@article{VietzeSchwarzenthalMoffittetal.2022,
  author    = {Vietze, Jana and Schwarzenthal, Miriam and Moffitt, Ursula and Civitillo, Sauro},
  title     = {Beyond 'migrant background': how to select relevant, social justice oriented, and feasible social categories in educational research},
  series = {European journal of psychology of education},
  volume    = {38},
  journal   = {European journal of psychology of education},
  number    = {1},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {New York},
  issn      = {0256-2928},
  doi       = {10.1007/s10212-022-00611-2},
  pages     = {389 -- 408},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Across continental Europe, educational research samples are often divided by 'migrant background', a binary variable criticized for masking participant heterogeneity and reinforcing exclusionary norms of belonging. This study endorses more meaningful, representative, and precise research by offering four guiding questions for selecting relevant, social justice oriented, and feasible social categories for collecting and analysing data in psychological and educational research. Using a preregistered empirical example, we first compare selected social categories ('migrant background', family heritage, religion, citizenship, cultural identification, and generation status) in their potential to reveal participant heterogeneity. Second, we investigate differences in means and relations between variables (discrimination experiences, perceived societal Islamophobia, and national identity) and academic motivation among 1335 adolescents in Germany (48\% female, M-age = 14.69). Regression analyses and multigroup SEM revealed differential experiences with and implications of discrimination for academic motivation. Results highlight the need for a deliberate, transparent use of social categories to make discrimination visible and centre participants' subjective experiences.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KunyuJuangMorenoHerrera2022,
  author    = {Kunyu, David Khisoni and Juang, Linda P. and Moreno Herrera, L{\´a}zaro},
  title     = {Evaluating the implementation quality of a vocational education intervention for youth in Dadaab refugee camp in Kenya},
  series = {Frontiers in human dynamics},
  volume    = {4},
  journal   = {Frontiers in human dynamics},
  publisher = {Frontiers Media},
  address   = {Lausanne},
  issn      = {2673-2726},
  doi       = {10.3389/fhumd.2022.898081},
  pages     = {16},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Refugee youth in protracted humanitarian contexts are faced with limited access to quality education. They may sustain traumatic experiences from conflicts and discrimination yet have limited psychosocial support access. Comprehending the magnitude and effects of these challenges is vital for designing and executing educational interventions in such contexts. This study evaluates the implementation quality of the Youth Education Pack intervention through the lens of the Inter-agency Network for Education in Emergencies minimum standards framework. It explores the types of discrimination experienced by refugee youth in the Dadaab refugee camp in Kenya. Nine participants comprising refugee students (N = 2), former refugee students (N = 2), teachers (N = 3), and project supervisors (N = 2) participated in the study. The first author conducted interviews and observations in the camp. The data were qualitatively coded deductively and analysed in Nvivo 12. We found that the YEP intervention faced contextual challenges that hindered the achievement of the implementation quality standards outlined in the INEE minimum standards for education. Refugee youth and refugee teachers experienced various forms of discrimination, including at individual, institutional, and structural levels. We conclude that providing refugee youth with an inclusive and high-quality education is central to providing secure and long-term solutions to their challenges and adversities and may promote their psychosocial wellbeing.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{Abramova2022,
  author    = {Abramova, Olga},
  title     = {No matter what the name, we're all the same?},
  series = {Electronic markets},
  volume    = {32},
  journal   = {Electronic markets},
  publisher = {Springer},
  address   = {Heidelberg},
  issn      = {1019-6781},
  doi       = {10.1007/s12525-021-00505-z},
  pages     = {1419 -- 1446},
  year      = {2022},
  abstract  = {Sharing marketplaces emerged as the new Holy Grail of value creation by enabling exchanges between strangers. Identity reveal, encouraged by platforms, cuts both ways: While inducing pre-transaction confidence, it is suspected of backfiring on the information senders with its discriminative potential. This study employs a discrete choice experiment to explore the role of names as signifiers of discriminative peculiarities and the importance of accompanying cues in peer choices of a ridesharing offer. We quantify users' preferences for quality signals in monetary terms and evidence comparative disadvantage of Middle Eastern descent male names for drivers and co-travelers. It translates into a lower willingness to accept and pay for an offer. Market simulations confirm the robustness of the findings. Further, we discover that females are choosier and include more signifiers of involuntary personal attributes in their decision-making. Price discounts and positive information only partly compensate for the initial disadvantage, and identity concealment is perceived negatively.},
  language  = {en}
}