@article{Warditz2018, author = {Warditz, Vladislava Maria}, title = {Русское имянаречение Нового времени}, series = {Voprosy onomastiki}, volume = {16}, journal = {Voprosy onomastiki}, number = {2}, publisher = {Uralʹskij federalʹnyj universitet}, address = {Ekaterinenburg}, issn = {1994-2400}, doi = {10.15826/vopr_onom.2019.16.2.018}, pages = {129 -- 144}, year = {2018}, abstract = {The author stems from the premise that modern anthroponymy effectively incorporates data from related fields of knowledge, primarily those of cultural and political history, thus getting enlarged through interdisciplinary research. An integrated approach allows one to deduce the extra-linguistic mechanisms which lay behind anthroponymic changes. In the same vein, the present paper focuses on the dynamics within the Russian anthroponymic paradigm caused by the changing vectors of political, ideological, cultural, and religious identity in the historical perspective of the New Time (1700-1920s). The study aims to establish the connection between specific trends in naming and the precedent names, events, and texts of political, cultural, and religious life. The mechanisms of anthroponymic shifts are illustrated by the cases of individual names becoming socially significant in a particular historical context. Using interdisciplinary methods of cultural anthropology, the study builds on textual sources, primarily name indexes to the collections of works by outstanding cultural figures and scholars, and biographical dictionaries. Some examples of pragmatic naming strategies in works of art (literature, opera, cinema) are also provided. Preliminary findings reveal some major trends in the Russian anthroponymic system of the New Age such as Europeization vs. Russification, modernization vs. archaization, as well as their synthesis. These tendencies remain key up to the present day and can be traced and characteristically defined within a set (or corpus) of names relating to the particular epoch, in terms of their frequency and the parameters of the sociolinguistic distribution. The diachronic perspective of the study also supports the sociolinguistic observation that the newly introduced names, which are currently in use, have a pronounced social resonance, which is getting neutralized as their frequency increases. Further development of the topic implies, among other things, statistical verification of preliminary findings.}, language = {ru} } @article{StroheFaber1999, author = {Strohe, Hans Gerhard and Faber, Cathleen}, title = {Statistika transformazii i transformazija statistiki : statistika zen w wostotschnoj germanii i rossi}, year = {1999}, language = {ru} } @misc{SeidelDreffke1997, author = {Seidel-Dreffke, Bj{\"o}rn}, title = {Vozvy¬ennoe v russkoj literature, Antologija; Kazan', 1994}, year = {1997}, language = {ru} } @misc{SeidelDreffke1995, author = {Seidel-Dreffke, Bj{\"o}rn}, title = {Vladimir Solov'ev i ego vremja; Progress, Moskva, 1990}, year = {1995}, language = {ru} } @article{Schulze2013, author = {Schulze, K.}, title = {Institut nravovogo gosudarstva v germania}, year = {2013}, language = {ru} } @article{Schmid2021, author = {Schmid, Herta}, title = {От психологического комизма к механическому комизму}, series = {Russian literature}, volume = {125-126}, journal = {Russian literature}, publisher = {Elsevier}, address = {Amsterdam}, issn = {0304-3479}, doi = {10.1016/j.ruslit.2021.11.006}, pages = {89 -- 107}, year = {2021}, abstract = {Research has characterized Nadezhda Teffi as the female Chekhov.1 However, connections can also be found between her work and that of Ivan S. Turgenev. In particular the one-act plays (Conversation on a Highroad; 1851) and (The Woman Question; 1907) are suitable for comparison. Not only does my comparison consider the gender conflict between man and woman, but also a dialectic method which Teffi may have discovered in Turgenev's work and elaborated further. The dialectical considerations are connected with different comic approaches: the psychological comedy of the realist Turgenev in the middle of the 19th century and the mechanical comedy of the utopian Teffi at the start of the 20th century. Its mechanical comicality shows that relates to an international debate, in which Paul Julius Mobius' essay 'Uber den physiologischen Schwachsinn des Weibes' ('On the Physiological Idiocy of the Female'; 1900) may well have played an unfavourable role.}, language = {ru} } @book{Savkina1998, author = {Savkina, Irina}, title = {Provincialki russkoj literatury : (¯enskaja proza 30 - 40-ch godov XIX veka)}, series = {Frauen, Literatur, Geschichte}, volume = {8}, journal = {Frauen, Literatur, Geschichte}, publisher = {G{\"o}pfert}, address = {Wilhelmshorst}, issn = {0945-8530}, pages = {223 S.}, year = {1998}, language = {ru} } @book{SapoznikovSapoznikovGoessel2001, author = {Sapoznikov, V. V. and Sapoznikov, VL. V. and G{\"o}ssel, Michael}, title = {Samodvojstvennye diskretnye ustrojstva}, publisher = {?nergoatomizdat}, address = {Sankt-Peterburg}, isbn = {5-283-04748-2}, pages = {330 S.}, year = {2001}, language = {ru} } @book{Parnell2004, author = {Parnell, Kristina}, title = {Golosa drugich : zenscinyimen sinstva v postsovetskoj literature}, series = {Frauen, Literatur, Geschichte}, volume = {18}, journal = {Frauen, Literatur, Geschichte}, publisher = {G{\"o}pfert}, address = {Fichtenwalde}, isbn = {3-932254-08-2}, pages = {209 S.}, year = {2004}, language = {ru} } @phdthesis{Mironova2005, author = {Mironova, Irina Aleksandrova}, title = {Vlijanie solne˜{\´e}cnoj aktivnosti na prozra˜{\´e}cnost˜\S atmosfery i opti˜{\´e}ceskie svojstva a˜{\c{c}}erozolja}, publisher = {Sankt Peterburgskij gos. univ.}, address = {Sankt Peterburg}, pages = {XVI, 17-160 S. : graph. Darst.}, year = {2005}, language = {ru} } @article{Miklashevsky2017, author = {Miklashevsky, Alex A.}, title = {О высоком и низком: пространственная семантика абстрактных и конкретных существительных}, series = {Tomsk state university journal}, journal = {Tomsk state university journal}, number = {424}, publisher = {Tomsk Stata Univ}, address = {Tomsk}, issn = {1561-7793}, doi = {10.17223/15617793/424/4}, pages = {26 -- 34}, year = {2017}, abstract = {Aim and material: In the present study, the data of the rating study presented earlier, where participants estimated the position of an object or phenomenon in vertical space by using the seven-point Likert scale, are used in order to systematically describe spatial information included in language units of different semantic categories. Background: The role of spatial semantics in language understanding is assumed by modern cognition theories and confirmed in experimental studies. Hypotheses: Based on conceptual metaphor theory, a number of hypotheses are proposed in the present study: different semantic categories of nouns (e.g., tools vs. animals vs. emotions etc.) should significantly differ in their spatial semantics as well; different semantic categories of abstract nouns (e.g., mental states vs. emotions vs. physical sensations) should also differ in their spatial semantics, as the latter is included in their conceptual structure; mental states and phenomena (e.g., imagination, thought or memory) should have higher values (i.e., be located higher in the virtual subjective space) than any other abstract concepts; emotional concepts (e.g., love, disgust or happiness) should be located higher than physical sensations (e.g., pain or softness); positive emotions (like joy or euphoria) should be located higher than negative ones (like feeling of guilt or disappointment). Methods: Statistical methods (parametric and non-parametric ones) are used in order to test the hypotheses. As additional cross-testing methods corpora data and expert assessment are included. Results: The results of the study confirmed all the hypotheses. A number of additional regularities were revealed: in general, abstract concepts get higher values on a scale, i.e., are located higher in the virtual subjective space than concrete ones; tool concepts are related more to the lower space, unlike sound concepts that are related to higher space. No difference was found between action concepts (like attack or running) and physical sensations. Discussion: The results obtained can also be explained in terms of other theories within the embodied cognition framework, as it is discussed in the conclusion (words as social tools by A. Borghi and F. Binkofski; ideas by G. Vigliocco and neurosemantic approach by F. Pulvermuller). The need in an integrative model and larger studies with other semantic categories is underlined.}, language = {ru} } @book{MeierManukow2011, author = {Meier, Bernd and Manukow, Sarkis}, title = {Fachdidaktik Technik}, series = {Schriften zu Arbeit - Beruf - Bildung ; 5}, journal = {Schriften zu Arbeit - Beruf - Bildung ; 5}, publisher = {Eigenverl.}, address = {Berlin}, isbn = {978-3-00-033972-1}, pages = {313}, year = {2011}, language = {ru} } @article{LaurinaviehyuteChrabaszczFarizovaetal.2016, author = {Laurinaviehyute, Anna K. and Chrabaszcz, Anna V. and Farizova, Nina O. and Tolkacheva, Valeria A. and Dragoy, Olga V.}, title = {Влияние сенсомоторных стереотипоВ на понимание пространстВенных конструкций}, series = {Voprosy Jazykoznanij}, journal = {Voprosy Jazykoznanij}, number = {3}, publisher = {Nauka}, address = {Moskva}, issn = {0373-658X}, doi = {10.31857/S0373658X0001002-1}, pages = {99 -- 109}, year = {2016}, abstract = {In an eye-tracking study we tested the hypothesis that comprehension is facilitated by a match between the order of the verb and its arguments in a sentence and the order of the actual sensorimotor interaction with these objects (for example, in the phrase put the bag into the box, the order of the arguments corresponds to the order of motor actions: take the bag, put it into the box) could facilitate comprehension of such constructions. We tested 40 native Russian speakers in a visual world sentence-picture matching task. In prepositional constructions, there was no difference between conditions that matched or mismatched sensorimotor stereotypes, whereas in instrumental constructions, sensorimotor stereotypes facilitated comprehension.}, language = {ru} } @article{Lamprecht1998, author = {Lamprecht, Rolf-Rainer}, title = {K jubilee Val'tera Vitta}, year = {1998}, language = {ru} } @article{Lamprecht1999, author = {Lamprecht, Rolf-Rainer}, title = {Za porogom jazykogo konflikta : me¯dunarodnyj proekt po opisaniju russkoj ustnoj spontannoj reci}, year = {1999}, language = {ru} } @article{Krien1995, author = {Krien, Margot}, title = {O nekotorych trudnostjach vybora i klassifikacii frazeologizov russkogo, pol'skogo i nemeckogo jazykov dlja sravnitel'nogo u\Sebnogo posobija tipa slovarja}, year = {1995}, language = {ru} } @article{Krien1994, author = {Krien, Margot}, title = {Leksi\Seskij minimum dlja prepodavanija russkogo jazyka : (rezul'taty sravnitel'nogo analiza u\Sebnikov)}, year = {1994}, language = {ru} } @misc{Kosta2005, author = {Kosta, Peter}, title = {Testelec, Ja. G., Vvedenie v obscij sintaksis (Einf{\"u}hrung in die allgemeine Syntax); Moskva, Rossijskij Gosudarstvennyj Gumanitarnyj Univ., 2001}, year = {2005}, abstract = {Besprechung eines ausgezeichneten Einf{\"u}hrungswerkes von Ja.G. Testelec in die allgemeine Syntaxtheorie (in russischer Sprache).}, language = {ru} } @article{Klessmann2002, author = {Kleßmann, Christoph}, title = {Poslewojennoje Wremja w Germanii (Woskok i Sapad)}, year = {2002}, language = {ru} } @misc{KempckeScharnhorst1996, author = {Kempcke, G{\"u}nter and Scharnhorst, J{\"u}rgen}, title = {Devkin, V. D., Nemecko-russkij slovar' razgovornoj leksiki}, year = {1996}, language = {ru} }