@article{SchroederTiberiusBounckenetal.2020,
  author    = {Schr{\"o}der, Katharina and Tiberius, Victor and Bouncken, Ricarda B. and Kraus, Sascha},
  title     = {Strategic entrepreneurship},
  series = {International journal of entrepreneurial behavior \& research},
  volume    = {27},
  journal   = {International journal of entrepreneurial behavior \& research},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {Emerald Group Publishing Limited},
  address   = {Bingley},
  issn      = {1355-2554},
  doi       = {10.1108/IJEBR-11-2020-0798},
  pages     = {753 -- 776},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Purpose: Strategic entrepreneurship (SE) depicts the nexus of strategic management and entrepreneurship, suggesting that firms can create superior wealth when simultaneously pursuing advantage-seeking and opportunity-seeking behavior. As the rapid growth in SE research led to a multidisciplinary, scattered and fragmented literature landscape, the authors aim to structure this research field. Design/methodology/approach: The authors employ a bibliographic coupling and literature review of the strategic entrepreneurship research field. Findings: The authors identify and describe five major research streams with 15 sub-themes in recent SE research. Based on our findings, the authors propose an integrated research framework and research gaps for future research. Originality/value: To the authors' knowledge, this is the first review on SE based on a bibliographic coupling.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{FilserTiberiusKrausetal.2020,
  author    = {Filser, Matthias and Tiberius, Victor and Kraus, Sascha and Zeitlhofer, Tanita and Kailer, Norbert and M{\"u}ller, Adrian},
  title     = {Opportunity recognition},
  series = {Entrepreneurship research journal},
  volume    = {13},
  journal   = {Entrepreneurship research journal},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {De Gruyter},
  address   = {Berlin},
  issn      = {2194-6175},
  doi       = {10.1515/erj-2020-0124},
  pages     = {1 -- 30},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {This paper provides an overview of the ever-increasing literature on opportunity recognition, with a focus on its antecedents and determinants. With a two-step research approach, a bibliometric analysis and a systematic literature review, we structure the current research in this field. By using bibliometric techniques, we analyzed 161 publications and, consequently, clustered the 30 most influential references. Apart from economic theories and the role of opportunity recognition in entrepreneurship, a strong research focus is on antecedents of opportunity recognition. Therefore, in our subsequent literature review, we focus on determinants which influence opportunity recognition. We find that the opportunity recognition process is influenced by various personal, organizational and environmental factors. We conclude with a research outlook for future research opportunities on opportunity recognition.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{LutherTiberiusBrem2020,
  author    = {Luther, Laura and Tiberius, Victor and Brem, Alexander},
  title     = {User experience (UX) in business, management, and psychology},
  series = {Multimodal technologies and interaction : open access journal},
  volume    = {4},
  journal   = {Multimodal technologies and interaction : open access journal},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {MDPI},
  address   = {Basel},
  issn      = {2414-4088},
  doi       = {10.3390/mti4020018},
  pages     = {19},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {User Experience (UX) describes the holistic experience of a user before, during, and after interaction with a platform, product, or service. UX adds value and attraction to their sole functionality and is therefore highly relevant for firms. The increased interest in UX has produced a vast amount of scholarly research since 1983. The research field is, therefore, complex and scattered. Conducting a bibliometric analysis, we aim at structuring the field quantitatively and rather abstractly. We employed citation analyses, co-citation analyses, and content analyses to evaluate productivity and impact of extant research. We suggest that future research should focus more on business and management related topics.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KruggelTiberiusFabro2020,
  author    = {Kruggel, Alexander and Tiberius, Victor and Fabro, Manuela},
  title     = {Corporate Citizenship},
  series = {Sustainability},
  volume    = {12},
  journal   = {Sustainability},
  number    = {13},
  publisher = {MDPI},
  address   = {Basel},
  issn      = {2071-1050},
  doi       = {10.3390/su12135289},
  pages     = {19},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Corporate citizenship, which is firms' societal engagement beyond customer and shareholder interests, is a prominent topic in management practice and has led to extensive research. This increased interest resulted in a complex and fragmented scholarly literature. In order to structure and map the field quantitatively, we conducted a temporal analysis of publications and citations, an analysis of the productivity of involved disciplines, an analysis of the productivity of publication forms including journal impact factors, an author productivity and citation analysis, a co-author analysis, an article citation analysis, an article co-citation analysis, and a keyword co-occurrence analysis. Results of these bibliometric analyses show that corporate citizenship research seems to have been in a phase of stagnation since 2014 and shows a rather low degree of interdisciplinarity. Papers are predominantly published in high impact journals. Authors show little collaboration with other researchers. Current research relates to other business ethics topics, addresses philosophical foundations, and starts to relate to human resource management and organization studies.},
  language  = {en}
}