed category system contrasts four supercategories, i.e., which organizational and economic aspects to consider, which persons to include as eligible SPs, how to develop adequate scenarios, and how to authentically and consistently portray mental health patients.Conclusions: Publications focused especially on the interrelation between authenticity and consistency of portrayals, on how to evoke empathy in learners, and on economic and training aspects. A variety of recommendations for implementing SP programs,from planning to training, monitoring, and debriefing, is provided, for example, ethical screening of and ongoing support for SPs.}, language = {en} }