@article{EngbertNuthmannRichteretal.2005,
  author    = {Engbert, Ralf and Nuthmann, Antje and Richter, Eike M. and Kliegl, Reinhold},
  title     = {SWIFT : A dynamical model of saccade generation during reading},
  issn      = {0033-295X},
  year      = {2005},
  abstract  = {Mathematical, models,have become an important tool for understanding the control of eye movements during reading. Main goals of the development of the SWIFT model (R. Engbert, A. Longtin, \& R. Kliegl, 2002) were to investigate the possibility of spatially distributed processing and to implement a general mechanism for all types of eye movements observed in reading experiments. The authors present an advanced version of SWIFT that integrates properties of the oculomotor system and effects of word recognition to explain many of the experimental phenomena faced in reading research. They propose new procedures for the estimation of model parameters and for the test of the model's performance. They also present a mathematical analysis of the dynamics of the SWIFT model. Finally, within this framework, they present an analysis of the transition from parallel to serial processing},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{LaubrockEngbertKliegl2005,
  author    = {Laubrock, Jochen and Engbert, Ralf and Kliegl, Reinhold},
  title     = {Microsaccade dynamics during covert attention},
  issn      = {0042-6989},
  year      = {2005},
  abstract  = {We compared effects of covert spatial-attention shifts induced with exogenous or endogenous cues on microsaccade rate and direction. Separate and dissociated effects were obtained in rate and direction measures. Display changes caused microsaccade rate inhibition, followed by sustained rate enhancement. Effects on microsaccade direction were differentially tied to cue class (exogenous vs. endogenous) and type (neutral vs. directional). For endogenous cues, direction effects were weak and occurred late. Exogenous cues caused a fast direction bias towards the cue (i.e., early automatic triggering of saccade programs), followed by a shift in the opposite direction (i.e, controlled inhibition of cue-directed saccades, leading to a 'leakage' of microsaccades in the opposite direction). (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KlieglEngbert2005,
  author    = {Kliegl, Reinhold and Engbert, Ralf},
  title     = {Fixation durations before word skipping in reading},
  issn      = {1069-9384},
  year      = {2005},
  abstract  = {We resolve a controversy about reading fixations before word-skipping saccades which were reported as longer or shorter than control fixations in earlier studies. Our statistics are based on resampling of matched sets of fixations before skipped and nonskipped words, drawn from a database of 121,321 single fixations contributed by 230 readers of the Potsdam sentence corpus. Matched fixations originated from single-fixation forward-reading patterns and were equated for their positions within words. Fixations before skipped words were shorter before short or high-frequency words and longer before long or low-frequency words in comparison with control fixations. Reasons for inconsistencies in past research and implications for computational models are discussed},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{MoshelLiangCaspietal.2005,
  author    = {Moshel, Shay and Liang, Jin-Rong and Caspi, Avi and Engbert, Ralf and Kliegl, Reinhold and Havlin, Shlomo and Zivotofsky, Ari Z.},
  title     = {Phase-synchronization decay of fixational eye movements},
  year      = {2005},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{LaubrockEngbertKliegl2005,
  author    = {Laubrock, Jochen and Engbert, Ralf and Kliegl, Reinhold},
  title     = {Microsaccade rate during (un)ambiguous apparent motion},
  issn      = {0301-0066},
  year      = {2005},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Kliegl2005,
  author    = {Kliegl, Reinhold},
  title     = {{\"U}ber rezeptive Ged{\"a}chtnisse},
  isbn      = {978-3-9522759-5-5},
  year      = {2005},
  language  = {de}
}