@misc{LeminenLehtonenBozicetal.2016,
  author    = {Leminen, Alina and Lehtonen, Minna and Bozic, Mirjana and Clahsen, Harald},
  title     = {Editorial},
  series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  journal   = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  number    = {441},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-407243},
  pages     = {3},
  year      = {2016},
  abstract  = {kein abstract vorhanden},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{HeyerClahsen2014,
  author    = {Heyer, Vera and Clahsen, Harald},
  title     = {Late bilinguals see a scan in scanner AND in scandal},
  series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  journal   = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  number    = {507},
  issn      = {1866-8364},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-41444},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-414441},
  pages     = {8},
  year      = {2014},
  abstract  = {Masked priming research with late (non-native) bilinguals has reported facilitation effects following morphologically derived prime words (scanner - scan). However, unlike for native speakers, there are suggestions that purely orthographic prime-target overlap (scandal - scan) also produces priming in non-native visual word recognition. Our study directly compares orthographically related and derived prime-target pairs. While native readers showed morphological but not formal overlap priming, the two prime types yielded the same magnitudes of facilitation for non-natives. We argue that early word recognition processes in a non-native language are more influenced by surface-form properties than in one's native language.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{CiaccioClahsen2019,
  author    = {Ciaccio, Laura Anna and Clahsen, Harald},
  title     = {Variability and consistency in first and second language processing},
  series = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  journal   = {Zweitver{\"o}ffentlichungen der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  number    = {1},
  issn      = {1866-8364},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-51772},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-517727},
  pages     = {36},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Word forms such as walked or walker are decomposed into their morphological constituents (walk + -ed/-er) during language comprehension. Yet, the efficiency of morphological decomposition seems to vary for different languages and morphological types, as well as for first and second language speakers. The current study reports results from a visual masked priming experiment focusing on different types of derived word forms (specifically prefixed vs. suffixed) in first and second language speakers of German. We compared the present findings with results from previous studies on inflection and compounding and proposed an account of morphological decomposition that captures both the variability and the consistency of morphological decomposition for different morphological types and for first and second language speakers. Open Practices This article has been awarded an Open Materials badge. Study materials are publicly accessible via the Open Science Framework at . Learn more about the Open Practices badges from the Center for Open Science.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{CiaccioBurchertSemenza2020,
  author    = {Ciaccio, Laura Anna and Burchert, Frank and Semenza, Carlo},
  title     = {Derivational morphology in agrammatic aphasia},
  series = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  journal   = {Postprints der Universit{\"a}t Potsdam : Humanwissenschaftliche Reihe},
  number    = {648},
  issn      = {1866-8364},
  doi       = {10.25932/publishup-47399},
  url       = {http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:517-opus4-473995},
  pages     = {17},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Although a relatively large number of studies on acquired language impairments have tested the case of derivational morphology, none of these have specifically investigated whether there are differences in how prefixed and suffixed derived words are impaired. Based on linguistic and psycholinguistic considerations on prefixed and suffixed derived words, differences in how these two types of derivations are processed, and consequently impaired, are predicted. In the present study, we investigated the errors produced in reading aloud simple, prefixed, and suffixed words by three German individuals with agrammatic aphasia (NN, LG, SA). We found that, while NN and LG produced similar numbers of errors with prefixed and suffixed words, SA showed a selective impairment for prefixed words. Furthermore, NN and SA produced more errors specifically involving the affix with prefixed words than with suffixed words. We discuss our findings in terms of relative position of stem and affix in prefixed and suffixed words, as well as in terms of specific properties of prefixes and suffixes.},
  language  = {en}
}