@book{DyckGieseLambers2017,
  author    = {Dyck, Johannes and Giese, Holger and Lambers, Leen},
  title     = {Automatic verification of behavior preservation at the transformation level for relational model transformation},
  number    = {112},
  publisher = {Universit{\"a}tsverlag Potsdam},
  address   = {Potsdam},
  isbn      = {978-3-86956-391-6},
  issn      = {1613-5652},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-100279},
  publisher      = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam},
  pages     = {viii, 112},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {The correctness of model transformations is a crucial element for model-driven engineering of high quality software. In particular, behavior preservation is the most important correctness property avoiding the introduction of semantic errors during the model-driven engineering process. Behavior preservation verification techniques either show that specific properties are preserved, or more generally and complex, they show some kind of behavioral equivalence or refinement between source and target model of the transformation. Both kinds of behavior preservation verification goals have been presented with automatic tool support for the instance level, i.e. for a given source and target model specified by the model transformation. However, up until now there is no automatic verification approach available at the transformation level, i.e. for all source and target models specified by the model transformation. In this report, we extend our results presented in [27] and outline a new sophisticated approach for the automatic verification of behavior preservation captured by bisimulation resp. simulation for model transformations specified by triple graph grammars and semantic definitions given by graph transformation rules. In particular, we show that the behavior preservation problem can be reduced to invariant checking for graph transformation and that the resulting checking problem can be addressed by our own invariant checker even for a complex example where a sequence chart is transformed into communicating automata. We further discuss today's limitations of invariant checking for graph transformation and motivate further lines of future work in this direction.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{WeidlichMendlingWeske2011,
  author    = {Weidlich, Matthias and Mendling, Jan and Weske, Mathias},
  title     = {Efficient consistency measurement based on behavioral profiles of process models},
  series = {IEEE transactions on software engineering},
  volume    = {37},
  journal   = {IEEE transactions on software engineering},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {Inst. of Electr. and Electronics Engineers},
  address   = {Los Alamitos},
  issn      = {0098-5589},
  doi       = {10.1109/TSE.2010.96},
  pages     = {410 -- 429},
  year      = {2011},
  abstract  = {Engineering of process-driven business applications can be supported by process modeling efforts in order to bridge the gap between business requirements and system specifications. However, diverging purposes of business process modeling initiatives have led to significant problems in aligning related models at different abstract levels and different perspectives. Checking the consistency of such corresponding models is a major challenge for process modeling theory and practice. In this paper, we take the inappropriateness of existing strict notions of behavioral equivalence as a starting point. Our contribution is a concept called behavioral profile that captures the essential behavioral constraints of a process model. We show that these profiles can be computed efficiently, i.e., in cubic time for sound free-choice Petri nets w.r.t. their number of places and transitions. We use behavioral profiles for the definition of a formal notion of consistency which is less sensitive to model projections than common criteria of behavioral equivalence and allows for quantifying deviation in a metric way. The derivation of behavioral profiles and the calculation of a degree of consistency have been implemented to demonstrate the applicability of our approach. We also report the findings from checking consistency between partially overlapping models of the SAP reference model.},
  language  = {en}
}