@inproceedings{Kay2024, author = {Kay, Alex James}, title = {Holocaust Research in Germany}, series = {Hurb{\´a}n Foly{\´o}irat}, volume = {2}, booktitle = {Hurb{\´a}n Foly{\´o}irat}, publisher = {Holokauszt Eml{\´e}kk{\"o}zpont - Holocaust Memorial Center}, address = {Budapest}, organization = {Holocaust Documentation Center and Memorial Collection Public Foundation}, issn = {3004-023X}, pages = {22 -- 28}, year = {2024}, language = {en} } @incollection{DebielSondermann2024, author = {Debiel, Tobias and Sondermann, Elena}, title = {Entwicklung und internationale Politik}, series = {Handbuch Internationale Beziehungen}, booktitle = {Handbuch Internationale Beziehungen}, editor = {Sauer, Frank and von Hauff, Luba and Masala, Carlo}, publisher = {Springer VS}, address = {Wiesbaden}, isbn = {978-3-658-33952-4}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-658-33953-1_44}, pages = {1397 -- 1425}, year = {2024}, abstract = {Gut zwei Jahrzehnte nach dem Millenniumsgipfel der Vereinten Nationen bleiben berechtigte Zweifel an der Wirksamkeit von Entwicklungszusammenarbeit (EZ). Ist das Politikfeld von den Realit{\"a}ten {\"u}berholt worden? Welchen Beitrag haben Entwicklungstheorien f{\"u}r die Weiterentwicklung von Entwicklungspolitik leisten k{\"o}nnen? Der Beitrag zieht eine Bilanz, die von der ersten Entwicklungsdekade in den 1960er-Jahren bis zu den Folgen der Covid-19-Pandemie reicht. Er pl{\"a}diert f{\"u}r eine herrschaftskritische Weiterentwicklung des Entwicklungsbegriffs und f{\"u}r eine St{\"a}rkung globaler Kooperation.}, language = {de} } @book{Petersen2024, author = {Petersen, Jens}, title = {Kants Recht der Freiheit}, publisher = {De Gruyter}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {9783111070063}, pages = {XIX, 245}, year = {2024}, abstract = {Das vorliegende Buch ber{\"u}cksichtigt neben den drei Kritiken und der sp{\"a}ten Rechtslehre Kants Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten, seine Anthropologie in pragmatischer Hinsicht, den Weltb{\"u}rgeressay, den Streit der Fakult{\"a}ten, die Friedensschrift und die Abhandlung {\"u}ber den Gemeinspruch, aus der die Formulierung ‚Recht der Freiheit' stammt. Erstes Kant-Buch zu seiner eigenen Wortsch{\"o}pfung "Recht der Freiheit". Er{\"o}rtert Kants "Rechtslehre und Gerichtsbarkeit" in der Kritik der reinen Vernunft}, language = {de} } @misc{KrauseGahn2024, author = {Krause, Werner and Gahn, Christina}, title = {How powerful are polls in influencing election outcomes?}, series = {The LOOP : ECPR's Political Science Blog}, journal = {The LOOP : ECPR's Political Science Blog}, publisher = {European Consortium for Political Research}, address = {Colchester}, year = {2024}, abstract = {Werner Krause and Christina Gahn argue that we need to pay more attention to how the media communicates the results of opinion polls to the public. Reporting methodological details, such as margins of error, can alter citizens' vote choices on election day. This has important implications for elections around the world}, language = {en} } @incollection{HerschingerRenner2024, author = {Herschinger, Eva and Renner, Judith}, title = {Diskursforschung in den Internationalen Beziehungen}, series = {Handbuch Internationale Beziehungen}, booktitle = {Handbuch Internationale Beziehungen}, editor = {Sauer, Frank and von Hauff, Luba and Masala, Carlo}, edition = {3., vollst{\"a}ndig {\"u}berarbeitete und erweiterte Auflage}, publisher = {Springer VS}, address = {Wiesbaden}, isbn = {978-3-658-33952-4}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-658-33953-1_15}, pages = {375 -- 399}, year = {2024}, abstract = {Diskursive Perspektiven auf internationale Politik haben in den vergangenen Jahren an Relevanz und Popularit{\"a}t gewonnen. Der vorliegende Beitrag gibt zun{\"a}chst einen {\"U}berblick {\"u}ber verschiedene Spielarten diskursiver Ans{\"a}tze in den Internationalen Beziehungen, um sich dann vor allem poststrukturalistisch inspirierten Diskursarbeiten zu widmen. Poststrukturalistische Ans{\"a}tze, so argumentieren wir, sind besonders interessant f{\"u}r die Disziplin der IB, da sie vier spezifische Gewinne bieten: Erstens erlauben sie eine kritische Perspektive auf Fragen internationaler Politik, zweitens hilft eine poststrukturalistische Perspektive dabei, den oft {\"u}bersehenen politischen Charakter sozialer Realit{\"a}t herauszustellen, drittens halten sie dazu an, die eigene Sichtweise des/der Forschenden zu reflektieren und viertens erlaubt es eine poststrukturalistische Vorgehensweise mit ihrem Fokus auf „Wie-m{\"o}glich-Fragen", eine alternative analytische Perspektive zu dominanten erkl{\"a}renden Ans{\"a}tzen einzunehmen.}, language = {de} } @article{CohenKrauseAbouChadi2024, author = {Cohen, Denis and Krause, Werner and Abou-Chadi, Tarik}, title = {Comparative vote switching}, series = {The journal of politics}, volume = {86}, journal = {The journal of politics}, number = {2}, publisher = {University of Chicago Press}, address = {Chicago, IL}, issn = {0022-3816}, doi = {10.1086/726952}, pages = {597 -- 607}, year = {2024}, abstract = {Large literatures focus on voter reactions to parties' policy strategies, agency, or legislative performance. While many inquiries make explicit assumptions about the direction and magnitude of voter flows between parties, comparative empirical analyses of vote switching remain rare. In this article, we overcome three challenges that have previously impeded the comparative study of dynamic party competition based on voter flows: we present a novel conceptual framework for studying voter retention, defection, and attraction in multiparty systems, showcase a newly compiled data infrastructure that marries comparative vote switching data with information on party behavior and party systems in over 250 electoral contexts, and introduce a statistical model that renders our conceptual framework operable. These innovations enable first-time inquiries into the polyadic vote switching patterns underlying multiparty competition and unlock major research potentials on party competition and party system change.}, language = {en} } @incollection{Marienfeldt2024, author = {Marienfeldt, Justine}, title = {Digitalisierung und Automatisierung in der Sachbearbeitung}, series = {Handbuch Digitalisierung in Staat und Verwaltung}, booktitle = {Handbuch Digitalisierung in Staat und Verwaltung}, editor = {Klenk, Tanja and Nullmeier, Frank and Wewer, G{\"o}ttrik}, publisher = {Springer VS}, address = {Wiesbaden}, isbn = {978-3-658-23669-4}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-658-23669-4_89-1}, pages = {1 -- 12}, year = {2024}, abstract = {Die Nutzung von Informations- und Kommunikationstechnik (IKT), Fachverfahren und die Automatisierung von Prozessen ver{\"a}ndern die Sachbearbeitung und Leistungserstellung in der Verwaltung und somit die T{\"a}tigkeiten, Arbeitsbedingungen und Personalstrukturen. Bei der Antragsbearbeitung und Bescheiderstellung in der Ordnungs- und Leistungsverwaltung erh{\"a}lt IKT nicht nur eine unterst{\"u}tzende, sondern zunehmend auch eine leitende oder entscheidende Rolle. Abh{\"a}ngig von der konkreten Ausgestaltung kann die fortschreitende Digitalisierung eine ganzheitliche Sachbearbeitung erm{\"o}glichen, aber auch einschr{\"a}nken. Insgesamt kann sie zu einer Neuordnung des Berufsfeldes {\"o}ffentlicher Dienst f{\"u}hren.}, language = {de} } @article{Marienfeldt2024, author = {Marienfeldt, Justine}, title = {Does digital government hollow out the essence of street-level bureaucracy?}, series = {Social policy \& administration}, journal = {Social policy \& administration}, publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell}, address = {Oxford}, issn = {0144-5596}, doi = {10.1111/spol.12991}, pages = {1 -- 25}, year = {2024}, abstract = {The growing use of digital tools in policy implementation has altered the work of street-level bureaucrats who are granted substantial discretionary power in decision-making. Digital tools can constrain discretionary power, like the curtailment thesis proposed, or serve as action resources, like the enablement thesis suggested. This article assesses empirical evidence of the impact of digital tools on street-level work and decision-making in service-oriented and regulation-oriented organisations based on a systematic literature review and thematic qualitative content analysis of 36 empirical studies published until 2021. The findings demonstrate different effects with regard to the role of digital tools and the core tasks of the public administration, depending on political and managerial goals and consequent system design. Leading or decisive digital tools mostly curtail discretion, especially in service-oriented organisations. In contrast, an enhanced information base or recommendations for actions enable decision-making, in particular in regulation-oriented organisations. By showing how street-level bureaucrats actively try to resist the curtailing effects caused by rigid design to address individual circumstances, for instance by establishing ways of coping like rule bending or rule breaking, using personal resources or prioritising among clients, this study demonstrates the importance of the continuation thesis and the persistently crucial role of human judgement in policy implementation.}, language = {en} } @book{Haenel2024, author = {H{\"a}nel, Hilkje Charlotte}, title = {Epistemische Ungerechtigkeiten}, publisher = {De Gruyter}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-11-075973-0}, doi = {10.1515/9783110759792}, pages = {X, 241}, year = {2024}, abstract = {Wem wird geglaubt und wem nicht? Wessen Wissen wird weitergegeben und wessen nicht? Wer hat eine Stimme und wer nicht? Theorien der epistemischen Ungerechtigkeit befassen sich mit dem breiten Feld der ungerechten oder unfairen Behandlung, die mit Fragen des Wissens, Verstehens und Kommunizierens zusammenh{\"a}ngen, wie z.B. die M{\"o}glichkeit, vom Wissen oder von kommunikativen Praktiken ausgeschlossen zu werden oder zum Schweigen gebracht zu werden, aber auch Kontexte, in denen die Bedeutungen mancher systematisch verzerrt oder falsch geh{\"o}rt und falsch dargestellt werden, in denen manchen misstraut wird oder es an epistemischer Handlungsf{\"a}higkeit mangelt. In diesem Buch wird eine {\"U}bersicht {\"u}ber die breite Debatte epistemischer Ungerechtigkeit, epistemischer Unterdr{\"u}ckung und epistemischer Gewalt gegeben, in dem unterschiedliche Theorien, die sich auf der Schnittstelle von Gerechtigkeitstheorie und epistemischen Fragen befinden, systematisch und kritisch diskutiert sowie theoretische Vorg{\"a}nger dieser Theorien beleuchtet werden.}, language = {de} } @incollection{BloiseIhle2024, author = {Bloise, Jennifer and Ihle, Sebastian}, title = {Speziesismus in den (sozialen) Medien}, series = {Tiere - Medien - Bildung}, booktitle = {Tiere - Medien - Bildung}, editor = {Hoiß, Christian and Schluchter, Jan-Ren{\´e}}, publisher = {kopaed}, address = {M{\"u}nchen}, isbn = {978-3-96848-108-1}, pages = {15 -- 31}, year = {2024}, language = {de} } @incollection{IhleCarl2024, author = {Ihle, Sebastian and Carl, Kea}, title = {Die Mensch-Tier-Beziehung im (Politik-) Unterricht}, series = {Beziehungsweisen von Mensch, Tier und Umwelt}, booktitle = {Beziehungsweisen von Mensch, Tier und Umwelt}, editor = {Juchler, Ingo}, publisher = {Springer VS}, address = {Wiesbaden}, isbn = {978-3-658-42652-1}, doi = {10.1007/978-3-658-42653-8_5}, pages = {69 -- 88}, year = {2024}, abstract = {Der vorliegende Beitrag, der sich weniger als Fachbeitrag, sondern vielmehr als Erfahrungsbericht aus der Praxis versteht, berichtet von unterschiedlichen Versuchen, die Mensch-Tier-Beziehung in den schulischen Kontext einzubringen und somit der unzureichenden Beachtung der Thematik entgegenzuwirken. Nachdem {\"u}berblicksartig die Relevanz der Mensch-Tier-Thematik herausgestellt und auf diese Weise die Notwendigkeit einer unterrichtlichen Besch{\"a}ftigung mit dem Verh{\"a}ltnis von Menschen und anderen Tieren begr{\"u}ndet wird, wird zun{\"a}chst von einem ersten Versuch berichtet, (angehende) Lehrkr{\"a}fte im Rahmen eines Workshops am Studienseminar Potsdam f{\"u}r die Relevanz der Mensch-Tier-Thematik zu sensibilisieren sowie {\"u}ber eine m{\"o}gliche Umsetzung in den verschiedenen Unterrichtsf{\"a}chern zu informieren. Anschließend werden - exemplarisch f{\"u}r den Politikunterricht - zwei Unterrichtsstunden, die die Mensch-Tier-Beziehung auf verschiedene Weise in den Politikunterricht einbeziehen, sowie die im Rahmen der Durchf{\"u}hrung gesammelten Erfahrungen vorgestellt.}, language = {de} } @article{Haenel2024, author = {H{\"a}nel, Hilkje C.}, title = {Willful testimonial injustice as a form of epistemic injustice}, series = {European journal of philosophy}, journal = {European journal of philosophy}, publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell}, address = {Oxford}, issn = {0966-8373}, doi = {10.1111/ejop.12928}, pages = {1 -- 19}, year = {2024}, abstract = {In the debate on epistemic injustice, it is generally assumed that testimonial injustice as one form of epistemic injustice cannot be committed (fully) deliberately or intentionally because it involves unconscious identity prejudices. Drawing on the case of sexual violence against refugees in European refugee camps, this paper argues that there is a form of testimonial injustice—willful testimonial injustice—that is deliberate. To do so, the paper argues (a) that the hearer intentionally utilizes negative identity prejudices for a particular purpose and (b) that the hearer is aware of the fact that the intentionally used prejudices are in fact prejudices. Furthermore, the paper shows how testimonial injustice relates to recognition failures both in terms of a causal as well as a constitutive claim. In fact, introducing willful testimonial injustice can support the constitutive claim of such a relation that has so far received little attention. Besides arguing for a novel form of testimonial injustice and contributing to the recent debate on the relation between epistemic injustice and recognition failures, this paper is also motivated by the attempt to draw attention to the inhumane conditions for refugees at the border of Europe as well as elsewhere.}, language = {en} } @phdthesis{Jahns2024, author = {Jahns, Esther}, title = {Diglossic translanguaging}, series = {Language and Social Life [LSL]}, volume = {33}, journal = {Language and Social Life [LSL]}, publisher = {de Gruyter Mouton}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-11-132246-9}, school = {Universit{\"a}t Potsdam}, pages = {XI, 245}, year = {2024}, abstract = {This book examines how German-speaking Jews living in Berlin make sense and make use of their multilingual repertoire. With a focus on lexical variation, the book demonstrates how speakers integrate Yiddish and Hebrew elements into German for indexing belonging and for positioning themselves within the Jewish community. Linguistic choices are shaped by language ideologies (e.g., authenticity, prescriptivism, nostalgia). Speakers translanguage when using their multilingual repertoire, but do so in a diglossic way, using elements from different languages for specific domains}, language = {en} } @inproceedings{OPUS4-63603, title = {Plattformen : Grundlagen und Neuordnung des Rechts digitaler Plattformen}, editor = {Buchheim, Johannes and Kraetzig, Viktoria and Mendelsohn, Juliane and Steinr{\"o}tter, Bj{\"o}rn}, publisher = {Nomos}, address = {Baden-Baden}, isbn = {978-3-7560-1454-5}, pages = {263}, year = {2024}, abstract = {Digitale Plattformen pr{\"a}gen unsere Rechts- und Wirtschaftsordnung, die Freizeitgestaltung, das Informationsverhalten und im Aggregat die digitale {\"O}ffentlichkeit. Die damit verbundenen Rechtsfragen sind im Fluss und ber{\"u}hren alle juristischen Teildisziplinen. Der Tagungsband n{\"a}hert sich daher den Entwicklungen des Plattformrechts aus disziplin{\"u}bergreifendem Blickwinkel. Dieser Versuch einer {\"u}berspannenden Perspektive fokussiert vor allem auf die beiden „Großen" der j{\"u}ngsten Rechtsakte (DSA/DMA) unter dem besonderen Gesichtspunkt ihres Vollzugs: Wie kann man ein globales Ph{\"a}nomen wie Plattformen lokal und regional regulieren? Welche Rolle spielt der Schwarm der Vielen in der Effektivierung der neuen Regularien? Passen Regelungsmodelle wie das Urheberrecht zum Plattformph{\"a}nomen?}, language = {de} } @misc{DuevelEhmigMcCalletal.2024, author = {D{\"u}vel, Pia and Ehmig, Ulrike and McCall, Jeremiah and Unceta G{\´o}mez, Luis and Bakogianni, Anastasia and Fischer, Jens and Serrano Lozano, David and Amb{\"u}hl, Annemarie and Matz, Alicia and Brinker, Wolfram and Mach, Jonas Konstantin and Mancini, Mattia and Werner, Eva}, title = {Spring Issue}, series = {thersites}, volume = {2024}, journal = {thersites}, number = {18}, editor = {Amb{\"u}hl, Annemarie and Carl{\`a}-Uhink, Filippo and Rollinger, Christian and Walde, Christine}, issn = {2364-7612}, doi = {10.34679/thersites.vol18}, year = {2024}, language = {en} } @article{TiberiusWeyland2024, author = {Tiberius, Victor and Weyland, Michael}, title = {Enhancing higher entrepreneurship education: insights from practitioners for curriculum improvement}, series = {The International journal of Management Education}, volume = {22}, journal = {The International journal of Management Education}, number = {2}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {Amsterdam}, issn = {1472-8117}, doi = {10.1016/j.ijme.2024.100981}, year = {2024}, abstract = {Curricula for higher entrepreneurship education should meet the requirements of both a solid theoretical foundation and a practical orientation. When these curricula are designed by education specialists, entrepreneurs are usually not consulted. To explore practitioners' curricular recommendations, we conducted 73 semi-structured interviews with entrepreneurs with at least five years of professional experience. We collected 49 items for teaching and learning objectives, 37 for contents, 28 for teaching methods, and 17 for assessment methods. The respondents are convinced that students should acquire solid knowledge in business and management, legal issues, and entrepreneurship. For the latter, only some core aspects are provided. The entrepreneurs put greater emphasis on entrepreneurial skills and attitudes and consider experiential learning designs as most suitable, both in the secure setting of the classroom and in real life. The findings can help reflect on current entrepreneurship curriculum designs.}, language = {en} } @article{BrenneckeCoutinhoGildingetal.2024, author = {Brennecke, Julia and Coutinho, James A. and Gilding, Michael and Lusher, Dean and Schaffer, Graham}, title = {Invisible iterations: how formal and informal organization shape knowledge networks for coordination}, series = {Journal of management studies}, journal = {Journal of management studies}, publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell}, address = {Oxford}, issn = {0022-2380}, doi = {10.1111/joms.13076}, pages = {1 -- 42}, year = {2024}, abstract = {This study takes a network approach to investigate coordination among knowledge workers as grounded in both formal and informal organization. We first derive hypotheses regarding patterns of knowledge-sharing relationships by which workers pass on and exchange tacit and codified knowledge within and across organizational hierarchies to address the challenges that underpin contemporary knowledge work. We use survey data and apply exponential random graph models to test our hypotheses. We then extend the quantitative network analysis with insights from qualitative interviews and demonstrate that the identified knowledge-sharing patterns are the micro-foundational traces of collective coordination resulting from two underlying coordination mechanisms which we label 'invisible iterations' and 'bringing in the big guns'. These mechanisms and, by extension, the associated knowledge-sharing patterns enable knowledge workers to perform in a setting that is characterized by complexity, uncertainty and ambiguity. Our research contributes to theory on the interplay between formal and informal organization for coordination by showing how self-directed, informal action is supported by the formal organizational hierarchy. In doing so, it also extends understanding of the role that hierarchy plays for knowledge-intensive work. Finally, it establishes the collective need to coordinate work as a previously overlooked driver of knowledge network relationships and network patterns. © 2024 The Authors. Journal of Management Studies published by Society for the Advancement of Management Studies and John Wiley \& Sons Ltd.}, language = {en} } @unpublished{HippLeumannSchober2024, author = {Hipp, Lena and Leumann, Sandra and Schober, Pia S.}, title = {Partnership penalties for working in gender-atypical occupations?}, doi = {10.31235/osf.io/ydurp}, pages = {35}, year = {2024}, abstract = {Does working in a gender-atypical occupation reduce individuals' likelihood of finding a different-sex romantic partner, and do such occupational partnership penalties contribute to occupational gender segregation? To answer this question, we theorized partnership penalties for working in gender-atypical occupations by drawing on insights from evolutionary psychology, social constructivism, and rational choice theory and exploited the stability of occupational pathways in Germany. In Study 1, we analyzed observational data from a national probability sample (N= 1,634,944) to assess whether individuals in gender-atypical occupations were less likely to be partnered than individuals who worked in gender typical occupations. To assess whether the observed partnership gaps found in Study 1 were causally related to the gender typicality of men's and women's occupations, we conducted a field experiment on a dating app (N = 6,778). Because the findings from Study 2 suggested that young women and men indeed experienced penalties for working in a gender-atypical occupation (at least when they were not highly attractive), we employed a choice-experimental design in Study 3 (N = 1,250) to assess whether women and men were aware of occupational partnership penalties and showed that anticipating occupational partnership penalties may keep young and highly educated women from working in gender-atypical occupations. Our main conclusion therefore is that that observed penalties and their anticipation seem to be driven by unconscious rather than conscious processes.}, language = {en} } @article{Mackert2024, author = {Mackert, J{\"u}rgen}, title = {Citizenship}, series = {Politische Soziologie: Handbuch f{\"u}r Wissenschaft und Studium}, journal = {Politische Soziologie: Handbuch f{\"u}r Wissenschaft und Studium}, editor = {Endreß, Martin and Rampp, Benjamin}, publisher = {Nomos}, address = {Baden-Baden}, isbn = {978-3-8487-4836-5}, year = {2024}, language = {de} } @book{Gronau2024, author = {Gronau, Norbert}, title = {Knowledge Modeling and Description Language (KMDL) 3.0}, publisher = {GITO mbH Verlag}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-95545-416-6}, pages = {135}, year = {2024}, language = {en} }