@article{CelebiKraheSpoerer2014,
  author    = {Celebi, Christin and Krah{\´e}, Barbara and Sp{\"o}rer, Nadine},
  title     = {Strengthened for the teaching profession: promoting professional competencies in teacher training students},
  series = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r p{\"a}dagogische Psychologie.},
  volume    = {28},
  journal   = {Zeitschrift f{\"u}r p{\"a}dagogische Psychologie.},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {Hogrefe},
  address   = {Bern},
  issn      = {1010-0652},
  doi       = {10.1024/1010-0652/a000128},
  pages     = {115 -- 126},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {A quasi-experimental study with N = 293 participants studying toward a teaching degree examined the efficacy of the intervention program "Strengthened for the teaching profession". In a pre-, intermediate- and post-test control group design, three treatment conditions that focused (1) on their individual professional strengths, (2) professional weaknesses, or (3) a combination of strengths and weaknesses were compared to a no-treatment control condition. Both at intermediate test and at posttest, students in the three intervention conditions scored higher than students in the control group on measures of self-efficacy and professional self-regulation. The combined intervention condition was more successful at promoting professional self-efficacy and self-regulation than the intervention focusing either on strengths or relative weaknesses only. The implications of the findings for teacher training are discussed.},
  language  = {de}
}