@misc{Hassler2015,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Evidentiality and the expression of speaker's stance in Romance languages and German},
  series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Philosophische Reihe},
  journal   = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Philosophische Reihe},
  number    = {138},
  issn      = {1866-8380},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-404492},
  pages     = {28},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {In recent years, the category of evidentiality has also come into use for the description of Romance languages and of German. This has been contingent on a change in its interpretation from a typological category to a semantic-pragmatic category, which allows an application to languages lacking specialised morphemes for the expression of evidentiality. We consider evidentiality to be a structural dimension of grammar, the values of which are expressed by types of constructions that code the source of information which a speaker imparts. If we look at the situation in Romance languages and in German, drawing a boundary between epistemic modality and evidentiality presents problems that are difficult to solve. Adding markers of the source of the speaker's knowledge often limits the degree of responsibility of the speaker for the content of the utterance. Evidential adverbs are a frequently used means of marking the source of the speaker's knowledge. The evidential meaning is generalised to marking any source of knowledge, what can be regarded as a result of a process of pragmaticalisation. The use of certain means which also carry out evidential markings can even contribute to the blurring of the different kinds of evidentiality. German also has modal verbs which in conjunction with the perfect tense of the verb have a predominantly evidential use (sollen and wollen). But even here the evidential marking is not without influence on the modality of the utterance. The Romance languages, however, do not have such specialised verbs for expressing evidentiality in certain contexts. To do this, they mark evidentiality - often context bound - by verb forms such as the conditional and the imperfect tense. This article shall contrast the different architectures used in expressing evidentiality in German and in the Romance languages.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Hassler2014,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Evidentiality and the expression of speaker's stance in Romance languages and German},
  series = {Discourse Studies : an interdisciplinary journal for the study of text and talk},
  volume    = {17},
  journal   = {Discourse Studies : an interdisciplinary journal for the study of text and talk},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Sage Publications},
  address   = {London},
  issn      = {1461-4456},
  doi       = {10.1177/1461445614564522},
  pages     = {182 -- 209},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {In recent years, the category of evidentiality has also come into use for the description of Romance languages and of German. This has been contingent on a change in its interpretation from a typological category to a semantic-pragmatic category, which allows an application to languages lacking specialised morphemes for the expression of evidentiality. We consider evidentiality to be a structural dimension of grammar, the values of which are expressed by types of constructions that code the source of information which a speaker imparts. If we look at the situation in Romance languages and in German, drawing a boundary between epistemic modality and evidentiality presents problems that are difficult to solve. Adding markers of the source of the speaker's knowledge often limits the degree of responsibility of the speaker for the content of the utterance. Evidential adverbs are a frequently used means of marking the source of the speaker's knowledge. The evidential meaning is generalised to marking any source of knowledge, what can be regarded as a result of a process of pragmaticalisation. The use of certain means which also carry out evidential markings can even contribute to the blurring of the different kinds of evidentiality. German also has modal verbs which in conjunction with the perfect tense of the verb have a predominantly evidential use (sollen and wollen). But even here the evidential marking is not without influence on the modality of the utterance. The Romance languages, however, do not have such specialised verbs for expressing evidentiality in certain contexts. To do this, they mark evidentiality - often context bound - by verb forms such as the conditional and the imperfect tense. This article shall contrast the different architectures used in expressing evidentiality in German and in the Romance languages.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Hassler2015,
  author    = {Haßler, Gerda},
  title     = {Evidentiality and the expression of speaker's stance in Romance languages and German},
  series = {Discourse studies : an interdisciplinary journal for the study of text and talk},
  volume    = {17},
  journal   = {Discourse studies : an interdisciplinary journal for the study of text and talk},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {Sage Publ.},
  address   = {London},
  issn      = {1461-4456},
  doi       = {10.1177/1461445614564522},
  pages     = {182 -- 209},
  year      = {2015},
  abstract  = {In recent years, the category of evidentiality has also come into use for the description of Romance languages and of German. This has been contingent on a change in its interpretation from a typological category to a semantic-pragmatic category, which allows an application to languages lacking specialised morphemes for the expression of evidentiality. We consider evidentiality to be a structural dimension of grammar, the values of which are expressed by types of constructions that code the source of information which a speaker imparts. If we look at the situation in Romance languages and in German, drawing a boundary between epistemic modality and evidentiality presents problems that are difficult to solve. Adding markers of the source of the speaker's knowledge often limits the degree of responsibility of the speaker for the content of the utterance. Evidential adverbs are a frequently used means of marking the source of the speaker's knowledge. The evidential meaning is generalised to marking any source of knowledge, what can be regarded as a result of a process of pragmaticalisation. The use of certain means which also carry out evidential markings can even contribute to the blurring of the different kinds of evidentiality. German also has modal verbs which in conjunction with the perfect tense of the verb have a predominantly evidential use (sollen and wollen). But even here the evidential marking is not without influence on the modality of the utterance. The Romance languages, however, do not have such specialised verbs for expressing evidentiality in certain contexts. To do this, they mark evidentiality - often context bound - by verb forms such as the conditional and the imperfect tense. This article shall contrast the different architectures used in expressing evidentiality in German and in the Romance languages.},
  language  = {en}
}
@phdthesis{Hekkel2021,
  author    = {Hekkel, Valerie},
  title     = {Eine soziolinguistische Betrachtung von parce que-Strukturen in Synchronie und Diachronie},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-51396},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-513963},
  school      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {VIII, 264, EEE},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Die Dissertation legt ihren Schwerpunkt auf die synchronische und diachronische Variation im Gebrauch der franz{\"o}sischen Kausalkonjunktion parce que sowie auf die Interaktion mit den außersprachlichen Variablen Alter und sozioprofessionelle Kategorie. Basierend auf vorausgehenden makrodiachronischen Studien, die Anhaltspunkte daf{\"u}r liefern, dass die Konjunktion einen Prozess der Pragmatikalisierung durchlaufen hat und weiterhin durchl{\"a}uft, wurde ein Untersuchungskorpus von 56 Interviews aus den diachronisch distinkten Korpora ESLO1, ESLO2 und LangAge extrahiert. Dieses Untersuchungskorpus diente als Grundlage f{\"u}r Panelstudien und Trendstudien, die darauf ausgerichtet waren, die Pragmatikalisierung von parce que aus einem mikrodiachronischen Gesichtspunkt zu verifizieren. Zus{\"a}tzlich zu der diachronischen Perspektive wurde eine synchronische Perspektive eingenommen, um die Variation im Gebrauch der Konjunktion so einem diachronischen Ph{\"a}nomen wie dem age grading oder der apparent time zuordnen zu k{\"o}nnen. Ausgehend von der Theorie der Konstruktionsgrammatik wurden parce que enthaltende Konstruktionen bottom-up annotiert und in f{\"u}nf Pragmatikalit{\"a}tsgrade kategorisiert (pra0-pra4). Diese wurden anschließend quantifiziert und in Abh{\"a}ngigkeit des Geburtsjahres und der sozioprofessionellen Kategorie der (m{\"a}nnlichen) Sprecher mithilfe mehrerer R-Modelle wie ctrees, trees, lm, hclust und kmeans analysiert. Die Frequenzentwicklung der Pragmatikalit{\"a}tsgrade best{\"a}tigte die Pragmatikalisierungshypothese in einem mikrodiachronischen Rahmen. Zudem konnte ein quantitativer R{\"u}ckgang im Gebrauch der Konstruktionen am nicht- oder weniger pragmatikalisierten (pra0, pra1) Pol festgestellt werden, w{\"a}hrend Verwendungsweisen h{\"o}herer Pragmatikalisierungsgrade (pra2-pra4) {\"u}ber 40 Jahre vergleichsweise stabil blieben. Obwohl f{\"u}r pra2 kein signifikanter Wandel hervortrat, wies dessen Entwicklung bei den Sprechern im mittleren Lebensalter sowie das synchronische Muster in Abh{\"a}ngigkeit von Alter (oder Geburtsjahr) und von sozioprofessioneller Kategorie dennoch in Richtung einer zugrundeliegenden diachronischen Variation. Diese k{\"o}nnte als ein durch die sozialen Transformationen der 1960er und 1970er Jahre katalysiertes Ph{\"a}nomen des age grading interpretiert werden. F{\"u}r die n{\"a}her am pragmatischen Pol situierten Gebrauchsweisen (pra3 und pra4) konnte keine klare Tendenz ermittelt werden. Die Ergebnisse fordern diachronische Konzepte wie age grading und apparent time heraus, indem sie die Simplizit{\"a}t der zugrundeliegenden Mechanismen sowie die g{\"a}ngigen Methoden, diese zu identifizieren, infrage stellen.},
  language  = {de}
}