@article{FernandezPalominoHattermannKrysanovaetal.2020, author = {Fernandez-Palomino, Carlos Antonio and Hattermann, Fred F. and Krysanova, Valentina and Vega-Jacome, Fiorella and Bronstert, Axel}, title = {Towards a more consistent eco-hydrological modelling through multi-objective calibration}, series = {Hydrological sciences journal = Journal des sciences hydrologiques}, volume = {66}, journal = {Hydrological sciences journal = Journal des sciences hydrologiques}, number = {1}, publisher = {Routledge, Taylor \& Francis Group}, address = {Abingdon}, issn = {0262-6667}, doi = {10.1080/02626667.2020.1846740}, pages = {59 -- 74}, year = {2020}, abstract = {Most hydrological studies rely on a model calibrated using discharge alone. However, judging the model reliability based on such calibration is problematic, as it does not guarantee the correct representation of internal hydrological processes. This study aims (a) to develop a comprehensive multi-objective calibration framework using remote sensing vegetation data and hydrological signatures (flow duration curve - FDC, and baseflow index) in addition to discharge, and (b) to apply this framework for calibration of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) in a typical Andean catchment. Overall, our calibration approach outperformed traditional discharge-based and FDC signature-based calibration strategies in terms of vegetation, streamflow, and flow partitioning simulation. New hydrological insights for the region are the following: baseflow is the main component of the streamflow sustaining the long dry-season flow, and pasture areas offer higher water yield and baseflow than other land-cover types. The proposed approach could be used in other data-scarce regions with complex topography.}, language = {en} } @article{GithuiThayalakumaranSelle2016, author = {Githui, Faith and Thayalakumaran, Thabo and Selle, Benny}, title = {Estimating irrigation inputs for distributed hydrological modelling: a case study from an irrigated catchment in southeast Australia}, series = {Hydrological processes}, volume = {30}, journal = {Hydrological processes}, publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell}, address = {Hoboken}, issn = {0885-6087}, doi = {10.1002/hyp.10757}, pages = {1824 -- 1835}, year = {2016}, abstract = {Adequate irrigation inputs are essential for the application of hydrological models in irrigated catchments, but reliable data on both the amount and the frequency of irrigation applications are often missing at an appropriate spatial scale. In this paper, we demonstrate and test approaches to estimate irrigation inputs for distributed hydrological modelling. In this context, the Soil and Water Assessment Tool was applied to simulate water balances for an irrigated catchment in southeast Australia during the period 2008-2010. Two methods for estimating irrigation inputs were tested. One method was based on a fixed irrigation application rate, whereas the other one had variable irrigation rates depending on season and the irrigated crop. These two approaches were also compared with the 'auto-irrigation' method within the Soil and Water Assessment Tool model. The method with variable irrigation rates resulted in the most reasonable interpretation of the readily available irrigation data, consistent estimates of irrigation runoff coefficients throughout the year and the best fit to observed data on both drain flows at the catchment outlet and spatial evapotranspiration patterns. We also found that the different irrigation inputs significantly affected simulated water balances, in particular deep percolation under relatively dry climatic conditions. All these results suggest that it is possible to infer irrigation inputs from readily available data and local knowledge, adequate for hydrological modelling in irrigated catchments. Our study also demonstrates that, in order to predict reliable water balances in irrigated catchments, an accurate knowledge of irrigation scheduling and irrigation runoff is required. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley \& Sons, Ltd.}, language = {en} } @article{WamburaDietrichGraef2018, author = {Wambura, Frank Joseph and Dietrich, Ottfried and Graef, Frieder}, title = {Analysis of infield rainwater harvesting and land use change impacts on the hydrologic cycle in the Wami River basin}, series = {Agricultural water management : an international journal}, volume = {203}, journal = {Agricultural water management : an international journal}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {Amsterdam}, issn = {0378-3774}, doi = {10.1016/j.agwat.2018.02.035}, pages = {124 -- 137}, year = {2018}, abstract = {The management of water resources in a river basin experiencing the expansion of agricultural activities requires a proper understanding of impacts on its hydrologic cycle. This study focused on the analysis of impacts of infield rainwater harvesting (IRWH) and future agricultural expansion as land and water uses change (LWUC) on the hydrologic cycle in the Wami River basin (Tanzania) using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT). In the SWAT model, IRWH was implemented by fragmenting rainwater harvesting hydrological response units (HRUs) from cropland HRUs and assigning them as potholes for rainwater impoundment. LWUC was implemented by customizing land cover types and their corresponding model parameters in all original HRUs, and introducing projected water uses in the model. The study thus demonstrated the successful modelling of IRWH and land use change in the SWAT model using HRU fragmentation and customization approaches, respectively. The results indicated that IRWH applications in croplands led to a large increase in evapotranspiration (ET) and the soil water content, and a decrease in percolation, especially in the dry years. However, the average annual streamflow showed negligible changes when IRWH was implemented, even in 50\% of current low-coverage croplands in the river basin. Thus, IRWH applications in the river basin are recommended. The results also indicated that LWUC caused huge changes in ET, the soil water content, percolation and the streamflow from the river basin. The average annual streamflow was predicted to decrease by 26\% due to LWUC. However, land use change alone without projected water uses was predicted to cause a minor decrease of about 1\% in the average annual streamflow. Therefore, further studies on the eco-hydrology of the river basin under various water use scenarios are recommended prior to the expansion of agricultural areas.}, language = {en} } @article{WamburaDietrichLischeid2018, author = {Wambura, Frank Joseph and Dietrich, Ottfried and Lischeid, Gunnar}, title = {Improving a distributed hydrological model using evapotranspiration-related boundary conditions as additional constraints in a data-scarce river basin}, series = {Hydrological processes}, volume = {32}, journal = {Hydrological processes}, number = {6}, publisher = {Wiley}, address = {Hoboken}, issn = {0885-6087}, doi = {10.1002/hyp.11453}, pages = {759 -- 775}, year = {2018}, abstract = {Many hydrological models have been calibrated and validated using hydrographs alone. Because streamflow integrates water fluxes in space, many distributed hydrological models tend to have multiple feasible descriptions of hydrological processes. This equifinality usually leads to substantial prediction uncertainty. In this study, additional constraintsnamely, the spatial patterns of long-term average evapotranspiration (ET), shallow groundwater level, and land cover changewere used to investigate the reduction of equifinality and prediction uncertainty in the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) in the Wami River basin in Tanzania. The additional constraints were used in the set-up, parameter emulation and calibration of the SWAT model termed an improved hydrological model (IHM). The IHM was then compared with a classical hydrological model (CHM) that was also developed using the SWAT model but without additional constraints. In the calibration, the CHM used only the hydrograph, but the IHM used the hydrograph and the spatial pattern of long-term average ET as an additional constraint. The IHM produced a single, unique behavioural simulation, whereas the CHM produced many behavioural simulations that resulted in prediction uncertainty. The performance of the IHM with respect to the hydrograph was more consistent than that of the CHM, and the former clearly captured the mean behaviour of ET in the river basin. Therefore, we conclude that additional constraints substantially reduce equifinality and prediction uncertainty in a distributed hydrological model.}, language = {en} }