@misc{SchusterKrahe2017,
  author    = {Schuster, Isabell and Krah{\´e}, Barbara},
  title     = {The prevalence of sexual aggression in Turkey: A systematic review},
  series = {Aggression and violent behavior : a review journa},
  volume    = {37},
  journal   = {Aggression and violent behavior : a review journa},
  publisher = {Elsevier},
  address   = {Oxford},
  issn      = {1359-1789},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.avb.2017.05.003},
  pages     = {102 -- 114},
  year      = {2017},
  abstract  = {Although sexual aggression is recognized as a serious problem worldwide, evidence on the prevalence and impact of sexual aggression is based predominantly on studies from Western countries with a Christian or non-religious majority. Little evidence is available from non-Western countries, especially from Muslim societies. The purpose of the present article was to provide a first systematic review of the studies examining the prevalence of sexual aggression in Turkey, including both victimization and perpetration reports from women and men. Additionally, differences in prevalence rates depending on relationship constellations and characteristics of victims and perpetrators were reviewed. By a two-stage literature search, 56 studies were identified for inclusion. All studies examined sexual victimization of women, only four studies included sexual victimization of men. Data on sexual aggression perpetration were extremely limited, with only two studies providing prevalence rates. Prevalence rates of sexual victimization were found to vary greatly, which may be attributed to a lack of methodological and conceptual consistency across studies. Likewise, no consistent picture was revealed for victims' or perpetrators' sociodemographic or situational characteristics associated with differences in prevalence rates. We discuss reasons for the variability in prevalence rates and outline recommendations for future research.},
  language  = {en}
}
@misc{EnsafdaranKraheNjadetal.2019,
  author    = {Ensafdaran, Faride and Krah{\´e}, Barbara and Njad, Soodabe Bassak and Arshadi, Nasrin},
  title     = {Efficacy of different versions of Aggression Replacement Training (ART)},
  series = {Aggression and violent behavior : a review journal},
  volume    = {47},
  journal   = {Aggression and violent behavior : a review journal},
  publisher = {Elsevier Science},
  address   = {Amsterdam},
  issn      = {1359-1789},
  doi       = {10.1016/j.avb.2019.02.006},
  pages     = {230 -- 237},
  year      = {2019},
  abstract  = {Aggression Replacement Training (ART) is a multimodal intervention for chronically aggressive youth. The program has been frequently administered in a variety of samples in the original form or in modified versions. This review examines evaluations of the efficacy of ART on aggressive behavior and secondary outcomes in children and youth, including modifications of ART and evaluations of the original version not covered by earlier reviews. Method: Scholarly databases were searched to identify 10 articles reporting 11 independent studies evaluating the efficacy ART in reducing aggressive behavior and improving anger control, social skills, and moral reasoning in children and youth. Results: The majority of studies found positive effects of ART on aggression and other outcomes related to anger control, social skills, and moral reasoning. However, most studies were based on small samples, and few included a control group to evaluate intervention success. Conclusions: The studies reviewed in this paper tentatively suggest that ART is an efficacious intervention to reduce aggressive behavior and improve anger control, social skills, and moral reasoning in at-risk children and youth. However, this conclusion is qualified by a number of methodological limitations that highlight the need for further, more rigorous evaluation studies.},
  language  = {en}
}