@phdthesis{Logačev2014,
  author    = {Logačev, Pavel},
  title     = {Underspecification and parallel processing in sentence comprehension},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-82047},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {The aim of the present thesis is to answer the question to what degree the processes involved in sentence comprehension are sensitive to task demands. A central phenomenon in this regard is the so-called ambiguity advantage, which is the finding that ambiguous sentences can be easier to process than unambiguous sentences. This finding may appear counterintuitive, because more meanings should be associated with a higher computational effort. Currently, two theories exist that can explain this finding. The Unrestricted Race Model (URM) by van Gompel et al. (2001) assumes that several sentence interpretations are computed in parallel, whenever possible, and that the first interpretation to be computed is assigned to the sentence. Because the duration of each structure-building process varies from trial to trial, the parallelism in structure-building predicts that ambiguous sentences should be processed faster. This is because when two structures are permissible, the chances that some interpretation will be computed quickly are higher than when only one specific structure is permissible. Importantly, the URM is not sensitive to task demands such as the type of comprehension questions being asked. A radically different proposal is the strategic underspecification model by Swets et al. (2008). It assumes that readers do not attempt to resolve ambiguities unless it is absolutely necessary. In other words, they underspecify. According the strategic underspecification hypothesis, all attested replications of the ambiguity advantage are due to the fact that in those experiments, readers were not required to fully understand the sentence. In this thesis, these two models of the parser's actions at choice-points in the sentence are presented and evaluated. First, it is argued that the Swets et al.'s (2008) evidence against the URM and in favor of underspecification is inconclusive. Next, the precise predictions of the URM as well as the underspecification model are refined. Subsequently, a self-paced reading experiment involving the attachment of pre-nominal relative clauses in Turkish is presented, which provides evidence against strategical underspecification. A further experiment is presented which investigated relative clause attachment in German using the speed-accuracy tradeoff (SAT) paradigm. The experiment provides evidence against strategic underspecification and in favor of the URM. Furthermore the results of the experiment are used to argue that human sentence comprehension is fallible, and that theories of parsing should be able to account for that fact. Finally, a third experiment is presented, which provides evidence for the sensitivity to task demands in the treatment of ambiguities. Because this finding is incompatible with the URM, and because the strategic underspecification model has been ruled out, a new model of ambiguity resolution is proposed: the stochastic multiple-channel model of ambiguity resolution (SMCM). It is further shown that the quantitative predictions of the SMCM are in agreement with experimental data. In conclusion, it is argued that the human sentence comprehension system is parallel and fallible, and that it is sensitive to task-demands.},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{BacskaiAtkari2014,
  author    = {Bacskai-Atkari, Julia},
  title     = {The syntax of comparative constructions : operators, ellipsis phenomena and functional left peripheries},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {978-3-86956-301-5},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-71255},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {xiii, 310},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {Adopting a minimalist framework, the dissertation provides an analysis for the syntactic structure of comparatives, with special attention paid to the derivation of the subclause. The proposed account explains how the comparative subclause is connected to the matrix clause, how the subclause is formed in the syntax and what additional processes contribute to its final structure. In addition, it casts light upon these problems in cross-linguistic terms and provides a model that allows for synchronic and diachronic differences. This also enables one to give a more adequate explanation for the phenomena found in English comparatives since the properties of English structures can then be linked to general settings of the language and hence need no longer be considered as idiosyncratic features of the grammar of English. First, the dissertation provides a unified analysis of degree expressions, relating the structure of comparatives to that of other degrees. It is shown that gradable adjectives are located within a degree phrase (DegP), which in turn projects a quantifier phrase (QP) and that these two functional layers are always present, irrespectively of whether there is a phonologically visible element in these layers. Second, the dissertation presents a novel analysis of Comparative Deletion by reducing it to an overtness constraint holding on operators: in this way, it is reduced to morphological differences and cross-linguistic variation is not conditioned by way of postulating an arbitrary parameter. Cross-linguistic differences are ultimately dependent on whether a language has overt operators equipped with the relevant - [+compr] and [+rel] - features. Third, the dissertation provides an adequate explanation for the phenomenon of Attributive Comparative Deletion, as attested in English, by way of relating it to the regular mechanism of Comparative Deletion. I assume that Attributive Comparative Deletion is not a universal phenomenon, and its presence in English can be conditioned by independent, more general rules, while the absence of such restrictions leads to its absence in other languages. Fourth, the dissertation accounts for certain phenomena related to diachronic changes, examining how the changes in the status of comparative operators led to changes in whether Comparative Deletion is attested in a given language: I argue that only operators without a lexical XP can be grammaticalised. The underlying mechanisms underlying are essentially general economy principles and hence the processes are not language-specific or exceptional. Fifth, the dissertation accounts for optional ellipsis processes that play a crucial role in the derivation of typical comparative subclauses. These processes are not directly related to the structure of degree expressions and hence the elimination of the quantified expression from the subclause; nevertheless, they are shown to be in interaction with the mechanisms underlying Comparative Deletion or the absence thereof.},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{BrandtKobele2014,
  author    = {Brandt-Kobele, Oda-Christina},
  title     = {Comprehension of verb inflection in German-speaking children},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {978-3-86956-216-2},
  issn      = {1869-3822},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-62046},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {xx, 325},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {Previous studies on the acquisition of verb inflection in normally developing children have revealed an astonishing pattern: children use correctly inflected verbs in their own speech but fail to make use of verb inflections when comprehending sentences uttered by others. Thus, a three-year old might well be able to say something like 'The cat sleeps on the bed', but fails to understand that the same sentence, when uttered by another person, refers to only one sleeping cat but not more than one. The previous studies that have examined children's comprehension of verb inflections have employed a variant of a picture selection task in which the child was asked to explicitly indicate (via pointing) what semantic meaning she had inferred from the test sentence. Recent research on other linguistic structures, such as pronouns or focus particles, has indicated that earlier comprehension abilities can be found when methods are used that do not require an explicit reaction, like preferential looking tasks. This dissertation aimed to examine whether children are truly not able to understand the connection the the verb form and the meaning of the sentence subject until the age of five years or whether earlier comprehension can be found when a different measure, preferential looking, is used. Additionally, children's processing of subject-verb agreement violations was examined. The three experiments of this thesis that examined children's comprehension of verb inflections revealed the following: German-speaking three- to four-year old children looked more to a picture showing one actor when hearing a sentence with a singular inflected verb but only when their eye gaze was tracked and they did not have to perform a picture selection task. When they were asked to point to the matching picture, they performed at chance-level. This pattern indicates asymmetries in children's language performance even within the receptive modality. The fourth experiment examined sensitivity to subject-verb agreement violations and did not reveal evidence for sensitivity toward agreement violations in three- and four-year old children, but only found that children's looking patterns were influenced by the grammatical violations at the age of five. The results from these experiments are discussed in relation to the existence of a production-comprehension asymmetry in the use of verb inflections and children's underlying grammatical knowledge.},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Schultheiss2014,
  author    = {Schultheiss, Corinna},
  title     = {Die Bewertung der pharyngalen Schluckphase mittels Bioimpedanz},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {978-3-86956-284-1},
  issn      = {1869-3822},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus-69589},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {XV, 108},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {Schlucken ist ein lebensnotwendiger Prozess, dessen Diagnose und Therapie eine enorme Herausforderung bedeutet. Die Erkennung und Beurteilung von Schlucken und Schluckst{\"o}rungen erfordert den Einsatz von technisch aufwendigen Verfahren, wie Videofluoroskopie (VFSS) und fiberoptisch-endoskopische Schluckuntersuchung (FEES), die eine hohe Belastung f{\"u}r die Patienten darstellen. Beide Verfahren werden als Goldstandard in der Diagnostik von Schluckst{\"o}rungen eingesetzt. Die Durchf{\"u}hrung obliegt in der Regel {\"a}rztlichem Personal. Dar{\"u}ber hinaus erfordert die Auswertung des Bildmaterials der Diagnostik eine ausreichend hohe Erfahrung. In der Therapie findet neben den klassischen Therapiemethoden, wie z.B. di{\"a}tetische Modifikationen und Schluckman{\"o}ver, auch zunehmend die funktionelle Elektrostimulation Anwendung. Ziel der vorliegenden Dissertationsschrift ist die Evaluation eines im Verbundprojekt BigDysPro entwickelten Bioimpedanz (BI)- und Elektromyographie (EMG)-Messsystems. Es wurde gepr{\"u}ft, ob sich das BI- und EMG-Messsystem eignet, sowohl in der Diagnostik als auch in der Therapie als eigenst{\"a}ndiges Messsystem und im Rahmen einer Schluckneuroprothese eingesetzt zu werden. In verschiedenen Studien wurden gesunde Probanden f{\"u}r die {\"U}berpr{\"u}fung der Reproduzierbarkeit (Intra-und Interrater-Reliabilit{\"a}t), der Unterscheidbarkeit von Schluck- und Kopfbewegungen und der Beeinflussung der Biosignale (BI, EMG) durch verschiedene Faktoren (Geschlecht der Probanden, Leitf{\"a}higkeit, Konsistenz und Menge der Nahrung) untersucht. Durch zus{\"a}tzliche Untersuchungen mit Patienten wurde einerseits der Einfluss der Elektrodenart gepr{\"u}ft. Andererseits wurden parallel zur BI- und EMG-Messung auch endoskopische (FEES) und radiologische Schluckuntersuchungen (VFSS) durchgef{\"u}hrt, um die Korrelation der Biosignale mit der Bewegung anatomischer Strukturen (VFSS) und mit der Schluckqualit{\"a}t (FEES) zu pr{\"u}fen. Es wurden 31 gesunde Probanden mit 1819 Schlucken und 60 Patienten mit 715 Schlucken untersucht. Die Messkurven zeigten einen typischen, reproduzierbaren Signalverlauf, der mit anatomischen und funktionellen {\"A}nderungen w{\"a}hrend der pharyngalen Schluckphase in der VFSS korrelierte (r > 0,7). Aus dem Bioimpedanzsignal konnten Merkmale extrahiert werden, die mit physiologischen Merkmalen eines Schluckes, wie verz{\"o}gerter laryngealer Verschluss und Kehlkopfhebung, korrelierten und eine Einsch{\"a}tzung der Schluckqualit{\"a}t in {\"U}bereinstimmung mit der FEES erm{\"o}glichten. In den Signalverl{\"a}ufen der Biosignale konnten signifikante Unterschiede zwischen Schluck- und Kopfbewegungen und den Nahrungsmengen und -konsistenzen nachgewiesen werden. Im Gegensatz zur Nahrungsmenge und -konsistenz zeigte die Leitf{\"a}higkeit der zu schluckenden Nahrung, das Geschlecht der Probanden und die Art der Elektroden keinen signifikanten Einfluss auf die Messsignale. Mit den Ergebnissen der Evaluation konnte gezeigt werden, dass mit dem BI- und EMG-Messsystem ein neuartiges und nicht-invasives Verfahren zur Verf{\"u}gung steht, das eine reproduzierbare Darstellung der pharyngalen Schluckphase und ihrer Ver{\"a}nderungen erm{\"o}glicht. Daraus ergeben sich vielseitige Einsatzm{\"o}glichkeiten in der Diagnostik, z.B. Langzeitmessung zur Schluckfrequenz und Einsch{\"a}tzung der Schluckqualit{\"a}t, und in der Therapie, z.B. der Einsatz in einer Schluckneuroprothese oder als Biofeedback zur Darstellung des Schluckes, von Schluckst{\"o}rungen.},
  language  = {de}
}