@article{MetinNguyenVietDungSchroeteretal.2018, author = {Metin, Ayse Duha and Nguyen Viet Dung, and Schr{\"o}ter, Kai and Guse, Bj{\"o}rn and Apel, Heiko and Kreibich, Heidi and Vorogushyn, Sergiy and Merz, Bruno}, title = {How do changes along the risk chain affect flood risk?}, series = {Natural hazards and earth system sciences}, volume = {18}, journal = {Natural hazards and earth system sciences}, number = {11}, publisher = {Copernicus}, address = {G{\"o}ttingen}, issn = {1561-8633}, doi = {10.5194/nhess-18-3089-2018}, pages = {3089 -- 3108}, year = {2018}, abstract = {Flood risk is impacted by a range of physical and socio-economic processes. Hence, the quantification of flood risk ideally considers the complete flood risk chain, from atmospheric processes through catchment and river system processes to damage mechanisms in the affected areas. Although it is generally accepted that a multitude of changes along the risk chain can occur and impact flood risk, there is a lack of knowledge of how and to what extent changes in influencing factors propagate through the chain and finally affect flood risk. To fill this gap, we present a comprehensive sensitivity analysis which considers changes in all risk components, i.e. changes in climate, catchment, river system, land use, assets, and vulnerability. The application of this framework to the mesoscale Mulde catchment in Germany shows that flood risk can vary dramatically as a consequence of plausible change scenarios. It further reveals that components that have not received much attention, such as changes in dike systems or in vulnerability, may outweigh changes in often investigated components, such as climate. Although the specific results are conditional on the case study area and the selected assumptions, they emphasize the need for a broader consideration of potential drivers of change in a comprehensive way. Hence, our approach contributes to a better understanding of how the different risk components influence the overall flood risk.}, language = {en} } @article{DoThiChinhBubeckNguyenVietDungetal.2016, author = {Do Thi Chinh, and Bubeck, Philip and Nguyen Viet Dung, and Kreibich, Heidi}, title = {The 2011 flood event in the Mekong Delta: preparedness, response, damage and recovery of private households and small businesses}, series = {Disasters : the journal of disaster studies, policy and management}, volume = {40}, journal = {Disasters : the journal of disaster studies, policy and management}, publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell}, address = {Hoboken}, issn = {0361-3666}, doi = {10.1111/disa.12171}, pages = {753 -- 778}, year = {2016}, abstract = {Floods frequently cause substantial economic and human losses, particularly in developing countries. For the development of sound flood risk management schemes that reduce flood consequences, detailed insights into the different components of the flood risk management cycle, such as preparedness, response, flood impact analyses and recovery, are needed. However, such detailed insights are often lacking: commonly, only (aggregated) data on direct flood damage are available. Other damage categories such as losses owing to the disruption of production processes are usually not considered, resulting in incomplete risk assessments and possibly inappropriate recommendations for risk management. In this paper, data from 858 face-to-face interviews among flood-prone households and small businesses in Can Tho city in the Vietnamese Mekong Delta are presented to gain better insights into the damage caused by the 2011 flood event and its management by households and businesses.}, language = {en} } @article{NguyenVietDungMerzBardossyetal.2015, author = {Nguyen Viet Dung, and Merz, Bruno and Bardossy, Andras and Apel, Heiko}, title = {Handling uncertainty in bivariate quantile estimation - An application to flood hazard analysis in the Mekong Delta}, series = {Journal of hydrology}, volume = {527}, journal = {Journal of hydrology}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {Amsterdam}, issn = {0022-1694}, doi = {10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.05.033}, pages = {704 -- 717}, year = {2015}, abstract = {The hydrological load causing flood hazard is in many instances not only determined by peak discharge, but is a multidimensional problem. While the methodology for multivariate frequency analysis is well established, the estimation of the associated uncertainty is rarely studied. In this paper, a method is developed to quantify the different sources of uncertainty for a bivariate flood frequency analysis. The method is exemplarily developed for the Mekong Delta (MD), one of the largest and most densely populated river deltas worldwide. Floods in the MD are the basis for the livelihoods of the local population, but they are also the major hazard. This hazard has, however, not been studied within the frame of a probabilistic flood hazard analysis. The nature of the floods in the MD suggests a bivariate approach, because the societal flood severity is determined by both peak discharge and flood volume. The uncertainty caused by selection of statistical models and parameter estimation procedures are analyzed by applying different models and methods. For the quantification of the sampling uncertainty two bootstrapping methods were applied. The developed bootstrapping-based uncertainty estimation method shows that large uncertainties are associated with the estimation of bivariate flood quantiles. This uncertainty is much larger than the model selection and fitting uncertainty. Given the rather long data series of 88 years, it is concluded that bivariate flood frequency analysis is expected to carry significant uncertainty and that the quantification and reduction of uncertainty merit greater attention. But despite this uncertainty the proposed approach has certainly major advantages compared to a univariate approach, because (a) it reflects the two essential aspects of floods in this region, (b) the uncertainties are inherent for every bivariate frequency analysis in hydrology due to the general limited length of observations and can hardly be avoided, and (c) a framework for the quantification of the uncertainties is given, which can be used and interpreted in the hazard assessment. In addition it is shown by a parametric bootstrapping experiment how longer observation time series can reduce the sampling uncertainty. Based on this finding it is concluded that bivariate frequency analyses in hydrology would greatly benefit from discharge time series augmented by proxy or historical data, or by causal hydrologic expansion of time series. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.}, language = {en} } @article{SunLallMerzetal.2015, author = {Sun, Xun and Lall, Upmanu and Merz, Bruno and Nguyen Viet Dung,}, title = {Hierarchical Bayesian clustering for nonstationary flood frequency analysis: Application to trends of annual maximum flow in Germany}, series = {Water resources research}, volume = {51}, journal = {Water resources research}, number = {8}, publisher = {American Geophysical Union}, address = {Washington}, issn = {0043-1397}, doi = {10.1002/2015WR017117}, pages = {6586 -- 6601}, year = {2015}, abstract = {Especially for extreme precipitation or floods, there is considerable spatial and temporal variability in long term trends or in the response of station time series to large-scale climate indices. Consequently, identifying trends or sensitivity of these extremes to climate parameters can be marked by high uncertainty. When one develops a nonstationary frequency analysis model, a key step is the identification of potential trends or effects of climate indices on the station series. An automatic clustering procedure that effectively pools stations where there are similar responses is desirable to reduce the estimation variance, thus improving the identification of trends or responses, and accounting for spatial dependence. This paper presents a new hierarchical Bayesian approach for exploring homogeneity of response in large area data sets, through a multicomponent mixture model. The approach allows the reduction of uncertainties through both full pooling and partial pooling of stations across automatically chosen subsets of the data. We apply the model to study the trends in annual maximum daily stream flow at 68 gauges over Germany. The effects of changing the number of clusters and the parameters used for clustering are demonstrated. The results show that there are large, mainly upward trends in the gauges of the River Rhine Basin in Western Germany and along the main stream of the Danube River in the south, while there are also some small upward trends at gauges in Central and Northern Germany.}, language = {en} }