@article{UhlemannWartenburgerHilton2022,
  author    = {Uhlemann, Charlotte and Wartenburger, Isabell and Hilton, Matt},
  title     = {Express yourself!},
  series = {Spektrum Patholinguistik 15},
  journal   = {Spektrum Patholinguistik 15},
  number    = {15},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {978-3-86956-542-2},
  issn      = {1866-9433},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-57239},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-572395},
  pages     = {107 -- 117},
  year      = {2022},
  language  = {de}
}
@misc{FrankFrankMohretal.2022,
  author    = {Frank, Ulrike and Frank, Katrin and Mohr, Bettina and Kurtenbach, Stephanie and Khader-Lindholz, Aischa and Sallat, Stephan and Wagner, Lilli and D{\"u}ring, Sarah and Lubitz, Anika and Schnelle, Kirsten and Klitsch, Julia and Netzebandt, Jonka and Fritsche, Tom and Uhlemann, Charlotte and Wartenburger, Isabell and Hilton, Matt and Neitzel, Isabel and Schmidt, Johanna and Eikerling, Maren and Cholin, Joana and Menze, Clara and Stadie, Nicole and Schmitz-Antonischki, Dorit and Heide, Judith and Plath, Almut and Corsten, Sabine and Hoffmann, Marie and Leinweber, Juliane and Spelter, Bianca and Karstens, Sven},
  title     = {Spektrum Patholinguistik Band 15. Schwerpunktthema: Interdisziplin{\"a}r behandeln - Multiprofessionelle Zusammenarbeit in der Sprachtherapie},
  series = {Spektrum Patholinguistik},
  journal   = {Spektrum Patholinguistik},
  number    = {15},
  editor    = {Tan, Sarah and D{\"u}ring, Sarah and Wilde, Alina and Wunderlich, Hanna and Fritzsche, Tom},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {978-3-86956-542-2},
  issn      = {1866-9433},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-55820},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-558206},
  pages     = {vii, 180},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Das 15. Herbsttreffen Patholinguistik mit dem Schwerpunktthema »Interdisziplin{\"a}r (be-)handeln - Multiprofessionelle Zusammenarbeit in der Sprachtherapie« fand am 20.11.2021 als Online-Veranstaltung statt. Das Herbsttreffen wird seit 2007 j{\"a}hrlich vom Verband f{\"u}r Patholinguistik e.V. (vpl), seit 2021 vom Deutschen Bundesverband f{\"u}r akademische Sprachtherapie und Logop{\"a}die (dbs) in Kooperation mit der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam durchgef{\"u}hrt. Der vorliegende Tagungsband beinhaltet die Vortr{\"a}ge zum Schwerpunktthema und Informationen aus der Podiumsdiskussion sowie die Posterpr{\"a}sentationen zu weiteren Themen aus der sprachtherapeutischen Forschung und Praxis.},
  language  = {de}
}
@article{HiltonTwomeyWestermann2019,
  author    = {Hilton, Matt and Twomey, Katherine Elizabeth and Westermann, Gert},
  title     = {Taking their eye off the ball},
  series = {Journal of experimental child psychology},
  volume    = {183},
  journal   = {Journal of experimental child psychology},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {New York},
  issn      = {0022-0965},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.jecp.2019.01.023},
  pages     = {134 -- 145},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {The current study tests the hypothesis that shy children's reduced word learning is partly due to an effect of shyness on attention during object labeling. A sample of 20- and 26-month-old children (N = 32) took part in a looking-while-listening task in which they saw sets of familiar and novel objects while hearing familiar or novel labels. Overall, children increased attention to familiar objects when hearing their labels, and they divided their attention equally between the target and competitors when hearing novel labels. Critically, shyness reduced attention to the target object regardless of whether the heard label was novel or familiar. When children's retention of the novel word-object mappings was tested after a delay, it was found that children who showed increased attention to novel objects during labeling showed better retention. Taken together, these findings suggest that shyer children perform less well than their less shy peers on measures of word learning because their attention to the target object is dampened. Thus, this work presents evidence that shyness modulates the low-level processes of visual attention that unfold during word learning.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{HiltonRaelingWartenburgeretal.2019,
  author    = {Hilton, Matt and R{\"a}ling, Romy and Wartenburger, Isabell and Elsner, Birgit},
  title     = {Parallels in Processing Boundary Cues in Speech and Action},
  series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  journal   = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  number    = {579},
  issn      = {1866-8364},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-43797},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-437975},
  pages     = {12},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Speech and action sequences are continuous streams of information that can be segmented into sub-units. In both domains, this segmentation can be facilitated by perceptual cues contained within the information stream. In speech, prosodic cues (e.g., a pause, pre-boundary lengthening, and pitch rise) mark boundaries between words and phrases, while boundaries between actions of an action sequence can be marked by kinematic cues (e.g., a pause, pre-boundary deceleration). The processing of prosodic boundary cues evokes an Event-related Potentials (ERP) component known as the Closure Positive Shift (CPS), and it is possible that the CPS reflects domaingeneral cognitive processes involved in segmentation, given that the CPS is also evoked by boundaries between subunits of non-speech auditory stimuli. This study further probed the domain-generality of the CPS and its underlying processes by investigating electrophysiological correlates of the processing of boundary cues in sequences of spoken verbs (auditory stimuli; Experiment 1; N = 23 adults) and actions (visual stimuli; Experiment 2; N = 23 adults). The EEG data from both experiments revealed a CPS-like broadly distributed positivity during the 250 ms prior to the onset of the post-boundary word or action, indicating similar electrophysiological correlates of boundary processing across domains, suggesting that the cognitive processes underlying speech and action segmentation might also be shared.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{HiltonRaelingWartenburgeretal.2019,
  author    = {Hilton, Matt and R{\"a}ling, Romy and Wartenburger, Isabell and Elsner, Birgit},
  title     = {Parallels in Processing Boundary Cues in Speech and Action},
  series = {Frontiers in Psychology},
  volume    = {10},
  journal   = {Frontiers in Psychology},
  publisher = {Frontiers Research Foundation},
  address   = {Lausanne},
  issn      = {1664-1078},
  doi       = {10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01566},
  pages     = {12},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Speech and action sequences are continuous streams of information that can be segmented into sub-units. In both domains, this segmentation can be facilitated by perceptual cues contained within the information stream. In speech, prosodic cues (e.g., a pause, pre-boundary lengthening, and pitch rise) mark boundaries between words and phrases, while boundaries between actions of an action sequence can be marked by kinematic cues (e.g., a pause, pre-boundary deceleration). The processing of prosodic boundary cues evokes an Event-related Potentials (ERP) component known as the Closure Positive Shift (CPS), and it is possible that the CPS reflects domaingeneral cognitive processes involved in segmentation, given that the CPS is also evoked by boundaries between subunits of non-speech auditory stimuli. This study further probed the domain-generality of the CPS and its underlying processes by investigating electrophysiological correlates of the processing of boundary cues in sequences of spoken verbs (auditory stimuli; Experiment 1; N = 23 adults) and actions (visual stimuli; Experiment 2; N = 23 adults). The EEG data from both experiments revealed a CPS-like broadly distributed positivity during the 250 ms prior to the onset of the post-boundary word or action, indicating similar electrophysiological correlates of boundary processing across domains, suggesting that the cognitive processes underlying speech and action segmentation might also be shared.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{HiltonWestermann2017,
  author    = {Hilton, Matt and Westermann, Gert},
  title     = {word-object mappings},
  series = {Journal of child language},
  volume    = {44},
  journal   = {Journal of child language},
  publisher = {Cambridge Univ. Press},
  address   = {New York},
  issn      = {0305-0009},
  doi       = {10.1017/S030500091600057X},
  pages     = {1394 -- 1412},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {This study set out to examine whether shyness, an aversion to novelty and unfamiliar social situations, can affect the processes that underlie early word learning. Twenty-four-month-old children (n =32) were presented with sets of one novel and two familiar objects, and it was found that shyer children were less likely to select a novel object as the referent of a novel label. Furthermore, not-shy children then showed evidence of retaining these novel mappings, but shy children did not. These findings suggest that shy children's aversion to novelty and to the unfamiliar context can impact on their word learning.},
  language  = {en}
}