@article{LiBuenningKaiseretal.2022,
  author    = {Li, Jianghong and B{\"u}nning, Mareike and Kaiser, Till and Hipp, Lena},
  title     = {Who suffered most?},
  series = {Journal of family research},
  volume    = {34},
  journal   = {Journal of family research},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {University of Bamberg Press},
  address   = {Bamberg},
  issn      = {2699-2337},
  doi       = {10.20377/jfr-704},
  pages     = {281 -- 309},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Objective: This study examines gender and socioeconomic inequalities in parental psychological wellbeing (parenting stress and psychological distress) during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany. Background: The dramatic shift of childcare and schooling responsibility from formal institutions to private households during the pandemic has put families under enormous stress and raised concerns about caregivers' health and wellbeing. Despite the overwhelming media attention to families' wellbeing, to date limited research has examined parenting stress and parental psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly in Germany. Method: We analyzed four waves of panel data (N= 1,771) from an opt-in online survey, which was conducted between March 2020 and April 2021. Multivariable OLS regressions were used to estimate variations in the pandemic's effects on parenting stress and psychological distress by various demographic and socioeconomic characteristics. Results: Overall, levels of parenting stress and psychological distress increased during the pandemic. During the first and third wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, mothers, parents with children younger than 11 years, parents with two or more children, parents working from home as well as parents with financial insecurity experienced higher parenting stress than other sociodemographic groups. Moreover, women, respondents with lower incomes, single parents, and parents with younger children experienced higher levels of psychological distress than other groups. Conclusion: Gender and socioeconomic inequalities in parents' psychological wellbeing increased among the study participants during the pandemic.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{JacobsWollnySeidleretal.2020,
  author    = {Jacobs, Ingo and Wollny, Anna and Seidler, Juliana and Wochatz, Germar},
  title     = {A trait emotional intelligence perspective on schema modes},
  series = {Scandinavian Journal of Psychology},
  volume    = {62},
  journal   = {Scandinavian Journal of Psychology},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Wiley},
  address   = {Hoboken},
  issn      = {0036-5564},
  doi       = {10.1111/sjop.12670},
  pages     = {227 -- 236},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Schema modes (ormodes) are a key concept in the theory underlying schema therapy. Modes have rarely been related to established models of personality traits. The present study thus investigates the associations between trait emotional intelligence (TEI) and 14 modes, and tests a global TEI-mode factors-general psychological distress mediation model. The study draws on self-report data from 173 inpatients from a German clinic for psychosomatic medicine. Global TEI correlated positively with both healthy modes (happy child and healthy adult) and negatively with 10 maladaptive modes. When modes were regressed on the four TEI factors, six (emotionality), five (well-being), four (sociability), and four (self-control) significant partial effects on 10 modes emerged. In the parallel mediation model, the mode factors internalization and compulsivity fully mediated the global TEI-general psychological distress link. Implications of the results for the integration of modes with traits in general and with TEI in particular as well as implications of low TEI as a transdiagnostic feature of personality malfunctioning are discussed.},
  language  = {en}
}