@article{KaanLiese2011,
  author    = {Kaan, Christopher and Liese, Andrea Margit},
  title     = {Public private partnerships in global food governance: business engagement and legitimacy in the global fight against hunger and malnutrition},
  series = {Agriculture and human values : journal of the Agriculture, Food, and Human Values Society},
  volume    = {28},
  journal   = {Agriculture and human values : journal of the Agriculture, Food, and Human Values Society},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Dordrecht},
  issn      = {0889-048X},
  doi       = {10.1007/s10460-009-9255-0},
  pages     = {385 -- 399},
  year      = {2011},
  abstract  = {This article compares two transnational public-private partnerships against hunger and malnutrition, the Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition and the International Alliance Against Hunger with regard to their degree of business involvement and their input and output legimacy. We examine the participation of stakeholders, the accountability and transparency of the decision-making process, and the perceived provision of a public good. We identify a link between business involvement and output legitimacy, and we discuss the implications for public and private food governance.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Lederer2011,
  author    = {Lederer, Markus},
  title     = {From CDM to REDD+ - what do we know for setting up effective and legitimate carbon governance?},
  series = {Ecological economics},
  volume    = {70},
  journal   = {Ecological economics},
  number    = {11},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Amsterdam},
  issn      = {0921-8009},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.02.003},
  pages     = {1900 -- 1907},
  year      = {2011},
  abstract  = {This article compares two carbon governance instruments - the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) and Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD+) - to assess lessons from the former for the latter regarding effectiveness and legitimacy of such instruments. The article argues that the CDM has a relatively high degree of output-oriented legitimacy resulting in effectiveness and some input-oriented legitimacy, with few discernible tradeoffs between them. In contrasting this to REDD+, the hypotheses are advanced that (i) output-oriented legitimacy/effectiveness can again be achieved but that (ii) a higher degree of input-oriented legitimacy is necessary for REDD+ and thus also a certain trade-off between the two forms of legitimacy can be expected. This is shown through comparing the technologies and methodologies, economic rationales, political support, regulatory structures, and environmental impacts of both instruments.},
  language  = {en}
}