@article{JashariTiberiusDabić2021,
  author    = {Jashari, Arbrie and Tiberius, Victor and Dabić, Marina},
  title     = {Tracing the progress of scenario research in business and management},
  series = {Futures \& foresight science},
  volume    = {4},
  journal   = {Futures \& foresight science},
  number    = {2},
  publisher = {John Wiley \& Sons},
  address   = {Hoboken, NJ},
  issn      = {2573-5152},
  doi       = {10.1002/ffo2.109},
  pages     = {9},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {Business and management research on scenarios has been highly productive over the decades but led to a complex literature that is hard to oversee. To organize the field and identify distinguishable research clusters, we conducted a co-citation analysis focusing on the long-term history of research. We compare our findings with a previously published bibliographic coupling, focusing on the more recent research to trace its development over time. Our study revealed six research clusters: (1) Planning the Future with Scenarios, (2) Scenario Planning in Strategic Management, (3) Reinforcing the Scenario Technique, (4) Integration of Scenario Planning and MCDA, (5) Combination of Different Methods, and (6) Decision-making through Stochastic Programming, whereas the bibliographic coupling generated 11 clusters. Some former research clusters were divided into separate new clusters, while others were united. Additionally, completely new clusters emerged. Future research on scenarios is expected (1) to further differentiate into strategy and operations, (2) to be based on "behavioral futures" or "behavioral foresight" as a new research stream, (3) to advance the scenario technique methodically and include new specific scenario generation methods, and (4) to put forth new application areas.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{KorteTiberiusBrem2021,
  author    = {Korte, Andreas and Tiberius, Victor and Brem, Alexander},
  title     = {Internet of Things (IoT) technology research in business and management literature},
  series = {Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research},
  volume    = {16},
  journal   = {Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research},
  number    = {6},
  publisher = {MPDI},
  address   = {Basel},
  issn      = {0718-1876},
  doi       = {10.3390/jtaer16060116},
  pages     = {2073 -- 2090},
  year      = {2021},
  abstract  = {In coherence with the progressive digitalization of all areas of life, the Internet of Things (IoT) is a flourishing concept in both research and practice. Due to the increasing scholarly attention, the literature landscape has become scattered and fragmented. With a focus on the commercial application of the IoT and corresponding research, we employ a co-citation analysis and literature review to structure the field. We find and describe 19 research themes. To consolidate the extant research, we propose a research framework, which is based on a theoretical implementation process of IoT as a concept, specific IoT applications, or architectures integrated in an adapted input-process-output model. The main variables of the model are an initial definition and conceptualization of an IoT concept (input), which goes through an evaluation process (process), before it is implemented and can have an impact in practice (output). The paper contributes to interdisciplinary research relating to a business and management perspective on IoT by providing a holistic overview of predominant research themes and an integrative research framework.},
  language  = {en}
}
@article{TiberiusRietzBouncken2020,
  author    = {Tiberius, Victor and Rietz, Meike and Bouncken, Ricarda B.},
  title     = {Performance analysis and science mapping of institutional entrepreneurship research},
  series = {Administrative Sciences},
  volume    = {10},
  journal   = {Administrative Sciences},
  number    = {3},
  publisher = {MDPI},
  address   = {Basel},
  doi       = {10.3390/admsci10030069},
  pages     = {21},
  year      = {2020},
  abstract  = {Institutional entrepreneurship comprises the activities of agents who disrupt existing social institutions or create new ones, often to enable diffusion, especially of radical innovations, in a market. The increased interest in institutional entrepreneurship has produced a large number of scholarly publications, especially in the last five years. As a consequence, the literature landscape is somewhat complex and scattered. We aim to compile a quantitative overview of the field within business and management research by conducting bibliometric performance analyses and science mappings. We identified the most productive and influential journals, authors, and articles with the highest impact. We found that institutional entrepreneurship has stronger ties to organization studies than to entrepreneurship research. Additionally, a large body of literature at the intersection of institutions and entrepreneurship does not refer to institutional entrepreneurship theory. The science mappings revealed a distinction between theoretical and conceptual research on one hand and applied and empirical research on the other hand. Research clusters reflect the structure-agency problem by focusing on the change agent's goals and interests, strategies, and specific implementation mechanisms, as well as the relevance of public agents for existing institutions, and a more abstract process rather than agency view.},
  language  = {en}
}